HKU POP releases popularity figures of CE and principal officialsBack

 
Press Release on November 15, 2011

| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


Abstract

The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong interviewed 1,002 Hong Kong people between October 31 and November 9 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. The survey shows that the popularity of CE Donald Tsang has somewhat increased compared to our last survey. His support rating now stands at 48.7 marks, approval rate at 29%, disapproval rate at 61%, giving a net popularity of negative 32 percentage points. As for the Secretaries of Departments, compared to a month ago, the popularity of CS Stephen Lam has also somewhat increased from its low level. His latest support rating is 40.4 marks, approval rate 22%, disapproval rate 32%, giving a net popularity of negative 10 percentage points. FS John Tsang has a support rating of 51.7 marks, approval rate 35%, disapproval rate 20%, and his net popularity at positive 15 percentage points. As for SJ Wong Yan-lung, his support rating is 60.6 marks, approval rate 63%, disapproval rate 3%, and his net popularity stands at positive 60 percentage points. Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rate of four Directors have gone up, seven have gone down, one remains unchanged. Those registered significant changes in approval rates beyond sampling error include Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, up by 5 and down by 5 percentage points respectively. Among all the Directors, only Tsang Tak-sing and Michael Suen register negative popularity, at negative 1 and 18 percentage points respectively. Carrie Lam continues to be the most popular Director. According to POP's standard and counting only incumbents, no official falls under the category of "ideal" performer. Wong Yan-lung, Carrie Lam, Ambrose Lee, Matthew Cheung and Eva Cheng now fall under the category of "successful" performer. The performance of York Chow, Edward Yau, John Tsang, Tsang Tak-sing, Michael Suen and Stephen Lam can be labeled as "mediocre", that of Ceajer Chan, Denise Yue, Raymond Tam and Gregory So can be labeled as "inconspicuous", and that of Donald Tsang "depressing". No official falls under the category of "disastrous". The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 65%.

Points to note:
[1] The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
[2] The sample size of this survey is 1,002 successful interviews, not 1,002 x 64.8% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-2.1 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level".
[4] When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.


Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via POP SITE the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in mid-year 2011. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:
Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages[6]

31/10-9/11/2011

1,002

64.8%

+/-3%

[6] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sample errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:
Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

[7] Based on 95% confidence interval.

Recent popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

13-20/9/11

26/9-4/10/11

12/10/11

13-20/10/11

31/10-9/11/2011

Latest change

Sample base

1,001

1,025

1,032

1,013

1,002

--

Overall response rate

65.5%

66.1%

65.6%

71.8%

64.8%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding[9]

Finding

Finding & error[8]

--

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

47.3[10]

48.4

50.6[10]

47.9[10]

48.7+/-1.4

+0.8

Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang

24%

24%

25%

25%

29+/-3%

+4%[10]

Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang

67%

69%

66%

65%

61+/-3%

-4%[10]

Net approval rate

-43%

-45%

-41%

-40%

-32%

+8%

[8] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.4, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[9] These questions only use sub-samples of the survey concerned. The sub-sample sizes of questions on CE's support rating and hypothetical voting were 770 and 843 respectively.
[10] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

Figures on the latest popularity ratings of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

4-7/7/11

1-9/8/11

29/8-6/9/11

26/9-4/10/11

31/10-9/11/2011

Latest change[11]

Sample base[10]

506-573

516-566

560-628

509-673

526-579

--

Overall response rate

67.4%

63.4%

64.6%

66.1%

64.8%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & error[12]

--

Ratings of CS Stephen Lam[13]

--

--

--

38.5

40.4+/-2.1

+1.9

Vote of confidence in CS Stephen Lam[13]

--

--

--

20%

22+/-3%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in CS Stephen Lam[13]

--

--

--

36%

32+/-4%

-4%

Net approval rate[13]

--

--

--

-16%

-10%

+6%

Ratings of FS John Tsang

44.9

47.3[14]

49.6[14]

50.2

51.7+/-1.6

+1.5

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

21%

26%[14]

33%[14]

39%[14]

35+/-4%

-4%

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang

37%

34%

27%[14]

23%[14]

20+/-3%

-3%

Net approval rate

-16%

-8%

6%

16%

15%

-1%

Ratings of SJ Y.L. Wong

59.1

55.7[14]

58.2

59.5

60.6+/-1.5

+1.1

Vote of confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

62%

54%[14]

58%

61%

63+/-4%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

5%

10%[14]

9%

6%[14]

3+/-2%

-3%[14]

Net approval rate

57%

44%

49%

55%

60%

+5%

[11] The frequency of this series of questions is different for different questions, and also different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals. Starting from 2011, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[12] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-2.1, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[13] The Government announced the appointment of former Secretary of Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam as the Chief Secretary on September 30.
[14] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

Figures on the latest popularity ratings of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

29/8-6/9/11

26/9-4/10/11

31/10-9/11/2011

Latest Change

Total sample size[15]

587-629

509-673

526-570

--

Overall response rate

64.6%

66.1%

64.8%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer

Base

%

Base

%

Base

%& error[16]

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

589

57%

537

61%

550

62+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

589

10%

537

10%

550

10+/-3%

--

Net approval rate

--

47%

--

51%

--

52%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

626

52%[18]

666

57%[18]

554

61+/-4%

+4%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

626

21%[18]

666

13%[18]

554

12+/-3%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

31%

--

44%

--

49%

+5%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

613

49%

637

51%

537

51+/-4%

--

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

613

11%

637

12%

537

10+/-3%

-2%

Net approval rate

--

38%

--

39%

--

41%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

623

43%[18]

584

49%[18]

544

50+/-4%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

623

20%

584

15%[18]

544

17+/-3%

+2%

Net approval rate

--

23%

--

34%

--

33%

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

617

51%

514

53%

552

49+/-4%

-4%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

617

23%

514

19%[18]

552

23+/4%

+4%

Net approval rate

--

28%

--

34%

--

26%

-8%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

623

37%

569

45%[18]

538

43+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

623

20%

569

17%

538

14+/-3%

-3%

Net approval rate

--

17%

--

28%

--

29%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

629

38%[18]

588

36%

526

41+/-4%

+5%[18]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

629

10%[18]

588

11%

526

7+/-2%

-4%[18]

Net approval rate

--

28%

--

25%

--

34%

+9%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

602

33%

667

38%[18]

550

35+/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

602

10%

667

8%

550

7+/-2%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

23%

--

30%

--

28%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam[17]

--

--

509

31%

570

27+/-4%[19]

-4%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam[17]

--

--

509

7%

570

7+/-2%

--

Net approval rate[17]

--

--

--

24%

--

20%

-4%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

604

28%

600

32%

548

27+/-4%[19]

-5%[18]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

604

32%

600

29%

548

28+/-4%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

-4%

--

3%

--

-1%

-4%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

588

25%

637

28%

550

25+/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

588

43%

637

43%

550

43+/-4%

--

Net approval rate

--

-18%

--

-15%

--

-18%

-3%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

620

21%

639

25%[18]

534

22+/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

620

16%[19]

639

15%

534

12+/-3%

-3%

Net approval rate

--

5%

--

10%

--

10%

--

[15] Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[16] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[17] The government announced the appointment of Raymond Tam as the new Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs on September 30.
[18] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
[19] In one decimal place, the approval rate of Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam Chi-yuen is 27.2% while the approval rate of Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing is 26.9%.

The latest survey showed that, CE Donald Tsang scored 48.7 marks, and 29% supported him as the Chief Executive, his net approval rate is negative 32%. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Stephen Lam, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung were 40.4, 51.7 and 60.6 marks, and 22%, 35% and 63% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. Their net approval rates are negative 10%, positive 15% and positive 60% respectively.

As for the Directors of Bureaux, results revealed that the top approval rate fell to Secretary for Development Carrie Lam, attaining 62%. Her net approval rate is positive 52%. The 2nd to 5th places belonged to Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee, Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung, Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng and Secretary for Food and Health York Chow, with approval rates 61%, 51%, 50% and 49% respectively and their net approval rates are positive 49%, 41%, 33% and 26% respectively., Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan, Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Education Michael Suen and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So ranked 6th to 12th, as they gained 43%, 41%, 35%, 27%, 27%, 25% and 22% support from the public respectively. Their corresponding net approval rates are positive 29%, positive 34%, positive 28%, positive 20%, negative 1%, negative 18% and positive 10%. In other words, only Carrie Lam, Ambrose Lee, Matthew Cheung and Eva Cheng scored approval rate of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from 13 to 20 October, 2011 while this survey was conducted from October 31 to November 9, 2011. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

7/11/11

The 2011 District Council election cumulative turnout rate of about 41.4%.

6/11/11

About 1,202,000 registered electors have cast their votes in the 2011 District Council election.

5/11/11

2011 District Council election will be held tomorrow.

26/10/11

Right-of-abode applications for domestic helpers will continue to be withheld.

24/10/11

The Court of Final Appeal rejected Tony Chan's final appeal.

18/10/11

The Next Media Limited Chairperson Jimmy Lai's donation record was found in the internet.

15/10/11

The "Occupy Wall Street" movement that began in the US spread over the world.

13/10/11

Donald Tsang regarded legislator Raymond Wong behaved like a "thug" and a "triad" member.



Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP Robert Chung.

Our latest survey shows that the popularity of CE Donald Tsang has somewhat increased compared to our last survey. His support rating now stands at 48.7 marks, approval rate at 29%, disapproval rate at 61%, giving a net popularity of negative 32 percentage points.

As for the Secretaries of Departments, compared to a month ago, the popularity of CS Stephen Lam has also somewhat increased from its low level. His latest support rating is 40.4 marks, approval rate 22%, disapproval rate 32%, giving a net popularity of negative 10 percentage points. FS John Tsang has a support rating of 51.7 marks, approval rate 35%, disapproval rate 20%, and his net popularity at positive 15 percentage points. As for SJ Wong Yan-lung, his support rating is 60.6 marks, approval rate 63%, disapproval rate 3%, and his net popularity stands at positive 60 percentage points. Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rate of four Directors have gone up, seven have gone down, one remains unchanged. Those registered significant changes in approval rates beyond sampling error include Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, up by 5 and down by 5 percentage points respectively. Among all the Directors, only Tsang Tak-sing and Michael Suen register negative popularity, at negative 1 and 18 percentage points respectively. Carrie Lam continues to be the most popular Director.

According to POP's standard and counting only incumbents, no official falls under the category of "ideal" performer. Wong Yan-lung, Carrie Lam, Ambrose Lee, Matthew Cheung and Eva Cheng now fall under the category of "successful" performer. The performance of York Chow, Edward Yau, John Tsang, Tsang Tak-sing, Michael Suen and Stephen Lam can be labeled as "mediocre", that of Ceajer Chan, Denise Yue, Raymond Tam and Gregory So can be labeled as "inconspicuous", and that of Donald Tsang "depressing". No official falls under the category of "disastrous".

The following table summarizes the grading of the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

"Ideal": those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

None

 

"Successful": those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

SJ Wong Yan-lung (63%); Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (62%); Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong (61%); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (51%); Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wah (50%)

 

"Mediocre": those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok (49%); Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah (43%); FS John Tsang Chun-wah (35%); Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (27%); Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung (25%); CS Stephen Lam Sui-lung (22%)

 

"Inconspicuous": those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (41%, 48%); Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee (35%, 42%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam Chi-yuen (27%, 35%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung (22%, 34%)

 

"Depressing": those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen (61%)

 

"Disastrous": those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

None



Future Release (Tentative)

  • November 22, 2011 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: People's most familiar political figures

| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |