HKU POP SITE releases the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang and Principal OfficialsBack

 
Press Release on August 12, 2008

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | News about POP |
| About HKUPOP | Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


Special Announcement

Sponsored by a number of organizations, the Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong, has already begun to conduct its rolling poll on the 2008 Legislative Council election. The poll is conducted every day, its findings will be released to sponsors for exclusive use on the same day, and then uploaded onto the "HKU POP SITE" (http://hkupop.pori.hk) for public consumption after the election. Organizations wishing to sponsor this rolling poll please contact Miss Chau or Miss Pang at 3921-2700.

Abstract

The Public Opinion Programme at the University of Hong Kong interviewed 1,009 Hong Kong people between 1-4 August by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. The survey finds that compared to mid-July, our latest survey shows that CE Donald Tsang's support rating has slightly increased while his approval rate has slightly dropped, but both within sampling errors. In other words, comparing the overall figures registered in last two consecutive surveys, the dropping trend of Donald Tsang's popularity has somewhat stopped. However, because the last survey accidentally fell before and after CE announced his over $10 billion package of 10 relief measures in the Legislative Council on July 16, if we use the figures differentially registered before and after that announcement, CE's current support rating and approval rate are significantly lower than the 56.1 marks and 48% registered on July 16. This shows that the popularity effect of the relief measures was quite short. Moreover, if we look at the result of our biannual survey on CE performance, only about one-third of the people now consider Donald Tsang doing a good job, representing a plunge of 24 percentage points over 6 months. As for the Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system, compared to early July, changes in approval rates of the following officials are significant beyond sampling errors: Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau's approval rate surged 8 percentage points, while those of Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng and Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan both increased by 5 percentage points. According to the benchmarks set by POP quite some time ago, the performance of Ambrose Lee can continue to be labeled as 'ideal', that of Wong Yan-lung, Henry Tang and Matthew Cheung can be labeled as 'successful', that of John Tsang, Carrie Lam, Donald Tsang, York Chow, Michael Suen, Stephen Lam and Tsang Tak-sing can be labeled as 'mediocre', and that of Eva Cheng, Denise Yue, Edward Yau, Ceajer Chan and Rita Lau can be labeled as 'inconspicuous'. No official falls under the categories of 'depressing' or 'disastrous'. The sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is below +/-2 to 5 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 69%.

Points to note:

* The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
* The sample size of this survey is 1,009 successful interviews, not 1,009 x 69.0% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
* The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is below +/-2 to 5 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.3 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/-5% at 95% confidence level".
* When quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
* The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.


Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via POP SITE the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang and Principal Officials under the accountability system. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2007 year-end. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages*

1-4/8/2008

1,009

69.0%

+/-3%

* Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sample errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages*
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages*
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

* Based on 95% confidence interval.

"Maximum sampling errors" occur when survey figures are close to 50%. If the figures are close to 0% or 100%, the sampling error will diminish accordingly. The sampling errors of ratings, however, will depend on the distribution of the raw figures. Since January 2007, POP lists out the sampling errors of all survey figures in detail and explain them in due course. Recent popularity figures of Donald Tsang are summarized as follows:

Date of survey

4-6/6/08

18-20/6/08

2-3/7/08

14-16/7/08

1-4/8/2008

Latest change

Sample base

1,032

1,003

1,019

1,181

1,009

--

Overall response rate

68.5%

70.3%

70.8%

64.4%

69.0%

--

Maximum sampling error of ratings (at 95 % confidence level)*

+/-1.2

+/-1.3

+/-1.3

+/-1.2

+/-1.3

--

Sampling error of percentages (at 95% confidence level)*

+/-3%

+/-3%

+/-3%

+/-3%

+/-3%

--

Finding for each question/Sampling error*

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Sampling error

 

Rating of CE Donald Tsang

60.8

57.9

55.9

54.5

54.8

+/-1.3

+0.3

Vote of confidence in CE Donald Tsang

57%

51%

46%

45%

43%

+/-3%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in CE Donald Tsang

24%

30%

37%

33%

36%

+/-3%

+3%

Considered Tsang was doing a good job as CE**^

--

--

--

--

32%

+/-3%

-24%

Considered Tsang was doing a bad job as CE**^

--

--

--

--

26%

+/-3%

+17%

* "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.3 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level".
** Collapsed from a 5-point scale.
^ The polling cycle for this item is different from the rest. The last survey was conducted in February 2008 and the positive and negative figures were 56% and 9% back then.


Figures on the latest popularity ratings of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

1-3/4/08

2-6/5/08

4-6/6/08

2-3/7/08

1-4/8/2008

Latest change*

Sample base

1,047

1,024

1,032

1,019

1,009

--

Overall response rate

63.6%

63.8%

68.5%

70.8%

69.0%

--

Maximum sampling error of ratings (at 95% confidence level)**

+/-1.1

+/-1.2

+/-1.2

+/-1.1

+/-1.1

--

Maximum sampling error of percentages (at 95% confidence level)**

+/-3%

+/-3%

+/-3%

+/-3%

+/-3%

--

Finding for each question / Sampling error**

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Sampling error

--

Ratings of CS Henry Tang

63.3

62.6

62.6

59.4

59.1

+/-1.1

-0.3

Vote of confidence in CS Henry Tang

59%

57%

56%

50%

51%

+/-3%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in CS Henry Tang

7%

8%

7%

11%

10%

+/-2%

-1%

Ratings of FS John Tsang

63.9

60.5

58.8

58.2

57.6

+/-1.1

-0.6

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

57%

52%

45%

46%

47%

+/-3%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang

8%

12%

11%

11%

13%

+/-2%

+2%

Ratings of SJ Y.L. Wong

62.3

63.0

62.3

62.9

60.7

+/-1.0

-2.2

Vote of confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

55%

54%

54%

60%

58%

+/-3%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in SJ Y.L.Wong

7%

8%

6%

5%

6%

+/-2%

+1%

** The frequency of this series of questions is different for different questions, and also different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals.
** "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.1, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures.


Figures on the latest popularity ratings of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey

4-6/6/08

2-3/7/08

1-4/8/2008

Latest Change
(Percentage)

Total sample size

1,032*

1,019

1,009

--

Overall response rate

68.5%

70.8%

69.0%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer/Error**

Base

%

Base

%

Base

%

Error

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

630

71%

610

70%

639

68%

+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee

630

4%

610

4%

639

6%

+/-2%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

587

53%

575

51%

567

50%

+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

587

7%

575

10%

567

11%

+/-3%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

574

47%

623

42%

602

45%

+/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Carrie Lam

574

10%

623

13%

602

12%

+/-3%

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

561

41%

575

38%

461

42%

+/-5%

+4%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health York Chow

561

26%

575

35%

461

32%

+/-4%

-3%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

528

39%

574

41%

605

41%

+/-4%

--

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Michael Suen

528

24%

574

25%

605

27%

+/-4%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

585

30%

573

34%

589

39%

+/-4%

+5%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng

585

9%

573

8%

589

8%

+/-2%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

606

32%

611

36%

530

34%

+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue

606

8%

611

8%

530

9%

+/-3%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

631

22%

653

24%

610

32%

+/-4%

+8%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau

631

11%

653

9%

610

9%

+/-2%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam

597

26%

497

27%

586

31%

+/-4%

+4%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam

597

29%

497

30%

586

34%

+/-4%

+4%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

619

26%

578

24%

534

29%

+/-4%

+5%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

619

7%

578

6%

534

4%

+/-2%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

562

22%

588

26%

650

27%

+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

562

26%

588

26%

650

31%

+/-4%

+5%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau

--

--

--

--

601

22%

+/-3%

--

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau

--

--

--

--

601

9%

+/-2%

--

* Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
** "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-5% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures.


The latest survey showed that, CE Donald Tsang scored 54.8 marks, and 43% supported him as the Chief Executive. By using a 5-point scale, 32% of the respondents thought Tsang was doing a good job as the CE, while 26% held the opposite view. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Henry Tang Ying-yen, FS John Tsang Chun-wah and SJ Wong Yan-lung were 59.1, 57.6 and 60.7 marks, and 51%, 47% and 58% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. As for the Directors of Bureaux, results revealed that the top approval rate fell to Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong, attaining 68%. Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung and Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, occupied the 2nd and 3rd ranks with respective support rates of 50% and 45%. The 4th to 8th ranks went to Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok, Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung, Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wah, Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee and Secretary for Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah as they gained 42%, 41%, 39%, 34% and 32% vote of confidence from the public respectively. Meanwhile, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung and Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung occupied the 9th to 10th ranks with respective support rates of 31% and 29%. Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Rita Lau Ng Wai-lan occupied the 11th and 12th rank, achieving 27% and 22%. In other words, only Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong and Matthew Cheung Kin-chung scored approval rates of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.

Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis. Our purpose is to provide readers with accurate information so that they can judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. When "Opinion Daily" began to operate on January 17, 2007, it only contained significant events and popularity figures of the Chief Executive over the past few months. As of today, it contains a chronology of events starting from May 1, 2006, and many poll figures registered since January 1, 2006. Readers can now check on the results of 9 different polling items compiled by POP, including the popularity of the Chief Executive, the HKSAR government, and the Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system. In near future, the content of "Opinion Daily" will continue to expand, in order to promote the science of opinion polling.

In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP since July 24 each day a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to the "Opinion Daily" feature page as soon as they are verified by POP, in order to provide readers with swifter and more accurate information.

In August 2007, POP began to include in its regular press releases a list of significant events which happened in between two surveys, so that readers can make their own judgment on whether these events have any effect on the ups and downs of the polling figures. This press release is no exception.

For the polling items covered in this press release, using the previous survey as a reference point for comparison, our "Opinion Daily" for this release starts on August 11, 2007, because the previous survey of some items was conducted from February 1 to 5, 2008 while this survey was conducted from August 1 to 4, 2008. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

30/7/08

The government will waive the HK$400-a-month foreign domestic helper levy for two years.

29/7/08

The SAR government and Ministry of Commerce signed Supplement V to the Hong Kong-Mainland Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA5) to allow Hong Kong enterprises greater and easier access to the mainland market.

20/7/08

The waiving of the domestic helper levy is likely to start a month early on August 1.

16/7/08

Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam- kuen has unveiled an HK$11 billion inflation relief package.

12/7/08

Rita Lau Ng Wai-lan succeeds Frederick Ma Si-hang as the Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development.

11/7/08

Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen promises to formulate policies to ease the burdens created by inflation.

1/7/08

Protesters of the annual July 1 march urging the Government's response to demands.

26/6/08

Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen makes unprecedented appearance in chamber to defend political appointees.

20/6/08

The government unveil a HK$1 billion buyout plan to reform chicken trade.

10/6/08

Chief Executive Donald Tsang apologizes for the arrangement of political appointments.

9/6/08

Government is uncertain of the source of bird flu virus.

6/6/08

Education Bureau announces that new arrangements will start in 2009-10 school year the earliest.

5/6/08

The Chief Executive's Office Chan Tak-lam says Government could have handled the deputy minister issue better.

31/5/08

Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen talks about Deputy Director of Bureau and Political Assistant in Shanghai.

25/4/08

The Department of Health loses 691 records of patients.

22/4/08

Hong Kong will build a rail link connecting the city to Guangzhou and Shenzhen.

14/3/08

Secretary for Food and Health York Chow anticipates that the flu could continue until April or afterward.

13/3/08

Proposal of reforming public health system is officially released.

12/3/08

York Chow announces all primary schools, special schools, nurseries and kindergartens will be closed for two weeks.

29/2/08

Government announces 2008-09 new land Application List.

28/2/08

The governments of HK, Guangdong, and Macau endorse the financing scheme for bridges linking the three places and the project will soon proceed to public tenders.

27/2/08

Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah delivers his first finanical budget, returning up to $100b to the people.

24/2/08

Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah will announce his first financial budget for the upcoming year on Wednesday.

22/2/08

Education Bureau proposes secondary schools to be given freedom of choosing which language to use for teaching.

16/2/08

More progress is made on cross-Pearl River Delta bridge development with settlement of financing proposal.


Commentary

(Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP Robert Chung.)

Compared to mid-July, our latest survey shows that CE Donald Tsang's support rating has slightly increased while his approval rate has slightly dropped, but both within sampling errors. In other words, comparing the overall figures registered in last two consecutive surveys, the dropping trend of Donald Tsang's popularity has somewhat stopped. However, because the last survey accidentally fell before and after CE announced his over $10 billion package of 10 relief measures in the Legislative Council on July 16, if we use the figures differentially registered before and after that announcement, CE's current support rating and approval rate are significantly lower than the 56.1 marks and 48% registered on July 16. This shows that the popularity effect of the relief measures was quite short. Moreover, if we look at the result of our biannual survey on CE performance, only about one-third of the people now consider Donald Tsang doing a good job, representing a plunge of 24 percentage points over 6 months.

As for the Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system, compared to early July, changes in approval rates of the following officials are significant beyond sampling errors: Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau's approval rate surged 8 percentage points, while those of Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng and Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan both increased by 5 percentage points.

According to the benchmarks set by us quite some time ago, the performance of Ambrose Lee can continue to be labeled as 'ideal', that of Wong Yan-lung, Henry Tang and Matthew Cheung can be labeled as 'successful', that of John Tsang, Carrie Lam, Donald Tsang, York Chow, Michael Suen, Stephen Lam and Tsang Tak-sing can be labeled as 'mediocre', and that of Eva Cheng, Denise Yue, Edward Yau, Ceajer Chan and Rita Lau can be labeled as 'inconspicuous'. No official falls under the categories of 'depressing' or 'disastrous'. As for the reasons affecting the popularity change of these officials, readers can make their own judgment using detailed records shown in our 'Opinion Daily' feature page.

The following table summarizes the grading of the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

"Ideal": those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Siu-kwong (68%)

 

"Successful": those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

SJ Wong Yan-lung (58%); CS Henry Tang Ying-yen (51%); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (50%)

 

"Mediocre": those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

FS John Tsang Chun-wah (47%); Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (45%); CE Donald Tsang Yam-kuen (43%); Secretary for Food and Health York Chow Yat-ngok (42%); Secretary for Education Michael Suen Ming-yeung (41%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung (31%); Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (27%)

 

"Inconspicuous": those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng Yu-wah (39%, 47%); Secretary for the Civil Service Denise Yue Chung-yee (34%, 43%); Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah (32%, 41%); Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (29%, 34%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Frederick Ma Si-hang (22%, 31%)

 

"Depressing": those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None

 

"Disastrous": those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates

None


Starting last year, a new grading system was adopted for the HKCEE Chinese Language and English Language, whereby the old 'pulling curve' system using a six-grade norm reference approach was replaced by a standard-referenced approach with six grades from Level '1' to '5*'. This should have deepened people's understanding of the standard-referenced approach, which is fairly similar to POP's grading system of principal officials. We therefore would not object to community members using Level '1' to '5*' to describe the popularity of principle officials.

News about POP

POP's normal practice is to release the results of our regular surveys every Tuesday afternoon via our POP Site, except during public holidays, each time with a forecast of the items to be released in the next 7 days. According to schedule, our next release of regular survey findings will be August 19, 2008, Tuesday, between 1 pm and 2 pm, when the latest figures on subjective social and rule of law indicators will be released.

POP will also follow the rhythm of the WorldPublicOpinion.org (WPO) to globally release the Chinese versions of WPO's press releases regularly, via our "World Public Opinion Platform" accessible through our POP Site and the "Hong Kong People's Opinion Platform" at http://www.hkpop.hk.

Our general practice is to answer all questions on the research design of the surveys published in the POP Site as soon as we receive them, but we will not further comment on the findings. We welcome questions for follow-up purpose, please email them to us at <[email protected]>. We will keep such an arrangement under constant review, suggestions most welcome. Please note that everything carried in the POP Site does not represent the stand of the University of Hong Kong. Dr Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of POP, is responsible for everything posted herewith, except for column articles which represent the stand of their authors.

For the whole of last year, we have included in our regular press releases a small educational section for the purpose of sharing our research experience with the readers and the general public, and the subject of our education section today is "About HKUPOP". In the near future, we will keep on stepping up our effort in promoting general civic education to enhance our POP Site accordingly.

About HKUPOP

Popularity surveys of CE and principal officials

In advanced democratic countries, the popularity of top leaders and principal officials is the crux of all opinion polls. Shortly after HKUPOP was established, we started to conduct surveys on these aspects. We have explained the development of these surveys in our press releases of October 31, 2006, January 16 and 31, February 8, March 13, June 12, August 14, September 11, October 16, November 13, December 11, 2007, February 12, March 11, April 8, May 13, June 10 as well as July 8, 2008. Today, we post it again, so that readers can review such development.

(1) Development of CE's popularity survey
  • From its establishment to the handover of Hong Kong, POP has continually conducted surveys to measure the popularity rating of Governor Chris Patten. After the handover when Tung Chee-hwa became the first Chief Executive in 1997, we began our popularity survey of CE Tung Chee-hwa. After Tung resigned and Donald Tsang succeeded, POP has begun to measure Tsang's popularity. The frequency of our surveys was at least once every month during the Patten era. It was then increased to three times per month when Tung became CE, until the end of 1997. From January 1998 onwards, it was reduced to twice every month.


  • The question wordings used in "popularity of Governor or CE" survey are: "Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your extent of support to the Governor/ the Chief Executive XXX, with 0 indicating absolutely not supportive, 100 indicating absolutely supportive and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate the Governor/the Chief Executive XXX?" and "If a general election of the Chief Executive were to be held tomorrow, and you had the right to vote, would you vote for XXX?".


  • Before April 2000, the sample size of our regular surveys was set at slightly over 500. After that, it was increased to at least 1,000.


(2) Development of CE's popularity (performance) survey>
  • The frequency of our surveys was once every two months since August 2002. From February 2004 onwards, it was reduced to once every six months.


  • The question wordings used in "CE popularity (performance)" survey are: "Do you think XXX is doing a good or bad job as CE?".


  • Regarding the sample size, ever since the beginning, the sample size of surveys has been set at slightly over 1,000.

(3) Development of the survey for Secretaries of Departments:

  • For the rating survey of the Secretaries of Departments, in between January to November 2001, the frequency of the survey was conducted on an irregular basis. From January 2002 onwards, the survey is conducted once every month. For the support rates of the Secretaries based on people's hypothetical vote of confidence, it was surveyed once every three months from September 2002 to December 2003. Then it was changed to once every two months from February 2004 to December 2005. From January 2006 onwards, the survey is conducted once every month.


  • The wordings used in the questionnaire are: "Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your extent of support to Chief Secretary for Administration XXX/Financial Secretary YYY/Secretary for Justice ZZZ, with 0 indicating absolutely not supportive, 100 indicating supportive and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate XXX/YYY/ZZZ?". For the support rates of Secretaries, the wordings are "If you had the right to vote on the reappointment or dismissal of XXX/YYY/ZZZ as the Chief Secretary for Administration/Financial Secretary/Secretary for Justice tomorrow, how would you vote?"


  • Regarding the sample size, ever since the beginning, the sample size of surveys has been set at slightly over 1,000.

(4) Development of the survey for Directors of Bureaux:

  • For the rating survey of the Directors of Bureaux, in between June 2002 to December 2005, the frequency was once every month. From January 2006 to June 2007, the survey is conducted once every two months. For the support rates of Directors of Bureaux, the frequency was once every three months from September 2002 to December 2003. Then from February 2004 to June 2007, the survey was conducted once every two months. In July 2007, with the beginning of CE's new term of office and the appointment of new principal officials, the frequency of support rate survey of the Directors of Bureaux was increased to once every month, while the frequency of rating survey was reduced to once every three months. Moreover, although all survey results are uploaded onto the POP Site in detail, POP no longer analyze the result of rating surveys. This is to better match the evolvement of the accountability system as well as the pace of democratic development.


  • Similar to the popularity survey of the Secretaries of Departments, that of the Directors of Bureaux also includes the questions of rating and hypothetical voting. The wordings used in the questionnaire are: "Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your extent of support to XXX, with 0 indicating absolutely not supportive, 100 indicating supportive and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate XXX?" and "If you had the right to vote on the reappointment or dismissal of XXX as YYYYYYYYY tomorrow, how would you vote?" However, the two questions are may not be asked in different the same surveys separately.


  • Regarding the sample size, from the beginning to December 2005, the sample size of the surveys was set at slightly over 1,000. However, from 2006 onwards, this series of questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, and the sample size for each question also varies.

All the findings from our surveys on "popularity of principal officials" have been released online through our HKU POP Site.


| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | News about POP |
| About HKUPOP | Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |