Survey on Voting Behavior in 2016 Legislative Council ElectionBack

| Research Background | Research Team Members | Contact Information| Research Design |

| Demographic profile of respondents | Frequency Tables| Related Release |


Research Background

In September 2016, Civic Data commissioned The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at The University of Hong Kong to conduct this survey from 3 to 11 October 2016 with 1,047 voters of Legislative Council Election on 4 September 2016. The objective was to gauge actual voters’ views on Legislative Council Election and their voting behavior.

 

The research instrument used in this study was designed entirely by the POP Team after consulting Civic Data. Fieldwork operations and data analysis were also conducted independently by the POP Team, without interference from any outside parties. In other words, although POP has sought opinion from the commissioning organization regarding the questionnaire design, POP was given full autonomy to design and conduct the survey, and POP would take full responsibility for all the findings reported herewith.



Research Team Members

Research Directors :
CHUNG Ting-Yiu Robert and
PANG Ka-Lai Karie

Project Manager :
LEE Wai-kin Frank

Project Executive :
CHAN Ka-Shu Kenneth

Data Analyst :
TAI Chit-Fai Edward


Survey date

:

3 – 11 October 2016

Survey method

:

Random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers

Target population

:

Voters of Legislative Council Election on 4 September 2016

Sampling method

:

Telephone numbers are randomly generated using known prefixes assigned to telecommunication services providers under the Numbering Plan provided by the Office of the Communications Authority (OFCA). Invalid numbers are then eliminated according to computer and manual dialing records to produce the final sample. If more than one subject had been available, the one who had his/her birthday next was selected.

Sample size

:

1,047 successful cases

Effective Response rate

:

72.0%

Standard error

:

Less than 1.5% (i.e. at 95% confidence level, the maximum sampling error of all percentages should be no more than +/-3.1 percentage points)

Weighting method

:

The raw data (of about 1,600 Hong Kong residents of age 18 or above) have been rim-weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2016 mid-year and the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution collected in the 2011 Census. Then among them, 1,047 voters of Legislative Council Election on 4 September 2016 were selected and adjusted its weighted proportion.


Research Design

Telephone interviews were conducted by telephone interviewers under close supervision. All data were collected by interviewers using a Web-based Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (Web-CATI) system invented in-house by the research team, which allowed real-time data capture and consolidation. To ensure data quality, on top of on-site supervision and random checking, voice recording, screen capturing and camera surveillance were used to monitor the interviewers’ performance.

 

Telephone numbers were randomly generated using known prefixes assigned to telecommunication services providers under the Numbering Plan provided by the Office of the Communications Authority (OFCA). Invalid numbers were then eliminated according to computer and manual dialing records to produce the final sample.

 

The target population of the survey was actual voters of Legislative Council Election on 4 September 2016. After telephone contact was successfully established with a target household, one eligible person was selected using “next birthday rule” for the interview. Telephone interviews were conducted during the period of 3 to 11 October, 2016. A total of 1,047 voters were successfully interviewed. The effective response rate of this survey was 72.0%, and the standard sampling error for percentages based on this sample was less than 1.5 percentage points. In other words, the sampling error for all percentages using the total sample was less than plus/minus 3.1 percentage points at 95% confidence level.

 

To ensure representativeness of the findings, the raw data (of about 1,600 Hong Kong residents of age 18 or above) have been rim-weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2016 mid-year and the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution collected in the 2011 Census. Then among them, 1,047 voters of Legislative Council Election on 4 September 2016 were selected and adjusted its weighted proportion.




| Research Background | Research Team Members | Contact Information| Research Design |

| Demographic profile of respondents | Frequency Tables| Related Release |