HKU POP releases popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang,CE-elect CY Leung and principal officialsBack

 
Press Release on April 17, 2012

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


Special Announcement

 

Starting from today, the Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong would release the popularity figures of CE and CE-elect Leung Chun-ying together, until the incumbent CE retires. This arrangement was first practiced in December 1996 when CH Tung became CE-elect, because both the incumbent CE and the CE-elect need to be monitored by public opinion. Readers may refer to the “Popularity of Tung Chee-Hwa” feature page under “Archive – POP Polls” in our POP Site (http://hkupop.pori.hk).

 

As for the survey questions, all popularity figures of the incumbent CE and the CE-elect come from our long-existing “0-100 support rating” question, and our “approval/disapproval rate” question, namely, “If a general election of the Chief Executive were to be held tomorrow, and you had the right to vote, would you vote for XXX?”. The former has been used since 1991 while the latter was introduced in 2002, and they have been used continually ever since. POP followed exactly the same method when we last released the popularity figures of CE-elect CY Leung. On the pros and cons of these two methods of measurement, please refer to the article “New Perspectives on Chief Executive Ratings” under “POP Column” in our POP Site. The article was published on 12 June 2003.



Abstract

POP interviewed 1,006 Hong Kong people between April 2 to 10, 2012 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. The survey shows that the support rating of CE Donald Tsang is 44.6 marks, slightly lower than last time. His approval rate now stands at 23%, disapproval rate at 70%, giving a net popularity of negative 47 percentage points. Tsang’s overall popularity has not changed much compared with two weeks ago. As for CE-elect CY Leung, his latest support rating of is 52.2 marks, approval rate 46%, disapproval rate 45%, meaning that his net popularity has changed significantly from negative 13 to positive 1 percentage point, widening his lead over CE Donald Tsang. As for the Secretaries of Departments, compared to a month ago, the rating of CS Stephen Lam has dropped significantly. His latest support rating is 36.7 marks, approval rate 14%, disapproval rate 45% which is his all-time record high, giving a net popularity of negative 31 percentage points. The popularity of FS John Tsang has dropped somewhat, his support rating is 49.8 marks which is a new low in 7 months. The net approval rate of John Tsang now stands at positive 10 percentage points. As for SJ Wong Yan-lung, his support rating is 60.3 marks, approval rate 63%, disapproval rate 6%, and his net popularity stands at positive 57 percentage points. Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rate of 5 of the 12 Directors have gone up, that of 7 Directors have gone down. Among them, only Secretary for Development Carrie Lam has registered change in approval rates beyond sampling error, up by 7 percentage points to reach her all-time record high. Carrie Lam continues to be the most popular Director. Among all the Directors, only Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing and Secretary for Education Michael Suen register negative popularity, at negative 10 and 34 percentage points respectively. According to POP’s standard, Carrie Lam falls under the category of “ideal” performer, Wong Yan-lung, Ambrose Lee and Matthew Cheung now fall under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Eva Cheng, York Chow, Edward Yau, Ceajer Chan, John Tsang, Tsang Tak-sing and Stephen Lam can be labeled as “mediocre”, that of Denise Yue, Raymond Tam and Gregory So can be labeled as “inconspicuous”, Michael Suen can be labeled as “depressing” and that of Donald Tsang “disastrous”. The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 60%.


Points to note:
[1] The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.

[2] The sample size of this survey is 1,006 successful interviews, not 1,006 x 60.0% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-2.0 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level".
[4] When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.




Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via POP SITE the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, CE-elect Leung Chun-ying, as well as Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages[6]

2-10/4/2012

1,006

60.0%

+/-3%

[6] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

 

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sampling errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

                   

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

[7] Based on 95% confidence interval.

 

Recent popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

1-6/2/12

20-22/2/12

2-7/3/12

16-21/3/12

2-10/4/2012

Latest change

Sample base

1,000

1,012

1,001

1,020

1,006

--

Overall response rate

64.0%

65.5%

66.6%

62.8%

60.0%

--

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error[8]

--

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

48.3

46.6[9]

43.5[9]

45.3[9]

44.6+/-1.3

-0.7

Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang

25%

29%[9]

25%[9]

25%

23+/-3%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang

67%

64%

71%[9]

69%

70+/-3%

+1%

Net approval rate

-42%

-35%

-46%

-44%

-47%

-3%

[8] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.3, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[9] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

 

Recent popularity figures of CE-elect CY Leung are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

27-30/3/12

2-10/4/2012

Latest change

Sample base

1,019

1,006

--

Overall response rate

63.4%

60.0%

--

Finding

Finding

Finding and error[10]

--

Support rating of CE-elect Leung Chun-ying

51.5

52.2+/-1.5

+0.7

Support Leung Chun-ying as CE

38%

46+/-3%

+8%[11]

Oppose Leung Chun-ying as CE

51%

45+/-3%

-6%[11]

Net approval rate

-13%

+1%

+14%

[10] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.5, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures.
[11] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

 

Recent popularity figures of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

3-6/1/12

1/2/12

1-6/2/12

2-7/3/12

2-10/4/2012

Latest change [10]

Sample base[12]

540-587

1,015

597-618

574-583

523-696

--

Overall response rate

65.1%

71.1%

64.0%

66.6%

60.0%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & error [13]

--

Ratings of CS Stephen Lam

36.4

--

38.6[14]

38.0

36.7+/-2.0

-1.3

Vote of confidence in CS Stephen Lam

15%

--

13%

20%[14]

14+/-3%

-6%[14]

Vote of no confidence in CS Stephen Lam

41%

--

40%

37%

45+/-4%

+8%[14]

Net approval rate

-26%

--

-27%

-17%

-31%

-14%

Ratings of FS John Tsang

50.6

54.1[14]

51.0[14]

50.9

49.8+/-1.6

-1.1

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

37%

29%[14]

34%[14]

41%[14]

36+/-4%

-5%[14]

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang

24%

26%

25%

24%

26+/-3%

+2%

Net approval rate

13%

3%

9%

17%

10%

-7%

Ratings of SJ Y.L. Wong

57.7[14]

--

58.6

60.5[14]

60.3+/-1.4

-0.2

Vote of confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

54%

--

57%

62%[14]

63+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

8%

--

9%

6%[14]

6+/-2%

--

Net approval rate

46%

--

48%

56%

57%

+1%

[12] The frequency of this series of questions is different for different questions, and also different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals. Starting from 2011, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[13] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-2.0, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[14] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

 

Figures on the latest popularity ratings of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

1-6/2/12

2-7/3/12

2-10/4/12

Latest change

Sample base [15]

537-632

504-658

531-660

--

Overall response rate

64.0%

66.6%

60.0%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer

Base

%

Base

%

Base

% & error [16]

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

632

62%

525

67%[17]

619

74+/-4%

+7%[17]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

632

11%

525

8%[17]

619

10+/-2%

+2%

Net approval rate

--

51%

--

59%

--

64%

+5%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

537

58%

606

57%

639

59+/-4%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

537

16%

606

15%

639

14+/-3%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

42%

--

42%

--

45%

+3%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

601

49%

599

52%

624

54+/-4%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

601

13%

599

12%

624

13+/-3%

+1%

Net approval rate

--

36%

--

40%

--

41%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

561

49%

562

50%

634

49+/-4%

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

561

17%

562

16%

634

20+/-3%

+4%[17]

Net approval rate

--

32%

--

34%

--

29%

-5%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

584

43%[17]

658

46%

614

47+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

584

29%[17]

658

28%

614

28+/-4%

--

Net approval rate

--

14%

--

18%

--

19%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

557

34%

557

40%[17]

531

39+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

557

24%

557

22%

531

23+/-4%

+1%

Net approval rate

--

10%

--

18%

--

16%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

598

33%

598

40%[17]

660

38+/-4%[18]

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

598

10%

598

6%[17]

660

10+/-2%

+4%[17]

Net approval rate

--

23%

--

34%

--

28%

-6%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

583

34%

504

36%

629

38+/-4%[18]

+2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

583

12%

504

12%

629

13+/-3%

+1%

Net approval rate

--

22%

--

24%

--

25%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam

574

26%

605

34%[17]

550

31+/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam

574

12%

605

10%

550

13+/-3%

+3%

Net approval rate

--

14%

--

24%

--

18%

-6%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

611

25%

590

29%

556

26+/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

611

34%

590

28%[17]

556

36+/-4%

+8%[17]

Net approval rate

--

-9%

--

1%

--

-10%

-11%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

616

21%

649

27%[17]

578

23+/-4%

-4%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

616

16%

649

15%

578

15+/-3%

--

Net approval rate

--

5%

--

12%

--

8%

-4%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

561

18%[17]

592

23%[17]

638

20+/-3%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

561

52%

592

46%[17]

638

54+/-4%

+8%[17]

Net approval rate

--

-34%

--

-23%

--

-34%

-11%

[15] Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[16] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[17] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

[18] In one decimal place, the approval rate of Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue is 38.3%, while that of Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan is 37.5%, so that Denise Yue ranks 7th while Ceajer Chan ranks 8th.


The latest survey showed that, CE Donald Tsang scored 44.6 marks, and 23% supported him as the Chief Executive, his net approval rate is negative 47%. CE-elect Leung Chun-ying scored 52.2 marks, and 46% supported him as CE, his net approval rate is positive 1%. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Stephen Lam, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung were 36.7, 49.8 and 60.3 marks, and 14%, 36% and 63% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. Their net approval rates are negative 31%, positive 10% and positive 57% respectively.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, results revealed that the top approval rate fell to Secretary for Development Carrie Lam, attaining 74%. Her net approval rate is positive 64%. The 2nd to 5th places belonged to Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee, Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung, Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng and Secretary for Food and Health York Chow, with approval rates 59%, 54%, 49% and 47% respectively and their net approval rates are positive 45%, 41%, 29% and 19% respectively. Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau, Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So and Secretary for Education Michael Suen ranked 6th to 12th, as they gained 39%, 38%, 38%, 31%, 26%, 23% and 20% support from the public respectively. Their corresponding net approval rates are positive 16%, positive 28%, positive 25%, positive 18%, negative 10%, positive 8% and negative 34%. In other words, Carrie Lam, Ambrose Lee and Matthew Cheung scored approval rate of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.



Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from March 2 to 7, 2012 while this survey was conducted from April 2 to 10, 2012. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

9/4/12

Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office director Wang Guangya said it's time to put aside differences and look forward future.

31/3/12

New Territories villagers refuse the urge by Secretary of Development Carrie Lam to register unauthorized structures.

29/3/12

Sun Hung Kai bosses Thomas and Raymond Kwok detained with former chief secretary Rafael Hui for bribery and misconduct.

25/3/12

Leung Chun Ying wins the Chief Executive election with 689 votes.

18/3/12

The Chief Executive election descends into a matter of mutual accusations between Henry Tang Ying-yen and Leung Chun-ying.

16/3/12

The Chief Executive candidate Henry Tang Ying-yen attacks Leung Chun-ying's integrity.

14/3/12

Premier Wen Jiabao speaks about Hong Kong's chief executive election for the first time.

10/3/12

The Chief Executive candidate Leung Chun-ying election office personnel and the Heung Yee Kuk members give different versions of the alleged dinner with a gangster boss.



Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP Robert Chung.

 

Our latest survey shows that the support rating of CE Donald Tsang is 44.6 marks, slightly lower than last time. His approval rate now stands at 23%, disapproval rate at 70%, giving a net popularity of negative 47 percentage points. Tsang’s overall popularity has not changed much compared with two weeks ago.

 

As for CE-elect CY Leung, his latest support rating of is 52.2 marks, approval rate 46%, disapproval rate 45%, meaning that his net popularity has changed significantly from negative 13 to positive 1 percentage point, widening his lead over CE Donald Tsang.

 

As for the Secretaries of Departments, compared to a month ago, the rating of CS Stephen Lam has dropped significantly. His latest support rating is 36.7 marks, approval rate 14%, disapproval rate 45% which is his all-time record high, giving a net popularity of negative 31 percentage points. The popularity of FS John Tsang has dropped somewhat, his support rating is 49.8 marks which is a new low in 7 months. The net approval rate of John Tsang now stands at positive 10 percentage points. As for SJ Wong Yan-lung, his support rating is 60.3 marks, approval rate 63%, disapproval rate 6%, and his net popularity stands at positive 57 percentage points. Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rate of 5 of the 12 Directors have gone up, that of 7 Directors have gone down. Among them, only Secretary for Development Carrie Lam has registered change in approval rates beyond sampling error, up by 7 percentage points to reach her all-time record high. Carrie Lam continues to be the most popular Director. Among all the Directors, only Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing and Secretary for Education Michael Suen register negative popularity, at negative 10 and 34 percentage points respectively.

 

According to POP’s standard, Carrie Lam falls under the category of “ideal” performer, Wong Yan-lung, Ambrose Lee and Matthew Cheung now fall under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Eva Cheng, York Chow, Edward Yau, Ceajer Chan, John Tsang, Tsang Tak-sing and Stephen Lam can be labeled as “mediocre”, that of Denise Yue, Raymond Tam and Gregory So can be labeled as “inconspicuous”, Michael Suen can be labeled as “depressing” and that of Donald Tsang “disastrous”.

 

The following table summarizes the grading of the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

"Ideal": those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (74%)

 

"Successful": those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

SJ Wong Yan-lung (63%); Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong (59%); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (54%);

 

"Mediocre": those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wah (49%); Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok (47%); Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah (39%); Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (38%[19]); FS John Tsang Chun-wah (36%); Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (26%); CS Stephen Lam Sui-lung (14%)

 

"Inconspicuous": those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee (38%[19], 48%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam Chi-yuen (31%, 44%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung (23%, 38%)

 

"Depressing": those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung (54%)

 

"Disastrous": those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen (70%)

[19] In one decimal place, the approval rate of Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue is 38.3%; the approval rate of Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan is 37.5%.


Future Release (Tentative)

  • April 24, 2012 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Media Performance


| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |