HKU POP SITE releases popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability systemBack

 
Press Release on November 10, 2009

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative)
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


Special Announcement

 

(1) The Public Opinion Programme at the University of Hong Kong will release on November 12 (Thursday) via POP SITE the findings of the latest survey of WorldPublicOpinion.org (WPO) conducted around the world. The topic of the survey is World Views of China and the United States. The survey interviewed 20,349 people in 23 regions worldwide between April 4 and July 9, 2009.

(2) Director of POP Robert Chung delivered his 「Hong Kong Letter」 entitled "Popularity of the Chief Executive" on RTHK last Saturday. With the consent of RTHK, its content has been uploaded under POP column at the POP SITE.


Abstract

 

POP interviewed 1,007 Hong Kong people between November 3 and 7 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. The survey shows that compared to the last survey, CE Donald Tsang's support rating has gone up by 1.3 marks, his approval rate is up by 3 percentage points, and his disapproval rate down by 3 percentage points. All changes are just below sampling errors. CE's net popularity now stands at negative 8 percentage points, with a support rating still below 50. For the Secretaries of Departments, compared to one month ago, the support ratings of CS Henry Tang and FS John Tsang have significantly gone down by 2.0 and 2.9 marks respectively, while the approval rate of FS John Tsang is significantly down by 5 percentage points. Both the support rating and approval rate of SJ Wong Yan-lung have remained stable. The net approval rates of the three officials now stand at positive 40, 40 and 61 percentage points respectively. Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rates of 5 among 12 Directors have gone up, 5 have gone down, while 2 remain unchanged. Among them, those with changes in approval rate beyond sampling error include Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau, both up by 7 percentage points, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan, down 7 percentage points, and Secretary for Development Carrie Lam, down 6 percentage points. Among the Directors of Bureaux, only Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam and Secretary for Education Michael Suen register negative popularity, meaning that their disapproval rates are higher than their approval rates. Their net popularity figures now stand at negative 6 and negative 4 percentage points. According to the benchmarks set by us quite some time ago, Ambrose Lee now falls under the category of "ideal" performance. Wong Yan-lung, John Tsang, Matthew Cheung, Henry Tang and York Chow can be labeled as "successful", Carrie Lam, Eva Cheng, Donald Tsang, Edward Yau, Michael Suen, Tsang Tak-sing and Stephen Lam can be labeled as "mediocre", Denise Yue, Ceajer Chan and Rita Lau can be labeled as "inconspicuous". No official falls under the categories of "depressing" or "disastrous". Director of POP Robert Chung explains that statistically speaking, changes in CE Donald Tsang's popularity figures fall within sampling errors means that such changes are not significant at 95% confidence level, but that does not mean that they are not practically useful or meaningful. One needs to look at other related figures, the sample size of surveys, and the trend of changes. On the whole, CE Donald Tsang's popularity seems to have recovered from its record low, but is still negative. The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is between +/-1 and +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 72%.

Points to note:
* The address of the 「HKU POP SITE」 is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
* The sample size of this survey is 1,007 successful interviews, not 1,007 x 71.8% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
* The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is between +/-1 and +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.4 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/- 4% at 95% confidence level".
* When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
* The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.

 

Latest Figures

 

POP today releases on schedule via POP SITE the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in mid-2009. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages*

3-7/11/09

1,007

71.8%

+/-4%

* Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. 「95% confidence level」 means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

 

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sample errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages*
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages*
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

* Based on 95% confidence interval.

 

「Maximum sampling errors」 occur when survey figures are close to 50%. If the figures are close to 0% or 100%, the sampling error will diminish accordingly. The sampling errors of ratings, however, will depend on the distribution of the raw figures. Since January 2007, POP lists out the sampling errors of all survey figures in detail and explain them in due course. Recent popularity figures of Donald Tsang are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

14-17/9/09

6-11/10/09

14/10/09^^

20-30/10/09

3-7/11/09

Latest Change

Sample base

1,004

1,010

1,007

1,005

1,007

--

Overall response rate

65.4%

67.5%

71.9%

73.1%

71.8%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & error*

--

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

54.8#

55.2

54.2

48.4#

49.7+/-1.4

+1.3

Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang

47%#

45%

45%

35%#

38%+/-3%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang

40%

38%

37%

49%#

46%+/-3%

-3%

* Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.4, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

 

Figures on the latest popularity ratings of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

6-12/7/09

4-10/8/09

1-4/9/09

6-11/10/09

3-7/11/09

Latest Change*

Sample base

1,006

1,001

1,002

1,010

1,007

--

Overall response rate

68.8%

70.5%

60.5%

67.5%

71.8%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & Error**

--

Ratings of CS Henry Tang

56.0

56.1

55.6

57.6#

55.6+/-1.1

-2.0#

Vote of confidence in CS Henry Tang

46%

44%

48%#

53%#

50%+/-3%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in CS Henry Tang

14%

16%

13%#

11%

10%+/-2%

-1%

Ratings of FS John Tsang

53.5

53.3

53.3

58.7#

55.8+/-1.1

-2.9#

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

44%

43%

41%

58%#

53%+/-3%

-5%#

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang

21%

20%

16%#

11%#

13%+/-2%

+2%

Ratings of SJ Y.L. Wong

60.8

61.5

60.3

62.1#

61.9+/-1.0

-0.2

Vote of confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

63%

62%

60%

64%#

65%+/-3%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

5%

6%

6%

5%

4%+/-1%

-1%

* The frequency of this series of questions is different for different questions, and also different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals.
** Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.1, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

 

Figures on the latest popularity ratings of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

1-4/9/09

6-11/10/09

3-7/11/09

Latest Change

Total sample size*

1,002

1,010

1,007

--

Overall response rate

60.5%

67.5%

71.8%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer

Base

%

Base

%

Base

%and Error**

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

565

69%

517

66%

525

67%+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

565

8%

517

6%

525

7%+/-2%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

565

53%#

553

55%

540

52%+/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

565

9%

553

8%

540

11%+/-3%

+3%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

542

46%#

550

49%

536

50%+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

542

29%#

550

24%#

536

24%+/-4%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

532

46%

512

51%#

509

45%+/-4%

-6%#

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

532

10%

512

11%

509

13%+/-4%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

564

34%

531

33%

527

40%+/-4%

+7%#

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

564

12%

531

12%

527

17%+/-3%

+5%#

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

520

32%#

567

36%

515

36%+/-4%

--

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

520

17%

567

13%#

515

19%+/-4%

+6%#

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue^

522

33%

521

34%

528

32%+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

522

12%

521

12%

528

13%+/-3%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen^

501

30%

543

31%

516

32%+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

501

37%

543

34%

516

36%+/-4%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

513

34%

530

37%

523

30%+/-4%

-7%#

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

513

15%

530

8% #

523

14%+/-3%

+6%#

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

505

30%

536

29%

537

29%+/-4%

--

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

505

29%

536

30%

537

28%+/-4%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau ^^

503

26%

529

21%#

527

28%+/-4%

+7%#

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau

503

10%

529

12%

527

14%+/-3%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam^^

502

30%

527

30%

516

28%+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam

502

32%

527

33%

516

34%+/-4%

+1%

* Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
** Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
^ The approval rates of Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue and Secretary for Education Michael Suen are 32.3% and 31.7% respectively
^^ The approval rates of Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau and Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam are 28.5% and 28.1% respectively.

 

The latest survey showed that, CE Donald Tsang scored 49.7 marks, and 38% supported him as the Chief Executive. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Henry Tang, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung were 55.6, 55.8 and 61.9 marks, and 50%, 53% and 65% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, results revealed that the top approval rate fell to Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee, attaining 67%. Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung ranked the 2nd and attained 52%. Secretary for Food and Health York Chow and Secretary for Development Carrie Lam ranked the 3rd and 4th places as they gained 50% and 45% vote of confidence from the public respectively. The 5th to 10th ranks went to Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng, Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau, Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue, Secretary for Education Michael Suen, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, with respective support rates of 40%, 36%, 32%, 32%, 30% and 29%. Meanwhile, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau and Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen lam shared the 11th rank, both achieving 28%. In other words, only Ambrose Lee, Matthew Cheung and York Chow scored approval rates of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.

 

Opinion Daily

 

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from October 6 to 11, 2009 while this survey was conducted from November 3 to 7, 2009. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

 

27/10/09

  1. Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah initiates a meeting with major property developers to discuss the soaring housing prices.
  2. Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen launches a scathing attack on the media.

24/10/09

Many newspapers on the following day keep reporting CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen's sister-in-law got compensation for losses on Lehman Brothers minibonds. 

23/10/09

Many newspapers on the following day keep on reporting and discussing to slow a surge in luxury property price. 

22/10/09

Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen names two new undersecretaries to join his embattled team of political appointees.

21/10/09

Many newspapers on the following day keep on reporting and discussing the possible bubble caused by extreme high property price. 

20/10/09

Many newspapers on the following day keep on reporting and discussing the plan of Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link.

18/10/09

Many newspapers on the following day keep on reporting and discussing the conflicts of interests in the lightbulb plan invloving CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen. 

16/10/09

Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen stresses that there is no conflicts of interests in the lightbulb plan.

15/10/09

Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen says properties are still affordable for Hong Kong people. 

14/10/09

Many newspapers on the following day report and discuss on the Chief Executive Donald Tsang's Policy Address. 


Commentary

 

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP Robert Chung.

 

Our latest survey shows that compared to the last survey, CE Donald Tsang's support rating has gone up by 1.3 marks, his approval rate is up by 3 percentage points, and his disapproval rate down by 3 percentage points. All changes are just below sampling errors. CE's net popularity now stands at negative 8 percentage points, with a support rating still below 50. It should be noted that statistically speaking, changes within sampling errors means that such changes are not significant at 95% confidence level, but that does not mean that they are not practically useful or meaningful. One needs to look at other related figures, the sample size of surveys, and the trend of changes. On the whole, CE Donald Tsang's popularity seems to have recovered from its record low, but is still negative.

 

For the Secretaries of Departments, compared to one month ago, the support ratings of CS Henry Tang and FS John Tsang have significantly gone down by 2.0 and 2.9 marks respectively, while the approval rate of FS John Tsang is significantly down by 5 percentage points. Both the support rating and approval rate of SJ Wong Yan-lung have remained stable. The net approval rates of the three officials now stand at positive 40, 40 and 61 percentage points respectively. Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rates of 5 among 12 Directors have gone up, 5 have gone down, while 2 remain unchanged. Among them, those with changes in approval rate beyond sampling error include Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau, both up by 7 percentage points, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan, down 7 percentage points, and Secretary for Development Carrie Lam, down 6 percentage points.

 

Among the Directors of Bureaux, only Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam and Secretary for Education Michael Suen register negative popularity, meaning that their disapproval rates are higher than their approval rates. Their net popularity figures now stand at negative 6 and negative 4 percentage points.

 

According to the benchmarks set by us quite some time ago, Ambrose Lee now falls under the category of "ideal" performance. Wong Yan-lung, John Tsang, Matthew Cheung, Henry Tang and York Chow can be labeled as "successful", Carrie Lam, Eva Cheng, Donald Tsang, Edward Yau, Michael Suen, Tsang Tak-sing and Stephen Lam can be labeled as "mediocre", Denise Yue, Ceajer Chan and Rita Lau can be labeled as "inconspicuous". No official falls under the categories of "depressing" or "disastrous". As for the reasons affecting the popularity change of these officials, readers can make their own judgment using detailed records shown in our "Opinion Daily" feature page.



The following table summarizes the grading of the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

 

"Ideal": those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong (67%)

 

"Successful": those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

SJ Wong Yan-lung (65%); FS John Tsang Chun-wah (53%); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (52%); CS Henry Tang Ying-yen (50%*) and Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok (50%*)

 

"Mediocre": those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (45%); Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wah (40%); CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen (38%); Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah (36%); Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung (32%); Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (29%) and Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung (28%)

 

"Inconspicuous": those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee (32%, 46%); Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (30%, 44%) and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau Ng Wai-lan (28%, 42%)

 

"Depressing": those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None

 

"Disastrous": those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None

*Approval rate of CS Henry Tang Ying-yen is 50.4%;approval rate of Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok is 50.1%


Future Release (Tentative)

 

  • November 12, 2009 (Thursday) 1pm to 2pm: World views on China and the United States
  • November 17, 2009 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Hong Kong people's feeling towards different governments and peoples

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative)
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |