HKU POP SITE releases the latestfindings of people's opinions towards Taiwan issues, Tibet issues and their appraisal of past Chinese leadersBack
--------------------------- blankSpace ---------------------------------------------->Press Release on March 17, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Next Release (Tentative) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong interviewed 1,019 Hong Kong people between 9 and 11 March by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. The survey finds that compared to three months ago, Hong Kong people's opinion towards the independence of Taiwan and Tibet, and Taiwan rejoining the United Nations has not changed much, but their confidence in reunification across the strait has increased significantly by 7 percentage points, reaching a 3-year high. People's opposition to the independence of Taiwan and Tibet remains high, at almost 80%, while their confidence in reunification across the strait and the applicability of "one country, two systems" to Taiwan remains positive, at 60% or more. About half opposes to Taiwan rejoining the United Nations, which is lower than that opposing the independence of Taiwan. This shows that some people are quite sympathetic to Taiwan's quest for more international space. On the other hand, people's appraisal of the merits and faults of past Chinese leaders Deng Xiaoping, Zhao Ziyang and Yang Shangkun has also not changed much over the past six months. The sampling error of all percentages released today is between +/-1 to 3 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the response rate of the survey is 65%. Points to note: * The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there. * The sample size of this survey is 1,019 successful interviews, not 1,019 x 65.2% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake. * The maximum sampling error of all percentages is below +/-1 to 3 percentage points at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level". * When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places in order to match the precision level of the figures. * The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latest Figures POP today releases via the POP Site the latest figures of people's opinions towards Taiwan, Tibet issues and their appraisal of past Chinese leaders. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2007 year-end. Herewith the contact information for the survey:
Recent figures of people's opinions towards Taiwan and Tibet issues are summarized as follows:
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful. Results obtained in mid-March revealed that 79% of Hong Kong people interviewed opposed the independence of Taiwan whereas only 13% showed support. Meanwhile, 77% objected Tibet becoming independent whilst only 10% held a positive view. Besides, 60% were confident in the ultimate reunification across the strait whilst 31% expressed no confidence. Moreover, 48% opposed Taiwan rejoining the United Nations, 37% supported it. As for the applicability of "one country, two systems" to Taiwan, 61% gave a positive view while 30% gave a negative answer. As for respondents' appraisals of the merits and faults of past Chinese leaders, POP has been tracking people's appraisal of these leaders since 1995, but our series on Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai and Chiang Kai Shek stopped in 2003, while that on more recently deceased leaders Zhao Ziyang, Yang Shangkun and Deng Xiaoping continued. The most recent results are summarized as follows:
# Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful. According to our latest survey, those considering Deng Xiaoping and Zhao Ziyang have accrued more merits than faults in the development of China accounted for 83% and 52% respectively. For Yang Shangkun, 16% of the respondents thought he has accrued more merits than faults, 17% found more faults than merits in Yang. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opinion Daily In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commentary Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of Public Opinion Programme, observed, "Compared to three months ago, Hong Kong people's opinion towards the independence of Taiwan and Tibet, and Taiwan rejoining the United Nations has not changed much, but their confidence in reunification across the strait has increased significantly by 7 percentage points, reaching a 3-year high. People's opposition to the independence of Taiwan and Tibet remains high, at almost 80%, while their confidence in reunification across the strait and the applicability of 'one country, two systems' to Taiwan remains positive, at 60% or more. About half opposes to Taiwan rejoining the United Nations, which is lower than that opposing the independence of Taiwan. This shows that some people are quite sympathetic to Taiwan's quest for more international space. On the other hand, people's appraisal of the merits and faults of past Chinese leaders Deng Xiaoping, Zhao Ziyang and Yang Shangkun has also not changed much over the past six months. As for the reasons affecting the ups and downs of different figures, readers are free to form their own judgment using the detailed records displayed in our 'Opinion Daily'." | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Next Release (Tentative)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Next Release (Tentative) | |