Frequency TablesBack
| [Q1] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of each university after taking into consideration its local and international reputation, facilities and campus environment, qualification of its teaching staff, academic research performance, conduct and quality of students as well as its learning atmosphere, diversification and level of recognition of its courses, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the following universities? |
|
Average |
Standard error |
No of raters |
Recognition |
HKUST |
7.50 |
0.04 |
1,135 |
90.1% |
CUHK |
7.41 |
0.05 |
1,167 |
92.6% |
HKU |
7.40 |
0.06 |
1,187 |
94.2% |
PolyU |
6.94 |
0.04 |
1,159 |
92.0% |
HKBU |
6.35 |
0.04 |
1,099 |
87.2% |
CityU |
6.25 |
0.04 |
1,109 |
88.0% |
EdUHK |
5.94 |
0.05 |
972 |
77.1% |
OUHK |
5.54 |
0.05 |
1,027 |
81.5% |
HKSYU |
5.47 |
0.05 |
1,022 |
81.1% |
LU |
5.45 |
0.05 |
1,067 |
84.7% |
| [Q2] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of Vice-Chancellor / President of each university while taking his local and international reputation, approachability to the public, leadership, vision, social credibility and public relations into consideration, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the following Vice-Chancellors / Presidents? |
|
Average |
Standard error |
No of raters |
Recognition |
|
|
CUHK – Joseph J.Y. SUNG |
7.76 |
0.05 |
1,085 |
86.1% |
|
HKUST – Tony F. CHAN |
6.97 |
0.06 |
716 |
56.8% |
|
HKU – Peter MATHIESON |
6.74 |
0.06 |
1,005 |
79.8% |
|
PolyU – Timothy W. TONG |
6.58 |
0.06 |
692 |
54.9% |
|
HKSYU – Henry H.L. HU |
6.44 |
0.07 |
725 |
57.5% |
|
EdUHK – Stephen Y.L. CHEUNG |
6.27 |
0.06 |
604 |
47.9% |
|
HKBU – Roland T. CHIN |
6.21 |
0.06 |
649 |
51.5% |
|
CityU – Way KUO |
6.06 |
0.06 |
638 |
50.6% |
|
OUHK – Yuk-shan WONG |
5.89 |
0.07 |
570 |
45.3% |
|
LU – Leonard K. CHENG |
5.53 |
0.07 |
663 |
52.6% |
| [Q3] What do you think are the qualities which most Hong Kong university students lack of? (multiple responses allowed) |
|
Freq. |
% of total responses (Base = 1,892) |
% of total sample (Base = 1,255) |
|
|
Social / interpersonal skills |
142 |
7.5% |
11.3% |
|
Conduct, honesty |
140 |
7.4% |
11.1% |
|
Work attitude |
126 |
6.6% |
10.0% |
|
Critical thinking and problem-solving ability |
112 |
5.9% |
8.9% |
|
Independence |
92 |
4.8% |
7.3% |
|
Global prospect / foresight |
89 |
4.7% |
7.1% |
|
Emotion stability |
74 |
3.9% |
5.9% |
|
Social / work experience |
70 |
3.7% |
5.6% |
|
Commitment to society |
59 |
3.1% |
4.7% |
|
Academic and professional knowledge |
56 |
3.0% |
4.5% |
|
Discipline, patience |
54 |
2.9% |
4.3% |
|
Resources / opportunity |
53 |
2.8% |
4.2% |
|
Civil awareness |
50 |
2.6% |
4.0% |
|
Creativity |
41 |
2.2% |
3.3% |
|
Self-confidence |
38 |
2.0% |
3.0% |
|
Job opportunity |
36 |
1.9% |
2.9% |
|
Proficiency in Chinese, English & Putonghua |
36 |
1.9% |
2.8% |
|
All-roundness |
35 |
1.8% |
2.8% |
|
Patriotism |
35 |
1.8% |
2.8% |
|
Self-expectations / dreams |
33 |
1.7% |
2.6% |
|
Alertness to risk / handling adverse conditions |
31 |
1.7% |
2.5% |
|
Learning attitude |
28 |
1.5% |
2.2% |
|
Communication skills |
23 |
1.2% |
1.8% |
|
Politeness |
23 |
1.2% |
1.8% |
|
Maturity / stability |
20 |
1.1% |
1.6% |
|
Self-motivation, aggressiveness |
20 |
1.1% |
1.6% |
|
Egocentricity / selfishness |
20 |
1.0% |
1.6% |
|
Humble / sympathy |
14 |
0.7% |
1.1% |
|
Utilitarian / materialistic |
10 |
0.5% |
0.8% |
|
Social awareness |
10 |
0.5% |
0.8% |
|
Political awareness / participation |
9 |
0.5% |
0.7% |
|
Leadership skills |
2 |
0.1% |
0.2% |
|
Financial management |
2 |
0.1% |
0.1% |
|
Nothing |
41 |
2.1% |
3.2% |
|
Others |
56 |
2.9% |
4.4% |
|
Don’t know/ hard to say |
214 |
11.3% |
17.1% |
|
Total |
1,892 |
100.0% |
|
|
Base |
1,255 |
||
|
Missing case(s) |
5 |
| [Q4] Under your job specifications, are you involved, in any way, in the recruitment process of new staff, including teachers? |
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
|
Yes |
169 |
13.5% |
|
No |
1,088 |
86.5% |
|
Total |
1,257 |
100.0% |
|
Base |
1,260 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
3 |
| [Q5] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] If you looked for a new employee, which university’s graduates would you prefer most? (single response only) |
|
Frequency |
% of potential employers (Base = 168) |
% of total sample (Base = 1,260) |
|
|
HKUST |
34 |
20.4% |
2.7% |
|
CUHK |
28 |
16.8% |
2.2% |
|
PolyU |
22 |
13.2% |
1.8% |
|
HKU |
18 |
10.6% |
1.4% |
|
CityU |
3 |
1.8% |
0.2% |
|
HKBU |
3 |
1.6% |
0.2% |
|
EdUHK |
3 |
1.5% |
0.2% |
|
HKSYU |
1 |
0.7% |
0.1% |
|
LU |
1 |
0.3% |
<0.1% |
|
OUHK |
<1 |
0.1% |
<0.1% |
|
Other overseas universities |
1 |
0.7% |
0.1% |
|
Others |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
No preference |
41 |
24.4% |
3.3% |
|
Don’t know / hard to say |
7 |
4.1% |
0.5% |
|
Won’t employ graduates |
6 |
3.7% |
0.5% |
|
Total |
168 |
100.0% |
|
|
Valid base |
169 |
||
|
Missing case(s) |
1 |
|
|
| [Q6] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff and have preference over a specific university’s graduates] Why would you prefer the graduates of the chosen university? (multiple responses allowed) |
|
Frequency |
% of total responses (Base = 161 responses from 114 respondents) |
% of valid respondents (Base = 114) |
% of total sample (Base = 1,260) |
|
|
Good performance of previous graduates |
46 |
28.3% |
39.9% |
3.6% |
|
Good knowledge in job-related areas |
28 |
17.7% |
24.9% |
2.3% |
|
Reputation |
23 |
14.3% |
20.2% |
1.8% |
|
Good work attitude |
13 |
8.4% |
11.8% |
1.1% |
|
Diligent, motivated |
7 |
4.5% |
6.3% |
0.6% |
|
Good language ability |
7 |
4.2% |
5.9% |
0.5% |
|
Alumni |
6 |
3.9% |
5.5% |
0.5% |
|
Good social relationship |
6 |
3.6% |
5.1% |
0.5% |
|
Good moral character |
5 |
3.1% |
4.4% |
0.4% |
|
Good academic ability |
4 |
2.7% |
3.7% |
0.3% |
|
Good leadership |
2 |
1.4% |
2.0% |
0.2% |
|
Good connection with outside (e.g., a university’s extensive connection with enterprises, companies, or industrial firms; large number of graduates) |
2 |
1.3% |
1.8% |
0.2% |
|
Others |
4 |
2.7% |
3.8% |
0.3% |
|
No specific reasons |
1 |
0.5% |
0.7% |
0.1% |
|
Don’t know / hard to say |
6 |
3.4% |
4.9% |
0.4% |
|
Total |
161 |
100.0% |
||
|
Valid base |
114 |
|||
|
Missing case(s) |
0 |
|
|
|
