HKU POP releases ratings of top 10 political groups Back

 
Press Release on October 22, 2013

| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Rating of Top Ten Political Groups) |


Abstract

 

The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong conducted a double stage survey on the rankings of the top 10 political groups in October 2013 by means of random telephone surveys conducted by real interviewers. Our latest survey completed in mid-October when controversies over the issue of television licenses were brewing shows that NPP surpasses the recognition threshold again to re-enter the “top 10” list, replacing HKASPDMC. In terms of support ratings, compared to four months ago, the ratings of 6 out of 10 political groups have gone down. Among them, ADPL, CP and DP register drops beyond sampling error, down by 5.3, 3.4 and 2.3 marks respectively. No political groups score more than 50 marks. In terms of relative rankings, HKCTU and FTU each goes up three positions to rank first and second. NPP re-enters the list to rank the 3rd. CP goes down one position to rank the 4th. ADPL goes down four positions to rank 5th. LP and DP swap positions to rank 6th and 7th. DAB, LSD and PP remain at the 8th, 9th and 10th positions respectively. It should be noted, however, that our “Top 10 Political Groups” only includes groups which are best known to the public, ranked according to their support ratings. Other political groups may well have very high or low support ratings, but because they are relatively less well-known, they are not included in our final list. The maximum sampling errors of the ratings of top ten political groups registered fall between +/-1.6 and +/-2.3 at 95% confidence level. The response rate of the rating survey is 67%.


Points to note:

[1] The address of the “HKU POP SITE” is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.

[2] The sample size of the first stage naming survey of top 10 political groups is 1,002 successful interviews, not 1,002 x 67.2% response rate, while the sample size of the second stage rating survey is other 1,007 successful interviews, not 1,007 x 66.6% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Because of sampling errors in conducting the survey(s) and the rounding procedures in processing the data, the figures cannot be too precise, and the totals may not be completely accurate. Therefore, when quoting percentages of the survey(s), journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-2.3 at 95% confidence level".
[4] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses “computerized random telephone survey” to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.

 



Latest Figures

POP today releases on schedule via the POP Site the latest ratings of the top 10 political groups. As a general practice, all the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in mid-year 2013. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

 

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Sampling error of percentages/ratings[5]

9-11/10/2013 (First stage naming survey)

1,002

67.2%

+/-3%

12-18/10/2013 (Second stage rating survey)

1,007

66.6%

+/-2.3

[5] Calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified.

 

The research design of our "Top ten political groups" has been explained in detail under "Survey Method" in our corresponding web page. The top political groups listed in our latest survey were all those who obtained highest unprompted mentions in our first stage naming survey conducted from October 9 to 11. In that survey, respondents could name, unaided, up to 10 political groups whom they knew best. Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), Democratic Party (DP), Civic Party (CP), Liberal Party (LP) and People Power (PP) were mentioned most frequently. Please refer to the relevant table in our website for the rest of the list. The 12 most frequently mentioned political groups then entered into the second stage rating survey. During that second stage survey conducted from October 12 to 18, respondents were asked to rate each political group in turn using a 0-100 scale. 0 indicates absolutely no support, 100 indicates absolute support, and 50 means half-half. After calculation, the bottom 2 political groups in terms of recognition rate were dropped, leaving behind the top 10. In case any group failed to reach the 50% benchmark recognition rate, it would also be dropped. It should, however, be noted that because political groups are not yet legal entities in Hong Kong, such definitions are rather vague, and so-called political groups are constantly evolving. As a result, strange names may appear in the list of groups mentioned by respondents in Stage One surveys. In order to avoid personal bias, our research team will eliminate groups which fall outside the popular definition only after the first stage of the survey. To facilitate readers follow our research process step by step, the POP Site has already displayed the results of all naming surveys conducted since July 1998. The latest ratings of the top 10 political groups, together with the previous ratings, are summarized below:

 

Date of survey

8-15/11/2012

22-25/2/2013

20-25/6/2013

12-18/10/2013

Latest change

Sample base

538-578

506-631

574-698

518-584

--

Overall response rate

66.5%

65.2%

66.9%

66.6%

--

Finding / Recog rate

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error[6]

Recog %

--

HKCTU

48.2{4}

49.5{2}

49.7{4}

49.3+/-1.9{1}

85.6%

-0.4

FTU

49.6{3}

49.0{3}

48.7{5}

48.9+/-1.8{2}

92.9%

+0.2

NPP

45.5 [7]

46.8{5}

46.5 [7]

47.0[9]+/-1.9{3}

76.2%

+0.5

CP

47.2{5}

48.1{4}

50.4{3}[8]

47.0[9]+/-1.9{4}

84.7%

-3.4[8]

ADPL

50.4{2}

49.9{1}

52.1{1}[8]

46.8+/-1.9{5}

79.7%

-5.3[8]

LP

45.0{7}[8]

44.4{7}

45.9{7}

45.9+/-1.6{6}

86.8%

--

DP

46.5{6}

46.6{6}

48.1{6}

45.8+/-1.8{7}

92.0%

-2.3[8]

DAB

44.7{8}

41.9{8}[8]

43.7{8}

45.0+/-2.2{8}

87.8%

+1.3

LSD

37.4{9}[8]

37.2{10}

38.9{9}

37.8+/-2.2{9}

85.8%

-1.1

PP

36.6{10}

37.6{9}

36.7{10}

36.3+/-2.3{10}

90.6%

-0.4

NWS

50.5{1}

52.0 [7]

--

48.6+/-2.0[7]

71.3%

--

Labour Party

47.5 [7]

46.4 [7]

49.6 [7] [8]

47.2+/-2.0[7]

73.8%

-2.4[8]

HKASPDMC

--

--

51.7{2}

--

--

--

[6] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-2.3 at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[7] Ratings with recognition rates not reaching top 10 in either stage of survey are not available. { } Number in square brackets indicates rankings.
[8] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
[9] In two decimal places, the ratings of NPP and CP are 46.98 and 46.97 respectively. Therefore, NPP and CP ranked at 3rd and 4th places respectively.

 

Findings obtained in mid-October showed that, the most popular political group was Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions (HKCTU) which attained 49.3 marks. Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions (FTU) scored 48.9 marks and ranked 2nd. The 3rd to 8th places went to New People’s Party (NPP), Civic Party (CP), Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People’s Livelihood (ADPL), Liberal Party (LP), Democratic Party (DP) and Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), attaining 47.0, 47.0, 46.8, 45.9, 45.8 and 45.0 marks respectively. The 9th and 10th places fell to League of Social Democrats (LSD) and People Power (PP) with respective scores of 37.8 and 36.3. The mean score obtained by the top 5 political groups was 47.8 marks. For this latest survey, Neighbourhood and Worker’s Service Centre (NWS) and Labour Party obtained a support rating of 48.6 and 47.2 marks respectively, but they were dropped due to their relatively low recognition rates. The overall ratings ranked according to results obtained over the past 12 months are tabulated as follows:

 

Date of survey

8-15/11/12

22-25/2/13

20-25/6/13

12-18/10/13

No. of times on top 10

Average  rating [10]

Overall ranking[11]

ADPL

50.4

49.9

52.1

46.8

4

49.8

{1}

HKCTU

48.2

49.5

49.7

49.3

4

49.2

{2}

FTU

49.6

49.0

48.7

48.9

4

49.1

{3}

CP

47.2

48.1

50.4

47.0

4

48.2

{4}

DP

46.5

46.6

48.1

45.8

4

46.8

{5}

LP

45.0

44.4

45.9

45.9

4

45.3

{6}

DAB

44.7

41.9

43.7

45.0

4

43.8

{7}

LSD

37.4

37.2

38.9

37.8

4

37.8

{8}

PP

36.6

37.6

36.7

36.3

4

36.8

{9}

NPP

--

46.8

--

47.0

2

46.9

{10}

HKASPDMC

--

--

51.7

--

1

51.7

{11}

NWS

50.5

--

--

--

1

50.5

{12}

[10] “Average rating” is the average of all ratings obtained by political groups over the past 12 months.
[11] “Overall ranking” is first determined by their number of times on top 10, and then their average ratings. { } Number in square brackets indicates rankings.

 

The overall rankings in the past 12 months showed that, nine political groups were listed for four times, ADPL ranked first, achieving an average rating of 49.8 marks. HKCTU and FTU ranked 2nd and 3rd, attaining average ratings of 49.2 and 49.1 marks respectively. Meanwhile, the 4th to 9th ranks fell to CP, DP, LP, DAB, LSD and PP, with respective average ratings of 48.2, 46.8, 45.3, 43.8, 37.8 and 36.8 marks. NPP was listed twice while HKASPDMC and NWS were listed once, now ranked the 10th to 12th with 46.9, 51.7 and 50.5 marks.


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey was conducted from June 20 to 25, 2013 while this survey was conducted from October 12 to 18, 2013. In between these two surveys, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

 

17/10/13

Leung Chun-ying announces that public consultation on political reform will begin by year-end.

15/10/13

Government issues two new free television licenses, Wong Wai-kay's application is rejected.

11/10/13

Leung Chun Ying clarifies that the government did not put Manila bus hostage crisis behind.

10/10/13

Li Keqiang urges Aquino to settle Manila bus hostage crisis as soon as possible.

28/9/13

Government defines poverty line.

12/9/13

The Independent Committee of ICAC releases a report, which revealed Timothy Tong Hin-ming has been involved in breaking the rules 18 times.

11/8/13

Leung Chun-ying attends a public forum in Tin Shui Wai.

4/8/13

Supporters and detractors of school teacher Alpais Lam Wai-sze hold a rally; the incident turns into a conflict at Mong Kok.

1/8/13

Franklin Lam Fan-keung resigns from the Executive Council.

22/7/13

Paul Chan Mo-po refuses to admit conflict of interest despite his family owns a land on Northeast New Territories.

16/7/13

Director of LOCPG Zhang Xiaoming comments on issues of "Occupy Central” and “Universal suffrage”.

4/7/13

Government introduces modified plan on new town project in the north-east New Territories.

1/7/13

Many newspapers report the news of July 1 March.

21/6/13

LegCo will vote on the bill of landfills expansion.



Commentary

Robert Ting-Yiu Chung, Director of Public Opinion Programme, observed, “Our latest survey of ‘Top 10 Political Groups’ completed in mid-October when controversies over the issue of television licenses were brewing shows that NPP surpasses the recognition threshold again to re-enter the ‘top 10’ list, replacing HKASPDMC. In terms of support ratings, compared to four months ago, the ratings of 6 out of 10 political groups have gone down. Among them, ADPL, CP and DP register drops beyond sampling error, down by 5.3, 3.4 and 2.3 marks respectively. No political groups score more than 50 marks. In terms of relative rankings, HKCTU and FTU each goes up three positions to rank first and second. NPP re-enters the list to rank the 3rd. CP goes down one position to rank the 4th. ADPL goes down four positions to rank 5th. LP and DP swap positions to rank 6th and 7th. DAB, LSD and PP remain at the 8th, 9th and 10th positions respectively. It should be noted, however, that our ‘Top 10 Political Groups’ only includes groups which are best known to the public, ranked according to their support ratings. Other political groups may well have very high or low support ratings, but because they are relatively less well-known, they are not included in our final list. As to what events have affected the ups and downs of the popularity of these groups, readers can make their own judgment after reading through detailed records placed in our ‘Opinion Daily’.”


Future Release (Tentative)

  • October 29, 2013 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Popularity of CE and HKSAR Government


| Abstract | Latest Figures | Opinion Daily | Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Rating of Top Ten Political Groups) |