HKU POP releases popularity figures of CE and principal officialsBack


Press Release on July 16, 2013

| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures |Opinion Daily |Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


Special Announcement

The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong has now released the preliminary report and all video records of “OCLP Deliberation Series” DDay1, together with all video records of July 1 Rally for head counting. Please go to these websites for free downloading: “HKU POP Site” (http://hkupop.pori.hk) and “PopCon” e-platform (http://popcon.hk).


 

Abstract

POP interviewed 1,001 Hong Kong people between July 2 and 5, 2013 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. Our survey shows that after the July 1 Rally all popularity figures of CE CY Leung have not changed much compared with those registered two weeks ago. They continue to remain low. CE’s support rating now stands at 46.5 marks, approval rate at 26%, disapproval rate at 55%, giving a net popularity of negative 29 percentage points. Both his approval rate and net popularity have dropped to record lows in his term. As for the Secretaries of Departments, the latest support rating of CS Carrie Lam is 61.9 marks, her approval rate 57%, disapproval rate 9%, and net popularity positive 48 percentage points. As for FS John Tsang, his latest support rating is 53.2 marks, approval rate 41%, disapproval rate 21%, and net popularity positive 20 percentage points. As for SJ Rimsky Yuen, his support rating is 52.6 marks, approval rate 28%, disapproval rate 18%, giving a net popularity of positive 10 percentage points. Carrie Lam remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the net approval rates of 3 of the 12 Directors have gone up and 9 have gone down. Among them, Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing, Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Education Eddie Ng and Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok registered significant changes in net approval rates, down by 23, 11, 9, 8 and 7 percentage points respectively. The popularity figures of Anthony Cheung, Lai Tung-kwok and Wong Kam-sing are at the poorest since they became Directors of Bureaux. Among all the Directors, Tsang Tak-sing, Paul Chan and Eddie Ng registered negative popularities, at negative 1, 26 and 27 percentage points respectively. Ko Wing-man continues to be the most popular Director. According to POP’s standard, Ko Wing-man falls under the category of “ideal” performer, Carrie Lam now falls under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Matthew Cheung, John Tsang, Ceajer Chan, Anthony Cheung, Lai Tung-kwok, Tsang Tak-sing, Wong Kam-sing, Paul Chan and Eddie Ng can be labeled as “mediocre”, that of Rimsky Yuen, Raymond Tam, Gregory So and Paul Tang can be labeled as “inconspicuous”. CY Leung falls into the category of “depressing” performer, while no one falls into that of “disastrous”. The maximum sampling errors of all approval and disapproval rates is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures and net approval rates need another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 68%.

Points to note:

[1] The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.

[2] The sample size of this survey is 1,001 successful interviews, not 1,001 x 68.0% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] The maximum sampling error of all percentages of each survey is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures and net approval rates needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-2.0, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% and sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-6% at 95% confidence level".
[4] Because of sampling errors in conducting the survey, and rounding procedures in collating the figures, when quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.

 


Latest Figures

POP today releases the latest popularity figures of CE CY Leung and various Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2012 year-end. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

 

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages[6]

2-5/7/2013

1,001

68.0%

+/-3%

[6] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings and net approval rates are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

 

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sampling errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

                   

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

[7] Based on 95% confidence interval.

 

Recent popularity figures of CE CY Leung are summarized as follows:


Date of survey

17-25/4/13

2-7/5/13

20-23/5/13

3-5/6/13

13-19/6/13

2-5/7/13

Latest change

Sample base

1,023

1,017

1,023

1,012

1,040

1,001

--

Overall response rate

68.6%

65.9%

69.5%

65.4%

68.0%

68.0%

--

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error[8]

--

Rating of CE CY Leung

49.9

49.0

46.7[9]

46.7

46.2

46.5+/-1.6

+0.3

Vote of confidence in CE CY Leung

35%

29%[9]

30%

30%

27%

26+/-3%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in CE CY Leung

49%

54%[9]

54%

54%

55%

55+/-3%

--

Net approval rate

-14%

-25%[9]

-24%

-24%

-28%

-29+/-5%

-1%

[8] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.6, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3%, sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-5% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[9] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


Recent popularity figures of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

 

Date of survey

27/2-6/3/13

2-10/4/13

2-7/5/13

3-5/6/13

2-5/7/13

Latest change [10]

Sample base[10]

615-649

552-610

599-638

595-647

615-663

--

Overall response rate

65.5%

66.2%

65.9%

65.4%

68.0%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & error [11]

--

Rating of CS Carrie Lam

60.9

62.2

60.7

60.8

61.9+/-1.7

+1.1

Vote of confidence in CS Carrie Lam

60%

56%

54%

58%

57+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in CS Carrie Lam

7%

7%

8%

8%

9+/-2%

+1%

Net approval rate

53%

49%

46%

50%

48+/-5%

-2%

Rating of FS John Tsang

52.1[12]

51.9

53.8[12]

54.9

53.2+/-1.5

-1.7[12]

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

39%[12]

36%

41%[12]

46%[12]

41+/-4%

-5%[12]

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang

20%[12]

21%

20%

19%

21+/-3%

+2%

Net approval rate

19%[12]

15%

21%

27%

20+/-6%

-7%[12]

Rating of SJ Rimsky Yuen

49.3

50.3

50.7

49.0

52.6+/-2.0

+3.6[12]

Vote of confidence in SJ Rimsky Yuen

26%

27%

26%

23%

28+/-4%

+5%[12]

Vote of no confidence in SJ Rimsky Yuen

16%

16%

16%

15%

18+/-3%

+3%

Net approval rate

10%

11%

10%

8%

10+/-5%

+2%

[10] The frequency of this series of questions is different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals. Starting from 2011, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[11] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-2.0, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4%, sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-6% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[12] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

 

Latest popularity figures of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below, in descending order of net approval rates:

 

Date of survey

2-7/5/13

3-5/6/13

2-5/7/13

Latest change

Sample base [13]

525-649

531-664

584-629

--

Overall response rate

65.9%

65.4%

68.0%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer

Base

%

Base

%

Base

% & error [14]

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man

587

79%

633

76%

584

78+/-3%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man

587

3%

633

4%

584

5+/-2%

+1%

Net approval rate

--

76%

--

72%

--

73+/-5%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

596

42%

604

45%

603

48+/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

596

25%

604

17%[15]

603

16+/-3%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

17%

--

28%[15]

--

32+/-6%

+4%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

592

41%

602

41%

600

39+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

592

8%

602

9%

600

12+/-3%

+3%

Net approval rate

--

33%

--

32%

--

27+/-6%

-5%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung

649

41%

664

43%

602

38+/-4%

-5%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung

649

14%

664

13%

602

19+/-3%

+6%[15]

Net approval rate

--

27%

--

30%

--

19+/-6%

-11%[15]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok

646

47%

585

43%

621

38+/-4%

-5%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok

646

11%

585

18%[15]

621

20+/-3%

+2%

Net approval rate

--

36%

--

25%[15]

--

18+/-6%

-7%[15]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang

598

15%

646

18%

623

22+/-3%

+4%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang

598

10%

646

9%

623

14+/-3%

+5%[15]

Net approval rate

--

5%[16]

--

9%

--

8+/-5%

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam

628

22%

613

28%[15]

591

24+/-4%

-4%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam

628

16%

613

17%

591

18+/-3%

+1%

Net approval rate

--

6%

--

11%

--

6+/-5%

-5%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

601

24%

600

23%

612

24+/-4%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

601

19%

600

19%

612

22+/-3%

+3%

Net approval rate

--

5%[16]

--

4%

--

2+/-6%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing

525

32%

557

37%[15]

629

25+/-4%

-12%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing

525

16%

557

14%

629

25+/-4%

+11%[15]

Net approval rate

--

16%

--

23%[15]

--

0+/-6%

-23%[15]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

550

31%

531

34%

600

26+/-4%

-8%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

550

27%

531

26%

600

27+/-4%

+1%

Net approval rate

--

4%

--

8%

--

-1+/-6%

-9%[15]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Paul Chan

593

18%

620

19%

585

20+/-3%

+1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Paul Chan

593

46%

620

46%

585

46+/-4%

--

Net approval rate

--

-28%

--

-27%

--

-26+/-6%

+1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Eddie Ng

610

17%

542

22%[15]

615

18+/-3%

-4%[15]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Eddie Ng

610

48%

542

41%[15]

615

45+/-4%

+4%

Net approval rate

--

-31%

--

-19%[15]

--

-27+/-6%

-8%[15]

[13] Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[14] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% and sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-6% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[15] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
[16] In two decimal place, the respective net approval rates of Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So and Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang are 5.01 and 4.98 percentage points. Thus, they were ranked eighth and ninth respectively at that time.

 

The latest survey showed that, CE CY Leung scored 46.5 marks, and 26% supported him as CE, his net approval rate is negative 29 percentage points. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Carrie Lam, FS John Tsang and SJ Rimsky Yuen were 61.9, 53.2 and 52.6 marks, and 57%, 41% and 28% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. Their net approval rates are positive 48, 20 and 10 percentage points respectively.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, according to the net approval rates, results revealed that the top position goes to Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man, attaining positive 73 percentage points. The 2nd to 3rd places belong to Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung and Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan with net approval rates positive 32 and positive 27 percentage points respectively. Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung, Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok, Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So, Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Development Paul Chan and Secretary for Education Eddie Ng ranked 4th to 12th, their corresponding net approval rates are positive 19, positive 18, positive 8, positive 6, positive 2, zero, negative 1, negative 26 and negative 27 percentage points. In other words, only Ko Wing-man scored net approval rate of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.

 


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from 3 to 5 June, 2013 while this survey was conducted from 2 to 5 July, 2013. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

 

4/7/13

Government introduces modified plan on new town project in the north-east New Territories.

3/7/13

Government turns down Lee Shau-kee's offer of lands to build affordable flats for young people.

1/7/13

Many newspapers report the news of July 1 March.

25/6/13

Government publishes report on its work in the past year.

24/6/13

Snowden vanishes; U.S. criticizes Hong Kong government for allowing Snowden to leave.

23/6/13

Snowden flees to Moscow.

21/6/13

LegCo will vote on the bill of landfills expansion.

12/6/13

Kai Tak Cruise Terminal launches officially.

9/6/13

Leung Chun-ying considers Occupy Central as an offense to law for no intention.

4/6/13

150,000 people participate in the June Fourth candlelight vigil.



Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP, Robert Chung.

 

Our latest survey shows that after the July 1 Rally all popularity figures of CE CY Leung have not changed much compared with those registered two weeks ago. They continue to remain low. CE’s support rating now stands at 46.5 marks, approval rate at 26%, disapproval rate at 55%, giving a net popularity of negative 29 percentage points. Both his approval rate and net popularity have dropped to record lows in his term.

 

As for the Secretaries of Departments, the latest support rating of CS Carrie Lam is 61.9 marks, her approval rate 57%, disapproval rate 9%, and net popularity positive 48 percentage points. As for FS John Tsang, his latest support rating is 53.2 marks, approval rate 41%, disapproval rate 21%, and net popularity positive 20 percentage points. As for SJ Rimsky Yuen, his support rating is 52.6 marks, approval rate 28%, disapproval rate 18%, giving a net popularity of positive 10 percentage points. Carrie Lam remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the net approval rates of 3 of the 12 Directors have gone up and 9 have gone down. Among them, Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing, Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Education Eddie Ng and Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok registered significant changes in net approval rates, down by 23, 11, 9, 8 and 7 percentage points respectively. The popularity figures of Anthony Cheung, Lai Tung-kwok and Wong Kam-sing are at the poorest since they became Directors of Bureaux. Among all the Directors, Tsang Tak-sing, Paul Chan and Eddie Ng registered negative popularities, at negative 1, 26 and 27 percentage points respectively. Ko Wing-man continues to be the most popular Director.

 

According to POP’s standard, Ko Wing-man falls under the category of “ideal” performer, Carrie Lam now falls under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Matthew Cheung, John Tsang, Ceajer Chan, Anthony Cheung, Lai Tung-kwok, Tsang Tak-sing, Wong Kam-sing, Paul Chan and Eddie Ng can be labeled as “mediocre”, that of Rimsky Yuen, Raymond Tam, Gregory So and Paul Tang can be labeled as “inconspicuous”. CY Leung falls into the category of “depressing” performer, while no one falls into that of “disastrous”.

 

The following table summarizes the grading of CE and the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

 

"Ideal": those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man (78%)

 

"Successful": those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

CS Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (57%)

 

"Mediocre": those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (48%); FS John Tsang Chun-wah (41%); Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (39%);Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung Bing-leung (38%[17]); Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok (38%[17]); Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (26%); Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing (25%); Secretary for Development Paul Chan Mo-po (20%); Secretary for Education Eddie Ng Hak-kim (18%)

 

"Inconspicuous": those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

SJ Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung (28%, 45%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam Chi-yuen (24%[18], 42%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung (24%[18], 46%); Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang Kwok-wai (22%, 36%)

 

"Depressing": those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

CE Leung Chun-ying (55%)

 

"Disastrous": those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

--

[17] In one decimal place, the respective approval rates of Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung and Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok are 37.8% and 37.7%.
[18] In one decimal place, the respective approval rates of Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam and Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So are 24.0% and 23.8%.

 


Future Release (Tentative)

  • July 23, 2013 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Popularity of Top Ten Legislative Councillors



| Special Announcement | Abstract | Latest Figures |Opinion Daily |Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |