HKU POP SITE releases popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability systemBack

 
Press Release on May 12, 2009

| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Next Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


Abstract

The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong interviewed 1,006 Hong Kong people between 5 and 7 May by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. The survey was conducted shortly after the first case of swine flu was confirmed in Hong Kong, and a number of quarantine measures were being taken. Findings show that the popularity figures of all government officials have gone up, with Secretary for Food and Health York Chow taking the lead with a 17-percentage-point increase in his own approval rate. Director of POP Robert Chung considers this to be a clear sign that people support the government's first wave of anti-epidemic measures. Besides, compared to half a month ago, CE Donald Tsang's popularity has increased significantly. His support rating has climbed to 57.0 marks while his approval rate has gone up to 50% and his net approval rate (or approval rate minus disapproval rate) now stands at positive 13 percentage points. All three figures are at their record highs since June last year. For the Secretaries of Departments, compared to one month ago, all their support ratings have increased notably, while their approval rates have increased slightly. SJ Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rates of all Directors have increased. Among them, the approval rate of Secretary for Food and Health York Chow has rocketed 17 percentage points, reaching a record high since February last year, obviously due to his performance in fighting against the epidemic. Other Directors of Bureaux whose approval rates have registered changes beyond sampling errors include Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan and Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue. Their approval rates have gone up by 10, 9 and 5 percentage points respectively. Among all Secretaries and Directors, none have negative popularity, meaning that all have approval rates higher than disapproval rates. According to the benchmarks set by us quite some time ago, no official now falls under the categories of "'ideal" performance. Ambrose Lee, Wong Yan-lung, Carrie Lam and Matthew Cheung can be labeled as "successful", Donald Tsang, York Chow, Henry Tang, Eva Cheng, John Tsang, Michael Suen, Edward Yau, Tsang Tak-sing, Stephen Lam and Ceajer Chan can be labeled as "mediocre", and Denise Yue and Rita Lau can be labeled as "inconspicuous". No official falls under the categories of "depressing" or "disastrous". The sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is between +/-1 and 4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 67%.

Points to note:

* The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
* The sample size of this survey is 1,006 successful interviews, not 1,006 x 66.5% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
* The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is between +/-1 and 4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.2 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level".
* When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
* The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.


Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via the POP Site the latest figures of CE Donald Tsang, Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. As a general practice, all figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2008 year-end. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages*

5-7/5/09

1,006

66.5%

+/-3%

* Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sample error. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sample errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages*
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages*
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

* Based on 95% confidence interval.

"Maximum sampling errors" occur when survey figures are close to 50%. If the figures are close to 0% or 100%, the sampling error will diminish accordingly. The sampling errors of ratings, however, will depend on the distribution of the raw figures. Since January 2007, POP lists out the sampling errors of all survey figures in detail and explain them in due course. Recent popularity figures of Donald Tsang are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

2-3/3/09

9-11/3/09

1-5/4/09

21-23/4/09

5-7/5/09

Latest change

Sample base

1,006

1,019

1,001

1,014

1,006

--

Overall response rate

66.1%

65.2%

67.5%

68.9%

66.5%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error*

 

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

51.6#

52.4

54.0#

53.2

57.0 +/-1.2

+3.8#

Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang

42%

44%

47%

44%

50% +/-3%

+6%#

Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang

39%

41%

39%

40%

37% +/-3%

-3%

* Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.2, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


Figures on the latest popularity ratings of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

2-4/2/09

25/2/09

2-3/3/09

1-5/4/09

5-7/5/09

Latest change*

Sample base

1,010

1,015^

1,006

1,001

1,006

--

Overall response rate

73.7%

67.7%

66.1%

67.5%

66.5%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error**

 

Ratings of CS Henry Tang

55.7#

--

53.4#

53.6

57.0 +/-1.1

+3.4#

Vote of confidence in CS Henry Tang

43%

--

43%

44%

46% +/-3%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in CS Henry Tang

14%

--

15%

17%

16% +/-2%

-1%

Ratings of FS John Tsang

56.7#

54.9#

49.2#

51.1#

54.6 +/-1.2

+3.5#

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

47%#

43%

35%#

40%#

42% +/-3%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang

15%#

15%

28%#

22%#

22% +/-3%

--

Ratings of SJ Y.L. Wong

61.0#

--

58.8#

60.3#

62.8 +/1.0

+2.5#

Vote of confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

61%#

--

57%#

61%#

63% +/-3%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

6%

--

7%

5%#

4% +/-1%

-1%

* The frequency of this series of questions is different for different questions, and also different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals.
** Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.2, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
^ These questions only use sub-samples of the survey concerned. The sub-sample sizes of questions on John Tsang's support rating and hypothetical voting were 591 and 590 respectively. Regarding the change of John Tsang's popularity figures, one can compare them per poll, or with other officials' figures after synchronizing them to the same cycle.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


Figures on the latest popularity ratings of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

2-3/3/09

1-5/4/09

5-7/5/09

Latest Change (%)

Total sample size

1,006*

1,001*

1,006*

--

Overall response rate

66.1%

67.5%

66.5%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer

Base

%

Base

%

Base

% and error**

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

578

63%

512

63%

558

66% +/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

578

12%

512

11%

558

8% +/-2%

-3%#

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam^

611

47%

510

50%

550

54% +/-4%

+4%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

611

14%

510

13%

550

12% +/-3%

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung^

566

52%

513

51%

544

54% +/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

566

11%

513

10%

544

9% +/-2%

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

579

38%

513

32%#

578

49% +/-4%

+17%#

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

579

35%

513

40%#

578

24% +/-4%

-16%#

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

580

34%

514

33%

550

43% +/-4%

+10%#

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

580

9%

514

11%

550

9% +/-2%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen^^

507

31%#

504

36%#

585

37% +/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

507

34%

504

31%

585

31% +/-4%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau ^^

587

30%

543

34%

585

37% +/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

587

15%

543

11%#

585

13% +/-3%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

594

33%

502

30%

603

35% +/-4%

+5%#

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

594

12%

502

12%

603

15% +/-3%

+3%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

516

26%

522

32%#

613

34% +/-4%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

516

26%

522

24%

613

22% +/-3%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam

513

30%

531

29%

608

32% +/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam

513

29%#

531

31%

608

31% +/-4%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

552

23%#

508

22%

590

31% +/-4%

+9%#

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

552

26%#

508

23%

590

20% +/-3%

-3%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau

541

22%

503

25%

655

27% +/-3%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau

541

14%

503

9%#

655

12% +/-3%

+3%

* Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
** Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
^ The approval rates of Secretary for Development Carrie Lam and Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung are 54.1% and 53.9% respectively.
^^ The approval rates of Secretary for Education Michael Suen and Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau are 37.4% and 37.2% respectively.


The latest survey showed that, CE Donald Tsang scored 57.0 marks, and 50% supported him as the Chief Executive. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Henry Tang Ying-yen, FS John Tsang Chun-wah and SJ Wong Yan-lung were 57.0, 54.6 and 62.8 marks, and 46%, 42% and 63% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. As for the Directors of Bureaux, results revealed that the top approval rate fell to Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong, attaining 66%. Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor and Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung shared the 2nd rank as both gained 54% vote of confidence from the public. Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok and Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wah occupied the 4th and 5th ranks with respective support rates of 49% and 43%. Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung and Secretary for Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah shared the 6th rank as both gained 37% vote of confidence from the public. The 8th to 11th ranks fell to Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung and Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung with respective support rates of 35%, 34%, 32% and 31%. The 12th rank went to Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau Ng Wai-lan, achieving 27% of public support. In other words, only Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong, Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor and Matthew Cheung Kin-chung scored approval rates of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.

Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from April 1 to 5, 09 while this survey was conducted from May 5 to 7, 09. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

7/5/09

Many newspapers follow and discuss the Influenza A H1N1 epidemic and the quarantine measures.

5/5/09

A cleaner is crushed to death by a metal gate.

4/5/09

The Hang Seng Index come back to the 16,000-point ceiling.

1/5/09

HK confirms first swine influenza (Influenza A H1N1) case.

27/4/09

The swine flu outbreak spreads fast across the world as global epidemic.

25/4/09

Flu checks in HK amid fear of flu pandemic.

22/4/09

The Court of Appeal blocks PCCW's privatization.

18/4/09

The central government rolls out a raft of measures to help Hong Kong through the global economic meltdown.

*11/4/09

Premier Wen Jiabao reminds HK people to strive to stabilize its status of financial centre.

9/4/09

Hong Kong is preparing for the development of RMB business.

6/4/09

PCCW privatization on hold after SFC made an appeal to the court.


Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP Robert Chung.

Our latest survey was conducted shortly after the first case of swine flu was confirmed in Hong Kong, and a number of quarantine measures were being taken. According to our findings, the popularity figures of all government officials have gone up, with Secretary for Food and Health York Chow taking the lead with a 17-percentage-point increase in his own approval rate. This clearly indicates that people support the government's first wave of anti-epidemic measures.

Besides, compared to half a month ago, CE Donald Tsang's popularity has increased significantly. His support rating has climbed to 57.0 marks while his approval rate has gone up to 50% and his net approval rate (or approval rate minus disapproval rate) now stands at positive 13 percentage points. All three figures are at their record highs since June last year.

For the Secretaries of Departments, compared to one month ago, all their support ratings have increased notably, while their approval rates have increased slightly. SJ Wong Yan-lung remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the approval rates of all Directors have increased. Among them, the approval rate of Secretary for Food and Health York Chow has rocketed 17 percentage points, reaching a record high since February last year, obviously due to his performance in fighting against the epidemic. Other Directors of Bureaux whose approval rates have registered changes beyond sampling errors include Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan and Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue. Their approval rates have gone up by 10, 9 and 5 percentage points respectively.

Among all Secretaries and Directors, none have negative popularity, meaning that all have approval rates higher than disapproval rates.

According to the benchmarks set by us quite some time ago, no official now falls under the categories of "'ideal" performance. Ambrose Lee, Wong Yan-lung, Carrie Lam and Matthew Cheung can be labeled as "successful", Donald Tsang, York Chow, Henry Tang, Eva Cheng, John Tsang, Michael Suen, Edward Yau, Tsang Tak-sing, Stephen Lam and Ceajer Chan can be labeled as "mediocre", and Denise Yue and Rita Lau can be labeled as "inconspicuous". No official falls under the categories of "depressing" or "disastrous". Other than for the fight against swine flu, readers can make their own judgment on the reasons affecting the popularity change of these officials using detailed records shown in our "Opinion Daily" feature page.

The following table summarizes the grading of the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

"Ideal": those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

None

 

"Successful": those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong (66%^); SJ Wong Yan-lung (63%); Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (54%*); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (54%*)

 

"Mediocre": those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen (50%^^); Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok (49%); CS Henry Tang Ying-yen (46%); Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wah (43%); FS John Tsang Chun-wah (42%); Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung (37%**); Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah (37%**); Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (34%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung (32%); Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (31%)

 

"Inconspicuous": those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee (35%**, 49%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau Ng Wai-lan (27%, 39%)

 

"Depressing": those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None

 

"Disastrous": those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None

^ The approval rate of Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong is 66.0% in 1 decimal place.
^^ The approval rate of CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen is 50.0% in 1 decimal place.
* The approval rates of Secretary for Development Carrie Lam and Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung are 54.1% and 53.9% respectively.
** The approval rates of Secretary for Education Michael Suen and Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau are 37.4% and 37.2% respectively.


Next Release (Tentative)

  • May 19, 2009 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: people's feeling towards different governments and peoples


| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Next Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |



*Erratum: The date in the original release is "10/4/09".