HKU POP releases the latest rankings of political figuresBack

 
Press Release on May 19, 2015

| Special Announcements| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (People's Most Familiar Political Figures) |


Special Announcements

(1) The “HKU POP Site” (http://hkupop.pori.hk) run by the Public Opinion Programme (POP) of The University of Hong Kong continues to release the results of the “Joint-University Rolling Survey on 2017 Chief Executive Election Proposal” on a daily basis except weekends and holidays. According to the latest findings, for the survey conducted from May 11 to 15, 46% “supported” the government’s proposal on CE election of 2017, 40% “opposed” and 14% did not give a definite answer. For details please refer to the feature page at http://hkupop.pori.hk/english/features/jointUrollingSurvey. Please note that the data released to public has a time lag of four days. Moreover, due to sampling errors, when quoting the figures, journalists should refrain from reporting the decimal places of the percentage figures.

 

(2) To facilitate academic study and rational discussion, POP has already released for public examination some time ago via POP Site the raw data of all 72 regular rating surveys of CE CY Leung, as well as the 181 regular rating surveys of former CE Donald Tsang and 239 regular rating surveys of former CE CH Tung, along with related demographics of respondents. Please follow normal academic standards when using or citing such data.


Abstract

POP interviewed 1,029 Hong Kong people between May 8 and 14 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. According to this latest survey, Leung Chun-ying continues to be the most visible political figure in Hong Kong, Carrie Lam ranks 2nd while Leung Kwok-hung ranks 3rd. Compared to 6 months ago, 9 people remain on the “top 10” list, only James Tien who ranked 8th last time has fallen out of the list after dropping to the 21st position. He is replaced by Anson Chan who has gone up 4 positions from the 12th place to occupy the 8th place. The ups and downs within the latest list should be good reflections of our changing political environment. If we would like to focus on long term development, we can use the overall rankings accumulated over five years. Figures show that Leung Kwok-hung, Donald Tsang, Wong Yuk-man, Regina Ip and Leung Chun-ying are people’s most familiar political figures in the long run. It should be noted, however, that our ranking of “people’s most familiar political figures” is based on our surveys which requested respondents to name local political figures without prompting. This kind of familiarity measurement is not the same as prompted ratings. In other words, those high on the list may not be the most supported figures, while those lower may have a different ranking if we use a prompting method. However, those who scored best in unprompted surveys are no doubt the most well-known political figures in Hong Kong. The maximum sampling error of percentages of people’s most familiar political figures is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level. The response rate of this survey is 67%.


Points to note:

[1] The address of the “HKU POP SITE” is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
[2] The sample size of the survey on people’s most familiar political figures, the sample size is 1,029 successful cases, not 1,029 x 67.4% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] The maximum sampling error of percentages is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state “sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4%, at 95% confidence level”. Because POP introduced “rim weighting” in 2014, during the transition period, whether changes in various figures are beyond sampling errors are based on tests using the same weighting methods. That is, to test whether the first set of figures collected in 2014 is significantly different from that of the previous survey, both sets of data are rim weighted before testing, instead of using simple computation of the published figures.
[4] Because of sampling errors in conducting the survey(s) and the rounding procedures in processing the data, the figures cannot be too precise, and the totals may not be completely accurate. Therefore, when quoting percentages of the survey(s), journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses “computerized random telephone survey” to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.



Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via the POP Site the survey results of people’s most familiar political figures. From 2014, POP enhanced the previous simple weighting method based on age and gender distribution to “rim weighting” based on age, gender and education (highest level attended) distribution. The latest figures released today have been rim-weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2014 year-end and the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution collected in the 2011 Census. Herewith the contact information of survey on people’s most familiar political figures:

 

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Sampling error of percentages [6]

8-14/5/2015

1,029

67.4%

+/-3%

[6] Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified.


This survey on people’s most familiar political figures has been conducted for many years, with results initially released through our publication POP Express until October 2006 when we began to release them online. Between 1994 and 2005, the survey was conducted and released in the form of “top 10 political figures” using our usual “top 10” or “top 5” series survey design, which involved both naming and rating stages. Starting from October 2005, we simplified our “top 10 political figures” survey by just recording and analyzing the “naming” results, because we have already developed over time numerous rating surveys covering CE, government officials, members of Legislative and Executive Councils, and so on. As for the rating part, we only conduct supplementary rating surveys to cover those listed in the top 10 political figures but not covered in other rating surveys. Take our latest survey as an example, our supplementary rating survey of Tung Chee-hwa, Donald Tsang and Anson Chan will be conducted later and the results will be uploaded onto our POP Site in due course. Moreover, in our presentation of findings, different from the other “top 10” rating series, we introduced rankings from 1 to 50 for “people’s most familiar political figures”, as well as average accumulative rankings calculated from the past 10 surveys spanning over about five years, in order to indicate the ups-and-downs of these political figures in the long run. Please refer to our POP Site for details. Herewith the result of our latest survey on “people’s most familiar political figures”, other rankings beyond the “Top 10” can be found in the POP Site:

 

Date of survey

4-7/11/13

22-30/4/14

31/10-5/11/14

8-14/5/15

Average ranking over the past 10 surveys [9]

Sample base

1,008[8]

1,032[8]

1,008

1,029[8]

--

Overall response rate

66.8%

65.6%

64.8%

67.4%

--

Sampling error of
percentages (at 95% confidence level)[7]

+/-3%

+/-3%

+/-3%

+/-3%

--

Latest finding / Rank

%

Rank

%

Rank

%

Rank

%

Rank

--

Leung Chun-ying

62%

1

25%

3

36%

1

57+/-4%

1

6.1

Carrie Lam

20%

8

19%[11]

7

31%

2

32+/-4%

2

17.5

Leung Kwok-hung

26%[10]

4

28%[12]

1

27%

3

31+/-4%

3

2.9

Tung Chee-hwa

26%[10]

6

19%[11]

6

21%

5

24+/-3%

4

12.4

Donald Tsang

32%

2

23%

4

14%

9

23+/-3%

5

3.7

Regina Ip

30%

3

21%

5

23%

4

22+/-3%

6

6.1

Jasper Tsang

18%

10

18%[13]

8

20%[14]

7

21+/-3%

7

7.9

Anson Chan

26%[10]

5

28%[12]

2

--

--

18+/-3%[15]

8

9.8

Wong Yuk-man

23%

7

18%[13]

10

20%[14]

6

18+/-3%[15]

9

5.4

Emily Lau

12%

16

12%

14

13%

10

18+/-3%[15]

10

11.7

[7] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[8] The sub-sample size in November 2013 was 594, while that in April 2014 was 547, and that in May 2015 was 671.
[9] The earliest of the past 10 surveys was conducted during November 8 to 12, 2010. For each survey, those who ranked 50th or beyond and those not on the list are counted as 50th in our calculation of average rankings.
[10] Based on the figures in November 2013 survey, the percentages of respondents who could name Leung Kwok-hung, Anson Chan and Tung Chee-hwa were 26.33%, 25.60% and 25.57% respectively, so Leung Kwok-hung, Anson Chan and Tung Chee-hwa ranked the 4th, 5th and 6th.
[11] Based on the figures in April 2014 survey, the percentages of respondents who could name Tung Chee-hwa and Carrie Lam were 19.1% and 18.6% respectively, so Tung Chee-hwa and Carrie Lam ranked the 6th and 7th.
[12] Based on the figures in April 2014 survey, the percentages of respondents who could name Leung Kwok-hung and Anson Chan were 27.9% and 27.8% respectively, so Leung Kwok-hung and Anson Chan ranked the 1st and 2nd.
[13] Based on the figures in April 2014 survey, the percentages of respondents who could name Jasper Tsang and Wong Yuk-man were 18.3% and 18.0% respectively, so Jasper Tsang and Wong Yuk-man ranked the 8th and 10th.
[14] Based on the figures in November 2014 survey, the percentages of respondents who named Wong Yuk-man and Jasper Tsang were 20.2% and 19.6% respectively, so Wong Yuk-man and Jasper Tsang ranked the 6th and 7th.
[15] Based on the figures of latest survey, the percentages of respondents who could name Anson Chan, Wong Yuk-man and Emily Lau were 17.70%, 17.60% and 17.57% respectively, so Anson Chan, Wong Yuk-man and Emily Lau ranked the 8th, 9th and 10th.

 

In our naming survey conducted from mid-May, respondents could name, unaided, up to 10 political figures whom they knew best. Leung Chun-ying, Carrie Lam and Leung Kwok-hung were the top three. The corresponding percentages of respondents who named these figures were 57%, 32% and 31%. Tung Chee-hwa, Donald Tsang, Regina Ip and Jasper Tsang occupied the 4th to 7th places, with 24%, 23%, 22% and 21% of respondents naming them respectively. The 8th to 10th ranks fell to Anson Chan, Wong Yuk-man and Emily Lau respectively, and percentage of respondents who named these figures was 18% each. Please refer to the relevant table for the rest of the list. For easy reference, POP Site has already displayed the results of all naming surveys conducted since March 1997.

 

Herewith some of the results of our “people’s most familiar political figures” surveys accumulated over past 10 surveys spanning over about five years:

18-20/5/2010──31/10-5/11/2014[16]

8-12/11/2010──8-14/5/2015 [16]

Overall rank

Political figures

Av. rank for 10 surveys

 

Over all rank

Political figures

Av. rank for 10 surveys

Overall rank

Political figures

Av. rank for 10 surveys

 

Over all rank

Political figures

Av. rank for 10 surveys

1

Leung Kwok-hung

2.9

 

11

Martin Lee

12.2

1

Leung Kwok-hung

2.9

 

11

Lee Cheuk-yan

12.4

2

Donald Tsang

3.3

 

12

Lee Cheuk-yan

12.2

2

Donald Tsang

3.7

 

12

Tung Chee-hwa

12.4

3

Wong Yuk-man

4.7

 

13

John Tsang

13.2

3

Wong Yuk-man

5.4

 

13

John Tsang

12.8

4

Regina Ip

6.7

 

14

Tung Chee-hwa

14.3

4

Regina Ip

6.1

 

14

Martin Lee

12.9

5

Henry Tang

7.9

 

15

Rita Fan

14.9

5

Leung Chun-ying

6.1

 

15

Rita Fan

14.7

6

Jasper Tsang

8.3

 

16

Audrey Eu

15.7

6

Jasper Tsang

7.9

 

16

Alan Leong

15.9

7

Leung Chun-ying

8.4

 

17

Alan Leong

15.8

7

Henry Tang

9.5

 

17

Tam Yiu-chung

16.4

8

Anson Chan

9.9

 

18

Tam Yiu-chung

16.6

8

Anson Chan

9.8

 

18

Audrey Eu

17.1

9

Emily Lau

11.6

 

19

Albert Chan

17.4

9

Albert Ho

11.5

 

19

Carrie Lam

17.5

10

Albert Ho

11.8

 

20

James Tien

21.4

10

Emily Lau

11.7

 

20

Albert Chan

18.7

[16] For each survey, those who ranked 50th or beyond and those not on the list are counted as 50th in our calculation of average rankings.


Based on the results of the past 10 surveys, Leung Kwok-hung has the highest overall rank with an average ranking of 2.9. The overall ranks of Donald Tsang and Wong Yuk-man come 2nd and 3rd respectively, with average rankings of 3.7 and 5.4. The overall ranks of Regina Ip and Leung Chun-ying come 4th and 5th respectively, with average rankings of 6.1. The overall ranks of Jasper Tsang, Henry Tang and Anson Chan come 6th to 8th with average rankings of 7.9, 9.5 and 9.8 respectively. The 9th and 10th overall ranks go to Albert Ho and Emily Lau, with corresponding average rankings of 11.5 and 11.7.


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called “Opinion Daily” at the “POP Site”, to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to “Opinion Daily” as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey was conducted from October 31 to November 5, 2014, while this survey was conducted from May 8 to 14, 2015. In between these two surveys, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.


3/5/15

Media continues to report on Hong Kong political reform.

24/4/15

HKTV wins judicial review over free TV license.

22/4/15

Government announces the proposal for selecting the Chief Executive in 2017.

11/4/15

Multiple-entry permits are changed to allow only one trip per week.

1/4/15

The Executive Council decides not to renew ATV's free-to-air broadcasting license.

17/3/15

The Executive Council approved the building of the third airport runway.

25/2/15

Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah releases the 2015-2016 Budget.

24/2/15

Leung Chun-ying proposes to tighten the Individual Visit Scheme.

14/1/15

CY Leung delivers the 2015 Policy Address.

7/1/15

Government starts the second consultation on political reform.

10/12/14

Police starts clearance in Admiralty.

19/11/14

Protesters charge the Legislative Council building.

31/10/14

Media continues to report on Occupy Central.



Commentary

Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of Public Opinion Programme, observed, “The purpose of our ranking of political figures is to show the changing political ecology by studying the ups and downs of people’s familiarity with these figures over time. According to our latest survey, Leung Chun-ying continues to be the most visible political figure in Hong Kong, Carrie Lam ranks 2nd while Leung Kwok-hung ranks 3rd. Compared to 6 months ago, 9 people remain on the ‘top 10’ list, only James Tien who ranked 8th last time has fallen out of the list after dropping to the 21st position. He is replaced by Anson Chan who has gone up 4 positions from the 12th place to occupy the 8th place. The ups and downs within the latest list should be good reflections of our changing political environment. If we would like to focus on long term development, we can use the overall rankings accumulated over five years. Figures show that Leung Kwok-hung, Donald Tsang, Wong Yuk-man, Regina Ip and Leung Chun-ying are people’s most familiar political figures in the long run. It should be noted, however, that our ranking of ‘people’s most familiar political figures’ is based on our surveys which requested respondents to name local political figures without prompting. This kind of familiarity measurement is not the same as prompted ratings. In other words, those high on the list may not be the most supported figures, while those lower may have a different ranking if we use a prompting method. However, those who scored best in unprompted surveys are no doubt the most well-known political figures in Hong Kong. As for the reasons affecting the ups and downs of these rankings, we leave it to our readers to form their own judgment using the detailed records displayed in our ‘Opinion Daily’.”



Future Release (Tentative)
  • May 26, 2015 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Popularity of CE and HKSAR Government


| Special Announcements| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (People's Most Familiar Political Figures) |