HKU POP SITE releases popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability systemBack

 
Press Release on October 13, 2009

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Next Release (Tentative)
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


Special Announcement

Two weeks ago, the 「POP Site」 at http://hkupop.pori.hk hosted by the Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong set up new links and functions like Facebook, Twitter, and RSS. The number of such links and functions has now increased to over 40, in order to help readers follow its content update and share its latest information with others. Moreover, as in previous years, POP will conduct an instant survey after the Chief Executive delivers his policy address tomorrow. Results will be announced the following day.


Abstract

POP interviewed 1,010 Hong Kong people between October 6 and 11 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. The survey shows that compared to two weeks ago, CE Donald Tsang's support rating and approval rate remain unchanged. His net popularity still stands at positive 7 percentage points. For the Secretaries of Departments, compared to one month ago, the support ratings and approval rates of CS Henry Tang, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung have all gone up significantly, especially for John Tsang whose approval rate surges 17 percentage points. This shows that 「a little illness may be a good thing」. The net approval rates of the three officials now stand at positive 42, 47 and 59 percentage points respectively. Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rates of most Directors have remained unchanged. Those with changes beyond sampling error include only Secretary for Development Carrie Lam, with approval rate up 5 percentage points, and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau, with approval rate down 5 percentage points. Among the Directors of Bureaux, Secretary for Education Michael Suen, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing register negative popularity, meaning that their disapproval rates are higher than their approval rates. Their net popularity figures now stand at negative 3, negative 3 and negative 1 percentage point. According to the benchmarks set by us quite some time ago, Ambrose Lee now falls under the categories of "ideal" performance. Wong Yan-lung, John Tsang, Matthew Cheung, Henry Tang and Carrie Lam can be labeled as "successful", York Chow, Donald Tsang, Michael Suen, Stephen Lam and Tsang Tak-sing can be labeled as "mediocre", and Ceajer Chan, Edward Yau, Denise Yue, Eva Cheng and Rita Lau can be labeled as "inconspicuous". No official falls under the categories of "depressing" or "disastrous". Director of POP Robert Chung expects that after CE Donald Tsang delivers his policy address tomorrow, there may be another round of fluctuations in the popularity of his leadership team. The sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is between +/-1 to 4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 68%.

Points to note:
* The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
* The sample size of this survey is 1,010 successful interviews, not 1,010 x 67.5% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
* The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is between +/-1 and 4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.2 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/- 4% at 95% confidence level".
* When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
* The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.

Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via POP SITE the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in mid-2009. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages*

6-11/10/09

1,010

67.5%

+/-3%

* Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. 「95% confidence level」 means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sample errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages*
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages*
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

* Based on 95% confidence interval.

「Maximum sampling errors」 occur when survey figures are close to 50%. If the figures are close to 0% or 100%, the sampling error will diminish accordingly. The sampling errors of ratings, however, will depend on the distribution of the raw figures. Since January 2007, POP lists out the sampling errors of all survey figures in detail and explain them in due course. Recent popularity figures of Donald Tsang are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

4-10/8/09

18-24/8/09

1-4/9/09

14-17/9/09

6-11/10/09

Latest change

Sample base

1,001

1,020

1,002

1,004

1,010

--

Overall response rate

70.5%

66.7%

60.5%

65.4%

67.5%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error*

--

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

54.7

54.5

52.8#

54.8#

55.2 +/-1.2

+0.4

Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang

41%

42%

42%

47%#

45% +/-3%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang

41%

38%

42%#

40%

38% +/-3%

-2%

* Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.2, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

Figures on the latest popularity ratings of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

1-3/6/09

6-12/7/09

4-10/8/09

1-4/9/09

6-11/10/09

Latest change*

Sample base

1,008

1,006

1,001

1,002

1,010

--

Overall response rate

65.0%

68.8%

70.5%

60.5%

67.5%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error**

--

Ratings of CS Henry Tang

56.0

56.0

56.1

55.6

57.6 +/-1.1

+2.0#

Vote of confidence in CS Henry Tang

46%

46%

44%

48%#

53% +/-3%

+5%#

Vote of no confidence in CS Henry Tang

13%#

14%

16%

13%#

11% +/-2%

-2%

Ratings of FS John Tsang

53.9

53.5

53.3

53.3

58.7 +/-1.1%

+5.4#

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

45%

44%

43%

41%

58% +/-3%

+17%#

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang

21%

21%

20%

16%#

11% +/-2%

-5%#

Ratings of SJ Y.L. Wong

61.4#

60.8

61.5

60.3

62.1 +/-1.1%

+1.8#

Vote of confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

63%

63%

62%

60%

64% +/-3%

+4%#

Vote of no confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

5%

5%

6%

6%

5% +/-1%

-1%

* The frequency of this series of questions is different for different questions, and also different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals.
** Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.1, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

Figures on the latest popularity ratings of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

4-10/8/09

1-4/9/09

6-11/10/09

Latest Change

Total sample size*

1,001

1,002

1,010

--

Overall response rate

70.5%

60.5%

67.5%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer

Base

%

Base

%

Base

% & error**

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

573

70%

565

69%

517

66% +/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

573

8%

565

8%

517

6% +/-2%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

527

58%#

565

53%#

553

55% +/-4%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

527

7%#

565

9%

553

8% +/-2%

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

534

47%

532

46%

512

51% +/-4%

+5%#

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

534

12%

532

10%

512

11% +/-3%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

530

55%

542

46%#

550

49% +/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

530

22%

542

29%#

550

24% +/-4%

-5%#

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

555

31%

513

34%

530

37% +/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

555

15%

513

15%

530

8% +/-2%

-7%#

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

523

37%

520

32%#

567

36% +/-4%

+4%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

523

15%

520

17%

567

13% +/-3%

-4%#

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

536

29%

522

33%

521

34% +/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

536

15%#

522

12%

521

12% +/-3%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

551

37%

564

34%

531

33% +/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

551

12%

564

12%

531

12% +/-3%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

509

34%

501

30%

543

31% +/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

509

34%

501

37%

543

34% +/-4%

-3%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam

515

29%

502

30%

527

30% +/-4%

--

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam

515

34%

502

32%

527

33% +/-4%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

531

34%#

505

30%

536

29% +/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

531

26%

505

29%

536

30% +/-4%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau

529

23%

503

26%

529

21% +/-4%

-5%#

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau

529

11%

503

10%

529

12% +/-3%

+2%

* Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
** Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

The latest survey showed that, CE Donald Tsang scored 55.2 marks, and 45% supported him as the Chief Executive. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Henry Tang, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung were 57.6, 58.7 and 62.1 marks, and 53%, 58% and 64% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. As for the Directors of Bureaux, results revealed that the top approval rate fell to Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee, attaining 66%. Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung ranked the 2nd and attained 55%. Secretary for Development Carrie Lam and Secretary for Food and Health York Chow ranked the 3rd and 4th places as they gained 51% and 49% vote of confidence from the public respectively. The 5th to 11th ranks went to Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan, Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau, Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue, Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng, Secretary for Education Michael Suen, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, with respective support rates of 37%, 36%, 34%, 33%, 31%, 30% and 29%. Meanwhile, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau occupied the 12th rank, achieving 21%. In other words, only Ambrose Lee, Matthew Cheung and Carrie Lam scored approval rates of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.

Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from September 1 to 4, 2009 while this survey was conducted from October 6 to 11, 2009. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

11/10/09

A Mainland woman dies during childbirth in the Baptist Hospital.

6/10/09

Charles Kao Kuen becomes the first Hong Kong scientist to be awarded the Nobel Prize in physics.

5/10/09

Many newspapers report and discuss on the alleged sex scandal involving Democratic Party legislator Kam Nai-wai.

1/10/09

The People's Republic of China celebrates its 60th anniversary. 

28/9/09

The Central Government issues 6 billion yuan Renminbi bonds in Hong Kong. 

26/9/09

HKMA Chief Executive Joseph Yam Chi-kwong said that the Exchange Fund earns 100 billion within 3 quarters. 

25/9/09

HSBC moves chief's office back to Hong Kong. 

24/9/09

The High Court dismisses the judicial review application from New World China Land. 

22/9/09

The Government announces RTHK to continue its function as government department.

13/9/09

Six workers fall to their deaths in ICC lift shaft. 

9/9/09

Many newspapers report and discuss the beating of three Hong Kong journalists by police in Xinjiang.

8/9/09

The Central Government is going to issue 6 billion yuan Renminbi bonds in Hong Kong.

6/9/09

An acid attack in Mong Kok injures 11 people.

2/9/09

Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal Li Kwok-nang announces early retirement. 

Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP Robert Chung.

Our latest survey shows that compared to two weeks ago, CE Donald Tsang's support rating and approval rate remain unchanged. His net popularity still stands at positive 7 percentage points.

For the Secretaries of Departments, compared to one month ago, the support ratings and approval rates of CS Henry Tang, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung have all gone up significantly, especially for John Tsang whose approval rate surges 17 percentage points. This shows that 「a little illness may be a good thing」. The net approval rates of the three officials now stand at positive 42, 47 and 59 percentage points respectively. Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rates of most Directors have remained unchanged. Those with changes beyond sampling error include only Secretary for Development Carrie Lam, with approval rate up 5 percentage points, and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau, with approval rate down 5 percentage points.

Among the Directors of Bureaux, Secretary for Education Michael Suen, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing register negative popularity, meaning that their disapproval rates are higher than their approval rates. Their net popularity figures now stand at negative 3, negative 3 and negative 1 percentage point.

According to the benchmarks set by us quite some time ago, Ambrose Lee now falls under the categories of "ideal" performance. Wong Yan-lung, John Tsang, Matthew Cheung, Henry Tang and Carrie Lam can be labeled as "successful", York Chow, Donald Tsang, Michael Suen, Stephen Lam and Tsang Tak-sing can be labeled as "mediocre", and Ceajer Chan, Edward Yau, Denise Yue, Eva Cheng and Rita Lau can be labeled as "inconspicuous". No official falls under the categories of "depressing" or "disastrous". As for the reasons affecting the popularity change of these officials, readers can make their own judgment using detailed records shown in our "Opinion Daily" feature page. After CE Donald Tsang delivers his policy address tomorrow, there may be another round of fluctuations in the popularity of his leadership team.

The following table summarizes the grading of the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

"Ideal": those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong (66%)

 

"Successful": those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

SJ Wong Yan-lung (64%); FS John Tsang Chun-wah (58%); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (55%); CS Henry Tang Ying-yen (53%) and Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (51%)

 

"Mediocre": those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok (49%); CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen (45%); Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung (31%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung (30%) and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (29%)

 

"Inconspicuous": those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (37%, 45%); Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah (36%, 49%); Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee (34%, 45%); Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wah (33%, 45%) and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau Ng Wai-lan (21%, 33%)

 

"Depressing": those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None

 

"Disastrous": those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None

Next Release (Tentative)
  • October 15, 2009 (Thursday) 1pm to 2pm: Instant poll on Policy Address
  • October 20, 2009 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Follow-up survey of Policy Address

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Next Release (Tentative)
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |