HKU POP releases ratings of top 10 political groupsBack

 
Press Release on July 10, 2012

| Special Announcement| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Rating of Top Ten Political Groups) |


Special Announcement

The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong will upload two full sets of video record of the July 1 Rally to the “PopCon” e-platform (http://popcon.hk) today and the day after tomorrow. Public are welcomed to download the video record from the “July 1 Rally Feature page”, and do their own headcount of the Rally. POP also provides all the video clips in higher resolution, available for purchase at production cost, for details, please refer to the note inside the page.



Abstract

 

POP conducted a double stage survey on the rankings of the top 10 political groups in late June and early July 2012 by means of random telephone surveys conducted by real interviewers. Our latest survey shows that compared to four months ago, the ratings of 7 out of 10 political groups have gone up. Among them, those with increases beyond sampling error include LSD, People Power and ADPL, up by 9.1, 9.0 and 4.0 marks respectively, while DAB’s rating drops significantly by 4.7 marks. Among the ‘top 10’ groups, only FTU scores more than 50 marks. In terms of relative rankings, FTU remains at the top position, ADPL goes up 4 positions to rank 2nd. DP and HKCTU continue to rank 3rd and 4th, CP goes up two positions to rank 5th, DAB and NPP go down 4 and 2 positions respectively to rank 6th and 7th, while LP, People Power and LSD continue to take the 8th, 9th and 10th positions. It should be noted, however, that our ‘Top 10 Political Groups’ only includes groups which are best known to the public, ranked according to their support ratings. Other political groups may well have very high or low support ratings, but because they are relatively less well-known, they are not included in our final list. The maximum sampling errors of the ratings of top ten political groups registered fall between +/-1.8 and +/-2.6 at 95% confidence level. The response rate of the rating survey is 66%.


Points to note:
[1] The address of the “HKU POP SITE” is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
[2] The sample size of the first stage naming survey of top 10 political groups is 1,031 successful interviews, not 1,031 x 70.4% response rate, while the sample size of the second stage rating survey is other 1,050 successful interviews, not 1,050 x 65.9% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-2.6 at 95% confidence level".
[4] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses “computerized random telephone survey” to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.


Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via the POP Site the latest ratings of the top 10 political groups. As a general practice, all the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2011 year-end. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Sampling error of percentages/ratings[5]

21-27/6/2012 (First stage naming survey)

1,031

70.4%

+/-3%

28/6-5/7/2012 (Second stage rating survey)

1,050

65.9%

+/-2.6

[5] Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified.

 

The research design of our "Top ten political groups" has been explained in detail under "Survey Method" in our corresponding web page. The top political groups listed in our latest survey were all those who obtained highest unprompted mentions in our first stage naming survey conducted from June 21 to 27. In that survey, respondents could name, unaided, up to 10 political groups whom they knew best. Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), Democratic Party (DP), Civic Party, Liberal Party (LP) and People Power were mentioned most frequently. Please refer to the relevant table in our website for the rest of the list. The 12 most frequently mentioned political groups then entered into the second stage rating survey. During that second stage survey conducted from June 28 to July 5, respondents were asked to rate each political group in turn using a 0-100 scale. 0 indicates absolutely no support, 100 indicates absolute support, and 50 means half-half. After calculation, the bottom 2 political groups in terms of recognition rate were dropped, leaving behind the top 10. In case any group failed to reach the 50% benchmark recognition rate, it would also be dropped. It should, however, be noted that because political groups are not yet legal entities in Hong Kong, such definitions are rather vague, and so-called political groups are constantly evolving. As a result, strange names may appear in the list of groups mentioned by respondents in Stage One surveys. In order to avoid personal bias, our research team will eliminate groups which fall outside the popular definition only after the first stage of the survey. To facilitate readers follow our research process step by step, the POP Site has already displayed the results of all naming surveys conducted since July 1998. The latest ratings of the top 10 political groups, together with the previous ratings, are summarized below:

Date of survey

23-30/8/2011

18-25/11/2011

20-22/2/2012

28/6-5/7/2012

Latest change

Sample base

522-605

502-606

516-565

503-566

--

Overall response rate

66.4%

72.2%

65.5%

65.9 %

--

Finding / Recog rate

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error[6]

Recog %

--

FTU

50.8{1}

52.3{2}

50.7{1}

51.1+/-2.1{1}

90%

+0.4

ADPL

47.2{5}

49.9{3}[8]

45.3{6}[8]

49.3+/-1.8{2}

77%

+4.0[8]

DP

45.3{8}[8]

48.8{5}[8]

46.8{3}[8]

46.6+/-2.0{3}

90%

-0.2

HKCTU

50.7{2}

49.3{4}

46.2{4}[8]

46.5+/-2.1{4}

82%

+0.3

CP

46.1{6}[8]

44.4{8}

43.9{7}

45.7+/-2.2{5}

84%

+1.8

DAB

45.5{7}

48.2{6}[8]

49.1{2}

44.4+/-2.5{6}

89%

-4.7[8]

NPP

46.4[7][8]

49.8 [7][8]

46.1{5}[8]

44.3+/-2.2{7}

77%

-1.8

Liberal Party

44.7{9}

45.2{7}

41.7{8}[8]

43.1+/-1.9{8}

86%

+1.4

People Power

34.9[7]

28.3{9}[8]

26.3{9}

35.3+/-2.6{9}

89%

+9.0[8]

LSD

32.6{10}

25.8{10}[8]

25.7{10}

34.8+/-2.5{10}

83%

+9.1[8]

NWS

50.4{3}

52.8{1}[8]

45.0[7][8]

50.3+/-2.3[7]

70%

+5.3[8]

Labour Party [9]

--

--

43.5[7]

46.2+/-2.3[7]

70%

+2.7[8]

Neo-Democrats

--

44.6[7]

--

--

--

--

HKASPDMC

48.8{4}[8]

--

--

--

--

--

[6] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-2.6 at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[7] Ratings with recognition rates not reaching top 10 in either stage of survey are not available. { } Number in square brackets indicates rankings.
[8] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
[9] Labour Party was founded on 18 December 2011.

 

Findings obtained in late June and early July showed that, the most popular political group was Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions (FTU) which attained 51.1 marks. Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People’s Livelihood (ADPL) scored 49.3 marks and ranked 2nd. The 3rd to 8th places were Democratic Party (DP), Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions (HKCTU), Civic Party (CP), Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), New People’s Party (NPP) and Liberal Party (LP) attaining 46.6, 46.5, 45.7, 44.4, 44.3 and 43.1 marks respectively. The 9th and 10th places fell to People Power and League of Social Democrats (LSD), with a respective score of 35.3 and 34.8. The mean score obtained by the top 5 political groups was 47.8 marks. For this latest survey, Neighbourhood and Worker’s Service Centre (NWS) and Labour Party obtained a support rating of 50.3 and 46.2 marks respectively, but they were dropped due to their relatively low recognition rates. The overall ratings ranked according to results obtained over the past 12 months are tabulated as follows:

Date of survey

23-20/8/11

18-25/11/11

20-22/2/12

28/6-5/7/12

No. of times on top 10

Average  rating [10]

Overall ranking[11]

FTU

50.8

52.3

50.7

51.1

4

51.2

{1}

HKCTU

50.7

49.3

46.2

46.5

4

48.2

{2}

ADPL

47.2

49.9

45.3

49.3

4

47.9

{3}

DP

45.3

48.8

46.8

46.6

4

46.9

{4}

DAB

45.5

48.2

49.1

44.4

4

46.8

{5}

CP

46.1

44.4

43.9

45.7

4

45.0

{6}

Liberal Party

44.7

45.2

41.7

43.1

4

43.7

{7}

LSD

32.6

25.8

25.7

34.8

4

29.7

{8}

People Power

-

28.3

26.3

35.3

3

30.0

{9}

NWS

50.4

52.8

-

-

2

51.6

{10}

NPP

-

-

46.1

44.3

2

45.2

{11}

HKASPDMC

48.8

-

-

-

1

48.8

{12}

[10] “Average rating” is the average of all ratings obtained by political groups over the past 12 months.
[11] “Overall ranking” is first determined by their number of times on top 10, and then their average ratings. { } Number in square brackets indicates rankings.

 

The overall rankings in the past 12 months showed that, eight political groups were listed for four times, FTU ranked first, achieving an average rating of 51.2 marks. HKCTU and ADPL ranked 2nd and 3rd, attaining average ratings of 48.2 and 47.9 marks respectively. Meanwhile, the 4th to 8th ranks fell to DP, DAB, CP, LP and LSD, with respective average ratings of 46.9, 46.8, 45.0, 43.7 and 29.7 marks. People Power was listed three times while NWS and NPP were listed twice, HKASPDMC was listed once, now ranked the 9th and 12th with 30.0, 51.6, 45.2 and 48.8 marks.


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey was conducted from February 20 to 22, 2012 while this survey was conducted from June 28 to July 5, 2012. In between these two surveys, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

2/7/12

New Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's plan to meet the public backfires as activists storm in Tuen Mun.

1/7/12

Many newspapers on the following day report the July 1 demonstration.

25/6/12

The Democratic Party plans to file an election petition to High Court after accusing Chief Executive-elect Leung Chun-ying of making false statements about having no illegal structures at his home.

21/6/12

Legislators veto to discuss in priority the motion to reorganize the government secretariat.

10/6/12

25,000 protestors demand Li Wangyang probe.

4/6/12

180,000 people take part in the June 4 candlelight vigil in Victoria Park.

17/5/12

Legislative Council President Jasper Tsang makes the decision to halt the debate on the replacement mechanism bill.

25/3/12

Leung Chun Ying wins the Chief Executive election with 689 votes.

28/2/12

Member of the Legislative Council Paul Tse proposes to submit a motion in the Legislative Council to impeach CE Donald Tsang.

27/2/12

Legislative leader Jasper Tsang Yok Sing announces to stay out of the chief executive election.



Commentary

Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of Public Opinion Programme, observed, “Our latest survey of ‘Top 10 Political Groups’ conducted from late June to early July shows that compared to four months ago, the ratings of 7 out of 10 political groups have gone up. Among them, those with increases beyond sampling error include LSD, People Power and ADPL, up by 9.1, 9.0 and 4.0 marks respectively, while DAB’s rating drops significantly by 4.7 marks. Among the ‘top 10’ groups, only FTU scores more than 50 marks. In terms of relative rankings, FTU remains at the top position, ADPL goes up 4 positions to rank 2nd. DP and HKCTU continue to rank 3rd and 4th, CP goes up two positions to rank 5th, DAB and NPP go down 4 and 2 positions respectively to rank 6th and 7th, while LP, People Power and LSD continue to take the 8th, 9th and 10th positions. It should be noted, however, that our ‘Top 10 Political Groups’ only includes groups which are best known to the public, ranked according to their support ratings. Other political groups may well have very high or low support ratings, but because they are relatively less well-known, they are not included in our final list. As to what events have affected the ups and downs of the popularity of these groups, readers can make their own judgment after reading through detailed records placed in our ‘Opinion Daily’.”



Future Release (Tentative)

  • July 17, 2012 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Popularity of CE and Principal Officials, PSI analysis


| Special Announcement| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Rating of Top Ten Political Groups) |