HKU POP releases the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang and the HKSAR GovernmentBack

 
Press Release on February 1, 2011

| Abstract | Latest Figures | Indepth Analysis | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of HKSAR Government) |


Abstract

Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong interviewed 1,018 Hong Kong people between 18 and 26 January 2011 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. Our latest survey shows that the popularity of CE Donald Tsang and the SAR Government has fluctuated within a narrow range over the past couple of months. CE's latest net popularity now stands at negative 8 percentage points, while that of the SAR Government stands at negative 2 percentage points. Further analysis shows that CE Donald Tsang receives significantly less support from the grassroots compared to other strata, while variations across strata is less significant in terms of satisfaction on government performance. Because it was in the last day of our fieldwork period that the government denied entry of people like Wang Dan, the effect of the incident cannot be fully reflected in our findings. The maximum sampling error of all percentage figures is +/-3 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 66%.

Points to note:
[1] The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
[2] The sample size of this survey is 1,018 successful interviews, not 1,018 x 65.8% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] The maximum sampling error of percentages is +/-3 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figure needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.3 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level".
[4] When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.



Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via the "POP SITE" the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang and the HKSAR Government. As a general practice, all figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in mid-year 2010.

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages[6]

18-26/1/2011

1,018

65.8%

+/-3%

[6] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

Recent popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang and people's satisfaction of the overall performance of the HKSAR Government are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

17-27/11/10

6-10/12/10

17-22/12/10

5-12/1/11

18-26/1/11

Latest Change

Sample base

1,001

1,011

1,017

1,025

1,018

--

Overall response rate

69.7%

65.0%

66.4%

64.9%

65.8%

--

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & error[7]

--

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

55.3[9]

54.4

53.3

54.6[9]

53.5+/-1.3

-1.1

Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang

40%

37%

39%

39%

38+/-3%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang

42%[9]

47%[9]

44%

45%

46+/-3%

+1%

Net approval rate

-2%

-10%

-5%

-6%

-8%

-2%

Satisfaction rate of SARG performance[8]

31%

--

29%

--

30+/-3%

+1%

Dissatisfaction rate of SARG performance[8]

30%[9]

--

35%[9]

--

32+/-3%

-3%

Net satisfaction

+1%

--

-6%

--

-2%

+4%

Mean value[8]

3.0+/-0.1
(Base=989)

--

2.8+/-0.1[9]
(Base=1,010)

--

2.9+/-0.1
(Base=1,004)

+0.1

[7] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.3, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[8] Collapsed from a 5-point scale. The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.
[9] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


The latest survey showed that, CE Donald Tsang scored 53.5 marks, and 38% supported him as the Chief Executive, the net approval rate is negative 8%. Regarding people's appraisal of the overall performance of the HKSAR Government, the latest figures revealed that 30% were satisfied, whereas 32% were dissatisfied, net satisfaction was negative 2%. The mean score is 2.9, meaning close to "half-half" in general.


Indepth Analysis

In the survey, we also asked respondents to classify themselves which one of the five social strata they belonged to. The options were: upper, upper-middle, middle-middle, lower-middle and lower stratum or grassroots. According to the choice of respondents, we grouped them into relatively upper, relatively middle and relatively lower strata, or in short form upper, middle and lower strata. Each stratum contains about one-third of the sample. The following table shows the mapping between respondents' choice and their final grouping:

Self-reported social stratum

Social stratum group

Upper stratum

Relatively upper stratum (about one-third)

Upper middle stratum

Middle-middle stratum

Lower middle stratum

Relatively middle stratum (about one-third)

Lower stratum or grassroots

Relatively lower stratum (about one-third)

Don't know/hard to say/refuse to answer

Unclassified


Herewith further analysis by respondents' social strata:
Date of survey: 18-26/1/11

Upper stratum

Middle stratum

Lower stratum

Overall sample size

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

55.4+/-2.0
(347)

52.8+/-2.2
(287)

50.9+/-2.5
(312)

53.2+/-1.3
(946)

Vote of confidence/
no confidence
in CE Donald Tsang

Support

39+/-5%
(139)

41+/-6%
(119)

33+/-5%
(106)

38+/-3%
(364)

Oppose

45+/-5%
(158)

46+/-6%
(132)

51+/-6%
(160)

47+/-3%
(451)

Don't know/
hard to say

16+/-4%
(58)

13+/-4%
(39)

16+/-4%
(51)

15+/-2%
(147)

Total

100%
(356)

100%
(290)

100%
(317)

100%
(962)


Date of survey: 18-26/1/11

Upper stratum

Middle stratum

Lower stratum

Overall sample size

Satisfaction/
dissatisfaction
rate of SARG
performance[10]

Satisfaction

31+/-5%
(111)

27+/-5%
(80)

29+/-5%
(92)

29+/-3%
(283)

Half-half

39+/-5%
(140)

38+/-6%
(111)

35+/-5%
(110)

37+/-3%
(361)

Dissatisfaction

28+/-5%
(99)

33+/-6%
(97)

35+/-5%
(112)

32+/-3%
(308)

Don't know/
hard to say

2+/-1%
(6)

1+/-1%
(3)

1+/-1%
(4)

1+/-1%
(12)

Total

100%
(356)

100%
(291)

100%
(318)

100%
(965)

Mean value[10]

3.0+/-0.1
(350)

2.9+/-0.1
(288)

2.8+/-0.1
(315)

2.9+/-0.1
(953)

[10] Collapsed from a 5-point scale. The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from December 17 to 22, 2010 while this survey was conducted from January 18 to 26, 2011. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

24/1/11

Home prices in Hong Kong is the most severely unaffordable among the 325 selected urban markets in the world.

15/1/11

Henry Tang encourages Hong Kong youngsters to be more tolerant of different views in the society.

14/1/11

The grown-up mainland children of Hong Kong people are allowed the right of abode in Hong Kong.

7/1/11

Graham Sheffield resigns from WKCDA.

4/1/11

Hong Kong Government gives up on landfill expansion and suggests to launch a new series of waste management plan.

2/1/11

Szeto Wah has passes away.

31/12/10

HK people count down for the new year 2011.

26/12/10

Premier Wen Jiabao says the inflation and the issue of rising price of property will be tackled soon.

22/12/10

Chief Executive Donald Tsang paid a duty visit to Beijing.



Commentary

Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of POP, observed, "Our latest survey shows that the popularity of CE Donald Tsang and the SAR Government has fluctuated within a narrow range over the past couple of months. CE's latest net popularity now stands at negative 8 percentage points, while that of the SAR Government (in terms of satisfaction rate) stands at negative 2 percentage points. Further analysis shows that CE Donald Tsang receives significantly less support from the grassroots compared to other strata, while variations across strata is less significant in terms of satisfaction on government performance. As for the reasons accounting for such variations and the ups and downs of various figures, we leave it to our readers to form their own judgment using detailed records displayed in our 'Opinion Daily', suffice to say it was in the last day of our fieldwork period that the government denied entry of people like Wang Dan, so the effect of the incident cannot be fully reflected in our findings."


Future Release (Tentative)

  • February 8, 2011 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Rating of Top Ten Legislative Councillors

| Abstract | Latest Figures | Indepth Analysis | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of HKSAR Government) |