HKU| FSS| Contact Us| Sitemap

• 
• 

Search Wizard

Local Public Figures Non-local Public Figures Research on Politics and Policies Social Research Groups & Organizations [-] [+]

Press Releases POP Polls POP Columns Features Research Report

Press Release on January 5, 2017

| Detailed Findings (Macau annual survey) |

| Detailed Findings (Macau Studies Feature Page) |

Special Announcement

To facilitate academic study and rational discussion, the Public Opinion Programme (POP) of The University of Hong Kong has already released for public examination some time ago via the “HKU POP Site” (http://hkupop.pori.hk) the raw data of all 112 regular rating surveys of CE CY Leung, as well as the 181 regular rating surveys of former CE Donald Tsang and 239 regular rating surveys of former CE CH Tung, along with related demographics of respondents. Please follow normal academic standards when using or citing such data.

Abstract

Hong Kong and Macau differ a lot, the figures of their public sentiments cannot be directly compared. However, within the survey series conducted by POP in Macau, they themselves can be compared. Between 1 and 9 December 2016, POP interviewed 520 Macau people by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers, and found that using a one-in-three choices method, livelihood problems continue to be Macau people’s most concerned problems, followed by economic and then political problems, a pattern which has existed for many years. Among them, the percentage of those most concerned with livelihood problems has increased to record high since the survey began in 1999, while that for political problems has dropped to all-time record low. The ratings of all 4 core social indicators register significant increases, while that of “democracy” has gone up to a new high since 2002 but remains at the bottom on the list. As for Macau people’s appraisal of news media in general, the latest credibility rating goes up significantly to 5.78 marks. Compared to one year ago, people’s net trusts in the Macau SAR and Central Governments have both increased significantly, to positive 49 and positive 51 percentage points respectively. As for the confidence indicators, people’s confidence in the future of Macau, the future of China, and “one country, two systems” have all remained positive. Its net trust towards Macau’s future has significantly increased to positive 64 percentage points as compared to one year ago, while the net trusts toward China’s future and “one country, two systems” are at positive 74 and positive 65 percentage points respectively. In terms of ethnic identity, people’s identity ratings of “Macau citizen” and “Chinese citizen” have both increased compared to one year ago, at 8.2 and 8.0 marks respectively. All in all, our Macau Annual Survey has shown that Macau people are generally very satisfied with the development of Macau in the year past. The maximum sampling error of all percentage figures is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures and net values need another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 66%.

Points to note:

[1] The address of the “HKU POP SITE”is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.

[2] The sample size of this survey is 520 successful interviews, not 520 x 65.6% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] The maximum sampling error of all percentages is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state “sampling error of rating not more than +/-0.2, of percentages not more than +/-4% and of net values not more than +/-7% at 95% confidence level”. Because POP introduced “rim weighting” in 2015 for this survey series, during the transition period, whether changes in various figures are beyond sampling errors are based on tests using the same weighting methods. That is, to test whether the first set of figures collected in 2015 is significantly different from that of the previous survey, both sets of data are rim weighted before testing, instead of using simple computation of the published figures.

[4] Because of sampling errors in conducting the survey(s) and the rounding procedures in processing the data, the figures cannot be too precise, and the totals may not be completely accurate. Therefore, when quoting percentages of the survey(s), journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses “computerized random telephone survey” to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.

Background Information

Since 1992, POP has been conducting onsite studies in Macau in order to study the development of its public sentiment. Among them, most are related to election studies and opinion testing. Up to now, these research projects include Macau Legislative Assembly Exit Polls (1992, 1996, 2001, 2005 and 2009), Macau handover and year-end review surveys (since 1999), and other feature studies

After the sovereignty of Hong Kong and Macau returned to China, the development of public sentiment in the two cities has become more inter-related. One can expect that Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Macau, Zhuhai and the whole Pearl River Delta will soon merge to become one entity both economically and culturally. Therefore, in the long run, establishing a common social indicator in this region is a “multiple-win situation” for all. POP’s research in Macau in the last 24 years is aimed at gradually building up a regional system on scientific public opinion polling, and to provide useful data for comparative studies in future.

Latest Figures

POP today releases via the “POP SITE” the second part of the Macau annual survey 2016. The first part of survey results was released on December 19, 2016. From 2015, POP enhanced the previous simple weighting method based on age and gender distribution to “rim weighting” based on age, gender and education (highest level attended) distribution for this survey series. The latest figures released today have been rim-weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Statistics and Census Service of Macau government regarding the gender-age distribution of the Macau population in 2015 year-end and the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution collected in the 2011 Census. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

Date of survey	Sample base	Overall response rate	Maximum sampling error of percentages[6]
1-9/12/2016	520	65.6%	+/-4%

[6] Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified.

I. Appraisal of society’s conditions

Recent figures of Macau people’s appraisal of society’s conditions are summarized as follows:

Date of survey	23-28/12/12	6-12/12/13	1-3/12/14	8-9/12/15	1-9/12/16	Latest change
Sample base[7]	519	511	502	510	520	--
Overall response rate	70.6%	69.6%	66.5%	66.1%	65.6%	--
Latest finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding and error[8]	--
Most concerned with livelihood problems[9]	72%	73%	69%	68%	74+/-4%	+6%[10]
Most concerned with economic problems	21%	20%	24%	25%	22+/-4%	-3%
Most concerned with political problems	4%	4%	4%	5%	1+/-1%	-4%[10]
Degree of stability	7.61[10]	7.20[10]	7.20	7.22	7.45+/-0.16	+0.23[10]
Degree of prosperity	7.65	7.41[10]	7.22[10]	6.76[10]	7.24+/-0.15	+0.48[10]
Degree of freedom	7.12[10]	6.82[10]	6.71	6.90	7.10+/-0.18	+0.20[10]
Degree of democracy	5.97	5.49[10]	5.51	5.58	6.07+/-0.19	+0.49[10]
Credibility rating of local news media in general	5.79	5.37[10]	5.20	5.23	5.78+/-0.20	+0.55[10]

[7] The frequency of this series of questions is different for different questions. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals.

[8] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-0.20 and sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.

[9] The wordings used before the 2012 survey were “social problems” and “social condition”. We take them to mean the same as “livelihood problems” and “livelihood condition” in the survey context.

[10] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level under the same weighting method, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

Latest survey showed that 74% of the respondents were most concerned with livelihood problems, 22% with economic problems, while 1% attached their greatest concern to political problems. Regarding the core social indicators, latest results showed that, on a scale of 0-10, Macau’s degree of “stability” scored the highest rating with 7.45 marks, followed by “prosperity” with 7.24 marks, and then “freedom” and “democracy”, with 7.10 and 6.07 marks respectively. As for people’s appraisal of Macau’s news media, on a scale of 0-10, the latest credibility rating of the Macau’s news media in general was 5.78 marks.

II. Trust and confidence indicators

Recent popularity figures of Macau SAR and Beijing Central and people’s confidence in the future as well as “one country, two systems” are summarized below:

Date of survey	23-28/12/12	6-12/12/13	1-3/12/14	8-9/12/15	1-9/12/16	Latest Change
Sample base [11]	519	511	502	510	520	--
Overall response rate	70.6%	69.6%	66.5%	66.1%	65.6%	--
Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding & error [12]	--
Trust in MSAR Government[13]	65%[14]	58%[14]	53%[14]	51%[14]	64+/-4%	+13%[14]
Distrust in MSAR Government[13]	11%[14]	19%[14]	21%	19%	15+/-3%	-4%[14]
Net trust	54%[14]	39%[14]	32%	33%	49+/-7%	+16%[14]
Mean value[13]	3.6 (Base=513)	3.4 [14] (Base=501)	3.4 (Base=495)	3.4 (Base=496)	3.6+/-0.1 (Base=515)	+0.2[14]
Trust in Beijing Government[13]	60%	56%	52%	55%	61+/-4%	+6%[14]
Distrust in Beijing Government[13]	11%	16%[14]	19%	11%[14]	11+/-3%	--
Net trust	49%	40%[14]	33%	44%[14]	51+/-6%	+7%[14]
Mean value[13]	3.7 (Base=475)	3.5 [14] (Base=468)	3.5 (Base=486)	3.6 (Base=464)	3.7+/-0.1 (Base=475)	+0.1
Confidence in Macau’s future	82%	76%[14]	74%	67%[14]	79+/-4%	+12%[14]
No-confidence in Macau’s future	12%	19%[14]	21%	24%	15+/-3%	-9%[14]
Net confidence	70%	57%[14]	53%	43%[14]	64+/-6%	+21%[14]
Confidence in China’s future	87%	81%[14]	80%	85%[14]	83+/-3%	-2%
No-confidence in China’s future	8%	12%[14]	14%	10%[14]	10+/-3%	--
Net confidence	79%	69%[14]	66%	76%[14]	74+/-5%	-2%
Confidence in “one country, two systems”	82%	75%[14]	70%[14]	75%	79+/-4%	+4%
No-confidence in “one country, two systems”	12%	19%[14]	23%	15%[14]	14+/-3%	-1%
Net confidence	70%	56%[14]	46%[14]	60%[14]	65+/-6%	+5%

[11] The frequency of this series of questions is different for different questions. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals.

[12] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% and of net values not more than +/-7% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.

[13] Collapsed from a 5-point scale. The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.

[14] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level under the same weighting method, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

Latest survey revealed that 64% of the respondents trusted the Macau SAR Government, 61% trusted the Beijing Central Government. The net trust values were positive 49 and positive 51 percentage points, while the mean scores of these trust indicators were 3.6 and 3.7 respectively, meaning between “quite trust” and “half-half” in general. On the other hand, 79% of the respondents had confidence in Macau’s future and 83% had confidence in China’s future, while 79% of the respondents were confident in “one country, two systems”. The three net confidence values were positive 64, positive 74 and positive 65 percentage points respectively.

III. Ethnic identity

Recent figures on Macau people’s ratings on two separate identities are tabulated as follows:

Date of survey	23-28/12/12	6-12/12/13	1-3/12/14	8-9/12/15	1-9/12/16	Latest change
Sample base	519	511	502	510	520	--
Overall response rate	70.6%	69.6%	66.5%	66.1%	65.6%	--
Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding and error[15]	--
Strength rating of being “Macau citizens”	8.3[16]	7.9[16]	8.0	7.9	8.2+/-0.2	+0.3[16]
Strength rating of being “citizens of PRC”	8.1	7.6[16]	7.7	7.9[16]	8.0+/-0.2	+0.1

[15] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of strength ratings not more than +/-0.2 at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.

[16] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level under the same weighting method, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

The above figures were collected from independent rating questions, but not involving the dichotomy issue of “Macau citizens” and “Chinese citizens”. Latest findings showed that the identity ratings for “Macau citizens” and “citizens of PRC” were 8.2 and 8.0 marks respectively.

Commentary

Frank Wai-Kin Lee, Research Manager of Public Opinion Programme, observed, “Hong Kong and Macau differ a lot, the figures of their public sentiments cannot be directly compared. However, within the survey series conducted by POP in Macau, they themselves can be compared. According to our annual survey completed at the end of last year, using a one-in-three choices method, livelihood problems continue to be Macau people’s most concerned problems, followed by economic and then political problems, a pattern which has existed for many years. Among them, the percentage of those most concerned with livelihood problems has increased to record high since the survey began in 1999, while that for political problems has dropped to all-time record low. The ratings of all 4 core social indicators register significant increases, while that of ‘democracy’ has gone up to a new high since 2002 but remains at the bottom on the list. As for Macau people’s appraisal of news media in general, the latest credibility rating goes up significantly to 5.78 marks. Compared to one year ago, people’s net trusts in the Macau SAR and Central Governments have both increased significantly, to positive 49 and positive 51 percentage points respectively. As for the confidence indicators, people’s confidence in the future of Macau, the future of China, and ‘one country, two systems’ have all remained positive. Its net trust towards Macau’s future has significantly increased to positive 64 percentage points as compared to one year ago, while the net trusts toward China’s future and ‘one country, two systems’ are at positive 74 and positive 65 percentage points respectively. In terms of ethnic identity, people’s identity ratings of ‘Macau citizen’ and ‘Chinese citizen’ have both increased compared to one year ago, at 8.2 and 8.0 marks respectively. All in all, our Macau Annual Survey has shown that Macau people are generally very satisfied with the development of Macau in the year past.

Future Release (Tentative)

• January 10, 2017 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Popularity of CE and Principal Officials

No. of hits since Jun 3, 2000: 80,973,699

No. of hits since Jan 1, 2018: 111,751

• 
• 
• 
• 

Everything carried in this website does not represent the stand of the University of Hong Kong. Dr Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of Public Opinion Programme, is responsible for everything posted herewith, except for column articles and messages posted at the opinion platforms. Any responsibility, legal and otherwise, arising from any such item shall vest entirely with its author. The intellectual property of all information contained in this website, including questionnaire design and research reports, originally belongs to HKU POP unless specified otherwise. HKU POP opens their copyright to the world via this website, but would request all users to acknowledge their source properly.

HKU POP all rights reserved.

Last update :  26/6/2019