Frequency TablesBack
| [Q1] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of each institution of higher education after taking into consideration its local and international reputation, facilities and campus environment, qualification of its teaching staff, academic research performance, conduct and quality of students as well as its learning atmosphere, diversification and level of recognition of its courses, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the following institutions? |
|
Average |
Standard error |
No of raters |
Recognition |
HKU |
8.22 |
0.04 |
1,158 |
96.4% |
CUHK |
7.77 |
0.04 |
1,153 |
96.0% |
HKUST |
7.63 |
0.04 |
1,117 |
93.0% |
PolyU |
6.92 |
0.04 |
1,134 |
94.4% |
HKBU |
6.30 |
0.04 |
1,119 |
93.2% |
CityU |
6.21 |
0.04 |
1,093 |
91.0% |
HKIEd |
5.88 |
0.05 |
1,017 |
84.7% |
LU |
5.50 |
0.05 |
1,054 |
87.7% |
HKSYU |
5.44 |
0.05 |
1,023 |
85.2% |
OUHK |
5.43 |
0.05 |
1,001 |
83.4% |
| [Q2] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of Vice-Chancellor / President of each institution while taking his local and international reputation, approachability to the public, leadership, vision, social credibility and public relations into consideration, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the following Vice-Chancellors / Presidents? |
|
Average |
Standard error |
No of raters |
Recognition |
CUHK – Joseph S.Y. SUNG |
7.84 |
0.05 |
990 |
82.5% |
HKU – Lap-chee TSUI |
7.73 |
0.05 |
877 |
73.1% |
HKUST – Tony F. CHAN |
7.14 |
0.06 |
635 |
52.9% |
PolyU – Timothy W. TONG |
6.61 |
0.06 |
545 |
45.4% |
HKSYU – Chi-yung CHUNG |
6.52 |
0.07 |
564 |
47.0% |
HKIEd – Anthony B.L. CHEUNG |
6.34 |
0.05 |
734 |
61.1% |
HKBU – Albert CHAN |
6.29 |
0.06 |
530 |
44.1% |
CityU – Way KUO |
6.23 |
0.06 |
533 |
44.4% |
LU – Yuk-shee CHAN |
6.04 |
0.07 |
512 |
42.6% |
OUHK – John C.Y. LEONG |
5.96 |
0.07 |
504 |
42.0% |
| [Q3] What do you think are the qualities which most Hong Kong university students lack of? (multiple responses allowed) |
|
Freq. |
% of total responses |
% of total sample |
Work attitude (e.g. serious, enthusiastic, diligent, responsible, motivated) |
232 |
11.4% |
19.3% |
Social/interpersonal skills |
143 |
7.1% |
11.9% |
Conduct, honesty |
137 |
6.8% |
11.4% |
Critical thinking and problem-solving ability |
113 |
5.6% |
9.4% |
Independence |
107 |
5.3% |
8.9% |
Proficiency in Chinese, English and Putonghua |
96 |
4.8% |
8.0% |
Commitment to society |
89 |
4.4% |
7.4% |
Global prospect / foresight |
87 |
4.3% |
7.3% |
Social/work experience |
76 |
3.8% |
6.4% |
|
|
|
|
Communication skills |
62 |
3.0% |
5.1% |
Academic and professional knowledge |
59 |
2.9% |
4.9% |
Discipline, patience |
57 |
2.8% |
4.7% |
Self-confidence |
55 |
2.7% |
4.6% |
Emotion stability |
45 |
2.2% |
3.8% |
Alertness to risk / handling adverse conditions |
45 |
2.2% |
3.7% |
Civil awareness |
44 |
2.2% |
3.7% |
Self-motivation, aggressiveness |
44 |
2.2% |
3.7% |
Creativity |
41 |
2.0% |
3.4% |
|
|
|
|
All-roundness |
34 |
1.7% |
2.8% |
Self-expectations / dreams |
30 |
1.5% |
2.5% |
Job opportunity |
28 |
1.4% |
2.3% |
Humble / sympathy |
24 |
1.2% |
2.0% |
Politeness |
22 |
1.1% |
1.8% |
Resources / opportunity |
21 |
1.0% |
1.7% |
Utilitarian / materialistic |
16 |
0.8% |
1.3% |
Financial management |
13 |
0.6% |
1.1% |
Patriotism |
8 |
0.4% |
0.6% |
Leadership skills |
6 |
0.3% |
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
Nothing |
58 |
2.8% |
4.8% |
Others |
32 |
1.6% |
2.6% |
Don』t know/ hard to say |
203 |
10.0% |
16.9% |
|
|
|
|
Total |
2,026 |
100.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Base |
1,201 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
0 |
|
|
| [Q4] Under your job specifications, are you involved, in any way, in the recruitment process of new staff, including teachers? |
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Yes |
221 |
18.4% |
No |
980 |
81.6% |
|
|
|
Total |
1,201 |
100.0% |
|
|
|
Base |
1,201 |
|
Missing case(s) |
0 |
|
| [Q5] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] If you looked for a new employee, which institution』s graduates would you prefer most? (single response only) |
|
Frequency |
% of potential employers |
% of total sample |
HKU |
55 |
24.8% |
4.5% |
|
|
|
|
CUHK |
31 |
14.2% |
2.6% |
PolyU |
30 |
13.5% |
2.5% |
HKUST |
27 |
12.4% |
2.3% |
CityU |
4 |
1.8% |
0.3% |
LU |
3 |
1.5% |
0.3% |
HKBU |
2 |
1.1% |
0.2% |
HKIEd |
2 |
0.9% |
0.2% |
HKSYU |
1 |
0.5% |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
Other overseas universities |
3 |
1.6% |
0.3% |
Others - IVE |
1 |
0.4% |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
No preference |
40 |
18.0% |
3.3% |
Don』t know / hard to say |
15 |
6.7% |
1.2% |
Won』t employ graduates |
6 |
2.7% |
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
Total |
220 |
100.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Valid base |
221 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
1 |
|
|
| [Q6] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff and have preference over a specific institution』s graduates] Why would you prefer the graduates of the chosen institution? (multiple responses allowed) |
|
Frequency |
% of total responses (Base = 236 responses from 157 respondents) |
% of valid respondents (Base = 157) |
% of total sample |
Good performance of previous graduates |
79 |
33.3% |
50.0% |
6.5% |
Good knowledge in job-related areas |
35 |
14.7% |
22.1% |
2.9% |
Good work attitude |
25 |
10.8% |
16.2% |
2.1% |
Reputation |
22 |
9.5% |
14.2% |
1.9% |
Diligent, motivated |
18 |
7.7% |
11.5% |
1.5% |
Good language ability |
14 |
6.1% |
9.1% |
1.2% |
Alumni |
10 |
4.1% |
6.1% |
0.8% |
Good social relationship |
7 |
2.9% |
4.3% |
0.6% |
Good connection with outside (e.g., a university』s extensive connection with enterprises, companies, or industrial firms; large number of graduates) |
7 |
2.8% |
4.2% |
0.5% |
Salary matched with abilities |
7 |
2.8% |
4.2% |
0.5% |
Good leadership |
2 |
0.8% |
1.2% |
0.2% |
Others |
10 |
4.1% |
6.1% |
0.8% |
Don』t know / hard to say |
1 |
0.5% |
0.8% |
0.1% |
Total |
236 |
100.0% |
|
|
Valid base |
157 |
|
|
|
Missing case(s) |
2 |
|
|
|
