HKU POP SITE releases popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability systemBack

 

Press Release on May 11, 2010

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


Special Announcement

Upon the invitation of the Justice and Peace Commission of the Hong Kong Catholic Diocese (HKJP), the Director of Public Opinion Programme at the University of Hong Kong Robert Chung has written an article entitled "the meaning of referendum movement" to discuss the issue of referendum. The Chinese version of the article was published in the May 2010 issue of the HKJP Newsletter, and uploaded onto the "POP Column" of the HKU POP Site (http://hkupop.pori.hk) on May 7, 2010 for public reference.


Abstract

HKUPOP interviewed 1,031 Hong Kong people between April 30 and May 6 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. Our latest survey shows that after a slight rebound at the end of last month, CE Donald Tsang's popularity has dropped again. In our latest survey, Donald Tsang's support rating has plunged 2.6 marks to 49.2, a record low since October last year. Changes in his approval and disapproval rates are within sampling errors, and his net popularity now stands at negative 14 percentage points. In between our last two surveys, Legco President Jasper Tsang said he might quit his presidential post to vote for the political reform package, Labour Day demonstrations happened, and whether CE would vote in the Legco by-election was discussed. All these might have affected CE's popularity. For the Secretaries of Departments, compared to one month ago, the popularity of CS Henry Tang, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung continue to drop, but only the support rating and approval rate of John Tsang have dropped beyond sampling error. The net approval rates of Tang, Tsang and Wong now stand at positive 24, 29 and 56 percentage points respectively. Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rates of 9 among 12 Directors have gone down, 2 remained unchanged and 1 has gone up. Among them, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan is the only one with a change in approval rate beyond sampling error, up by 5 percentage points. Three Directors have their disapproval rates gone up beyond sampling errors. Among the Secretaries and Directors, only Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam, Secretary for Education Michael Suen and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing register negative popularity, meaning that their disapproval rates are higher than their approval rates. Their net popularity figures now stand at negative 10, negative 8 and negative 3 percentage points. According to POP's standard, no official falls under the category of "ideal" performance. Ambrose Lee and Wong Yan-lung now fall under the category of "successful". John Tsang, Matthew Cheung, Carrie Lam, York Chow, Henry Tang, Eva Cheng, Edward Yau, Donald Tsang, Michael Suen, Stephen Lam and Tsang Tak-sing can be labeled as "mediocre". Ceajer Chan, Denise Yue and Rita Lau can be labeled as "inconspicuous". No official falls under the categories of "depressing" or "disastrous". The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is between +/-1 and +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 72%.

Points to note:
[1] The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
[2] The sample size of this survey is 1,031 successful interviews, not 1,031 x 72.4% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is between +/-1 and +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.3 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level".
[4] When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.



Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via POP SITE the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2009 year-end. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:
Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages[6]

30/4-6/5/10

1,031

72.4%

+/-3%

[6] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sample errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

[7] Based on 95% confidence interval.

"Maximum sampling errors" occur when survey figures are close to 50%. If the figures are close to 0% or 100%, the sampling error will diminish accordingly. The sampling errors of ratings, however, will depend on the distribution of the raw figures. Since January 2007, POP lists out the sampling errors of all survey figures in detail and explain them in due course. Recent popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

1-3/3/10

23-25/3/10

7-12/4/10

26-29/4/10

30/4-6/5/10

Latest Change

Sample base

1,005

1,012

1,009

1,010

1,031

--

Overall response rate

64.2%

69.3%

65.3%

69.5%

72.4%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & error[8]

--

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

53.1

52.5

50.7[9]

51.8

49.2 +/-1.3

-2.6[9]

Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang

42%[9]

38%[9]

34%[9]

37%

34+/-3%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang

42%

46%[9]

49%

46%

48+/-3%

+2%

[8] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.3, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[9] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


Figures on the latest popularity ratings of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

29/1-2/2/10

24/2/10

1-3/3/10

7-12/4/10

30/4-6/5/10

Latest Change[10]

Sample base

1,003

1,003[13]

1,005

1,009

1,031

--

Overall response rate

65.4%

65.4%

64.2%

65.3%

72.4%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & Error[11]

--

Ratings of CS Henry Tang

54.4

--

54.4

52.5[12]

51.8 +/-1.2

-0.7

Vote of confidence in CS Henry Tang

43%

--

46%

42%[12]

42+/-3%

--

Vote of no confidence in CS Henry Tang

16%

--

17%

18%

18+/-2%

--

Ratings of FS John Tsang

58.3

61.3[12]

57.4[12]

54.5[12]

53.1 +/-1.2

-1.4[12]

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

57%

53%

54%

53%

49+/-3%

-4%[12]

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang[

11%

8%[12]

18%[12]

19%

20+/-2%

+1%

Ratings of SJ Y.L. Wong

61.9

--

61.2

59.9[12]

58.9 +/-1.1

-1.0

Vote of confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

64%

--

64%

59%[12]

62+/-3%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

5%

--

6%

7%

6+/-1%

-1%

[10] The frequency of this series of questions is different for different questions, and also different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals.
[11] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.2, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[12] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
[13] The survey was conducted on February 24, and the sub-sample sizes of questions on FS's support rating and hypothetical voting were 689 and 576 respectively.


Figures on the latest popularity ratings of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

1-3/3/10

7-12/4/10

30/4-6/5/10

Latest Change

Total sample size[14]

1,005

1,009

1,031

--

Overall response rate

64.2%

65.3%

72.4%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer

Base

%

Base

%

Base

% and Error[15]

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

510

64%

589

65%

540

65+/-4%

--

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

510

8%[16]

589

8%

540

8+/-2%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

531

52%[16]

540

51%

580

48+/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

531

9%

540

14%[16]

580

16+/-3%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

521

52%[16]

533

48%

515

46+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

521

13%

533

18%[16]

515

18+/-3%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

540

53%[16]

564

47%[16]

576

45+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

540

23%

564

25%

576

30+/-4%

+5%[16]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

561

43%

512

41%

550

40+/-4%

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

561

18%

512

22%

550

26+/-4%

+4%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

541

38%

514

39%

519

37+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

541

15%

514

16%

519

22+/-4%

+6%[16]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

527

32%

551

28%

557

33+/-4%

+5%[16]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

527

9%[16]

551

15%[16]

557

11+/-3%

-4%[16]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

519

40%[16]

602

33%[16]

534

30+/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

519

27%[16]

602

36%[16]

534

38+/-4%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue[17]

548

35%

517

30%[16]

564

29+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

548

9%[16]

517

15%[16]

564

13+/-3%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam[17]

538

32%

590

29%

523

29+/-4%

--

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam

538

31%

590

33%

523

39+/-4%

+6%[16]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing[17]

563

31%

580

29%

528

28+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

563

29%

580

33%

528

31+/-4%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau[17]

518

27%

533

29%

528

28+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau

518

12%

533

12%

528

15+/-3%

+3%

[14] Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[15] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[16] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
[17] In one decimal place, the approval rates of Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue and Secretary for Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung are 29.3% and 28.7% respectively; while that for Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau Ng Wai-lan are 28.1% and 27.8% respectively.


The latest survey showed that, CE Donald Tsang scored 49.2 marks, and 34% supported him as the Chief Executive. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Henry Tang, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung were 51.8, 53.1 and 58.9 marks and 42%, 49% and 62% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly.

As for the Directors of Bureaux, results revealed that the top approval rate fell to Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee, attaining 65%. The 2nd place belonged to Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung, with 48% approval rate. Secretary for Development Carrie Lam and Secretary for Food and Health York Chow ranked 3rd and 4th, with approval rate 46% and 45% respectively. Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng and Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau ranked 5th and 6th, with approval rate 40% and 37% respectively. Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan, Secretary for Education Michael Suen, Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau ranked 7th to 12th, as they gained 33%, 30%, 29%, 29%, 28% and 28% support from the public respectively. In other words, only Ambrose Lee scored approval rate of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from April 7 to 12, 2010 while this survey was conducted from April 30 to May 6, 2010. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

5/5/10

The debt crisis in Europe affects the financial stability of the world.

4/5/10

Many newspapers report and discuss about the housing policy in Hong Kong.

3/5/10

The Urban Renewal Authority announces 8 new measures on property sales.

1/5/10

Hong Kong and Macau demonstrates on the first of May.

30/4/10

The Shanghai World Expo 2010 opens.

21/4/10

The HKSAR Government announces guidelines to regulate property sales arrangement.

19/4/10

Stock markets in China and Hong Kong plummet.

14/4/10

The Constitutional Reform Proposal in 2012 is unveiled by HKSAR government.

12/4/10

HK Government proposes three rules to tighten control on flat sales.

8/4/10

Geoffrey Ma Tao-li will succeed Andrew Li Kwok-nang as the new Chief Justice of the High Court in August.

7/4/10

China/Guangdong and Hong Kong signed the Framework Agreement.



Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP Robert Chung.

After a slight rebound at the end of last month, CE Donald Tsang's popularity has dropped again. In our latest survey, Donald Tsang's support rating has plunged 2.6 marks to 49.2, a record low since October last year. Changes in his approval and disapproval rates are within sampling errors, and his net popularity now stands at negative 14 percentage points. In between our last two surveys, Legco President Jasper Tsang said he might quit his presidential post to vote for the political reform package, Labour Day demonstrations happened, and whether CE would vote in the Legco by-election was discussed. All these might have affected CE's popularity.

For the Secretaries of Departments, compared to one month ago, the popularity of CS Henry Tang, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung continue to drop, but only the support rating and approval rate of John Tsang have dropped beyond sampling error. The net approval rates of Tang, Tsang and Wong now stand at positive 24, 29 and 56 percentage points respectively. Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rates of 9 among 12 Directors have gone down, 2 remained unchanged and 1 has gone up. Among them, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan is the only one with a change in approval rate beyond sampling error, up by 5 percentage points. Three Directors have their disapproval rates gone up beyond sampling errors.

Among the Secretaries and Directors, only Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam, Secretary for Education Michael Suen and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing register negative popularity, meaning that their disapproval rates are higher than their approval rates. Their net popularity figures now stand at negative 10, negative 8 and negative 3 percentage points.

According to POP's standard, no official falls under the category of "ideal" performance. Ambrose Lee and Wong Yan-lung now fall under the category of "successful". John Tsang, Matthew Cheung, Carrie Lam, York Chow, Henry Tang, Eva Cheng, Edward Yau, Donald Tsang, Michael Suen, Stephen Lam and Tsang Tak-sing can be labeled as "mediocre". Ceajer Chan, Denise Yue and Rita Lau can be labeled as "inconspicuous". No official falls under the categories of "depressing" or "disastrous". As for the reasons affecting the popularity change of these officials, readers can make their own judgment using detailed records shown in our "Opinion Daily" feature page.

The following table summarizes the grading of the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

"Ideal": those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

None

 

"Successful": those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong (65%); SJ Wong Yan-lung (62%)

 

"Mediocre": those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

FS John Tsang Chun-wah (49%); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (48%); Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (46%); Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok (45%); CS Henry Tang Ying-yen (42%); Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wah (40%); Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah (37%); CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen (34%); Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung (30%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung (29%); Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (28%)

 

"Inconspicuous": those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (33%, 44%); Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee (29%, 42%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau Ng Wai-lan (28%, 43%)

 

"Depressing": those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None

 

"Disastrous": those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None



Future Release (Tentative)
  • May 14, 2010 (Friday) 1pm to 2pm: 2010 Legislative Council By-election Survey Third Summary Report
  • May 18, 2010 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Hong Kong people's feeling towards different governments and peoples

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |