HKU POP releases popularity figures of CE and principal officialsBack


Press Release on April 14, 2015

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures |Opinion Daily |Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


Special Announcement

To facilitate academic study and rational discussion, The Public Opinion Programme (POP) of The University of Hong Kong has already released for public examination some time ago via the “HKU POP Site” (http://hkupop.pori.hk) the raw data of all 69 regular rating surveys of CE CY Leung, as well as the 181 regular rating surveys of former CE Donald Tsang and 239 regular rating surveys of former CE CH Tung, along with related demographics of respondents. POP today releases the raw data of the latest which is the 70th CE rating survey of CY Leung. Please follow normal academic standards when using or citing such data.


Abstract

POP interviewed 1,018 Hong Kong people between 31 March to 9 April, 2015 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. Our latest survey shows CE CY Leung’s overall popularity has increased from early March. His net popularity has gone up significantly by 6 percentage points to negative 33 percentage points, while his support rating has increased to 43.3 marks, but still below the warning line of 45. As for the Secretaries of Departments, the latest support rating of CS Carrie Lam is 56.2 marks, her approval rate 49%, disapproval rate 15%, giving a net popularity of positive 34 percentage points. The latest support rating of FS John Tsang is 60.2 marks, approval rate 59%, disapproval rate 12%, and net popularity positive 47 percentage points. As for SJ Rimsky Yuen, his support rating is 48.1 marks, approval rate 30%, disapproval rate 26%, giving a net popularity of positive 4 percentage points. The support ratings and net popularities of the three secretaries have gone up since last survey in early March. John Tsang continues to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the net approval rates of 8 among the 12 Directors have gone up, while 2 have gone down and 2 remain unchanged. Among them, only Secretary for Development Paul Chan registers significant change in his net approval rate, down by 7 percentages points. Among all the Directors, Eddie Ng and Paul Chan register negative popularities, at negative 33 and 34 percentage points respectively. Ko Wing-man continues to be the most popular Director, with a net approval rate of positive 75 percentage points. According to POP’s standard, Ko Wing-man falls under the category of “ideal” performer, John Tsang falls under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Carrie Lam, Matthew Cheung, Anthony Cheung, Lai Tung-kwok, Wong Kam-sing, Gregory So, Tsang Tak-sing, Rimsky Yuen, Raymond Tam and Eddie Ng can be labeled as “mediocre”. That of Ceajer Chan and Paul Tang can be labeled as “inconspicuous”. CY Leung and Paul Chan fall into the category of “depressing” performer, while no one falls into that of “disastrous”. The maximum sampling errors of all approval and disapproval rates is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling errors of rating figures and net approval rates need another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 68%. As the support rating of CE CY Leung continues to stand below the warning line of 45 again, Director of POP, Robert Chung, again reprints the abstracts of two articles written by him before on CE popularity, to discuss the possibility of a governance crisis. The articles can be downloaded in full from the POP Site.

Points to note:

[1] The address of the “HKU POP SITE” is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
[2] The sample size of this survey is 1,018 successful interviews, not 1,018 x 68.4% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state “sampling error of rating not more than +/-2.0, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4%, and sampling error of net values not more than +/-7% at 95% confidence level”.
[4] Because of sampling errors in conducting the survey(s) and the rounding procedures in processing the data, the figures cannot be too precise, and the totals may not be completely accurate. Therefore, when quoting percentages of the survey(s), journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses “computerized random telephone survey” to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.


Latest Figures

POP today releases the latest popularity figures of CE CY Leung and various Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. From 2014, POP enhanced the previous simple weighting method based on age and gender distribution to “rim weighting” based on age, gender and education (highest level attended) distribution. The latest figures released today have been rim-weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2014 year-end and the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution collected in the 2011 Census. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

 

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages[6]

31/3-9/4/2015

1,018

68.4%

+/-3%

[6] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings and net approval rates are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

 

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sampling errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

[7] Based on 95% confidence interval.

 

Recent popularity figures of CE CY Leung are summarized as follows:


Date of survey

19-21/1/15

30/1-4/2/15

11-16/2/15

2-5/3/15

16-19/3/15

31/3-9/4/15

Latest change

Sample base

1,024

1,028

1,008

1,000

1,010

1,018

--

Overall response rate

65.2%

67.5%

67.6%

67.2%

69.1%

68.4%

--

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error [8]

--

Rating of CE CY Leung

42.1[9]

40.9

40.7

39.6

41.9[9]

43.3+/-1.8

+1.4

Vote of confidence in CE CY Leung

24%

24%

22%

22%

21%

26+/-3%

+5%[9]

Vote of no confidence in CE CY Leung

58%

62%[9]

64%

64%

59%[9]

58+/-3%

-1%

Net approval rate

-34%

-38%

-42%

-42%

-39%

-33+/-5%

+6%[9]

[8] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.8, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3%, sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-5% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[9] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level under the same weighting method, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


Recent popularity figures of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

 

Date of survey

2-8/1/15

30/1-4/2/15

25/2/15[11]

2-5/3/15

31/3-9/4/15

Latest change

Sample base[10]

619-655

571-632

610

633-720

664-689

--

Overall response rate

65.5%

67.5%

67.4%

67.2%

68.4%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & error[11]

--

Rating of CS Carrie Lam

54.8

54.2

--

54.0

56.2+/-1.9

+2.2[12]

Vote of confidence in CS Carrie Lam

47%

48%

--

46%

49+/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in CS Carrie Lam

20%

23%

--

21%

15+/-3%

-6%[12]

Net approval rate

27%

25%

--

26%

34+/-6%

+8%[12]

Rating of FS John Tsang

56.1

58.6[12]

61.0[12]

59.0[12]

60.2+/-1.5

+1.2

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

54%

55%

58%

57%

59+/-4%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang

13%

13%

14%

12%

12+/-2%

--

Net approval rate

41%

42%

44%

45%

47+/-5%

+2%

Rating of SJ Rimsky Yuen

45.8

46.4

--

45.1

48.1+/-2.0

+3.0[12]

Vote of confidence in SJ Rimsky Yuen

32%

32%

--

28%[12]

30+/-4%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in SJ Rimsky Yuen

30%[12]

29%

--

32%

26+/-3%

-6%[12]

Net approval rate

2%

3%

--

-4%[12]

4+/-6%

+8%[12]

[10] The frequency of this series of questions is different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals. Starting from 2011, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies. The survey conducted on 25/2/2015 was the instant survey after the Budget Speech and only asked rating of FS as well as his vote of confidence.
[11] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-2.0, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4%, sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-6% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[12] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level under the same weighting method, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

 

Latest popularity figures of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below, in descending order of net approval rates:

 

Date of survey

30/1-4/2/15

2-5/3/15

31/3-9/4/15

Latest change

Sample base [13]

562-643

561-611

588-631

--

Overall response rate

67.5%

67.2%

68.4%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer

Base

%

Base

%

Base

% &
error [14]

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man

593

82%[15]

597

77%[15]

629

80+/-3%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man

593

3%[15]

597

5%

629

5+/-2%

--

Net approval rate

--

78%[15]

--

72%[15]

--

75+/-4%

+3%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

595

40%

596

38%

620

41+/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

595

13%

596

9%[15]

620

6+/-2%

-3%[15]

Net approval rate

--

28%

--

29%

--

34+/-5%

+5%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

571

46%

561

43%

605

46+/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

571

17%

561

18%

605

15+/-3%

-3%

Net approval rate

--

29%

--

25%

--

31+/-6%

+6%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung

610

40%

588

39%

616

39+/-4%

--

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung

610

22%

588

21%

616

20+/-3%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

18%

--

18%

--

19+/-6%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang

590

26%

581

22%[15]

588

23+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang

590

10%

581

11%

588

11+/-3%

--

Net approval rate

--

16%

--

12%

--

13+/-5%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing

616

33%

569

31%

631

33+/-4%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing

616

24%

569

21%

631

21+/-3%

--

Net approval rate

--

9%

--

11%

--

11+/-6%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

643

31%

610

31%

625

31+/-4%

--

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

643

27%

610

28%

625

24+/-3%

-4%[15]

Net approval rate

--

4%

--

3%

--

8+/-6%

+5%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

629

31%

602

30%

595

31+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

629

26%

602

25%

595

24+/-4%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

5%[15]

--

5%[16]

--

7+/-6%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok

562

32%[15]

589

37%[15]

595

34+/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok

562

37%

589

31%[15]

595

31+/-4%

--

Net approval rate

--

-5%

--

5% [15][16]

--

4+/-7%

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam

579

27%[15]

595

30%

630

29+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam

579

30%[15]

595

31%

630

26+/-4%

-5%[15]

Net approval rate

--

-3%[15]

--

-1%

--

3+/-6%

+4%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Eddie Ng

601

20%

611

17%

622

15+/-3%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Eddie Ng

601

50%

611

49%

622

48+/-4%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

-30%

--

-33%

--

-33+/-6%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Paul Chan

630

18%

573

21%

604

17+/-3%

-4%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Paul Chan

630

49%[15]

573

48%

604

51+/-4%

+3%

Net approval rate

--

-31%[15]

--

-27%

--

-34+/-6%

-7%[15]

[13] Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[14] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% and sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-7% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[15] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level under the same weighting method, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
[16] Based on the figures in early March survey, in two decimal places, the respective net approval rates of Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing are 5.38 and 5.06 percentage points. Thus, they ranked seventh and eighth at that time.

 

The latest survey showed that, CE CY Leung scored 43.3 marks, and 26% supported him as CE, his net approval rate is negative 33 percentage points. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Carrie Lam, FS John Tsang and SJ Rimsky Yuen were 56.2, 60.2 and 48.1 marks, and 49%, 59% and 30% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. Their net approval rates are positive 34, positive 47 and positive 4 percentage points respectively.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, according to the net approval rates, results revealed that the top position goes to Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man, attaining positive 75 percentage points. The 2nd and 3rd places belong to Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan and Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung with net approval rates of positive 34 and 31 percentage points respectively. Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung, Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang, Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam, Secretary for Education Eddie Ng and Secretary for Development Paul Chan and ranked 4th to 12th, their corresponding net approval rates are positive 19, positive 13, positive 11, positive 8, positive 7, positive 4, positive 3, negative 33 and negative 34 percentage points. In other words, only Ko Wing-man scored net approval rate of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.

 


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called “Opinion Daily” at the “POP Site”, to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to “Opinion Daily” as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from 2 to 5 March, 2015 while this survey was conducted from 31 March to 9 April, 2015. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

 

9/4/15

Media continues to report on Hong Kong stock market turnover reaches all time high.

8/4/15

Hong Kong stock market turnover reaches all time high.

4/4/15

Media continues to report on 25th anniversary of the promulgation of the Basic Law.

3/4/15

25th anniversary of the promulgation of the Basic Law is coming up.

1/4/15

Executive Council decides not to renew ATV's free-to-air broadcasting license.

31/3/15

ATV might transfer controlling stake to HKTV.

27/3/15

MTR fares may rise by 4.3 per cent in June.

17/3/15

The Executive Council approved the building of the third airport runway.

9/3/15

Media continues to report on protest against parallel traders.

7/3/15

Zhang Xiaoming makes a statement about China and Hong Kong.



Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP, Robert Chung.

 

Our latest survey shows CE CY Leung’s overall popularity has increased from early March. His net popularity has gone up significantly by 6 percentage points to negative 33 percentage points, while his support rating has increased to 43.3 marks, but still below the warning line of 45.

 

As for the Secretaries of Departments, the latest support rating of CS Carrie Lam is 56.2 marks, her approval rate 49%, disapproval rate 15%, giving a net popularity of positive 34 percentage points. The latest support rating of FS John Tsang is 60.2 marks, approval rate 59%, disapproval rate 12%, and net popularity positive 47 percentage points. As for SJ Rimsky Yuen, his support rating is 48.1 marks, approval rate 30%, disapproval rate 26%, giving a net popularity of positive 4 percentage points. The support ratings and net popularities of the three secretaries have gone up since last survey in early March. John Tsang continues to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the net approval rates of 8 among the 12 Directors have gone up, while 2 have gone down and 2 remain unchanged. Among them, only Secretary for Development Paul Chan registers significant change in his net approval rate, down by 7 percentages points. Among all the Directors, Eddie Ng and Paul Chan register negative popularities, at negative 33 and 34 percentage points respectively. Ko Wing-man continues to be the most popular Director, with a net approval rate of positive 75 percentage points.

 

According to POP’s standard, Ko Wing-man falls under the category of “ideal” performer, John Tsang falls under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Carrie Lam, Matthew Cheung, Anthony Cheung, Lai Tung-kwok, Wong Kam-sing, Gregory So, Tsang Tak-sing, Rimsky Yuen, Raymond Tam and Eddie Ng can be labeled as “mediocre”. That of Ceajer Chan and Paul Tang can be labeled as “inconspicuous”. CY Leung and Paul Chan fall into the category of “depressing” performer, while no one falls into that of “disastrous”.

 

The following table summarizes the grading of CE and the principal officials for readers’ easy reference:

 

Ideal: those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man (80%)

 

Successful: those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

FS John Tsang Chun-wah (59%)

 

Mediocre: those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

CS Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (49%); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (46%); Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung Bing-leung (39%); Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok (34%); Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing (33%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung (31%)[17]; Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (31%)[17]; SJ Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung (30%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam Chi-yuen (29%); Secretary for Education Eddie Ng Hak-kim (15%)

 

Inconspicuous: those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (41%, 47%); Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang Kwok-wai (23%, 34%)

 

Depressing: those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

CE Leung Chun-ying (58%); Secretary for Development Paul Chan Mo-po (51%)

 

Disastrous: those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

 

[17] In one decimal place, the respective approval rates of Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing are 31.4% and 30.9%.

 

Since the support rating of CE CY Leung continues to stand below the warning line of 45 again, I reprint again the abstracts of two articles written by me before on CE popularity for public reference, to discuss the possibility of a governance crisis. The articles can be downloaded in full from the POP Site.

 

“The Popularity of Tung Chee-hwa from All Angles” (released on 14/5/2003): “According to our experience, a political figure with less than 50 marks can be said to have fallen into negative popularity, while a score of less than 45 marks can indicate credibility crisis. Using this analysis, Tung has been negatively popular among the general public since August 2002, and in March 2003, he has sunk into a credibility crisis…”

 

“New Perspectives on Chief Executive Ratings” (released on 12/6/2003): “Concurrent tests showed that a support rating of 55 marks was more or less equivalent to a ‘vote share’ of 45%, 50 marks could be converted to round about 30%, 45 marks to 20%, and 40 marks to 10% to 15%... In late 1990, after the ‘approval rate’ of Margaret Thatcher sank to 25%, she withdrew from the election for the leader of the British Conservative Party, thereby gave up her job as the Prime Minister of UK, a post which she held since 1979. In early 1997, John Major lost his post of Prime Minister to Tony Blair, after his ‘approval rate’ hovered around the level of 30% for a long time. As for former USA President Bill Clinton, his lowest ever ‘approval rate’ within his 8-year terms of office was as high as 37%...”

 


Future Release (Tentative)

  • April 21, 2015 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Media Performance



| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures |Opinion Daily |Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |