HKU POP SITE releases the latest ratings of the top 10 political groupsBack
Press Release on August 27, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Special Announcement: About voluntary blood test recruitment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special Announcement: About voluntary blood test recruitment The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong is being commissioned by the School of Public Health of the same university to recruit voluntary families to participate in a study on the proportion of infections of the novel strain of H1N1 swine influenza, through random telephone interviews. The study would facilitate the pandemic preparedness for our government as well as health authorities around the world. Voluntary family members will be invited to have two rounds of small blood samples taking, details of which will be explained during the recruitment exercise. We sincerely plead for people's cooperation. This study is conducted by the School of Public Health in collaboration with Queen Mary Hospital and the Centre for Health Protection of Department of Health. It is funded by the Area of Excellence Scheme of the Hong Kong University Grants Committee and the Research Fund for the Control of Infectious Diseases, Hong Kong. The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/ Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster. If people have any questions in relation to the study, please contact the School of Public Health hotline at 8170-0183, or by email to [email protected], or visit the following website: http://web.hku.hk/~kkocuhk/serofluc.htm. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract POP conducted a double stage survey on the ranking of the top 10 political groups in August, by means of random telephone surveys conducted by real interviewers. The surveys find that AFA has re-entered the list this time after passing the recognition benchmark. Its rating now stands at 38.2 marks, which is a new high since May 2004, but it is still at the bottom of the league. Meanwhile, the rating of CP has dropped significantly compared to 3 months ago, while the ratings of other groups on the list have not changed much. In terms of relative rankings, FTU and CTU continue to occupy the 1st and 2nd places, while ADPL advances one position to become the 3rd. Other than CP dropping from the 3rd place to the 5th, the change in relative rankings of other groups is just within one position up or down. The sampling errors of the ratings registered fall between +/-1.2 and 1.6 while the response rate of the rating survey is 65%. Points to note: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latest Figures POP today releases on schedule via the POP Site the latest ratings of the top 10 political groups. As a general practice, all the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2008 year-end. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:
The research design of our "Top ten political groups" has been explained in detail under "Survey Method" in our corresponding web page. The top political groups listed in our latest survey were all those who obtained highest unprompted mentions in our first stage naming survey conducted from August 11 to 16. In that survey, respondents could name, unaided, up to 10 political groups whom they knew best. Democratic Alliance for Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), Democratic Party (DP), Liberal Party (LP), Civic Party (CP) and League of Social Democrats (LSD) were mentioned most frequently. Please refer to the relevant table in our website for the rest of the list. The 12 most frequently mentioned political groups then entered into the second stage rating survey. During that second stage survey conducted from August 18 to 25, respondents were asked to rate each political group in turn using a 0-100 scale. 0 indicates absolutely no support, 100 indicates absolute support, and 50 means half-half. After calculation, the bottom 2 political groups in terms of recognition rate were dropped, leaving behind the top 10. In case any group failed to reach the 50% benchmark recognition rate, it would also be dropped. It should, however, be noted that because political groups are not yet legal entities in Hong Kong, such definitions are rather vague, and so-called political groups are constantly evolving. As a result, strange names may appear in the list of groups mentioned by respondents in Stage One surveys. In order to avoid personal bias, our research team will eliminate groups which fall outside the popular definition only after the first stage of the survey. In the latest survey, our research team considered that the Frontier no longer exists practically, so it has been eliminated from the list. To facilitate readers follow our research process step by step, the POP Site has already displayed the results of all naming surveys conducted since July 1998. The latest ratings of the top 10 political groups, together with the previous ratings, are summarized below:
** Ratings with recognition rates not reaching top 10 in either stage of survey are not available. [ ] Number in square brackets indicates rankings. # Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful. Findings obtained in the second half of August showed that, the best-known political group was the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions (FTU) which attained 52.2 marks. Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions (HKCTU) ranked 2nd with 51.1 marks. The 3rd to 7th ranks fell to Hong Kong Association for Democracy & People's Livelihood (ADPL), Democratic Party (DP), Civic Party (CP), Democratic Alliance for Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB) and Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements in China (HKASPDMC) with respective scores of 49.9, 49.7, 49.5, 49.0 and 47.0 marks. Liberal Party (LP), League of Social Democrats (LSD) and April Fifth Action (AFA) ranked the 8th to 10th, attaining 44.6, 40.3 and 38.2 marks respectively. The mean score obtained by the top 5 political groups was 50.5 marks. For this latest survey, Heung Yee Kuk N.T. (HYK) and Neighbourhood and Worker's Service Centre (NWS) obtained a support rating of 41.7 and 49.8 marks respectively, but they were dropped due to their relatively low recognition rates. The overall ratings ranked according to results obtained over the past 12 months are tabulated as follows:
** "Overall ranking" is first determined by their number of times on top 10, and then their average ratings. ^ Ratings with recognition rates not reaching top 10 in either stage of survey are not available. The overall rankings in the past 12 months showed that, the top 8 political groups were all listed for four times. FTU was in the top rank, achieving an average rating of 52.8 marks. HKCTU, CP and ADPL ranked 2nd to 4th, attaining 51.7, 50.4 and 50.0 marks respectively. Meanwhile, the 5th to 8th ranks fell to DAB, DP, LP and LSD with respective scores of 49.2, 49.1, 43.5 and 42.3. Frontier and AFA was listed for three times and ranked 9th and 10th, attaining 46.9 and 37.1 marks. HKASPDMC was listed for two times and ranked 11th.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opinion Daily In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP. For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey was conducted from May 19 to 22, 2009 while this survey was conducted from August 18 to 25. In between these two surveys, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of Public Opinion Programme, observed, "In our latest survey of 'Top 10 Political Groups', AFA has re-entered the list this time after passing the recognition benchmark. Its rating now stands at 38.2 marks, which is a new high since May 2004, but it is still at the bottom of the league. Meanwhile, the rating of CP has dropped significantly compared to 3 months ago, while the ratings of other groups on the list have not changed much. In terms of relative rankings, FTU and CTU continue to occupy the 1st and 2nd places, while ADPL advances one position to become the 3rd. Other than CP dropping from the 3rd place to the 5th, the change in relative rankings of other groups is just within one position up or down. It should be noted, however, that our 'Top 10 Political Groups' only includes groups which are best known to the public, ranked according to their support ratings. Other political groups may well have very high or low support ratings, but because they are relatively less well-known, they are not included in our final list. As to what events have affected the ups and downs of the popularity of these groups, readers can make their own judgment after reading through detailed records placed in our 'Opinion Daily'."
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Next Release (Tentative)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Special Announcement: About voluntary blood test recruitment |