HKU POP SITE releases popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, HKSAR Government, Executive Councilors, Under Secretaries and Political AssistantsBack

 
Press Release on November 3, 2009

| Abstract | Latest Figures | (1) Popularity Figures of CE Donald Tsang and the HKSAR Government |
(2) Top 5 members of Executive Council
| (3) Under Secretaries and Political Assistants | Next Release (Tentative)
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of HKSAR Government/
Rating of Top Five Executive Council Non-Official Members /Popularity of Under Secretaries and Political Assistants
)|


Abstract
The latest survey conducted by the Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong shows that CE Donald Tsang's support rating and approval rate have both dropped to record low since he became CE. In terms of total sample, his support rating has dropped below 50 for the first time, while his net approval rate now stands at negative 14 percentage points. As for the popularity of the SAR Government, compared to a month ago, people's dissatisfaction rate has surged by 10 percentage points to reach its record high since January 2005. The government's net popularity has plummeted to negative 12 percentage points. Director of POP Robert Chung has already pointed out in 2003 that 「a political figure with less than 50 marks can be said to have fallen into negative popularity, while a score of less than 45 marks can indicate credibility crisis」. Using this analysis, Tsang is not yet facing a credibility crisis, but he has to be careful. The survey also finds that the popularity ratings of the 「top 5」 non-official Executive Councillors have remained very stable, except Leung Chun-ying whose popularity rating has registered a significant decrease. The relative rankings of all councillors have remained exactly the same. They are, in descending order, Ronald Arculli, Leung Chun-ying, Cheng Yiu-tong, Lau Kong-wah and Lau Wong-fat occupying from the 1st to 5th places. As for the Under Secretaries and Political Assistants, the survey finds that all 9 old and new Under Secretaries have above-zero recognition rates, while 5 out of 9 Political Assistants have zero recognition. The situation is exactly like that three months ago, without any progress. No official has a recognition rate up to 3%, meaning that people are still not familiar with the team. The sampling errors of percentages registered fall between +/-1% and +/- 3% while those of ratings are between +/-1.4 and +/-1.6. The response rate of the latest survey is 73%.

Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via the "POP SITE" the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, HKSAR Government, Executive Councilors, Under Secretaries and Political Assistants. As a general practice, all figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in mid-2009.

(1) Popularity Figures of CE Donald Tsang and the HKSAR Government

Herewith the contact information for the latest survey on the popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang and HKSAR Government:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Sampling error of percentages*

20-30/10/09

1,005

73.1%

+/-3%

* Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. 「95% confidence level」 means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

Recent popularity figures of Donald Tsang and people's satisfaction of the overall performance of the HKSAR Government are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

1-4/9/09

14-17/9/09

6-11/10/09

14/10/09^^

20-30/10/09

Latest Change^

Sample base

1,002

1,004

1,010

1,007

1,005

--

Overall response rate

60.5%

65.4%

67.5%

71.9%

73.1%

--

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and Error*

--

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

52.8#

54.8#

55.2

54.2

48.4 +/-1.4

-5.8#

Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang

42%

47%#

45%

45%

35% +/-3%

-10%#

Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang

42%#

40%

38%

37%

49% +/-3%

+12%#

Satisfaction rate of SARG performance **

--

31%

--

--

27% +/-3%

-4%#

Dissatisfaction rate of SARG performance**

--

29%

--

--

39% +/-3%

+10%#

* Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. 「95% confidence level」 means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state 「sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.4, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level」 when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
** Collapsed from a 5-point scale.
^ The polling cycle for different items varies. Parallel comparison across items should be synchronized.
^^ These questions only use sub-samples of the survey concerned. The sub-sample sizes of questions on CE's support rating and hypothetical voting were 735 and 742 respectively.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

The latest survey conducted in late-October showed that, CE Donald Tsang scored 48.4 marks, and 35% supported him as the Chief Executive while another 49% opposed. Regarding people's appraisal of the overall performance of the HKSAR Government, the latest figures revealed that 27% were satisfied, whereas 39% were dissatisfied.

Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of POP, observed, 「Our latest survey shows that CE Donald Tsang's support rating and approval rate have both dropped to record low since he became CE. In terms of total sample, his support rating has dropped below 50 for the first time, while his net approval rate now stands at negative 14 percentage points. As for the popularity of the SAR Government, compared to a month ago, people's dissatisfaction rate has surged by 10 percentage points to reach its record high since January 2005. The government's net popularity has plummeted to negative 12 percentage points. Regarding the reasons for CE's popularity plunge, the following table of sub-sample figures across different stages of the survey may be quite telling:

Date of Survey^

20-21/10/09

22-23/10/09

26/10/09

28-30/10/09

Sub-sample base^^

176

94

260

475

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

50.9 +/-3.3

47.2 +/-4.2

46.9 +/-2.8

48.6 +/-2.1

Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang

42% +/-7%

25% +/-9%

35% +/-6%

34% +/-4%

Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang

41% +/-7%

50% +/-11%

53% +/-6%

48% +/-5%

^ The survey period is segregated by these events: 22/10/09 CE appointed new Under Secretaries, 24/10/09 Media reported CE's sister-in-law's involvement in Lehman Brothers minibonds, 27/10/09 CE criticized the media. The period of this survey is quite long, with some dates jumped. Please refer to 「Opinion Daily」 in the POP Site for daily figures.
^^ Sampling errors for different sub-samples vary with their sizes. All errors have been reported in detail, calculated at 95% confidence level, meaning that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

On May 14, 2003, I published an article on 「The Popularity of Tung Chee-hwa from All Angles」. I pointed out that "a political figure with less than 50 marks can be said to have fallen into negative popularity, while a score of less than 45 marks can indicate credibility crisis" (see "POP Column" in the POP Site). Using this analysis, Tsang is not yet facing a credibility crisis, but he has to be careful. According to our records, the support rating of Former CE Tung Chee-hwa first dropped below 45 marks in March 2003, and couldn't clear himself of this dangerous zone until July 2004. During the same period, Tung's approval rate has basically remained below 20%. His popularity remained negative until he left office.」

(2) Top 5 members of Executive Council

Herewith the contact information for the latest survey on the Top 5 members of Executive Council:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Sampling error of percentages/ratings*

15-19/10/09
(First stage naming survey)

1,002

69.9%

+/-3%

20-30/10/09
(Second stage rating survey)

1,005

73.1%

+/-1.6

* Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. 「95% confidence level」 means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

The research design of our 「Top 5 Executive Councilors」 is similar to that of our 「Top 10」 series, it is explained in detail under 「Survey Method」 in our web page. The top councillors listed in our latest survey were all those who obtained the highest unprompted mentions in our first stage naming survey conducted in mid-October. In that survey, respondents could name, unaided, up to 5 non-official Executive Councillors whom they knew best. Leung Chun-ying, Lau Wong-fat, Cheng Yiu-tong, Lau Kong Wah, Ronald Arculli, Anthony Cheung, Laura M Cha, Lawrence Lau Juen-yee, V Nee Yeh and Anna Wu Hung-yuk were the ten most frequently mentioned councillors. Please refer to the relevant table in our website for the rest of the list. Those 6 who were named most frequently then entered into the second stage rating survey. During the second stage rating survey conducted in late October, respondents were asked to rate each short-listed councillor in turn using a 0-100 scale. 0 indicates absolutely no support, 100 indicates absolute support, and 50 means half-half. After calculation, the bottom 1 councillor in terms of recognition rate was dropped; the remaining 5 were then ranked according to their support ratings attained to become the top 5 Executive Councillors. Recent ratings of the top 5 members of Executive Council are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

27-29/10/08

12-13/1/09

6-9/4/09

20-23/7/09

20-30/10/09

Latest Change

Sample base

1,015

1,015

1,010

1,003

1,005

--

Overall response rate

70.3%

70.2%

67.5%

68.7%

73.1%

--

Finding/ Recognition rate

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error*

Regconition rate

--

Ronald Arculli

54.9 [1]#

55.5 [1]

57.1 [1]#

51.1 [1]#

50.9 +/-1.4[1]

79.5%

-0.2

Leung Chun-ying

47.3 [4]#

49.1 [5]#

51.4 [2]#

46.7 [2]#

44.7 +/-1.4[2]

87.6%

-2.0#

Cheng Yiu-tong

48.6 [3]#

49.6 [4]

51.0 [4]

42.6 [3]#

41.9 +/-1.6[3]

77.8%

-0.7

Lau Kong-wah

46.5 [5]

49.8 [3]#

51.1 [3]

41.4 [4]#

41.5 +/-1.6[4]

79.9%

+0.1

Lau Wong-fat

Not a Exco member then

46.4[5]

37.6 [5]#

37.8 +/-1.5[5]

86.1%

+0.2

Anthony Cheung

53.7 [2]#

55.2 [2]

55.6 [**]

49.0 [**]#

49.6 +/-1.6[**]

62.9%

+0.6

Laura Cha

--

49.3 [**]

--

--

--

--

--

Bernard Cahn

53.2 [**]#

--

--

--

--

--

--

* Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level", meaning that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.6 at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
** Ratings with recognition rates not reaching top 5 in either stage of survey are not available.
[ ] Number in square brackets indicates rankings.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

The latest survey conducted in late-October showed that Ronald Arculli was the most popularly supported non-official Executive Councillor, attaining 50.9 marks. The 2nd to 4th ranks went to Leung Chun-ying, Cheng Yiu-tong and Lau Kong-wah, with 44.7, 41.9 and 41.5 marks respectively. The 5th rank went to Lau Wong-fat with 37.8 marks. The mean score obtained by these top 5 non-official Executive Councillors was 43.4 marks. For this latest survey, Anthony Cheung obtained a support rating of 49.6 marks, but he was dropped due to his relatively low recognition rate. The overall ratings ranked according to results obtained over the past year are tabulated as follows:

Date of survey

12-13/1/09

6-9/4/09

20-23/7/09

20-30/10/09

No.of times on top 5*

Average rating*

Overall ranking**

Ronald Arculli

55.5

57.1

51.1

50.9

4

53.7

1

Leung Chun-ying

49.1

51.4

46.7

44.7

4

48.0

2

Cheung Yiu-tong

49.6

51.0

42.6

41.9

4

46.3

3

Lau Kong-wah

49.8

51.1

41.4

41.5

4

45.9

4

Lau Wong-fat

-

46.4

37.6

37.8

3

40.6

5

Anthony Cheung

55.2

^

^

^

1

55.2

6

* 「Average rating」 is the average of all ratings obtained by Executive Councillors over the past 4 surveys.
** 「Overall ranking」 is first determined by their number of times on top 10, and then their average ratings.
^ Ratings with recognition rates not reaching top 5 in either stage of survey are not available.

The overall rankings in the past year showed that four non-official Executive Councillors have been on the list for four times. Ronald Arculli, Leung Chun-ying, Cheung Yiu-yong and Lau Kong-wah achieved an average rating of 53.7, 48.0, 46.3 and 45.9 marks, Lau Wong-fat and Anthony Cheung have been on the list for three and one time(s) respectively. They ranked 5th and 6th with 40.6 and 55.2 marks in corresponding order.

Director of POP Robert Chung observed, 「Compared to three months ago, the popularity ratings of the "top 5" non-official Executive Councillors have remained very stable, except Leung Chun-ying whose popularity rating has registered a significant decrease. The relative rankings of all councillors have remained exactly the same. They are, in descending order, Ronald Arculli, Leung Chun-ying, Cheng Yiu-tong, Lau Kong-wah and Lau Wong-fat occupying from the 1st to 5th places. It should be noted, however, that our list of "top five" only includes non-official councillors best known to the public, ranked according to their support ratings. Some of the other councillors may well have very high or low support ratings, but because they are not the most well-known councillors, they do not appear on the list by design. As for the reasons affecting the ups and downs of these popularity ratings, we leave it to our readers to form their own judgment using the detailed records displayed in the "Opinion Daily" of our POP Site.」

(3) Under Secretaries and Political Assistants

In May 2008, the HKSAR Government announced the list of newly employed Under Secretaries and Political Assistants. POP has now conducted a survey once every three months to gauge people's familiarity with these officials, as a test of their popularity. Herewith the contact information for the survey:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Sampling error of percentages*

20-30/10/09

1,005

73.1%

+/-3%

* Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. 「95% confidence level」 means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified.

Herewith the result of our latest survey on 「people's most familiar Under Secretaries」:

Date of survey

1-5/4/09

14-18/7/09

20-30/10/09

Lastest Change

Sub-sample base

516

529

562

--

Latest finding/Rank

Percentage

Percentage

Percentage and error*

Rank

--

Under Secretary for the Environment Kitty Poon Kit

0.8%

1.2%

2.3% +/-1%

1

+1.1%

Under Secretary for the Education Kenneth Chen Wei-on

1.1%

2.0%

2.1% +/-1%

2

+0.1%

Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Adeline Wong Ching-man^

--

--

1.9% +/-1%

3

--

Under Secretary for Transport and Housing Yau Shing-mu

0.2%

0.8%

1.7% +/-1%

4

+0.9%

Under Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung

0.7%

3.1%#

1.5% +/-1%

5

-1.6%#

Under Secretary for Food and Health Gabriel Matthew Leung

0.0%

1.5%#

1.2% +/-1%

6

-0.3%

Under Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok^

--

--

1.0% +/-1%

7

--

Under Secretary for Home Affairs Florence Hui Hiu-fai##

0.6%

0.2%

0.3% +/-1%

8

+0.1%

Under Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Julia Leung Fung-yee##

0.8%

0.9%

0.3% +/-1%

9

-0.6%

Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam Chi-yuen^^

0.0%

0.8%

--

--

--

Wrongly answered the name of Secretaries of Departments/Directors of Bureaux

2.9%

3.3%

9.0% +/-2%

--

+5.7%#

Wrongly answered the name of Political Assistants

2.1%

1.6%

1.7% +/-1%

--

+0.1%

Wrongly answered the name of others

0.8%

3.6%#

5.0% +/-2%

--

+1.4%

Don't know

91.3%

86.0%#

78.6% +/-3%

--

-7.4%#

* Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. 「95% confidence level」 means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
## The percentages of respondents who could name Florence Hui Hiu-fai and Julia Leung Fung-yee were 0.32% and 0.27% respectively. Hence Florence Hui ranked the 8th while Julia Leung was placed at 9th rank.
^ On October 22, 2009 the goverrnment announced the appointment of Adeline Wong Ching-man as the Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs, and Lai Tung-kwok as the Under Secretary for Security. POP immediately included them in the survey, with a sub-sample size of 385 cases. Sample errors re-calculated.
^^ Raymond Tam Chi-yuen became the Director of the Chief Executive's Office on August 1, 2009.

Herewith the result of our latest survey on 「people's most familiar Political Assistants」:

Date of survey

1-5/4/09

14-18/7/09

20-30/10/09

Latest Change

Sub-sample base

513

529

562

--

Latest finding/Rank

Percentage

Percentage

Percentage and error*

Rank

--

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Labour & Welfare Zandra Mok Yee-tuen

0.5%

0.8%

0.6% +/-1%

1

-0.2%

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Security Victor Lo Yik-kee

0.2%

0.0%

0.4% +/-1%

2

+0.4%

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Education Jeremy Young Chit-on

0.7%

0.9%

0.3% +/-1%

3

-0.6%

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Development Raymond Cheung Man-to

0.4%

0.0%

0.1% +/-1%

4

+0.1%

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Katherine Ng Kit-shuen

0.0%

0.4%

0.0%

--

--

Political Assistant to the Financial Secretary Frankie Yip

0.0%

0.3%

0.0%

--

--

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Food & Health Paul Chan Chi-yuen

0.5%

0.0%

0.0%

--

--

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Environment Linda Choy Siu-min

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

--

--

Political Assistant to the Secretary for Home Affairs Caspar Tsui

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

--

--

Wrongly answered the name of Secretaries of Departments/Directors of Bureaux

1.7%

0.5%#

3.1% +/-1%

--

+2.6%#

Wrongly answered the name of Under Secretaries

0.9%

1.1%

1.3% +/-1%

--

+0.2%

Wrongly answered the name of others

1.4%#

1.6%

1.8% +/-1%

--

+0.2%

Don't know

93.5%

94.9%

92.8% +/-2%

--

-2.1%#

* Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. 「95% confidence level」 means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

In our naming survey conducted in late October, respondents could name, unaided, Under Secretaries and Political Assistants whom they knew best. Results showed that all nine Under Secretaries were mentioned, they were Kitty Poon, Kenneth Chen, Adeline Wong, Yau Shing-mu, Gregory So, Gabriel Matthew Leung, Lai Tung-kwok, Florence Hui and Julia Leung. The corresponding percentages of respondents who could name these figures were 2.3%, 2.1%, 1.9%, 1.7%, 1.5%, 1.2%, 1.0% and two obtaining less than 1%. Yet, 78.6% of the respondents could not recall any names of Under Secretaries. As for Political Assistants, only four Political Assistants were mentioned, they were Zandra Mok, Victor Lo, Jeremy Young and Raymond Cheung. The corresponding percentages of respondents who could name these figures were all less than 1%. Yet, 92.8% of the respondents could not recall any names of Political Assistants.

Director of POP Robert Chung observed, 「In our latest survey, all 9 old and new Under Secretaries have above-zero recognition rates, while 5 out of 9 Political Assistants have zero recognition. The situation is exactly like that three months ago, without any progress. No official has a recognition rate up to 3%, meaning that people are still not familiar with the team. It should be noted, however, that our ranking of recognition is based on respondents' ability to name these officials unaided. This kind of familiarity measurement is not the same as prompted ratings, and the results may not necessarily indicate people's support of these officials. In other words, those high on the list may not be the most supported figures, while those lower down may have a different ranking if we use a prompting method. As for the reasons affecting the popularity of these officials, we leave it to our readers to form their own judgment using the detailed records displayed in the "Opinion Daily" of our POP Site.」

Next Release (Tentative)
  • November 5, 2009 (Thursday) 1pm to 2pm: Six trust and confidence indicators
  • November 10, 2009 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Popularity of CE Donald Tsang and Principal Officials

| Abstract | Latest Figures | (1) Popularity Figures of CE Donald Tsang and the HKSAR Government |
(2) Top 5 members of Executive Council
| (3) Under Secretaries and Political Assistants | Next Release (Tentative)
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of HKSAR Government/
Rating of Top Five Executive Council Non-Official Members /Popularity of Under Secretaries and Political Assistants
)|