HKU POP SITE releases the latest results of subjective freedom indicatorsBack


Press Release on January 23, 2007
 

| Special Announcement | Latest Figures | Commentary | News about POP | About HKUPOP |
| Detailed Findings (Subjective Freedom Indicators) |

Special Announcement
 

Other than publishing a regular press release on the latest results of subjective freedom indicators as scheduled via the "HKU POP SITE" (http://hkupop.pori.hk), the Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong today also expanded the coverage of "significant events" under its new online feature page "Opinion Daily" to events happening in November 2006. Moreover, the online "POP Poll" feature page has also been revised to facilitate readers' search for individual research items.


Latest Figures
 

POP SITE today releases the latest results of subjective freedom indicators. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in mid-2006. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:


 Date of survey  Overall sample size   Response rate   Maximum Sampling error of percentages* 
 9-12/1/2007   1,009   62.7%   +/- 3% 
* Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sample error. Sampling errors of ratings are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.
 

Recent trends of these indicators are summarized as follows:

 
 Date of survey  4-6/7/05   17-21/10/05   3-6/1/06   4-7/7/06   9-12/1/07   Latest change 
 Sample base  1,020   1,009   1,018   1,015   1,009   -- 
 Overall response rate  61.9%   65.6%   63.5%   55.9%   62.7%   -- 
 Maximum sampling error of indicators (at 95 % confidence level)*  +/- 0.14   +/- 0.16   +/- 0.14   +/- 0.16   +/-0.14   -- 
 Finding for each question/Sampling error**  Finding   Finding   Finding   Finding   Finding   Sampling error   -- 
 Freedom of religious belief  8.50   8.61   8.66   8.69   8.64   +/-0.10   -0.05 
 Freedom to enter or leave Hong Kong  8.34   8.51   8.54   8.67   8.56   +/-0.10   -0.11 
 Freedom to engage in academic research  8.01   8.14   8.09   8.25   8.08   +/-0.10   -0.17 
 Freedom to engage in artistic and literary creation  8.00   7.99   8.00   8.03   8.00   +/-0.12   -0.03 
 Freedom of procession and demonstration  7.38   7.33   7.71   7.67   7.48   +/-0.12   -0.19 
 Freedom of speech  7.20   7.26   7.68   7.94   7.46   +/-0.12   -0.48 
 Freedom of publication  7.27   7.31   7.66   7.61   7.46   +/-0.12   -0.15 
 Freedom of press  7.15   7.18   7.63   7.54   7.40   +/-0.12   -0.14 
 Freedom of association  7.11   7.09   7.41   7.47   7.21   +/-0.12   -0.26 
 Freedom to strike  6.73   6.72   6.83   6.80   6.92   +/-0.14   +0.12 
** "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-0.14 at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures.
 

The survey conducted in early January revealed that, on a scale of 0-10, the freedoms of "religious belief" and "entering or leaving Hong Kong" scored the highest ratings with 8.64 and 8.56 marks, followed by freedoms to engage in "academic research" and "artistic and literary creation", attaining 8.08 and 8.00 marks correspondingly. Freedoms of "procession and demonstration", "speech", "publication" and "press" formed the next tier, with respective scores of 7.48, 7.46, 7.46 and 7.40 marks. Finally, the freedoms of "association" and to "strike" attained 7.21 and 6.92 marks correspondingly.


Commentary

Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of Public Opinion Programme, observed, "Compared to 6 months ago, our latest survey shows that all 10 subjective freedom indicators with the exception of 'freedom to strike' have dropped, most noticeably for the freedoms of 'speech' and 'association'. If we use a longer perspective, then 7 out of 10 indicators which climbed to record high in 2006 since the survey started after the handover have gone back to the level registered at the end of 2005. This probably also reflects the public mood in general. The freedom to 'strike', however, has climbed to record high even though it is still at the bottom of the list. In terms of relative ranking, the freedoms of 'religious belief' and 'entering or leaving Hong Kong' continue to cluster at the top, with over 8.5 marks. The freedoms to engage in 'academic research' and 'artistic and literary creation' form the second tier, with over 8.0 marks. The freedoms of 'procession and demonstration', 'speech', 'publication', 'press' and 'association' cluster to form the third tier, with about 7.5 marks. The freedom to 'strike', although reaching record high this time, continues to form a group of its own at the bottom of the list, with less than 7.0 marks."

News about POP

POP's normal practice is to release the results of our regular surveys every Tuesday afternoon via our POP Site, except during public holidays, each time with a forecast of the items to be released in the next 7 days. According to schedule, our next release of regular survey findings will be January 30, 2007, Tuesday, between 1pm to 2pm, when the latest popularity figures of CE Donald Tsang and HKSAR Government will be released.

Our general practice is to answer all questions on the research design of the surveys published in the POP Site as soon as we receive them, but we will not further comment on the findings. We welcome questions for follow-up purpose, please email them to us at . We will keep such an arrangement under constant review, suggestions most welcome. Please note that everything carried in the POP Site does not represent the stand of the University of Hong Kong. Dr Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of POP, is responsible for everything posted herewith, except for column articles which represent the stand of their authors.

For the whole of last year, we have included in our regular press releases a small educational section for the purpose of sharing our research experience with the readers and the general public, and the subject of our education section today is "About HKUPOP". In the near future, we will keep on stepping up our effort in promoting general civic education to enhance our POP Site accordingly.

About HKUPOP

Subjective "freedom indicators" surveys

Social indicator survey is an important way for the general public to monitor a society's development. HKUPOP first conducted such surveys around the handover of Hong Kong in 1997, in order to monitor the new development of Hong Kong society. Regarding the development of our surveys on "social indicators" and "rule of law indicators", we have explained them in our press release of September 5, 2006. Today, we concentrate on the development of "freedom indicators" survey. In our research domain, "freedom indicators" comprises 10 main indicators, namely, "freedom of speech", "freedom of press", "freedom of publication", "freedom of procession and demonstration", "freedom of association", "freedom to strike", "freedom to enter or leave Hong Kong", "freedom to engage in academic research", "freedom to engage in artistic and literary creation" and "freedom of religious belief". The development of these surveys is as follows:

  • Between August and November 1997, our surveys on freedom indicators were conducted once a month. It was reduced to once every two months after that. In October 2000, it was further reduced to once every three months. Starting from January 2006, "freedom indicators" are surveyed once every six months to cope with the changing social conditions.

  • For the "freedom indicators" surveys, the question wordings used in the questionnaire are "Please use 0 - 10 to evaluate the extent of the freedom of XX in Hong Kong. 10 indicates absolute freedom, 0 indicates absolute lack of freedom, 5 indicates half-half. What do you think?"

  • Regarding the sample size, between August 1997 and March 2000, the sample size of all surveys was set at slightly over 500. Since May 2000, it was increased to at least 1,000.

  • The findings of our early "freedom indicators" surveys conducted between August 1997 and August 1999 were published in our newsletter POP Express. After our HKU POP Site was established in June 2000, such findings were released online since February 2002 while all previous findings published in our POP Express were also uploaded online in various formats.

| Special Announcement | Latest Figures | Commentary | News about POP | About HKUPOP |
| Detailed Findings (Subjective Freedom Indicators) |