HKU POP releases popularity figures of CE and principal officialsBack


Press Release on November 12, 2013

| Abstract | Latest Figures |Opinion Daily |Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


 

Abstract

The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong interviewed 1,008 Hong Kong people between November 4 and 7, 2013 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. Our survey shows that the popularity of CE CY Leung continues to drop. Having dropped below the warning line of 45 in the last survey, his support rating now drops to another record low of 41.2 marks. Leung’s approval rate now stands at 22%, disapproval rate at 63%, giving a net popularity of negative 41 percentage points, which is historical low since he took office. As for the Secretaries of Departments, the latest support rating of CS Carrie Lam is 60.8 marks, her approval rate 60%, disapproval rate 9%, giving a net popularity of positive 52 percentage points. As for FS John Tsang, his latest support rating is 53.9 marks, approval rate 42%, disapproval rate 17%, and net popularity positive 25 percentage points. As for SJ Rimsky Yuen, his support rating is 49.9 marks, approval rate 26%, disapproval rate 19%, giving a net popularity of positive 8 percentage points. Carrie Lam remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the net approval rates of 9 among the 12 Directors have gone down, 2 have gone up and 1 remained unchanged. Among them, those registered significant changes in net approval rate include Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So, Secretary for Education Eddie Ng, Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Development Paul Chan, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam, and Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man, down by 24, 15, 7, 7, 7, 6 percentage points and up by 5 percentage points respectively. Among all the Directors, Gregory So, Eddie Ng, and Paul Chan registered negative popularities, at negative 12, 43 and 45 percentage points respectively. Ko Wing-man continues to be the most popular Director, at positive 79 percentage points. According to POP’s standard, Ko Wing-man falls under the category of “ideal” performer, Carrie Lam and Matthew Cheung now fall under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Lai Tung-kwok, John Tsang, Anthony Cheung, Wong Kam-sing, Tsang Tak-sing and Gregory So can be labeled as “mediocre”, that of Ceajer Chan, Paul Tang, Rimsky Yuen and Raymond Tam can be labeled as “inconspicuous”. CY Leung, Paul Chan and Eddie Ng fall into the category of “depressing” performer, while no one falls into that of “disastrous”. The maximum sampling errors of all approval and disapproval rates is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling errors of rating figures and net approval rates need another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 67%.

Points to note:

[1] The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.

[2] The sample size of this survey is 1,008 successful interviews, not 1,008 x 66.8% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state “sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.9, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4%, and sampling error of net values not more than +/-6% at 95% confidence level”.
[4] Because of sampling errors in conducting the survey(s) and the rounding procedures in processing the data, the figures cannot be too precise, and the totals may not be completely accurate. Therefore, when quoting percentages of the survey(s), journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses “computerized random telephone survey” to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.

 


Latest Figures

POP today releases the latest popularity figures of CE CY Leung and various Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2013 mid-year. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

 

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages[6]

4-7/11/2013

1,008

66.8%

+/-3%

[6] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings and net approval rates are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

 

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sampling errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

 

                   

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

[7] Based on 95% confidence interval.

 

Recent popularity figures of CE CY Leung are summarized as follows:


Date of survey

15-20/8/13

3-5/9/13

23-26/9/13

3-8/10/13

18-24/10/13

4-7/11/13

Latest change

Sample base

1,015

1,006

1,013

1,009

1,018

1,008

--

Overall response rate

65.7%

64.5%

63.8%

63.5%

69.2%

66.8%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error[8]

--

Rating of CE CY Leung

43.7[9]

45.7 [9]

49.4[9]

48.1

44.0[9]

41.2+/-1.7

-2.8[9]

Vote of confidence in CE CY Leung

25%

28%

34%[9]

31%

22%[9]

22+/-3%

--

Vote of no confidence in CE CY Leung

56%

56%

49%[9]

55%[9]

60%[9]

63+/-3%

+3%

Net approval rate

-31%

-28%

-15%[9]

-24%[9]

-38%[9]

-41+/-5%

-3%

[8] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.7, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3%, sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-5% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[9] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


Recent popularity figures of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

 

Date of survey

2-5/7/13

1-8/8/13

3-5/9/13

3-8/10/13

4-7/11/13

Latest change [10]

Sample base[10]

615-663

605-626

586-626

605-638

581-589

--

Overall response rate

68.0%

65.2%

64.5%

63.5%

66.8%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & error [11]

--

Rating of CS Carrie Lam

61.9

63.3

63.2

62.0

60.8+/-1.7

-1.2

Vote of confidence in CS Carrie Lam

57%

60%

62%

60%

60+/-4%

--

Vote of no confidence in CS Carrie Lam

9%

6%[12]

7%

8%

9+/-2%

+1%

Net approval rate

48%

54%[12]

55%

52%

52+/-5%

--

Rating of FS John Tsang

53.2[12]

56.9[12]

57.3

56.0

53.9+/-1.6

-2.1[12]

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

41%[12]

51%[12]

50%

45%[12]

42+/-4%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang

21%

17%[12]

16%

18%

17+/-3%

-1%

Net approval rate

20%[12]

34%[12]

34%

27%[12]

25+/-6%

-2%

Rating of SJ Rimsky Yuen

52.6[12]

53.0

52.4

51.5

49.9+/-1.9

-1.6

Vote of confidence in SJ Rimsky Yuen

28%[12]

34%[12]

30%

28%

26+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in SJ Rimsky Yuen

18%

12%[12]

13%

16%

19+/-3%

+3%

Net approval rate

10%

22%[12]

17%

13%

8+/-6%

-5%

[10] The frequency of this series of questions is different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals. Starting from 2011, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[11] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.9, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4%, sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-6% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[12] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

 

Latest popularity figures of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below, in descending order of net approval rates:

 

Date of survey

3-5/9/13

3-8/10/13

4-7/11/13

Latest change

Sample base [13]

579-630

570-627

588-646

--

Overall response rate

64.5%

63.5%

66.8%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer

Base

%

Base

%

Base

% & error [14]

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man

589

80%

604

77%

590

81+/-3%

+4%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man

589

4%

604

3%

590

3+/-1%

--

Net approval rate

--

76%

--

74%

--

79+/-4%

+5%[15]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

618

50%

597

49%

594

50+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

618

16%

597

14%

594

16+/-3%

+2%

Net approval rate

--

34%

--

35%

--

35+/-6%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

607

40%

627

41%

624

40+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

607

7%

627

10%[15]

624

9+/-2%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

33%

--

31%

--

30+/-5%

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung

596

40%

595

42%

636

41+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung

596

18%[15]

595

17%

636

18+/-3%

+1%

Net approval rate

--

22%[15]

--

25%

--

22+/-6%[17]

-3%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok

617

44%

597

46%

646

42+/-4%

-4%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok

617

16%

597

18%

646

20+/-3%

+2%

Net approval rate

--

28%

--

29%

--

22+/-6%[17]

-7%[15]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang

611

28%

570

29%

619

28+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang

611

11%[15]

570

8%[15]

619

11+/-3%

+3%

Net approval rate

--

17%

--

21%

--

17+/-5%

-4%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing

625

31%

592

28%

605

33+/-4%

+5%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing

625

22%

592

25%

605

25+/-4%

--

Net approval rate

--

9%

--

3%

--

8+/-6%

+5%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam

579

28%

602

28%

643

25+/-3%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam

579

16%

602

16%

643

19+/-3%

+3%

Net approval rate

--

12%

--

12 %[16]

--

6+/-5%

-6%[15]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

602

33%

624

31%

588

29+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

602

27%

624

24%

588

29+/-4%

+5%[15]

Net approval rate

--

6%

--

7%

--

0+/-6%

-7%[15]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

630

35%

600

30%[15]

596

22+/-3%

-8%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

630

17%

600

17%

596

34+/-4%

+17%[15]

Net approval rate

--

18%

--

12%[16]

--

-12+/-6%

-24%[15]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Eddie Ng

593

25%

626

19%[15]

623

14+/-3%

-5%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Eddie Ng

593

42%

626

47%[15]

623

57+/-4%

+10%[15]

Net approval rate

--

-17%

--

-28%[15]

--

-43+/-6%

-15%[15]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Paul Chan

600

14%

602

15%

622

16+/-3%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Paul Chan

600

60%

602

53%[15]

622

61+/-4%

+8%[15]

Net approval rate

--

-46%

--

-38%[15]

--

-45+/-6%

-7%[15]

[13] Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[14] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% and sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-6% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[15] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
[16] In one decimal place, the respective net approval rates of Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So are 12.5 and 12.4 percentage points. Thus, they are ranked seventh and eighth respectively.
[17] In one decimal place, the respective net approval rates of Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung and Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok are 22.1 and 21.9 percentage points. Thus, they are ranked fourth and fifth respectively.

 

The latest survey showed that, CE CY Leung scored 41.2 marks, and 22% supported him as CE, his net approval rate is negative 41 percentage points. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Carrie Lam, FS John Tsang and SJ Rimsky Yuen were 60.8, 53.9 and 49.9 marks, and 60%, 42% and 26% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. Their net approval rates are positive 52, 25 and 8 percentage points respectively.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, according to the net approval rates, results revealed that the top position goes to Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man, attaining positive 79 percentage points. The 2nd and 3rd places belong to Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung and Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan with net approval rates positive 35 and positive 30 percentage points respectively. Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung, Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok, Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang, Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So, Secretary for Education Eddie Ng and Secretary for Development Paul Chan ranked 4th to 12th, their corresponding net approval rates are positive 22, positive 22, positive 17, positive 8, positive 6, 0, negative 12, negative 43 and negative 45 percentage points. In other words, only Ko Wing-man scored net approval rate of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.

 


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called “Opinion Daily” at the “POP Site”, to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to “Opinion Daily” as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from 3 to 8 October, 2013 while this survey was conducted from 4 to 7 November, 2013. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

 

6/11/13

Thousands of people demonstrate outside the Government Headquarters to protest against its decision on issuing free television licenses.

5/11/13

Government releases a six page statement to explain its decision on issuing free television licenses.

4/11/13

Michael Tien Puk-sun reveals that HKTV scored the lowest marks among the three new television license applicants in terms of financial ability.

24/10/13

The Government launches consultation on population policies.

20/10/13

120,000 people demonstrate to protest against the Government’s decision on rejecting HKTV's application to free television license.

17/10/13

Leung Chun-ying announces that public consultation on political reform will begin by year-end.

15/10/13

Government issues two new free television licenses, Wong Wai-kay's application is rejected.

11/10/13

Leung Chun Ying clarifies that the government did not put Manila bus hostage crisis behind.

8/10/13

Aquino refuses to apologize on Manila bus hostage crisis.

6/10/13

Xi Jinping instructs Leung Chun-ying to follow the Basic Law on political reform.



Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP, Robert Chung.

 

Our latest survey conducted in early November shows that the popularity of CE CY Leung continues to drop. Having dropped below the warning line of 45 in the last survey, his support rating now drops to another record low of 41.2 marks. Leung’s approval rate now stands at 22%, disapproval rate at 63%, giving a net popularity of negative 41 percentage points, which is historical low since he took office.

 

As for the Secretaries of Departments, the latest support rating of CS Carrie Lam is 60.8 marks, her approval rate 60%, disapproval rate 9%, giving a net popularity of positive 52 percentage points. As for FS John Tsang, his latest support rating is 53.9 marks, approval rate 42%, disapproval rate 17%, and net popularity positive 25 percentage points. As for SJ Rimsky Yuen, his support rating is 49.9 marks, approval rate 26%, disapproval rate 19%, giving a net popularity of positive 8 percentage points. Carrie Lam remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the net approval rates of 9 among the 12 Directors have gone down, 2 have gone up and 1 remained unchanged. Among them, those registered significant changes in net approval rate include Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So, Secretary for Education Eddie Ng, Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Development Paul Chan, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam, and Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man, down by 24, 15, 7, 7, 7, 6 percentage points and up by 5 percentage points respectively. Among all the Directors, Gregory So, Eddie Ng, and Paul Chan registered negative popularities, at negative 12, 43 and 45 percentage points respectively. Ko Wing-man continues to be the most popular Director, at positive 79 percentage points.

 

According to POP’s standard, Ko Wing-man falls under the category of “ideal” performer, Carrie Lam and Matthew Cheung now fall under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Lai Tung-kwok, John Tsang, Anthony Cheung, Wong Kam-sing, Tsang Tak-sing and Gregory So can be labeled as “mediocre”, that of Ceajer Chan, Paul Tang, Rimsky Yuen and Raymond Tam can be labeled as “inconspicuous”. CY Leung, Paul Chan and Eddie Ng fall into the category of “depressing” performer, while no one falls into that of “disastrous”.

 

The following table summarizes the grading of CE and the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

 

Ideal: those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man (81%)

 

Successful: those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

CS Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (60%); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (50%)

 

Mediocre: those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok (42%[18]); FS John Tsang Chun-wah (42%[18]); Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung Bing-leung (41%); Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing (33%); Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (29%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung (22%)

 

Inconspicuous: those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (40%, 49%); Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang Kwok-wai (28%, 38%); SJ Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung (26%, 45%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam Chi-yuen (25%, 43%)

 

Depressing: those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

CE Leung Chun-ying (63%); Secretary for Development Paul Chan Mo-po (61%); Secretary for Education Eddie Ng Hak-kim (57%)

 

Disastrous: those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

--

[18] In one decimal place, the respective approval rates of Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok and FS John Tsang Chun-wah are 42.3% and 41.9%.

 


Future Release (Tentative)

  • November 19, 2013 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: People's most familiar political figures



| Abstract | Latest Figures |Opinion Daily |Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |