HKU POP releases the latest survey on Taiwan issuesBack

 
Press Release on April 3, 2012

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Indepth Analysis |
| Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Opinion on Independence of Taiwan / Confidence in Cross-strait Reunification) |
| Detailed Findings (Opinion on Applicability of "One Country, Two Systems" to Taiwan) |
| Detailed Findings (Opinion on Taiwan's Rejoining the United Nations / Tibet Issues) |


Special Announcement

The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong has recently destroyed all personal information collected during the “3.23 Civil Referendum” project, including all HKID numbers and mobile phone numbers, in electronic or paper format. Details will be announced under a separate cover.



Abstract

POP interviewed 1,014 Hong Kong people between 22 and 27 March, 2012 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. Our latest survey shows that after the Presidential Election in Taiwan, Hong Kong people’s opposition to the independence of Taiwan remains high, but has slightly dropped to 64% compared to three months ago. People’s confidence in ‘one country, two systems’ applicable to Taiwan has rebounded significantly to 49% after dropping to a 40% low three months ago, giving a positive value of net confidence again. People’s confidence in reunification across the strait, however, has dropped significantly over the past three months, giving a net confidence of negative 6 percentage points, while those supporting Taiwan rejoining the UN goes up to 43%. Further analysis shows that older people are more opposed to Taiwan’s independence, and are more confident of cross-strait reunification. The maximum sampling error of all percentages is between +/-3 and +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the response rates of the surveys are 63%.


Points to note:
[1] The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
[2] The sample size of the survey is 1,014 successful interviews, not 1,014 x 62.7% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] ?The maximum sampling error of all percentages is between +/-3 and +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level".
[4] When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places in order to match the precision level of the figures.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.


Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via the POP Site the latest findings on various Taiwan issues. As a general practice, all figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2011 year-end. Herewith the contact information for the latest surveys:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages[6]

22-27/3/2012

1,014

62.7%

+/-3%

[6] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified.


Latest people's views towards various Taiwan issues are summarized below:

Date of survey

3/2011

6/2011

9/2011

12/2011

3/2012

Latest Change

Total sample size[7]

1,000

1,034

1,038

1,005

1,014

--

Overall response rate

64.2%

66.5%

66.2%

67.4%

62.7%

--

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & error [8]

--

Taiwan independence: Opposition rate

63%[9]

65%

63%

67%

64+/-4%

-3%

Taiwan independence: Support rate

20%[9]

19%

20%

20%

20+/-3%

--

Believed ‘one country, two systems' was applicable to Taiwan

40%[9]

44%

46%

40%[9]

49+/-4%

+9%[9]

Believed ‘one country, two systems' was not applicable to Taiwan

42%

40%

37%

44%[9]

37+/-4%

-7%[9]

Confidence in cross-strait reunification

45%

46%

44%

45%

40+/-4%

-5%[9]

No confidence in cross-strait reunification

44%

40%

43%

41%

46+/-4%

+5%[9]

Taiwan rejoining the United Nations: Support rate

--

39%

36%

39%

43+/-4%

+4%

Taiwan rejoining the United Nations: Opposition rate

--

37%

41%

39%

34+/-4%

-5%[9]

[7] Starting from March 2011, these questions only use sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned. The sub-sample sizes of the surveys range from 542 to 585, and the increased sampling errors have already been reflected in the figures tabulated. 
[8] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[9]Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


Latest survey revealed that 64% of Hong Kong people interviewed opposed the independence of Taiwan whereas 20% showed support. As for the applicability of “one country, two systems” to Taiwan, 49% gave a positive view while 37% gave a negative answer. 40% were confident in the ultimate reunification across the strait whilst 46% expressed no confidence. 43% supported the rejoining the United Nations of Taiwan while 34% opposed.



Indepth Analysis

In the survey, we also asked respondents for their age. If they were reluctant to give their exact age, they could give us a range. According to their answers, we grouped them into 18-29, 30-49, and 50 years or older. Herewith further analysis of respondents' view on the Taiwan independence issue by age:

Date of survey: 22-27/3/12

18-29

30-49

50 or above

Overall Sample

View on the Taiwan independence issue[10]

Support

31+/-6%
(35)

22+/-4%
(49)

13+/-3%
(30)

20+/-2%
(114)

Oppose

53+/-7%
(60)

64+/-5%
(139)

70+/-4%
(170)

64+/-3%
(369)

Don't know/ hard to say

17+/-5%
(19)

14+/-3%
(31)

18+/-3%
(43)

16+/-2%
(92)

Total

100%
(114)

100%
(219)

100%
(243)

100%
(576)

[10] Differences among sub-groups are tested to be statistically significant at 95% confidence level.

 

Herewith further analysis of respondents' confidence in cross-strait reunification by age:

Date of survey: 22-27/3/12

18-29

30-49

50 or above

Overall Sample

Confidence in cross-strait reunification[11]

Yes

29+/-6%
(31)

36+/-5%
(77)

48+/-5%
(115)

40+/-3%
(223)

No

60+/-7%
(64)

53+/-5%
(114)

32+/-4%
(77)

46+/-3%
(254)

Don't know/ hard to say

11+/-4%
(12)

11+/-3%
(23)

19+/-4%
(46)

14+/-2%
(80)

Total

100%
(107)

100%
(213)

100%
(237)

100%
(558)

[11] Differences among sub-groups are tested to be statistically significant at 95% confidence level.



Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey was conducted from December 6 to 13, 2011 while this survey was conducted from March 22 to 27, 2012. In between these two surveys, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.


15/3/12

Vice Premier Zhang Dejiang replaces Bo Xilai as the Secretary of Municipal Committee of the CPC in Chongqing.

5/3/12

China lowered its economic growth target this year to below the symbolic 8 percent level.

21/1/12

Beijing University professor Kong Qingdong comments many Hong Kong people are dogs.

14/1/12

Taiwan's president, Ma Ying-jeou, was elected to a second term.

14/12/11

The annual three day Central Economic Work Conference laid out an economic blueprint for 2012.



Commentary

Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of Public Opinion Programme, observed, "Our latest survey shows that after the Presidential Election in Taiwan, Hong Kong people's opposition to the independence of Taiwan remains high, but has slightly dropped to 64% compared to three months ago. People's confidence in ‘one country, two systems' applicable to Taiwan has rebounded significantly to 49% after dropping to a 40% low three months ago, giving a positive value of net confidence again. People's confidence in reunification across the strait, however, has dropped significantly over the past three months, giving a net confidence of negative 6 percentage points, while those supporting Taiwan rejoining the UN goes up to 43%. Further analysis shows that older people are more opposed to Taiwan's independence, and are more confident of cross-strait reunification. As for the reasons affecting the ups and downs of various figures, readers are welcome to make their own judgment using the detailed records displayed in our ‘Opinion Daily'."



Future Release (Tentative)

  • April 10, 2012 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Follow-up survey of CE election


| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Indepth Analysis |
| Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Opinion on Independence of Taiwan / Confidence in Cross-strait Reunification) |
| Detailed Findings (Opinion on Applicability of "One Country, Two Systems" to Taiwan) |
| Detailed Findings (Opinion on Taiwan's Rejoining the United Nations / Tibet Issues) |