數據彙集 Frequency TablesBack

Q1 有意見認為律政司今次自行決定不檢控梁振英，係因為佢係國家領導之一、係全國政協副主席，又係前行政長官，所以認為律政司偏頗，你有幾贊成或者反對整個講法，話律政司偏頗？(訪員追問程度)

Q1 There has been a saying that the Secretary for Justice decided not to prosecute CY Leung at her sole discretion because Leung is one of the national leaders, the CPPCC Vice-Chairman and former Chief Executive, and that she is biased. How much do you support or oppose to the saying that the Secretary for Justice is biased? (Interviewers to probe intensity)

		頻數 Frequency		百分比 Valid Percent (基數Base=981)
好贊成 Very much support	} 贊成 Support	393	} 589	40 %	} 60%
幾贊成 Quite support		195		20%
一半半Half-half		52		5%
幾反對 Quite oppose	} 反對 Object	127	} 257	13%	} 26%
好反對 Very much oppose		130		13%
唔知∕難講Don't know / hard to say		83		8%
合計Total		981		100%
缺數 Missing		24
平均值Mean*		3.7
樣本誤差Sampling error		+/-0.1

* 平均量值是把所有答案按照支持程度，以1分最低5分最高量化成為1、2、3、4、5分，再求取樣本平均數值。平均值越接近5分，代表越正面。
*Mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean. As the mean value is closer to 5 marks, it means it is more positive.

Q2 過去律政司就牽涉高官嘅案件作出檢控決定時，會詳細公開交代調查結果同埋法律分析，你認為律政司今次處理梁振英UGL案件時，有幾應該或者唔應該交代詳細調查結果同埋法律理據？(訪員追問程度)

Q2 In the past, the Secretary for Justice would publicly account for the investigation results and legal analysis in detail when making prosecution decision on cases concerning senior government officers. Do you think it is necessary that when handling the UGL case concerning CY Leung, the Secretary for Justice should account for the investigation results and legal analysis in detail? (Interviewers to probe intensity)

		頻數 Frequency		百分比 Valid Percent (基數Base=992)
好應該 Very necessary	} 應該 Necessary	676	} 843	68 %	} 85%
幾應該 Quite necessary		167		17%
一半半Half-half		13		1%
幾唔應該∕唔係幾應該 Quite unnecessary / not quite necessary	} 唔應該 Not necessary	52	} 94	5%	} 9%
好唔應該∕完全唔應該 Very unnecessary / not necessary at all		42		4%
唔知∕難講Don't know / hard to say		43		4%
合計Total		992		100%
缺數 Missing		13
平均值Mean*		4.5
樣本誤差Sampling error		+/-0.1

Q3 過去幾次涉及高官嘅案件，包括梁錦松案、曾蔭權案、湯顯明案，律政司都有外聘大律師提供獨立法律意見，你認為律政司今次處理梁振英UGL案件時，有幾應該或者唔應該外聘大律師決定是否檢控？ (訪員追問程度)

Q3 In the past few cases concerning senior government officials, including Anthony Leung, Donald Tsang and Timothy Tong, the Secretary for Justice had sought external independent legal opinion. Do you think it is necessary that when handling the UGL case concerning CY Leung, the Secretary for Justice should seek external independent legal opinion in order to make prosecution decision? (Interviewers to probe intensity)

		頻數 Frequency		百分比 Valid Percent (基數Base=984)
好應該 Very necessary	} 應該 Necessary	557	} 724	57 %	} 73%
幾應該 Quite necessary		166		17%
一半半Half-half		25		3%
幾唔應該∕唔係幾應該 Quite unnecessary / not quite necessary	} 唔應該 Not necessary	69	} 146	7%	} 15%
好唔應該∕完全唔應該 Very unnecessary / not necessary at all		77		8%
唔知∕難講Don't know / hard to say		90		9%
合計Total		984		100%
缺數 Missing		21
平均值Mean*		4.2
樣本誤差Sampling error		+/-0.1

Q4律政司今次決定不檢控梁振英，有冇影響你對香港法治嘅信心？（如被訪者答“有影響”，訪員追問正面∕負面及程度）

Q4 In light of the Secretary for Justice’s decision not to prosecute CY Leung, does it have any impact on your confidence in the rule of law in Hong Kong? (If respondent answers “yes”, interviewer to probe the positive/negative impact and intensity)

		頻數 Frequency		百分比 Valid Percent (基數Base=1000)
有影響，好正面 Yes, very positive impact	} 有影響，正面 Yes, positive impact	23	} 724	2%	} 4%
有影響，幾正面 Yes, quite positive impact		12		1%
有影響，一半半∕正負參半∕好壞參半 Yes, half-half / half positive and half negative impact		24		2%
有影響，幾負面 Yes, quite negative impact	} 有影響，負面 Yes, negative impact	186	} 146	19%	} 54%
有影響，好負面 Yes, very negative impact		352		35%
冇影響 No		374		37%
唔知∕難講Don't know / hard to say		28		3%
合計Total		1000		100%
缺數 Missing		5
平均值Mean*		2.1
樣本誤差Sampling error		+/-0.1

* 包括認為「有影響」及「冇影響」者，共971人。平均量值是把所有答案按照支持程度，以1分最低5分最高量化成為1、2、3、4、5分，再求取樣本平均數值。平均值越接近5分，代表越正面，當中「冇影響」量化為3分。
* Counting 971 who think "have impact" or "no impact". Mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean. As the mean value is closer to 5 marks, it means it is more positive. "No impact" is counted as 3 marks.

Q4律政司今次決定不檢控梁振英，有冇影響你對香港法治嘅信心？[綜合數據]

Q4 In light of the Secretary for Justice’s decision not to prosecute CY Leung, does it have any impact on your confidence in the rule of law in Hong Kong? [aggregate figures]

	頻數 Frequency	百分比 Valid Percent (基數Base=1000)
有影響Yes	597	60%
冇影響 No	374	37%
唔知∕難講Don't know / hard to say	28	3%
合計Total	1000	100%
缺數 Missing	5
平均值Mean*	1.6
樣本誤差Sampling error	+/-0.1

* 只計認為「有影響」者，共597人。平均量值是把所有答案按照支持程度，以1分最低5分最高量化成為1、2、3、4、5分，再求取樣本平均數值。平均值越接近5分，代表越正面。
* Only counting 597 who think "have impact". Mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean. As the mean value is closer to 5 marks, it means it is more positive.