Frequency Tables of General SurveyBack
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very successful | 18 | ) | 0.9% | ) |
Quite successful | 145 | ) 163 | 7.2% | ) 8.1% |
Half-half | 365 | 18.1% | ||
Quite unsuccessful | 568 | ) | 28.2% | ) |
Very unsuccessful | 637 | ) 1,205 | 31.6% | ) 59.8% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 280 | 13.9% | ||
Total | 2,013 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 2,026 | |||
Missing case(s) | 13 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very positive impact | 41 | ) | 2.0% | ) |
Quite positive impact | 418 | ) 459 | 20.7% | ) 22.7% |
No impact at all | 489 | 24.2% | ||
Quite negative impact | 641 | ) | 31.8% | ) |
Very negative impact | 205 | ) 846 | 10.1% | ) 41.9% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 226 | 11.2% | ||
Total | 2,019 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 2,026 | |||
Missing case(s) | 7 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very successful | 82 | ) | 4.1% | ) |
Quite successful | 568 | ) 650 | 28.2% | ) 32.3% |
Half-half | 448 | 22.3% | ||
Quite unsuccessful | 457 | ) | 22.7% | ) |
Very unsuccessful | 273 | ) 730 | 13.6% | ) 36.3% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 183 | 9.1% | ||
Total | 2,012 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 2,026 | |||
Missing case(s) | 14 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very successful | 64 | ) | 3.2% | ) |
Quite successful | 431 | ) 495 | 21.4% | ) 24.6% |
Half-half | 520 | 25.8% | ||
Quite unsuccessful | 600 | ) | 29.7% | ) |
Very unsuccessful | 275 | ) 875 | 13.6% | ) 43.3% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 127 | 6.3% | ||
Total | 2,018 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 2,026 | |||
Missing case(s) | 8 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very successful | 37 | ) | 1.8% | ) |
Quite successful | 274 | ) 311 | 13.6% | ) 15.4% |
Half-half | 456 | 22.6% | ||
Quite unsuccessful | 662 | ) | 32.8% | ) |
Very unsuccessful | 477 | ) 1,139 | 23.6% | ) 56.4% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 113 | 5.6% | ||
Total | 2,019 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 2,026 | |||
Missing case(s) | 7 |
Positive | Negative | |
A general success | 8.1% | 59.8% |
Impact on Hong Kong's international image | 22.7% | 41.9% |
Hong Kong gone out of SARS | 32.3% | 36.3% |
Attracting tourists | 24.6% | 43.3% |
Reviving Hong Kong's economy | 15.4% | 56.4% |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Yes | 296 | 14.7% |
No | 1,603 | 79.3% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 122 | 6.0% |
Total | 2,021 | 100.0% |
Base | 2,026 | |
Missing case(s) | 5 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Yes | 1,588 | 78.6% |
No | 304 | 15.0% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 128 | 6.3% |
Total | 2,019 | 100.0% |
Base | 2,026 | |
Missing case(s) | 7 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Yes | 1,306 | 64.8% |
No | 372 | 18.4% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 339 | 16.8% |
Total | 2,016 | 100.0% |
Base | 2,026 | |
Missing case(s) | 10 |
Frequency | Percentage | Percentage excluding "Don't know / Hard to say" |
Positive | Negative | |
Harbour Fest, $15.0 per capita | 14.7% | 79.3% |
Real Madrid visit, $0.10 per capita | 78.6% | 15.0% |
Hong Kong Arts Festival, $2.60 per capita | 64.8% | 18.4% |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very sufficient | 79 | ) | 3.9% | ) |
Quite sufficient | 231 | ) 310 | 11.5% | ) 15.4% |
Half-half | 161 | 8.0% | ||
Quite insufficient | 611 | ) | 30.3% | ) |
Very insufficient | 802 | ) 1,413 | 39.8% | ) 70.1% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 133 | 6.6% | ||
Total | 2,017 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 2,026 | |||
Missing case(s) | 9 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very good | 96 | ) | 4.8% | ) |
Quite good | 685 | ) 781 | 34.1% | ) 38.9% |
Half-half | 347 | 17.2% | ||
Quite bad | 328 | ) | 16.3% | ) |
Very bad | 376 | ) 704 | 18.7% | ) 35.0% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 178 | 8.9% | ||
Total | 2,011 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 2,026 | |||
Missing case(s) | 15 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very appropriate | 231 | ) | 11.5% | ) |
Quite appropriate | 953 | ) 1,184 | 47.3% | ) 58.8% |
Half-half | 205 | 10.2% | ||
Quite inappropriate | 263 | ) | 13.0% | ) |
Very inappropriate | 186 | ) 449 | 9.2% | ) 22.2% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 179 | 8.9% | ||
Total | 2,016 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 2,026 | |||
Missing case(s) | 10 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Too high | 1,105 | 55.0% |
Reasonable | 693 | 34.5% |
Too low | 19 | 1.0% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 192 | 9.6% |
Total | 2,009 | 100.0% |
Base | 2,026 | |
Missing case(s) | 17 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very much agreed | 196 | ) | 9.7% | ) |
Quite agreed | 559 | ) 755 | 27.7% | ) 37.4% |
Half-half | 114 | 5.7% | ||
Quite disagreed | 468 | ) | 23.2% | ) |
Very much disagreed | 559 | ) 1,027 | 27.7% | ) 50.9% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 122 | 6.1% | ||
Total | 2,018 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 2,026 | |||
Missing case(s) | 8 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Too many | 1,180 | 59.2% |
Just right | 638 | 32.0% |
Too few | 35 | 1.8% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 141 | 7.1% |
Total | 1,994 | 100.0% |
Base | 2,026 | |
Missing case(s) | 32 |
Frequency | % of total responses (Base =3,077) | % of total sample (Base =2,026) | |
$0-15 | 778 | 43.7% | 58.1% |
$16-50 | 340 | 19.1% | 25.4% |
$51-100 | 157 | 8.8% | 11.7% |
$101-150 | 64 | 3.6% | 4.8% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 442 | 24.8% | |
Total | 1,781 | 100.0% | |
Median | $10.00 | ||
Mean | $30.60 | ||
Standard error | $1.10 | ||
Base* | 1,819 | ||
Missing case(s) | 38 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Yes | 68 | ) | 3.3% | ) |
Yes, but forgot the number of concerts attended | 3 | ) 71 | 0.1% | ) 3.4% |
No | 1,951 | 96.3% | ||
Don't know / Hard to say | 4 | 0.2% | ||
Total | 2,025 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 2,026 | |||
Missing case(s) | 1 |
Frequency | % of sub-sample (Base = 68) | % of total sample (Base =2,026) | |
Insufficient promotions | 1,040 | 33.8% | 51.3% |
Inexperienced organizer / Confusing arrangements | 528 | 17.1% | 26.1% |
Performers not attractive enough | 403 | 13.1% | 19.9% |
Tickets too expensive | 393 | 12.8% | 19.4% |
Hong Kong people not interested in music festivals | 123 | 4.0% | 6.1% |
Production not attractive enough | 103 | 3.3% | 5.1% |
Too much negative media coverage / Negative reviews | 102 | 3.3% | 5.0% |
Bad choice of location | 65 | 2.1% | 3.2% |
Hong Kong people dissatisfied with the Government | 39 | 1.3% | 1.9% |
Insufficient lead time for the event | 23 | 0.7% | 1.1% |
Others | 29 | 0.9% | 1.4% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 232 | 7.5% | 11.5% |
Total | 3,077 | 100.0% | |
Base | 2,026 | ||
Missing case(s) | 18 |
Frequency | % of total responses (Base = 2,640) | % of sub-sample (Base =1,951) | % of total sample (Base =2,026) | |
Tickets too expensive / No extra money | 587 | 22.2% | 30.1% | 29.0% |
Not interested in music festivals | 451 | 17.1% | 23.1% | 22.3% |
No time / Too busy | 443 | 16.8% | 22.7% | 21.9% |
Performers not attractive enough | 408 | 15.4% | 20.9% | 20.1% |
Insufficient promotions | 268 | 10.2% | 13.7% | 13.2% |
Didn't like the location | 91 | 3.5% | 4.7% | 4.5% |
Production not attractive enough | 79 | 3.0% | 4.0% | 3.9% |
Too much negative media coverage / Negative reviews | 59 | 2.2% | 3.0% | 2.9% |
Didn't know Hong Kong Harbour Fest until it was over | 45 | 1.7% | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Not in Hong Kong | 35 | 1.3% | 1.8% | 1.7% |
Others | 155 | 5.9% | 7.9% | 7.7% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 18 | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.9% |
Total | 2,640 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 1,951 | |||
Missing case(s) | 21 |
Frequency | % of total responses (Base = 79) | % ofsub-sample (Base = 71) | % of total sample (Base = 2,026) | |
Attracted by the performers/production | 36 | 46.0% | 50.7% | 1.8% |
Received a complimentary ticket | 13 | 16.1% | 18.3% | 0.6% |
Accompanied family members / friends / colleagues / classmates | 9 | 11.6% | 12.7% | 0.4% |
Wanted to contribute in reviving the economy of Hong Kong | 6 | 7.2% | 8.5% | 0.3% |
Curious about the event | 4 | 4.6% | 5.6% | 0.2% |
Wanted to contribute in promoting the image of Hong Kong | 3 | 3.4% | 4.2% | 0.1% |
Attracted by the promotional work | 2 | 2.6% | 2.8% | 0.1% |
Others | 5 | 7.0% | 7.0% | 0.2% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 1 | 1.5% | 1.4% | 0.0% |
Total | 79 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 71 | |||
Missing case(s) | 1 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Yes | 658 | 32.7% |
No | 1,150 | 57.2% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 202 | 10.1% |
Total | 2,011 | 100.0% |
Base | 2,026 | |
Missing case(s) | 15 |
Frequency | % of sub-sample (Base = 71) | |
0 - 9 | 1 | 1.3% |
10 - 19 | 1 | 0.8% |
20 - 29 | 3 | 4.7% |
30 - 39 | 5 | 6.7% |
40 - 49 | 6 | 8.7% |
50 | 6 | 8.6% |
51 - 60 | 10 | 13.7% |
61 - 70 | 15 | 20.9% |
71 - 80 | 19 | 27.3% |
81 - 90 | 2 | 3.0% |
91 - 100 | 3 | 4.2% |
Total | 70 | 100.0% |
Mean | 61.9 | |
Standard error | 2.48 | |
Median | 65.0 | |
Base | 71 | |
Missing case(s) | 1 |
Frequency | % of sub-sample (Base = 71) | |||
Very satisfied | 10 | ) | 14.5% | ) |
Quite satisfied | 28 | ) 38 | 40.3% | ) 54.8% |
Half-half | 16 | 22.0% | ||
Quite dissatisfied | 8 | ) | 12.0% | ) |
Very dissatisfied | 7 | ) 15 | 9.7% | ) 21.7% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 1 | 150.0% | ||
Total | 70 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 71 | |||
Missing case(s) | 1 |
Frequency | % of sub-sample (Base = 71) | |||
Very satisfied | 12 | ) | 16.6% | ) |
Quite satisfied | 38 | ) 50 | 54.6% | ) 71.2% |
Half-half | 12 | 16.5% | ||
Quite dissatisfied | 6 | ) | 7.9% | ) |
Very dissatisfied | 3 | ) 9 | 4.4% | ) 12.3% |
Total | 70 | 100.0% | ||
Base | 71 | |||
Missing case(s) | 1 |
Frequency | % of sub-sample (Base = 71) | |
Yes | 29 | 40.6% |
No | 39 | 55.0% |
Don't know / Hard to say | 3 | 4.4% |
Total | 70 | 100.0% |
Base | 71 | |
Missing case(s) | 1 |