HKU| FSS| Contact Us| Sitemap

• 
• 

Search Wizard

Local Public Figures Non-local Public Figures Research on Politics and Policies Social Research Groups & Organizations [-] [+]

Press Releases POP Polls POP Columns Features Research Report

Press Release on March 15, 2016

| Detailed Findings (Rating of Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying) | Detailed Findings (Popularity of Principal Officials) |

Special Announcement

To facilitate academic study and rational discussion, Public Opinion Programme (POP) at The University of Hong Kong has already released for public examination some time ago via the “HKU POP SITE” (http://hkupop.pori.hk) the raw data of all 92 regular rating surveys of CE CY Leung, as well as the 181 regular rating surveys of former CE Donald Tsang and 239 regular rating surveys of former CE CH Tung, along with related demographics of respondents. POP today releases the raw data of the latest which is the 93rd CE rating survey of CY Leung. Please follow normal academic standards when using or citing such data.

Abstract

POP interviewed 1,000 Hong Kong people between 7 and 10 March, 2016 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. Our latest survey conducted in the first half of March shows that the popularity rating of CY Leung has significantly decreased by 2.1 marks to 37.7 from the middle of February, which remains below the warning line of 45. His approval rate now stands at 23%, disapproval rate 63%, giving a net popularity of negative 40 percentage points. As for the Secretaries of Departments, the latest support rating of CS Carrie Lam is 54.2 marks. Her approval rate is 50%, disapproval rate 21%, giving a net popularity of positive 29 percentage points. The latest support rating of FS John Tsang is 63.4 marks, approval rate 69%, disapproval rate 8%, thus a net popularity of positive 60 percentage points. As for SJ Rimsky Yuen, his support rating is 46.5 marks, approval rate 34%, disapproval rate 27%, giving a net popularity of positive 7 percentage points. In terms of popularity rating, John Tsang continues to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the net approval rates of 4 among the 13 Directors have gone up, while 6 have gone down and 3 remain unchanged. Among them, only Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So and Secretary for Home Affairs Lau Kong-wah register significant changes in their net approval rate, each down by 8 percentage points. Among all the Directors, Nicholas Yang, Gregory So, Paul Chan, Lau Kong-wah and Eddie Ng register negative popularities, at negative 1, 5, 24, 25 and 47 percentage points respectively. Ko Wing-man continues to be the most popular Director, with a net approval rate of positive 71 percentage points. According to POP’s standard, Ko Wing-man and John Tsang fall under the category of “ideal” performer, Carrie Lam falls under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Matthew Cheung, Ceajer Chan, Anthony Cheung, Rimsky Yuen, Lai Tung-kwok, Raymond Tam, Gregory So, Wong Kam-sing, Nicholas Yang, Paul Chan and Lau Kong-wah can be labeled as “mediocre”. Clement Cheung can be labeled as “inconspicuous”. Eddie Ng and CY Leung fall into the category of “depressing” performer, while no one falls into that of “disastrous”. The maximum sampling error of all approval and disapproval rates is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling errors of rating figures and net approval rates need another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 67%. As the support rating of CE CY Leung continues to stand below the warning line of 45, Senior Data Analyst of POP, Edward Tai, reprints the abstracts of two articles written by Director of POP, Robert Chung, before on CE popularity, to discuss the possibility of a governance crisis. The articles can be downloaded in full from the POP Site.

Points to note:

[1] The address of the “HKU POP SITE” is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.

[2] The sample size of this survey is 1,000 successful interviews, not 1,000 x 67.4% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.

[3] “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state “sampling error of rating not more than +/-2.2, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4%, and sampling error of net values not more than +/-7% at 95% confidence level”.

[4] Because of sampling errors in conducting the survey(s) and the rounding procedures in processing the data, the figures cannot be too precise, and the totals may not be completely accurate. Therefore, when quoting percentages of the survey(s), journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used.

[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses “computerized random telephone survey” to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.

Latest Figures

POP today releases the latest popularity figures of CE CY Leung and various Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. From 2014, POP enhanced the previous simple weighting method based on age and gender distribution to “rim weighting” based on age, gender and education (highest level attended) distribution. The latest figures released today have been rim-weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2015 year-end and the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution collected in the 2011 Census. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

[6] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings and net approval rates are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sampling errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

[7] Based on 95% confidence interval.

Recent popularity figures of CE CY Leung are summarized as follows:

Date of survey	4-6/1/16	13/1/16 [8]	18-21/1/16	1-4/2/16	17-19/2/16	7-10/3/16	Latest change
Sample base	1,013	608	1,010	1,014	1,001	1,000	--
Overall response rate	63.9%	64.1%	67.2%	66.4%	66.4%	67.4%	--
Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding and error [9]	--
Rating of CE CY Leung	37.5[10]	37.0	38.7	39.5	39.8	37.7+/-2.0	-2.1[10]
Vote of confidence in CE CY Leung	22%[10]	18%[10]	23%[10]	21%	23%	23+/-3%	--
Vote of no confidence in CE CY Leung	66%[10]	72%[10]	62%[10]	61%	61%	63+/-3%	+2%
Net approval rate	-44%[10]	-54%[10]	-39%[10]	-39%	-38%	-40+/-5%	-2%

[8] This survey was the instant survey after the Policy Address and only asked rating of CE as well as his vote of confidence. Its sample size was 608.

[9] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of rating not more than +/-2.0, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3%, sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-5% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.

[10] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level under the same weighting method, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

Recent popularity figures of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

Date of survey	2-5/11/15	3-7/12/15	4-6/1/16	1-4/2/16	24/2/16 [11]	7-10/3/16	Latest change
Sample base[11]	608-680	572-653	551-618	576-651	528	642-708	--
Overall response rate	66.4%	65.4%	63.9%	66.4%	63.6%	67.4%	--
Latest finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding	Finding & error [12]	--
Rating of CS Carrie Lam	55.7	59.0[13]	52.1[13]	52.7	--	54.2+/-2.2	+1.5
Vote of confidence in CS Carrie Lam	50%	52%	44%[13]	45%	--	50+/-4%	+5%[13]
Vote of no confidence in CS Carrie Lam	17%	15%	22%[13]	24%	--	21+/-3%	-3%
Net approval rate	33%	37%	22%[13]	20%	--	29+/-6%	+9%[13]
Rating of FS John Tsang	61.8	62.7	59.3[13]	62.3[13]	62.2	63.4+/-1.5	+1.2
Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang	64%	63%	57%[13]	59%	58%	69+/-4%	+11%[13]
Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang	8%	10%	9%	8%	10%	8+/-2%	-2%
Net approval rate	56%	53%	48%	51%	48%	60+/-5%	+12%[13]
Rating of SJ Rimsky Yuen	48.8[13]	47.1	45.0[13]	44.9	--	46.5+/-2.2	+1.6
Vote of confidence in SJ Rimsky Yuen	33%	28%[13]	27%	26%	--	34+/-4%	+8%[13]
Vote of no confidence in SJ Rimsky Yuen	26%	27%	28%	31%	--	27+/-4%	-4%
Net approval rate	7%	1%	-1%	-5%	--	7+/-6%	+12%[13]

[11] The frequency of this series of questions is different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals. Starting from 2011, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies. The survey conducted on 24/2/2016 was the Budget instant survey and only asked rating of FS as well as his vote of confidence.

[12] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-2.2, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4%, sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-6% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.

[13] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level under the same weighting method, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

Latest popularity figures of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below, in descending order of net approval rates:

[14] Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.

[15] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% and sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-7% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.

[16] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level under the same weighting method, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

[17] The Innovation and Technology Bureau was established on November 20, 2015 and Nicholas Yang was appointed Secretary for Innovation and Technology.

[18] Based on the figures in early January, in one decimal place, the respective net approval rates of Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So are 7.3 and 6.8 percentage points. Thus, they are ranked eighth and ninth at that time.

[19] Based on the figures in the latest survey, in one decimal place, the respective net approval rates of Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung and Secretary for the Civil Service Clement Cheung are 14.5 and 14.2 percentage points. Thus, they are ranked fourth and fifth this time.

The latest survey showed that, CE CY Leung scored 37.7 marks, and 23% supported him as CE, his net approval rate is negative 40 percentage points. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Carrie Lam, FS John Tsang and SJ Rimsky Yuen were 54.2, 63.4 and 46.5 marks, and 50%, 69% and 34% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. Their net approval rates are positive 29, positive 60 and positive 7 percentage points respectively.

As for the Directors of Bureaux, according to the net approval rates, results revealed that the top position goes to Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man, attaining positive 71 percentage points. The 2nd and 3rd places belong to Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan and Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung with net approval rates of positive 28 and positive 20 percentage points respectively. Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung, Secretary for the Civil Service Clement Cheung, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam, Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok, Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing, Secretary for Innovation and Technology Nicholas Yang, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So, Secretary for Development Paul Chan, Secretary for Home Affairs Lau Kong-wah and Secretary for Education Eddie Ng ranked 4th to 13th, their corresponding net approval rates are positive 14, positive 14, positive 6, positive 5, positive 4, negative 1, negative 5, negative 24, negative 25 and negative 47 percentage points. In other words, only Ko Wing-man scored a net approval rate of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.

Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called “Opinion Daily” at the “POP Site”, to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to “Opinion Daily” as soon as they are verified by POP.

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from 1 to 4 February, 2016 while this survey was conducted from 7 to 10 March, 2016. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Senior Data Analyst of POP, Edward Tai.

Our latest survey conducted in the first half of March shows that the popularity rating of CY Leung has significantly decreased by 2.1 marks to 37.7 from the middle of February, which remains below the warning line of 45. His approval rate now stands at 23%, disapproval rate 63%, giving a net popularity of negative 40 percentage points.

As for the Secretaries of Departments, the latest support rating of CS Carrie Lam is 54.2 marks. Her approval rate is 50%, disapproval rate 21%, giving a net popularity of positive 29 percentage points. The latest support rating of FS John Tsang is 63.4 marks, approval rate 69%, disapproval rate 8%, thus a net popularity of positive 60 percentage points. As for SJ Rimsky Yuen, his support rating is 46.5 marks, approval rate 34%, disapproval rate 27%, giving a net popularity of positive 7 percentage points. In terms of popularity rating, John Tsang continues to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the net approval rates of 4 among the 13 Directors have gone up, while 6 have gone down and 3 remain unchanged. Among them, only Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So and Secretary for Home Affairs Lau Kong-wah register significant changes in their net approval rate, each down by 8 percentage points. Among all the Directors, Nicholas Yang, Gregory So, Paul Chan, Lau Kong-wah and Eddie Ng register negative popularities, at negative 1, 5, 24, 25 and 47 percentage points respectively. Ko Wing-man continues to be the most popular Director, with a net approval rate of positive 71 percentage points.

According to POP’s standard, Ko Wing-man and John Tsang fall under the category of “ideal” performer, Carrie Lam falls under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Matthew Cheung, Ceajer Chan, Anthony Cheung, Rimsky Yuen, Lai Tung-kwok, Raymond Tam, Gregory So, Wong Kam-sing, Nicholas Yang, Paul Chan and Lau Kong-wah can be labeled as “mediocre”. Clement Cheung can be labeled as “inconspicuous”. Eddie Ng and CY Leung fall into the category of “depressing” performer, while no one falls into that of “disastrous”.

The following table summarizes the grading of CE and the principal officials for readers’ easy reference:

“Ideal”: those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man (79%); FS John Tsang Chun-wah (69%)

“Successful”: those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

CS Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (50%)[20]

“Mediocre”: those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (43%); Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (41%); Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung Bing-leung (38%); SJ Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung (34%)[21]; Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok (34%)[21]; Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam Chi-yuen (31%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung (30%); Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing (29%); Secretary for Innovation and Technology Nicholas Yang Wei-hsiung (26%); Secretary for Development Paul Chan Mo-po (26%); Secretary for Home Affairs Lau Kong-wah (23%)

“Inconspicuous”: those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for the Civil Service Clement Cheung Wan-ching (22%, 29%);

“Depressing”: those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Education Eddie Ng Hak-kim (63%)[22]; CE Leung Chun-ying (63%)[22]

“Disastrous”: those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

[20] In two decimal places, the approval rate of CS Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor is 50.03%.

[21] In one decimal place, the respective approval rates of SJ Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung and Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok are 34.3% and 33.6%.

[22] In one decimal place, the respective disapproval rates of Secretary for Education Eddie Ng Hak-kim and CE Leung Chun-ying are 63.4% and 62.9%.

Since the support rating of CE CY Leung continues to stand below the warning line of 45, I reprint again the abstracts of two articles written by Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of POP, before on CE popularity for public reference, to discuss the possibility of a governance crisis. The articles can be downloaded in full from the POP Site.

“The Popularity of Tung Chee-hwa from All Angles” (released on 14/5/2003): “According to our experience, a political figure with less than 50 marks can be said to have fallen into negative popularity, while a score of less than 45 marks can indicate credibility crisis. Using this analysis, Tung has been negatively popular among the general public since August 2002, and in March 2003, he has sunk into a credibility crisis…”

“New Perspectives on Chief Executive Ratings” (released on 12/6/2003): “Concurrent tests showed that a support rating of 55 marks was more or less equivalent to a ‘vote share’ of 45%, 50 marks could be converted to round about 30%, 45 marks to 20%, and 40 marks to 10% to 15%... In late 1990, after the ‘approval rate’ of Margaret Thatcher sank to 25%, she withdrew from the election for the leader of the British Conservative Party, thereby gave up her job as the Prime Minister of UK, a post which she held since 1979. In early 1997, John Major lost his post of Prime Minister to Tony Blair, after his ‘approval rate’ hovered around the level of 30% for a long time. As for former USA President Bill Clinton, his lowest ever ‘approval rate’ within his 8-year terms of office was as high as 37%...”

Future Release (Tentative)

March 22, 2016 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Second Budget follow-up survey

No. of hits since Jun 3, 2000: 81,291,301

No. of hits since Jan 1, 2018: 429,353

• 
• 
• 
• 

Everything carried in this website does not represent the stand of the University of Hong Kong. Dr Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of Public Opinion Programme, is responsible for everything posted herewith, except for column articles and messages posted at the opinion platforms. Any responsibility, legal and otherwise, arising from any such item shall vest entirely with its author. The intellectual property of all information contained in this website, including questionnaire design and research reports, originally belongs to HKU POP unless specified otherwise. HKU POP opens their copyright to the world via this website, but would request all users to acknowledge their source properly.

HKU POP all rights reserved.

Last update :  26/6/2019