HKU POP releases popularity figures of CE and principal officialsBack


Press Release on May 14, 2013

| Abstract | Latest Figures |Opinion Daily |Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |


 

Abstract

The Public Opinion Programme (POP) at the University of Hong Kong interviewed 1,017 Hong Kong people between May 2 and 7, 2013 by means of a random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers. Our survey shows that the general popularity of CE CY Leung has significantly dropped. Although his support rating has not dropped too much, it has gone back to the level registered in early March. It now stands at 49.0 marks. CE’s approval rate, however, has dropped significantly to 29%, disapproval rate climbs significantly to 54%, giving a net popularity of negative 25 percentage points. All three figures are at their poorest since he became CE. As for the Secretaries of Departments, the latest support rating of CS Carrie Lam is 60.7 marks, her approval rate 54%, disapproval rate 8%, and net popularity positive 46 percentage points. As for FS John Tsang, his latest support rating is 53.8 marks, approval rate 41%, disapproval rate 20%, and net popularity positive 21 percentage points. As for SJ Rimsky Yuen, his support rating is 50.7 marks, approval rate 26%, disapproval rate 16%, giving a net popularity of positive 10 percentage points. Carrie Lam remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department, but her approval rate has dropped to all-time record low since she became CS. As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the net approval rates of 8 of the 12 Directors have gone down, 3 have gone up and 1 has remained unchanged. Among them, Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung, Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So and Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man registered significant changes in net approval rates, down by 12 and 8 percentage points and up by 6 and 5 percentage points respectively. Among all the Directors, Paul Chan and Eddie Ng registered negative popularity, at negative 28 and 31 percentage points respectively. Ko Wing-man continues to be the most popular Director. According to POP’s standard, Ko Wing-man falls under the category of “ideal” performer, Carrie Lam now falls under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Lai Tung-kwok, Matthew Cheung, John Tsang, Anthony Cheung, Tsang Tak-sing, Paul Chan and Eddie Ng can be labeled as “mediocre”, that of Ceajer Chan, Wong Kam-sing, Rimsky Yuen, Gregory So, Raymond Tam and Paul Tang can be labeled as “inconspicuous”. CY Leung falls into the category of “depressing” performer, while no one falls into that of “disastrous”. According to records in our “Opinion Daily”, recent events which have pulled down the popularity of government officials may include the alleged misconduct of former ICAC head Timothy Tong, controversies over Sichuan donations, and dock workers’ strike. The maximum sampling errors of all approval and disapproval rates is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures and net approval rates need another calculation. The response rate of the survey is 66%.

Points to note:

[1] The address of the "HKU POP SITE" is http://hkupop.pori.hk, journalists can check out the details of the survey there.

[2] The sample size of this survey is 1,017 successful interviews, not 1,017 x 65.9% response rate. In the past, many media made this mistake.
[3] The maximum sampling error of all percentages of each survey is +/-4 percentage points at 95% confidence level, while the sampling error of rating figures and net approval rates needs another calculation. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. When quoting these figures, journalists can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.8, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% and sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-7% at 95% confidence level".
[4] Because of sampling errors in conducting the survey, and rounding procedures in collating the figures, when quoting percentages of this survey, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, but when quoting the rating figures, one decimal place can be used, in order to match the precision level of the figures.
[5] The data of this survey is collected by means of random telephone interviews conducted by real interviewers, not by any interactive voice system (IVS). If a research organization uses "computerized random telephone survey" to camouflage its IVS operation, it should be considered unprofessional.

 


Latest Figures

POP today releases the latest popularity figures of CE CY Leung and various Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system. All the figures have been weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2012 year-end. Herewith the contact information for the latest survey:

 

Date of survey

Overall sample size

Response rate

Maximum sampling error of percentages[6]

2-7/5/2013

1,017

65.9%

+/-3%

[6] Errors are calculated at 95% confidence level using full sample size. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Questions using only sub-samples would have bigger sampling error. Sampling errors of ratings and net approval rates are calculated according to the distribution of the scores collected.

 

As different questions involve different sub-samples, the sampling errors will vary accordingly. The table below briefly shows the relationship between sample size and maximum sampling errors for the readers to capture the corresponding changes:

                   

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

Sample size
(total sample or sub-sample)

Sampling error of percentages[7]
(maximum values)

1,300

+/- 2.8 %

1,350

+/- 2.7 %

1,200

+/- 2.9 %

1,250

+/- 2.8 %

1,100

+/- 3.0 %

1,150

+/- 3.0 %

1,000

+/- 3.2 %

1,050

+/- 3.1 %

900

+/- 3.3 %

950

+/- 3.2 %

800

+/- 3.5 %

850

+/- 3.4 %

700

+/- 3.8 %

750

+/- 3.7 %

600

+/- 4.1 %

650

+/- 3.9 %

500

+/- 4.5 %

550

+/- 4.3 %

400

+/- 5.0 %

450

+/- 4.7 %

[7] Based on 95% confidence interval.

 

Recent popularity figures of CE CY Leung are summarized as follows:


Date of survey

18-21/2/13

27/2-6/3/13

21-27/3/13

2-10/4/13

17-25/4/13

2-7/5/13

Latest change

Sample base

1,027

1,023

1,003

1,007

1,023

1,017

--

Overall response rate

65.5%

65.5%

67.1%

66.2%

68.6%

65.9%

--

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding and error[8]

--

Rating of CE CY Leung

48.0 [9]

48.6

51.4[9]

50.5

49.9

49.0+/-1.4

-0.9

Vote of confidence in CE CY Leung

31%

33%

32%

32%

35%

29+/-3%

-6% [9]

Vote of no confidence in CE CY Leung

51%

49%

51%

51%

49%

54+/-3%

+5% [9]

Net approval rate

-20%

-16%

-19%

-19%

-14%

-25+/-6%

-11% [9]

[8] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of rating not more than +/-1.4, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3%, sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-6% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[9] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.


Recent popularity figures of the three Secretaries of Departments under the accountability system are summarized below:

 

Date of survey

1-6/2/13

27/2/13[10]

27/2-6/3/13

2-10/4/13

2-7/5/13

Latest change [11]

Sample base[11]

592-662

1,010

615-649

552-610

599-638

--

Overall response rate

64.6%

67.3%

65.5%

66.2%

65.9%

--

Latest finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding

Finding & error [12]

--

Rating of CS Carrie Lam

60.6[13]

--

60.9

62.2

60.7+/-1.5

-1.5

Vote of confidence in CS Carrie Lam

57%[13]

--

60%

56%

54+/-4%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in CS Carrie Lam

9%[13]

--

7%

7%

8+/-2%

+1%

Net approval rate

48%[13]

--

53%

49%

46+/-5%

-3%

Rating of FS John Tsang

57.8

56.6

52.1[13]

51.9

53.8+/-1.5

+1.9[13]

Vote of confidence in FS John Tsang

54%

48%

39%[13]

36%

41+/-4%

+5%[13]

Vote of no confidence in FS John Tsang

8%[13]

12%

20%[13]

21%

20+/-3%

-1%

Net approval rate

46%

36%

19%[13]

15%

21+/-6%

+6%

Rating of SJ Rimsky Yuen

47.8[13]

--

49.3

50.3

50.7+/-1.8

+0.4

Vote of confidence in SJ Rimsky Yuen

24%[13]

--

26%

27%

26+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in SJ Rimsky Yuen

18%

--

16%

16%

16+/-3%

--

Net approval rate

6%

--

10%

11%

10+/-5%

-1%

[10] The survey conducted on 27/2/2013 was the instant survey after the Budget Speech and only asked rating of FS as well as his vote of confidence.
[11] The frequency of this series of questions is different from that of CE popularity ratings. Comparisons, if made, should be synchronized using the same intervals. Starting from 2011, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[12] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. "95% confidence level" means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state "sampling error of various ratings not more than +/-1.8, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4%, sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-6% at 95% confidence level" when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[13] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.

 

Latest popularity figures of Directors of Bureaux under the accountability system are summarized below, in descending order of net approval rates:

 

Date of survey

27/2-6/3/13

2-10/4/2013

2-7/5/2013

Latest change

Sample base [14]

570-692

566-644

525-649

--

Overall response rate

65.5%

66.2%

65.9%

--

Sample base for each question/ Percentage of answer

Base

%

Base

%

Base

% & error [15]

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man

601

80%[16]

611

75%[16]

587

79+/-3%

+4%[16]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man

601

3%[16]

611

4%

587

3+/-1%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

77%[16]

--

71%[16]

--

76+/-4%

+5%[16]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok

670

55%

644

53%

646

47+/-4%

-6%[16]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok

670

11%

644

9%

646

11+/-3%

+2%

Net approval rate

--

44%

--

44%

--

36+/-5%

-8%[16]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

685

48%[16]

610

39%[16]

592

41+/-4%

+2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan

685

9%

610

8%

592

8+/-2%

--

Net approval rate

--

39%

--

31%[16]

--

33+/-5%

+2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung

611

44%

618

42%

649

41+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung

611

16%

618

15%

649

14+/-3%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

28%

--

27%

--

27+/-5%

--

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

645

57%

585

49%[16]

596

42+/-4%

-7%[16]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung

645

12%

585

20%[16]

596

25+/-4%

+5%[16]

Net approval rate

--

45%

--

29%[16]

--

17+/-7%

-12%[16]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing

692

40%

590

33%[16]

525

32+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing

692

10%[16]

590

15%[16]

525

16+/-3%

+1%

Net approval rate

--

30%[16]

--

18%[16]

--

16+/-6%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam

656

26%[16]

600

26%

628

22+/-3%

-4%[16]

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam

656

17%[16]

600

18%

628

16+/-3%

-2%

Net approval rate

--

9%[16][17]

--

8%

--

6+/-5%

-2%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

644

27%

593

21%[16]

601

24+/-4%

+3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So

644

20%[16]

593

22%

601

19+/-3%

-3%

Net approval rate

--

7%

--

-1%[16]

--

5+/-5%[18]

+6%[16]

Vote of confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang

593

21%

612

17%[16]

598

15+/-3%

-2%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang

593

9%

612

11%

598

10+/-3%

-1%

Net approval rate

--

12%

--

6%[16]

--

5+/-4%[18]

-1%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

570

35%

566

32%

550

31+/-4%

-1%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing

570

26%[16]

566

25%

550

27+/-4%

+2%

Net approval rate

--

9%[16][17]

--

7%

--

4+/-7%

-3%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Development Paul Chan

582

23%[16]

581

21%

593

18+/-3%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Development Paul Chan

582

43%[16]

581

45%

593

46+/-4%

+1%

Net approval rate

--

-20%[16]

--

-24%

--

-28+/-6%

-4%

Vote of confidence in Secretary for Education Eddie Ng

621

23%

628

20%

610

17+/-3%

-3%

Vote of no confidence in Secretary for Education Eddie Ng

621

44%

628

45%

610

48+/-4%

+3%

Net approval rate

--

-21%

--

-25%

--

-31+/-6%

-6%

[14] Starting from 2006, these questions only uses sub-samples of the tracking surveys concerned, the sample size for each question also varies.
[15] All error figures in the table are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times, using the same questions each time but with different random samples, we would expect 95 times getting a figure within the error margins specified. Media can state “sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% and sampling error of net approval rates not more than +/-7% at 95% confidence level” when quoting the above figures. The error margin of previous survey can be found at the POP Site.
[16] Such changes have gone beyond the sampling errors at the 95% confidence level, meaning that they are statistically significant prima facie. However, whether numerical differences are statistically significant or not is not the same as whether they are practically useful or meaningful.
[17] In one decimal place, the respective net approval rates of Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam and Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing are 9.8 and 8.6 percentage points. Thus, they are ranked eighth and ninth respectively.
[18] In two decimal place, the respective net approval rates of Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So and Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang are 5.01 and 4.98 percentage points. Thus, they are ranked eighth and ninth respectively.

 

The latest survey showed that, CE CY Leung scored 49.0 marks, and 29% supported him as CE, his net approval rate is negative 25 percentage points. Meanwhile, the corresponding ratings of CS Carrie Lam, FS John Tsang and SJ Rimsky Yuen were 60.7, 53.8 and 50.7 marks, and 54%, 41% and 26% would vote for their reappointment correspondingly. Their net approval rates are positive 46, 21 and 10 percentage points respectively.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, according to the net approval rates, results revealed that the top position goes to Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man, attaining positive 76 percentage points. The 2nd to 4th places belong to Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan and Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung with net approval rates positive 36, positive 33 and positive 27 percentage points respectively. Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung, Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing, Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So, Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang, Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing, Secretary for Development Paul Chan and Secretary for Education Eddie Ng ranked 5th to 12th, their corresponding net approval rates are positive 17, positive 16, positive 6, positive 5, positive 5, positive 4, negative 28 and negative 31 percentage points. In other words, only Ko Wing-man scored net approval rate of over 50% among all Directors of Bureaux.

 


Opinion Daily

In January 2007, POP opened a feature page called "Opinion Daily" at the "POP Site", to record significant events and selected polling figures on a day-to-day basis, in order to let readers judge by themselves the reasons for the ups and downs of different opinion figures. In July 2007, POP collaborated with Wisers Information Limited whereby Wisers supplies to POP each day starting from July 24, a record of significant events of that day, according to the research method designed by POP. These daily entries would be uploaded to "Opinion Daily" as soon as they are verified by POP.

 

For the polling items covered in this press release, the previous survey of some items was conducted from 2 to 10 April, 2013 while this survey was conducted from 2 to 7 May, 2013. During this period, herewith the significant events selected from counting newspaper headlines and commentaries on a daily basis and covered by at least 25% of the local newspaper articles. Readers can make their own judgment if these significant events have any impacts to different polling figures.

 

6/5/13

Strikers accept a 9.8 percent pay rise from contractors.

2/5/13

An independent committee will examine the former head of the ICAC Timothy Tong.

30/4/13

Inquiry report of Lamma ferry tragedy puts blame on Marine Department.

27/4/13

Chairman of the National People's Congress Standing Committee, Zhang Dejiang meets with the political parties in Hong Kong for the first time.

24/4/13

Government's request of a HK$100 million donation to the Sichuan government to aid quake victims is on hold.

23/4/13

The government requests Legco for a $100 million donation to Sichuan government to aid quake victims.

18/4/13

Global Stevedoring Service Co. decides to close down.

16/4/13

The Executive Council approves the results of the MTR's fare adjustment mechanism.

13/4/13

Media continues to report the news of H7N9 bird flu.

4/4/13

The negotiation between dock workers and contractors fails.



Commentary

Note: The following commentary was written by Director of POP, Robert Chung.

 

Our latest survey shows that the general popularity of CE CY Leung has significantly dropped. Although his support rating has not dropped too much, it has gone back to the level registered in early March. It now stands at 49.0 marks. CE’s approval rate, however, has dropped significantly to 29%, disapproval rate climbs significantly to 54%, giving a net popularity of negative 25 percentage points. All three figures are at their poorest since he became CE.

 

As for the Secretaries of Departments, the latest support rating of CS Carrie Lam is 60.7 marks, her approval rate 54%, disapproval rate 8%, and net popularity positive 46 percentage points. As for FS John Tsang, his latest support rating is 53.8 marks, approval rate 41%, disapproval rate 20%, and net popularity positive 21 percentage points. As for SJ Rimsky Yuen, his support rating is 50.7 marks, approval rate 26%, disapproval rate 16%, giving a net popularity of positive 10 percentage points. Carrie Lam remains to be the most popular Secretary of Department, but her approval rate has dropped to all-time record low since she became CS.

 

As for the Directors of Bureaux, compared to one month ago, the net approval rates of 8 of the 12 Directors have gone down, 3 have gone up and 1 has remained unchanged. Among them, Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung, Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok, Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So and Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man registered significant changes in net approval rates, down by 12 and 8 percentage points and up by 6 and 5 percentage points respectively. Among all the Directors, Paul Chan and Eddie Ng registered negative popularity, at negative 28 and 31 percentage points respectively. Ko Wing-man continues to be the most popular Director.

 

According to POP’s standard, Ko Wing-man falls under the category of “ideal” performer, Carrie Lam now falls under the category of “successful” performer. The performance of Lai Tung-kwok, Matthew Cheung, John Tsang, Anthony Cheung, Tsang Tak-sing, Paul Chan and Eddie Ng can be labeled as “mediocre”, that of Ceajer Chan, Wong Kam-sing, Rimsky Yuen, Gregory So, Raymond Tam and Paul Tang can be labeled as “inconspicuous”. CY Leung falls into the category of “depressing” performer, while no one falls into that of “disastrous”.

 

According to records in our “Opinion Daily”, recent events which have pulled down the popularity of government officials may include the alleged misconduct of former ICAC head Timothy Tong, controversies over Sichuan donations, and dock workers’ strike. The following table summarizes the grading of CE and the principal officials for readers' easy reference:

 

"Ideal": those with approval rates of over 66%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man (79%)

 

"Successful": those with approval rates of over 50%; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

CS Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor (54%)

 

"Mediocre": those not belonging to other 5 types; ranked by their approval rates shown inside brackets

Secretary for Security Lai Tung-kwok (47%); Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung Kin-chung (42%); FS John Tsang Chun-wah (41%[19]); Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung Bing-leung (41%[19]); Secretary for Home Affairs Tsang Tak-sing (31%); Secretary for Development Paul Chan Mo-po (18%); Secretary for Education Eddie Ng Hak-kim (17%)

 

"Inconspicuous": those with recognition rates of less than 50%; ranked by their approval rates; the first figure inside bracket is approval rate while the second figure is recognition rate

Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Ceajer Chan Ka-keung (41%, 50%); Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing (32%, 48%); SJ Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung (26%, 42%); Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development Gregory So Kam-leung (24%, 42%); Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Raymond Tam Chi-yuen (22%, 38%); Secretary for the Civil Service Paul Tang Kwok-wai (15%, 24%)

 

"Depressing": those with disapproval rates of over 50%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

CE Leung Chun-ying (54%)

 

"Disastrous": those with disapproval rates of over 66%; ranked by their disapproval rates shown inside brackets

--

 [19] In two decimal place, the respective approval rates of FS John Tsang Chun-wah and Secretary for Transport and Housing Anthony Cheung Bing-leung are 41.42 and 41.39 percentage points.


Future Release (Tentative)

  • May 21, 2013 (Tuesday) 1pm to 2pm: Ratings of top 5 Executive Councillors



| Abstract | Latest Figures |Opinion Daily |Commentary | Future Release (Tentative) |
| Detailed Findings (Popularity of Chief Executive/Popularity of Principal Officials) |