HKU POP SITE releases popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability systemBack

 
Press Release on July 14, 2009

| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Next Release (Tentative)
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


Abstract

The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong interviewed 1,006 Hong Kong people between 6 and 12 July by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. The survey finds that both in terms of support rating and approval rate, the popularity of CE Donald Tsang has dropped again after its rebound two weeks ago, probably due to the effect of July 1 rally. Tsang's disapproval rate now stands at 45%, which is record high since he became CE. His net approval rate now stands at negative 5 percentage points. For the Secretaries of Departments, compared to one month ago, the support ratings and approval rates of CS Henry Tang, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung have all remained stable, with respective net approval rates of positive 32, 23 and 58 percentage points. SJ Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux and in terms of approval rates, compared to one month ago, with the exception of Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan, whose approval rate goes up significantly by 5 percentage points, and Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue, whose approval rate goes down significantly by 6 percentage points, the changes in approval rates of the other Directors of Bureaux are all within sampling errors. In terms of disapproval rate, with the exception of Secretary for Environment Edward Yau, and Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan, the disapproval rates of all other Directors of Bureaux have gone up. Those with disapproval rate climbed beyond sampling errors include Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue, Secretary for Food and Health York Chow, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, and Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung. Their disapproval rates have gone up by 8, 6, 6, 6 and 4 percentage points respectively. Moreover, negative popularity has reappeared among Secretaries and Directors, as Secretary for Education Michael Suen, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam, and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing register net popularity of negative 7, 5 and 2 percentage points correspondingly. According to the benchmarks set by us quite some time ago, Ambrose Lee, now falls under the categories of "'ideal" performance. Wong Yan-lung, Matthew Cheung and York Chow can be labeled as "successful", Carrie Lam, Henry Tang, John Tsang, Donald Tsang, Edward Yau, Michael Suen, Stephen Lam and Tsang Tak-sing can be labeled as "mediocre", and Eva Cheng, Ceajer Chan, Denise Yue and Rita Lau can be labeled as "inconspicuous". No official falls under the categories of "depressing" or "disastrous". The sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is between +/-1 and 4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 69%.

Points to note:
* The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
* The sample size of this survey is 1,006 successful interviews, not 1,006 x 68.8% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
* The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is between +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.3 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level".
* When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
* The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.

 

Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via the POP Site the latest figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. As a general practice, all figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2008 year-end. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

Date of survey

Sample base

Overall response rate

Sampling error of percentages*

6-12/7/09

1,006

68.8%

+/-3%

* Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sample error. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sample errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages*
(maximum values)
Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)
Sampling error of percentages*
(maximum values)
1,300 +/- 2.8 % 1,350 +/- 2.7 %
1,200 +/- 2.9 % 1,250 +/- 2.8 %
1,100 +/- 3.0 % 1,150 +/- 3.0 %
1,000 +/- 3.2 % 1,050 +/- 3.1 %
900 +/- 3.3 % 950 +/- 3.2 %
800 +/- 3.5 % 850 +/- 3.4 %
700 +/- 3.8 % 750 +/- 3.7 %
600 +/- 4.1 % 650 +/- 3.9 %
500 +/- 4.5 % 550 +/- 4.3 %
400 +/- 5.0 % 450 +/- 4.7 %
* Based on 95% confidence interval.

"Maximum sampling errors" occur when survey figures are close to 50%. If the figures are close to 0% or 100%, the sampling error will diminish accordingly. The sampling errors of ratings, however, will depend on the distribution of the raw figures. Since January 2007, POP lists out the sampling errors of all survey figures in detail and explain them in due course. Recent popularity figures of Donald Tsang are summarized as follows:

Date of survey
5-7/5/09 19-22/5/09 1-3/6/09 16-21/6/09 6-12/7/09 Latest change
Sample base
1,006 1,011 1,008 1,012 1,006 --
Overall response rate
66.5% 68.3% 65.0% 69.0% 68.8% --
Latest finding
Finding Finding Finding Finding Finding and error* --
Rating of CE Donald Tsang
57.0# 54.4 53.4 55.4# 53.8 +/-1.3 -1.6#
Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang
50%# 47% 43%# 45% 40% +/-3% -5%#
Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang
37% 36% 40%# 39% 45% +/-3% +6%#
* Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.3, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

Figures on the latest popularity ratings of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey
2-3/3/09
1-5/4/09
5-7/5/09
1-3/6/09
6-12/7/09
Latest change*
Sample base
1,006
1,001
1,006
1,008
1,006
--
Overall response rate
66.1%
67.5%
66.5%
65.0%
68.8%
--
Latest finding
Finding
Finding
Finding
Finding
Finding and error**
--
Ratings of CS Henry Tang
53.4#
53.6
57.0#
56
56.0 +/-1.2
--
Vote of confidence in CS Henry Tang
43%
44%
46%
46%
46% +/-3%
--
Vote of no confidence in CS Henry Tang
15%
17%
16%
13%#
14% +/-2%
1%
Ratings of FS John Tsang
49.2#
51.1#
54.6#
53.9
53.5 +/-1.2
-0.4
Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang
35%#
40%#
42%
45%
44% +/-3%
-1%
Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang
28%#
22%#
22%
21%
21% +/-3%
--
Ratings of SJ Y.L. Wong
58.8#
60.3#
62.8#
61.4#
60.8 +/-1.0
-0.6
Vote of confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong
57%#
61%#
63%
63%
63% +/-3%
--
Vote of no confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong
7%
5%#
4%
5%
5% +/-1%
--
* The frequency of this series of questions is different for different questions, and also different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals.
** Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.2, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

Figures on the latest popularity ratings of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey
5-7/5/09
1-3/6/09
6-12/7/09
Latest Change (%)
Total sample size*
1,006
1,008
1,006
--
Overall response rate
66.5%
65.0%
68.8%
--
Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer
Base
%
Base
%
Base
% and error**
--
Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee
558
66%
509
67%
521
68% +/-4%
1%
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee
558
8%
509
7%
521
8% +/-2%
1%
Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung
544
54%
576
53%
514
52% +/-4%
-1%
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung
544
9%
576
8%
514
12% +/-3%
+4%#
Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow
578
49%
527
54%#
524
51% +/-4%
-3%
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow
578
24%
527
18%#
524
24% +/-4%
+6%#
Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam
550
54%
552
52%
500
50% +/-4%
-2%
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam
550
12%
552
10%
500
11% +/-3%
1%
Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau
585
37%
530
34%
501
37% +/-4%
3%
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau
585
13%
530
16%
501
13% +/-3%
-3%
Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng
550
43%
553
36%#
512
35% +/-4%
-1%
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng
550
9%
553
10%
512
11% +/-3%
1%
Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan ^
590
31%
526
26%#
504
31% +/-4%
+5%#
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan
590
20%
526
16%#
504
16% +/-3%
--
Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen ^
585
37%
553
32%#
517
31% +/-4%
-1%
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen
585
31%
553
36%#
517
38% +/-4%
2%
Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue^^
603
35%
548
36%
501
30% +/-4%
-6%#
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue
603
15%
548
11%#
501
19% +/-4%
+8%#
Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam^^
608
32%
585
28%
510
30% +/-4%
2%
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam
608
31%
585
29%
510
35% +/-4%
+6%#
Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing
613
34%
595
30%
512
28% +/-4%
-2%
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing
613
22%
595
24%
512
30% +/-4%
+6%#
Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau
655
27%
531
25%
502
26% +/-4%
1%
Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau
655
12%
531
11%
502
14% +/-3%
3%
* Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
** Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
^ The approval rates of Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan and Secretary for Education Michael Suen are 31.2% and 30.6% respectively.
^^ The approval rates of Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue and Secretary for the Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam are 29.9% and 29.7% respectively.

The latest survey showed that, CE Donald Tsang scored 53.8 marks, and 40% supported him as the Chief Executive. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Henry Tang Ying-yen, FS John Tsang Chun-wah and SJ Wong Yan-lung were 56.0, 53.5 and 60.8 marks, and 46%, 44% and 63% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. As for the Directors of Bureaux, results revealed that the top approval rate fell to Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong, attaining 68%. Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung ranked 2nd with an approval rate of 52%. Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok came 3rd at 51% while the 4th place fell to Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor with approval rate of 50%. The 5th and 6th ranks fell to Secretary for Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah and Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wa with respective support rates of 37% and 35%. Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung and Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung shared the 7th place as they both gained 31% vote of confidence from the public. Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee and Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung shared the 9th place as they both gained 30% vote of confidence from the public. The 11th and 12th rank went to Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau Ng Wai-lan, achieving 28% and 26% of public support respectively. In other words, only Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong, Matthew Cheung Kin-chung and York Chow Yat-ngok scored approval rates of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.

Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from June 1 to 3, 2009 while this survey was conducted from July 6 to 12, 2009. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

10/7/09

Review report on post-service outside work for Directorate civil servants is released.

3/7/09

Government proposes a three-tier system for grading the urgency of ambulance service.

1/7/09

Tens of thousands take to the streets to call for diversified demands. 

30/6/09

Disney invests about HK$3.63 billion to expand the theme park.

29/6/09

Hong Kong and Mainland China sign an agreement to use RMB for cross-border trade from next month.

25/6/09

Police officers cancel their protest march planned for Sunday. 

22/6/09

The Taskforce on Economic Challenges proposes measures to boost the development of six predominant industries. 

18/6/09

Five more schools are ordered to close after new swine flu cases are confirmed. 

16/6/09

The executive council proposes a pay cut of 5.38% for all civil servants in the upper salary band. 

15/6/09

Many newspapers report and discuss the controversial issue of Zheng Sheng College's relocation to Mui Wo. 

11/6/09

All primary schools and kindergartens are suspended for 2 weeks to prevent spread of the swine flu. 

10/6/09

A 16-year-old girl becomes the city's first non-imported case of human swine flu. 

9/6/09

The police are offering a reward of $900,000 for information leading to the arrest of those involved in the acid attack. 

6/6/09

Many newspapers report on increasing drug abuse among youngsters. 

4/6/09

An estimated 150,000 people gather in Victoria Park for the 20th anniversary of June 4th Incident. 

 

Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP Robert Chung.

Our latest survey shows that both in terms of support rating and approval rate, the popularity of CE Donald Tsang has dropped again after its rebound two weeks ago, probably due to the effect of July 1 rally. Tsang's disapproval rate now stands at 45%, which is record high since he became CE. His net approval rate now stands at negative 5 percentage points.

For the Secretaries of Departments, compared to one month ago, the support ratings and approval rates of CS Henry Tang, FS John Tsang and SJ Wong Yan-lung have all remained stable, with respective net approval rates of positive 32, 23 and 58 percentage points. SJ Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

As for the Directors of Bureaux and in terms of approval rates, compared to one month ago, with the exception of Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan, whose approval rate goes up significantly by 5 percentage points, and Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue, whose approval rate goes down significantly by 6 percentage points, the changes in approval rates of the other Directors of Bureaux are all within sampling errors. In terms of disapproval rate, with the exception of Secretary for Environment Edward Yau, and Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan, the disapproval rates of all other Directors of Bureaux have gone up. Those with disapproval rate climbed beyond sampling errors include Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue, Secretary for Food and Health York Chow, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, and Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung. Their disapproval rates have gone up by 8, 6, 6, 6 and 4 percentage points respectively.

Moreover, negative popularity has reappeared among Secretaries and Directors, as Secretary for Education Michael Suen, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam, and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing register net popularity of negative 7, 5 and 2 percentage points correspondingly.

According to the benchmarks set by us quite some time ago, Ambrose Lee, now falls under the categories of "ideal" performance. Wong Yan-lung, Matthew Cheung and York Chow can be labeled as "successful", Carrie Lam, Henry Tang, John Tsang, Donald Tsang, Edward Yau, Michael Suen, Stephen Lam and Tsang Tak-sing can be labeled as "mediocre", and Eva Cheng, Ceajer Chan, Denise Yue and Rita Lau can be labeled as "inconspicuous". No official falls under the categories of "depressing" or "disastrous". As for the reasons affecting the popularity change of these officials, readers can make their own judgment using detailed records shown in our "Opinion Daily" feature page.

The following table summarizes the grading of the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

"Ideal": those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong (68%)

 

"Successful": those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

SJ Wong Yan-lung (63%); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (52%); Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok (51%)

 

"Mediocre": those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (50%*); CS Henry Tang Ying-yen (46%); FS John Tsang Chun-wah (44%); CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen (40%); Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah (37%); Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung (31%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung (30%); Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (28%)

 

"Inconspicuous": those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wah (35%, 46%); Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (31%, 48%); Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee (30%, 49%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau Ng Wai-lan (26%, 40%)

 

"Depressing": those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None

 

"Disastrous": those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None

* The approval rates of Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor is 49.8% in 1 decimal place.

Next Release (Tentative)
  • July 21, 2009 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Ratings of Top 10 Legislative Councillors

 

| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Next Release (Tentative)
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |