HKU POP SITE releases popularity figures of Executive Councillors, Under Secretaries and Political AssistantsBack

 
Press Release on November 3, 2009

| Abstract | Latest Figures | (1) Top 5 members of Executive Council | | (2) Under Secretaries and Political Assistants |
| Future Releases (Tentative)
| Detailed Findings (Rating of Top Five Executive Council Non-Official Members /
Popularity of Under Secretaries and Political Assistants
)|


Abstract

The latest survey conducted by the Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong shows that compared to three months ago, with the recovery of the popularity of the CE and the government from their new lows, the popularity ratings of the "top 5" non-official Executive Councillors have all gone up in parallel. In terms of relative rankings, Cheng Yiu-tong and Lau Kong-wah who occupied the 3rd and 4th places last time have swapped positions, while other positions remain unchanged. The top five places in descending order are Ronald Arculli, Leung Chun-ying, Lau Kong-wah, Cheng Yiu-tong and Lau Wong-fat. As for the Under Secretaries and Political Assistants, the survey finds that 7 out of 9 old and new Under Secretaries have above-zero recognition rates, 6 out of 9 Political Assistants have zero recognition, while no official has a recognition rate up to 2%. All three figures are worse than three months ago. Director of POP Robert Chung announced that since POP's past 7 surveys spanning over 18 months have consistently shown that people practically know nothing about these Under Secretaries and Political Assistants, and the situation seems to be getting worse, POP has decided to stop conducting such surveys in order to deploy its resources to other more meaningful surveys. POP will leave it to other people to monitor the performance of these officials by other scientific means. The maximum sampling errors of percentages cited above fall between +/-1% and +/- 3% while those of ratings are between +/-1.3 and +/-1.8. The response rate of the latest survey is 70%.

Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via the "POP SITE" the latest popularity figures of Executive Councilors, Under Secretaries and Political Assistants. As a general practice, all figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in mid-2009.

 

(1) Top 5 members of Executive Council

Herewith the contact information for the latest survey on the Top 5 members of Executive Council:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Sampling error of percentages/ratings [1]

4-9/1/2010
(First stage naming survey)

1,011

68.0%

+/-3%

11-13/1/2010
(Second stage rating survey)

1,008

70.3%

+/-1.8

[1] Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

The research design of our "Top 5 Executive Councilors" is similar to that of our "Top 10" series, it is explained in detail under "Survey Method" in our web page. The top councillors listed in our latest survey were all those who obtained the highest unprompted mentions in our first stage naming survey conducted in early January. In that survey, respondents could name, unaided, up to 5 non-official Executive Councillors whom they knew best. Leung Chun-ying, Cheng Yiu-tong, Lau Wong-fat, Lau Kong Wah, Anthony Cheung, Ronald Arculli, Laura M Cha, Lawrence Lau Juen-yee, Anna Wu Hung-yuk and Leong Che-hung were the ten most frequently mentioned councillors. Please refer to the relevant table in our website for the rest of the list. Those 6 who were named most frequently then entered into the second stage rating survey. During the second stage rating survey conducted in mid January, respondents were asked to rate each short-listed councillor in turn using a 0-100 scale. 0 indicates absolutely no support, 100 indicates absolute support, and 50 means half-half. After calculation, the bottom 1 councillor in terms of recognition rate was dropped; the remaining 5 were then ranked according to their support ratings attained to become the top 5 Executive Councillors. Recent ratings of the top 5 members of Executive Council are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

12-13/1/09

6-9/4/09

20-23/7/09

20-30/10/09

11-13/1/2010

Latest Change

Sample base

1,015

1,010

1,003

1,005

1,008

--

Overall response rate

70.2%

67.5%

68.7%

73.1%

70.3%

--

Finding/ Recognition rate

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error [2]

Regconition rate

--

Ronald Arculli

55.5 {1}

57.1 {1}[4]

51.1 {1} [4]

50.9 {1}

56.5+/-1.3{1}

78.3%

+5.6[4]

Leung Chun-ying

49.1 {5} [4]

51.4 {2} [4]

46.7 {2} [4]

44.7 {2} [4]

49.2+/-1.6{2}

81.9%

+4.5[4]

Lau Kong-wah

49.8 {3} [4]

51.1 {3}

41.4 {4} [4]

41.5{4}

46.1 +/-1.8 {3}

75.5%

+4.6[4]

Cheng Yiu-tong

49.6 {4}

51.0 {4}

42.6 {3} [4]

41.9 {3}

44.9+/-1.8{4}

73.7%

+3.0[4]

Lau Wong-fat

--

46.4{5}

37.6 {5} [4]

37.8 {5}

43.7+/-1.6{5}

83.1%

+5.9[4]

Anthony Cheung

55.2 {2}

55.6 [3]

49.0 [3] [4]

49.6 [3]

54.1+/-1.6[3]

56.9%

+4.5[4]

Laura Cha

49.3 [3]

--

--

--

--

--

--

[2] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level", meaning that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.8 at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. Numbers in square brackets { } indicates rankings. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[3] Ratings with recognition rates not reaching top 5 in either stage of survey are not available.
[4] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


The latest survey conducted in mid-January showed that Ronald Arculli was the most popularly supported non-official Executive Councillor, attaining 56.5 marks. The 2nd rank went to Leung Chun-ying with 49.2 marks. The 3rd to 5th ranks went to Lau Kong-wah, Cheng Yiu-tong and Lau Wong-fat, with 46.1, 44.9 and 43.7 marks respectively. The mean score obtained by these top 5 non-official Executive Councillors was 48.1 marks. For this latest survey, Anthony Cheung obtained a support rating of 54.1 marks, but he was dropped due to his relatively low recognition rate. The overall ratings ranked according to results obtained over the past year are tabulated as follows:

Date of survey

12-13/1/09

6-9/4/09

20-23/7/09

20-30/10/09

No.of times on top 5

Average rating [5]

Overall ranking [6]

Ronald Arculli

57.1

51.1

50.9

56.5

4

53.9

1

Leung Chun-ying

51.4

46.7

44.7

49.2

4

48.0

2

Cheung Yiu-tong

51.0

42.6

41.9

44.9

4

45.1

3

Lau Kong-wah

51.1

41.4

41.5

46.1

4

45.0

4

Lau Wong-fat

46.4

37.6

37.8

43.7

4

41.4

5

Anthony Cheung

[7]

[7]

[7]

[7]

--

--

--

[5] "Average rating" is the average of all ratings obtained by Executive Councillors over the past 4 surveys.
[6] "Overall ranking" is first determined by their number of times on top 10, and then their average ratings.
[7] Ratings with recognition rates not reaching top 5 in either stage of survey are not available.


The overall rankings in the past year showed that five non-official Executive Councillors have been on the list for four times. Ronald Arculli, Leung Chun-ying, Cheung Yiu-yong, Lau Kong-wah and Lau Wong-fat ranked 1st to 5th place respectively. They achieved an average rating of 53.9, 48.0, 45.1, 45.0 and 41.4 marks respectively.

Director of POP Robert Chung observed, "Compared to three months ago, with the recovery of the popularity of the CE and the government from their new lows, the popularity ratings of the "top 5" non-official Executive Councillors have all gone up in parallel. In terms of relative rankings, Cheng Yiu-tong and Lau Kong-wah who occupied the 3rd and 4th places last time have swapped positions, while other positions remain unchanged. The top five places in descending order are Ronald Arculli, Leung Chun-ying, Lau Kong-wah, Cheng Yiu-tong and Lau Wong-fat. It should be noted, however, that our list of "top five" only includes non-official councillors best known to the public, ranked according to their support ratings. Some of the other councillors may well have very high or low support ratings, but because they are not the most well-known councillors, they do not appear on the list by design. As for the reasons affecting the ups and downs of these popularity ratings, we leave it to our readers to form their own judgment using the detailed records displayed in the "Opinion Daily" of our POP Site."

(2) Under Secretaries and Political Assistants

In May 2008, the HKSAR Government announced the list of newly employed Under Secretaries and Political Assistants. POP has now conducted a survey once every three months to gauge people's familiarity with these officials, as a test of their popularity. Herewith the contact information for the survey:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Sampling error of percentages [8]

4-9/1/2010

1,011

68.0%

+/-3%

[8] Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified.

Herewith the result of our latest survey on "people's most familiar Under Secretaries":

Date of survey

14-18/7/09

20-30/10/09

4-9/1/10

Lastest Change

Sub-sample base

529

562

518

--

Latest finding/Rank

Percentage

Percentage

Percentage and error [9]

Rank

--

Under Secretary for Food and Health Gabriel Matthew Leung [11]

1.5%[10]

1.2%

1.6%+/-1%

1

+0.4%

Under Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung [11]

3.1%[10]

1.5%[10]

1.6%+/-1%

2

+0.1%

Under Secretary for the Environment Kitty Poon Kit [11]

1.2%

2.3%[10]

1.6%+/-1%

3

-0.7%

Under Secretary for Education Kenneth Chen Wei-on

2.0%

2.1%

0.6%+/-1%

4

-1.5%[10]

Under Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Julia Leung Fung-yee [12]

0.9%

0.3%

0.3%+/-1%

5

--

Under Secretary for Transport and Housing Yau Shing-mu [12]

0.8%

1.7%

0.3%+/-1%

6

-1.4%[10]

Under Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok

not app.

1.0%[13]

0.2%+/-1%

7

-0.8%

Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Adeline Wong Ching-man

not app.

1.9%[13]

0.0%

--

--

Under Secretary for Home Affairs Florence Hui Hiu-fai

0.2%

0.3%

0.0%

--

--

Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam Chi-yuen [14]

0.8%

not app.

not app.

--

--

Wrongly answered the name of Secretaries of Departments/Directors of Bureaux

3.3%

9.0%[10]

3.3%+/-1%

--

-5.7%[10]

Wrongly answered the name of Political Assistants

1.6%

1.7%

0.2%+/-1%

--

-1.5%[10]

Wrongly answered the name of others

3.6%[10]

5.0%

1.4%+/-1%

--

-3.6%[10]

Don't know

86.0%[10]

78.6%[10]

90.1%+/-3%

--

+11.5%[10]

[9] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[10] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
[11] The percentages of respondents who could name Gabriel Matthew Leung, Gregory So and Kitty Poon were 1.612%, 1.609% and 1.574% respectively. Hence Gabriel Matthew Leung ranked the 1st, Gregory So ranked the 2nd while Kitty Poon was placed at 3rd rank.
[12] The percentages of respondents who could name Julia Leung and Yau Shing-mu were 0.33% and 0.29% respectively. Hence Julia Leung ranked the 5th and Yau Shing-mu ranked the 6th rank.
[13] On October 22, 2009 the goverrnment announced the appointment of Adeline Wong Ching-man as the Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs, and Lai Tung-kwok as the Under Secretary for Security. POP immediately included them in the survey, with a sub-sample size of 385 cases.
[14] Raymond Tam Chi-yuen became the Director of the Chief Executive's Office on August 1, 2009.


Herewith the result of our latest survey on "people's most familiar Political Assistants":

Date of survey

14-18/7/09

20-30/10/09

4-9/1/2010

Latest Change

Sub-sample base

529

562

517

--

Latest finding/Rank

Percentage

Percentage

Percentage and error [15]

Rank

--

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Labour & Welfare Zandra Mok Yee-tuen

0.8%

0.6%

0.5%+/-1%

1

-0.1%

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Education Jeremy Young Chit-on

0.9%

0.3%

0.4%+/-1%

2

+0.1%

Political Assistant to the Financial Secretary Frankie Yip

0.3%

0.0%

0.2%+/-1%

3

+0.2%

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Security Victor Lo Yik-kee

0.0%

0.4%

0.0%

--

--

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Development Raymond Cheung Man-to

0.0%

0.1%

0.0%

--

--

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Katherine Ng Kit-shuen

0.4%

0.0%

0.0%

--

--

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Food & Health Paul Chan Chi-yuen

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

--

--

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Environment Linda Choy Siu-min

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

--

--

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Home Affairs Caspar Tsui

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

--

--

Wrongly answered the name of Secretaries of Departments/Directors of Bureaux

0.5%[16]

3.1%[16]

0.8%+/-1%

--

-2.3%[16]

Wrongly answered the name of Under Secretaries

1.1%

1.3%

0.7%+/-1%

--

-0.6%

Wrongly answered the name of others

1.6%

1.8%

0.8%+/-1%

--

-1%

Don't know

94.9%

92.8%[16]

96.7%+/-2%

--

+3.9%[16]

[15] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[16] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


In our naming survey conducted in early January, respondents could name, unaided, Under Secretaries and Political Assistants whom they knew best. Results showed that seven Under Secretaries were mentioned, they were Gabriel Matthew Leung, Gregory So, Kitty Poon, Kenneth Chen, Julia Leung, Yau Shing-mu and Lai Tung-kwok. The corresponding percentages of respondents who could name these figures were 1.6%, 1.6%, 1.6%, 0.6%, 0.3%, 0.3% and 0.2%. Yet, 90.1% of the respondents could not recall any names of Under Secretaries. As for Political Assistants, only three Political Assistants were mentioned, they were Zandra Mok, Jeremy Young and Frankie Yip. The corresponding percentages of respondents who could name these figures were all less than 1%. Yet, 96.7% of the respondents could not recall any names of Political Assistants.

Director of POP Robert Chung observed, 「In our latest survey, 7 out of 9 old and new Under Secretaries have above-zero recognition rates, 6 out of 9 Political Assistants have zero recognition, while no official has a recognition rate up to 2%. All three figures are worse than three months ago. Since our past 7 surveys spanning over 18 months have consistently shown that people practically know nothing about these Under Secretaries and Political Assistants, and the situation seems to be getting worse, we have decided to stop conducting such surveys in order to deploy our resources to other more meaningful surveys. We leave it to other people to monitor the performance of these officials by other scientific means.

Future Releases (Tentative)
  • January 21, 2010 (Thursday) 1pm to 2pm: Freedom Indicators
  • January 26, 2009 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Popularity of CE Donald Tsang and Principal Officials

| Abstract | Latest Figures | (1) Top 5 members of Executive Council | (2) Under Secretaries and Political Assistants |
|
Next Release (Tentative) | Detailed Findings (Rating of Top Five Executive Council Non-Official Members /
Popularity of Under Secretaries and Political Assistants
)|