HKU POP releases the latest rankings of political figuresBack

 
Press Release on November 18, 2014

| Special Announcements| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (People's Most Familiar Political Figures) |


Special Announcements

(1) In light of numerous public requests received by the Public Opinion Programme (POP) of The University of Hong Kong asking us to conduct surveys on the current situation, POP has opened a new page at “PopCon” (http://popcon.hk) to let people suggest questions for general surveys of the Hong Kong public. Up to now 43 proposed questions and 13 email opinions have been received from citizens. POP has selected some of the proposed questions and is now conducting the survey. The preliminary result is expected to be released tomorrow (November 19, 2014) via “PopCon”, while the tables, charts and raw data will be uploaded onto the “HKU POP Site” (http://hkupop.pori.hk) next Tuesday (November 25, 2014). The questions asked in the survey include: “How much do you support or oppose the Occupy Movement initiated by students and citizens?”, “Should the Occupy Movement continue or stop?”, “Should the SAR government clear the occupied areas or leave them alone?” and “How genuine do you think the SAR government / Central government / student organizers of the Occupy Movement is in resolving the current standoff?”

 

(2) To facilitate academic study and rational discussion, POP has already released for public examination some time ago via the “HKU POP Site” (http://hkupop.pori.hk) the raw data of all 59 regular rating surveys of CE CY Leung, as well as the 181 regular rating surveys of former CE Donald Tsang and 239 regular rating surveys of former CE CH Tung, along with related demographics of respondents. Please follow normal academic standards when using or citing such data.


Abstract

POP interviewed 1,008 Hong Kong people between October 31 and November 5 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. According to this latest survey, Leung Chun-ying is the most visible political figure in Hong Kong again, Carrie Lam ranks 2nd while Leung Kwok-hung ranks 3rd. Compared to 6 months ago, 8 people remain on the “top 10” list. Anson Chan and Martin Lee who ranked 2nd and 9th last time have both fallen out of the list after dropping 10 positions each. They are replaced by James Tien and Emily Lau who have gone up 16 positions and 4 positions from the 24th and 14th places to rank the 8th and 10th respectively. The ups and downs within the latest list should be good reflections of our changing political environment. If we would like to focus on long term development, we can use the overall rankings accumulated over five years. Figures show that Leung Kwok-hung, Donald Tsang, Wong Yuk-man, Regina Ip and Henry Tang are people’s most familiar political figures in the long run. It should be noted, however, that our ranking of “people’s most familiar political figures” is based on our surveys which requested respondents to name local political figures without prompting. This kind of familiarity measurement is not the same as prompted ratings. In other words, those high on the list may not be the most supported figures, while those lower may have a different ranking if we use a prompting method. However, those who scored best in unprompted surveys are no doubt the most well-known political figures in Hong Kong. The maximum sampling error of percentages of people’s most familiar political figures is +/-3 percentage points at 95% confidence level. The response rate of this survey is 65%.


Points to note:

[1] The address of the “HKU POP SITE” is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.
[2] The sample size of the survey on people’s most familiar political figures, the sample size is 1,008 successful cases, not 1,008 x 64.8% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] The maximum sampling error of percentages is +/-3 percentage points at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state “sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3%, at 95% confidence level”. Because POP introduced “rim weighting” in 2014, during the transition period, whether changes in various figures are beyond sampling errors are based on tests using the same weighting methods. That is, to test whether the first set of figures collected in 2014 is significantly different from that of the previous survey, both sets of data are rim weighted before testing, instead of using simple computation of the published figures.
[4] Because of sampling errors in conducting the survey(s) and the rounding procedures in processing the data, the figures cannot be too precise, and the totals may not be completely accurate. Therefore, when quoting percentages of the survey(s), journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses “computerized random telephone survey” to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.



Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via the POP Site the survey results of people’s most familiar political figures. From 2014, POP enhanced the previous simple weighting method based on age and gender distribution to “rim weighting” based on age, gender and education (highest level attended) distribution. The latest figures released today have been rim-weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2014 mid-year and the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution collected in the 2011 Census. Herewith the contact information of survey on people’s most familiar political figures:

 

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Sampling error of percentages [6]

31/10-5/11/2014

1,008

64.8%

+/-3%

[6] Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified.


This survey on people’s most familiar political figures has been conducted for many years, with results initially released through our publication POP Express until October 2006 when we began to release them online. Between 1994 and 2005, the survey was conducted and released in the form of “top 10 political figures” using our usual “top 10” or “top 5” series survey design, which involved both naming and rating stages. Starting from October 2005, we simplified our “top 10 political figures” survey by just recording and analyzing the “naming” results, because we have already developed over time numerous rating surveys covering CE, government officials, members of Legislative and Executive Councils, and so on. As for the rating part, we only conduct supplementary rating surveys to cover those listed in the top 10 political figures but not covered in other rating surveys. Take our latest survey as an example, our supplementary rating survey of Tung Chee-hwa and Donald Tsang will be conducted later and the results will be uploaded onto our POP Site in due course. Moreover, in our presentation of findings, different from the other “top 10” rating series, we introduced rankings from 1 to 50 for “people’s most familiar political figures”, as well as average accumulative rankings calculated from the past 10 surveys spanning over about five years, in order to indicate the ups-and-downs of these political figures in the long run. Please refer to our POP Site for details. Herewith the result of our latest survey on “people’s most familiar political figures”, other rankings beyond the “Top 10” can be found in the POP Site:

 

Date of survey

23/4-1/5/13

4-7/11/13

22-30/4/14

31/10-5/11/14

Average ranking over the past 10 surveys [13]

Sample base

1,002[8]

1,008[8]

1,032[8]

1,008

--

Overall response rate

68.4%

66.8%

65.6%

64.8%

--

Sampling error of
percentages (at 95% confidence level)[7]

+/-3%

+/-3%

+/-3%

+/-3%

--

Latest finding / Rank

%

Rank

%

Rank

%

Rank

%

Rank

--

Leung Chun-ying

57%

1

62%

1

25%

3

36+/-3%

1

8.4

Carrie Lam

20%

10

20%

8

19%[10]

7

31+/-3%

2

22.2

Leung Kwok-hung

39%

2

26%[9]

4

28%

1

27+/-3%

3

2.9

Regina Ip

19%

11

30%

3

21%

5

23+/-3%

4

6.7

Tung Chee-hwa

14%

14

26%[9]

6

19%[10]

6

21+/-3%

5

14.3

Wong Yuk-man

32%

3

23%

7

18%[11]

10

20+/-3%[12]

6

4.7

Jasper Tsang

24%

6

18%

10

18%[11]

8

20+/-3%[12]

7

8.3

James Tien

7%

22

11%

18

6%

24

17+/-2%

8

21.4

Donald Tsang

26%

4

32%

2

23%

4

14+/-2%

9

3.3

Emily Lau

21%

7

12%

16

12%

14

13+/-2%

10

11.6

[7] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[8] The sub-sample size in April 2013 was 545, while that in November 2013 was 594, that in April 2014 was 547.
[9] The percentages of respondents who named Leung Kwok-hung and Tung Chee-hwa were 26.3% and 25.6% respectively, so Leung Kwok-hung ranked higher than Tung Chee-hwa.
[10] The percentages of respondents who named Tung Chee-hwa and Carrie Lam were 19.1% and 18.6% respectively, so Tung Chee-hwa ranked higher than Carrie Lam.
[11] The percentages of respondents who named Jasper Tsang and Wong Yuk-man were 18.3% and 18.0% respectively, so Jasper Tsang ranked higher than Wong Yuk-man.
[12] The percentages of respondents who named Wong Yuk-man and Jasper Tsang were 20.2% and 19.6% respectively, so Wong Yuk-man ranked higher than Jasper Tsang.
[13] The earliest of the past 10 surveys was conducted during May 18 to 20, 2010. For each survey, those who ranked 50th or beyond and those not on the list are counted as 50th in our calculation of average rankings.

 

In our naming survey conducted from late October to early November, respondents could name, unaided, up to 10 political figures whom they knew best. Leung Chun-ying, Carrie Lam and Leung Kwok-hung were the top three. The corresponding percentages of respondents who named these figures were 36%, 31% and 27%. Regina Ip, Tung Chee-hwa, Wong Yuk-man and Jasper Tsang occupied the 4th to 7th places, with 23%, 21%, 20% and 20% of respondents naming them respectively. The 8th to 10th ranks fell to James Tien, Donald Tsang and Emily Lau respectively, and percentages of respondents who named these figures were 17%, 14% and 13%. Please refer to the relevant table for the rest of the list. For easy reference, POP Site has already displayed the results of all naming surveys conducted since March 1997.

 

Herewith some of the results of our “people’s most familiar political figures” surveys accumulated over past 10 surveys spanning over about five years:

19-23/11/2009──22-30/4/2014[14]

18-20/5/2010──31/10-5/11/2014[14]

Overall rank

Political figures

Av. rank for 10 surveys

 

Over all rank

Political figures

Av. rank for 10 surveys

Overall rank

Political figures

Av. rank for 10 surveys

 

Over all rank

Political figures

Av. rank for 10 surveys

1

Donald Tsang

2.5

 

11

Lee Cheuk-yan

11.8

1

Leung Kwok-hung

2.9

 

11

Martin Lee

12.2

2

Leung Kwok-hung

3.3

 

12

Albert Ho

11.9

2

Donald Tsang

3.3

 

12

Lee Cheuk-yan

12.2

3

Wong Yuk-man

4.7

 

13

John Tsang

13.3

3

Wong Yuk-man

4.7

 

13

John Tsang

13.2

4

Henry Tang

6.0

 

14

Audrey Eu

14.1

4

Regina Ip

6.7

 

14

Tung Chee-hwa

14.3

5

Regina Ip

6.7

 

15

Rita Fan

14.5

5

Henry Tang

7.9

 

15

Rita Fan

14.9

6

Jasper Tsang

8.1

 

16

Alan Leong

15.9

6

Jasper Tsang

8.3

 

16

Audrey Eu

15.7

7

Anson Chan

9.6

 

17

Tung Chee-hwa

16.1

7

Leung Chun-ying

8.4

 

17

Alan Leong

15.8

8

Martin Lee

10.6

 

18

Tam Yiu-chung

16.8

8

Anson Chan

9.9

 

18

Tam Yiu-chung

16.6

9

Leung Chun-ying

11.4

 

19

Albert Chan

18.0

9

Emily Lau

11.6

 

19

Albert Chan

17.4

10

Emily Lau

11.6

 

20

James Tien

22.3

10

Albert Ho

11.8

 

20

James Tien

21.4

[14] For each survey, those who ranked 50th or beyond and those not on the list are counted as 50th in our calculation of average rankings.

 

Based on the results of the past 10 surveys, Leung Kwok-hung has the highest overall rank with an average ranking of 2.9. Donald Tsang has the 2nd highest overall rank with an average ranking of 3.3. The overall ranks of Wong Yuk-man and Regina Ip come 3rd and 4th respectively, with average rankings of 4.7 and 6.7. The overall ranks of Henry Tang and Jasper Tsang come 5th and 6th with average rankings of 7.9 and 8.3 respectively. The 7th to 10th overall ranks go to Leung Chun-ying, Anson Chan, Emily Lau and Albert Ho, with corresponding average rankings of 8.4, 9.9, 11.6 and 11.8.


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called “Opinion Daily” at the “POP Site”, to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to “Opinion Daily” as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey was conducted from April 22 to 30, 2014, while this survey was conducted from October 31 to November 5, 2014. In between these two surveys, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.


5/11/14

Media continues to report on Occupy Central.

29/10/14

The Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference removes James Tien from his position, Tien resigns as Liberal Party leader.

24/10/14

Tung Chee-hwa urges protesters to leave the occupied areas.

21/10/14

The government and Hong Kong Federation of Students start the first dialogue but both parties have not reached a consensus at the moment.

16/10/14

CE CY Leung says the government will restart the talk with Hong Kong Federation of Students as soon as next week.

27/9/14

Occupy Central starts earlier than said.

26/9/14

Students break into Civic Square; Joshua Wong is arrested.

3/9/14

Tung Chee-hwa and Chris Patten share their opinions on Hong Kong's political reform.

31/8/14

The National People’s Congress Standing Committee approves electing Hong Kong’s chief executive in 2017's proposal by vote.

28/8/14

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) searches home of Jimmy Lai Chee-yin and Lee Cheuk-yan.



Commentary

Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of Public Opinion Programme, observed, “The purpose of our ranking of political figures is to show the changing political ecology by studying the ups and downs of people’s familiarity with these figures over time. According to our latest survey, Leung Chun-ying is the most visible political figure in Hong Kong again, Carrie Lam ranks 2nd while Leung Kwok-hung ranks 3rd. Compared to 6 months ago, 8 people remain on the ‘top 10’ list. Anson Chan and Martin Lee who ranked 2nd and 9th last time have both fallen out of the list after dropping 10 positions each. They are replaced by James Tien and Emily Lau who have gone up 16 positions and 4 positions from the 24th and 14th places to rank the 8th and 10th respectively. The ups and downs within the latest list should be good reflections of our changing political environment. If we would like to focus on long term development, we can use the overall rankings accumulated over five years. Figures show that Leung Kwok-hung, Donald Tsang, Wong Yuk-man, Regina Ip and Henry Tang are people’s most familiar political figures in the long run. It should be noted, however, that our ranking of ‘people’s most familiar political figures’ is based on our surveys which requested respondents to name local political figures without prompting. This kind of familiarity measurement is not the same as prompted ratings. In other words, those high on the list may not be the most supported figures, while those lower may have a different ranking if we use a prompting method. However, those who scored best in unprompted surveys are no doubt the most well-known political figures in Hong Kong. As for the reasons affecting the ups and downs of these rankings, we leave it to our readers to form their own judgment using the detailed records displayed in our ‘Opinion Daily’.”



Future Release (Tentative)
  • November 25, 2014 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Popularity of CE and HKSAR Government


| Special Announcements| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (People's Most Familiar Political Figures) |