數據彙集Frequency tablesBack

[Q1] 你認為香港嘅退休保障制度應該朝向「不論貧富」抑或「有經濟需要」嘅方向發展？
In your opinion, towards which direction should the retirement protection system of Hong Kong be developed, “Regardless of rich or poor” or “Those with financial needs”?
  頻數 Frequency 百分比 Percentage
(基數Base=535)
朝向「不論貧富」方向發展
Should be developed towards “Regardless of rich or poor”		 252 47.1%
朝向「有經濟需要」方向發展
Should be developed towards “Those with financial needs”		 242 45.1%
冇所謂
It doesn’t matter		 20 3.8%
唔知∕難講
Don't know / hard to say		 21 4.0%
合計 Total 535 100.0%
缺數 Missing 1


[Q2-Q3] 有學者提出一個「全民養老金」方案，建議即時每月向65歲或以上人士發放$3,500。為咗應付呢筆開支，學者有以下兩個建議：
A scholar has proposed a “Universal Pension” scheme, which suggests immediately giving out a sum of $3,500 to each citizen aged 65 years old or above every month. To cover such expenditure, there are two suggestions:

[Q2] 第一，將現時全港勞動人口強積金嘅每月一半供款，轉至一個「全民養老金」嘅「資金池」以發放俾所有長者，請問你有幾贊成或反對以一半強積金供款轉至資金池發放俾所有長者？[訪員追問程度]
First, to transfer half of the MPF contributions of Hong Kong’s working population into a “Fund Pool” for distributing the pensions to all senior citizens of Hong Kong. How much do you support or oppose this proposal? [Probe intensity]
  頻數 Frequency 百分比 Percentage
(基數Base=534)
好贊成
Very much support		 78 14.6%
幾贊成
Somewhat support		 88 16.4%
一半半
Half-half		 89 16.7%
幾反對
Somewhat oppose		 135 25.3%
好反對
Very much oppose		 115 21.5%
唔知∕難講
Don't know / hard to say		 30 5.6%
合計 Total 534 100.0%
缺數 Missing 2


[Q2]第一，將現時全港勞動人口強積金嘅每月一半供款，轉至一個「全民養老金」嘅「資金池」以發放俾所有長者，請問你有幾贊成或反對以一半強積金供款轉至資金池發放俾所有長者？[訪員追問程度] [綜合數據]
First, to transfer half of the MPF contributions of Hong Kong’s working population into a “Fund Pool” for distributing the pensions to all senior citizens of Hong Kong. How much do you support or oppose this proposal? [Probe intensity] [Aggregate data]
  頻數 Frequency 百分比 Percentage
(基數Base=534)
贊成
Support		 165 31.0%
一半半
Half-half		 89 16.7%
反對
Oppose		 249 46.7%
唔知∕難講
Don't know / hard to say		 30 5.6%
合計 Total 534 100.0%
缺數 Missing 2


[Q3] 第二，政府只透過增加利得稅，而唔加薪俸稅同開徵銷售稅去應付「全民養老金」開支。你認為政府會唔會接受學者呢個建議只增加利得稅，而唔加薪俸稅同開徵銷售稅？
Second, the government should cover the expenditure for the “Universal Pension” scheme only by raising the profits tax, but not by raising the salary tax or levying sales tax. Do you think the government would follow this suggestion and would only raise the profits tax, but would not raise the salary tax or levy sales tax?
  頻數 Frequency 百分比 Percentage
(基數Base=536)
會
Yes		 106 19.9%
唔會
No		 329 61.4%
唔知∕難講
Don't know / hard to say		 100 18.7%
合計 Total 536 100.0%
缺數 Missing <1


[Q4] 最後，有人話如果實施「全民養老金」可能會吸引內地嘅長者申請單程證黎香港以享有呢個福利。請問你有幾擔心或唔擔心呢個情況出現？[訪員追問程度]
Last but not least, some people said that the implementation of the “Universal Pension” scheme may attract elderly people in mainland China to apply for One-Way Permit to enter Hong Kong so as to enjoy this welfare benefit. How much are you worried or not worried about this? [Probe intensity]
  頻數 Frequency 百分比 Percentage
(基數Base=536)
好擔心
Very worried		 185 34.5%
幾擔心
Somewhat worried		 122 22.8%
一半半
Half-half		 23 4.3%
唔係幾擔心
Not quite worried		 102 19.0%
完全唔擔心
Totally not worried		 95 17.6%
唔知∕難講
Don't know / hard to say		 9 1.7%
合計 Total 536 100.0%


[Q4] 最後，有人話如果實施「全民養老金」可能會吸引內地嘅長者申請單程證黎香港以享有呢個福利。請問你有幾擔心或唔擔心呢個情況出現？[訪員追問程度] [綜合數據]
Last but not least, some people said that the implementation of the “Universal Pension” scheme may attract elderly people in mainland China to apply for One-Way Permit to enter Hong Kong so as to enjoy this welfare benefit. How much are you worried or not worried about this? [Probe intensity]
  頻數 Frequency 百分比 Percentage
(基數Base=536)
擔心
Worried		 307 57.3%
一半半
Half-half		 23 4.3%
唔擔心
Not worried		 196 36.6%
唔知∕難講
Don't know / hard to say		 9 1.7%
合計 Total 536 100.0%