數表 TablesBack
咁如果10分代表社會福利極佳,0分代表社會福利極差,5分代表一半半,你會比幾多分香港社會?(半年結)
If you were to use 0-10 to evaluate whether Hong Kong is a society with sufficient social welfare, with 10 indicating absolutely sufficient, 0 indicating absolutely insufficient, 5 indicating half-half, how would you rate Hong Kong? (half-yearly average)
調查日期 Date of survey |
社會福利程度評價 Appraisal of Degree of Social Welfare Sufficiency |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
半年結樣本人數 Total Sample(half year) |
半年結次樣本人數 Sub Sample(half year) |
評分人數 Number of Raters |
認知率 Recognition Rate |
1-6/2019 | 5.79 | 0.10 | 1018 | 546 | 537 | 98.2% |
1-6/2018 | 6.18 | 0.08 | 2052 | 1614 | 1600 | 99.2% |
7-12/2017* | 6.55 | 0.08 | 1030 | 673 | 670 | 99.6% |
1-6/2017 | 6.21 | 0.10 | 1029 | 536 | 534 | 99.6% |
7-12/2016 | 6.24 | 0.09 | 1013 | 579 | 568 | 98.0% |
1-6/2016 | 6.20 | 0.09 | 1026 | 587 | 579 | 98.5% |
7-12/2015 | 6.49 | 0.09 | 1010 | 591 | 580 | 98.2% |
1-6/2015 | 6.59 | 0.08 | 1019 | 635 | 624 | 98.3% |
7-12/2014 | 6.23 | 0.08 | 1017 | 633 | 621 | 98.1% |
1-6/2014 | 6.39 | 0.09 | 1031 | 581 | 578 | 99.4% |
7-12/2013 | 6.33 | 0.08 | 1027 | 645 | 640 | 99.3% |
1-6/2013 | 6.26 | 0.08 | 1023 | 672 | 668 | 99.4% |
7-12/2012 | 6.37 | 0.08 | 1040 | 553 | 551 | 99.5% |
1-6/2012 | 6.22 | 0.08 | 1007 | 594 | 580 | 97.7% |
7-12/2011 | 6.56 | 0.08 | 1005 | 631 | 621 | 98.4% |
1-6/2011 | 5.86 | 0.09 | 1035 | 562 | 550 | 97.8% |
7-12/2010 | 6.45 | 0.08 | 1007 | 525 | 520 | 99.0% |
1-6/2010 | 6.12 | 0.08 | 1060 | 506 | 500 | 98.9% |
7-12/2009 | 6.28 | 0.06 | 1006 | 1006 | 994 | 98.8% |
1-6/2009 | 6.13 | 0.06 | 1011 | 1011 | 995 | 98.4% |
7-12/2008 | 6.32 | 0.06 | 1016 | 1016 | 998 | 98.2% |
1-6/2008 | 6.12 | 0.06 | 1028 | 1028 | 994 | 96.7% |
7-12/2007 | 6.42 | 0.06 | 1010 | 1010 | 986 | 97.6% |
1-6/2007 | 6.40 | 0.06 | 1014 | 1014 | 984 | 97.0% |
7-12/2006 | 6.28 | 0.07 | 1019 | 1019 | 997 | 97.8% |
1-6/2006 | 6.34 | 0.06 | 1017 | 1017 | 993 | 97.6% |
7-12/2005 | 6.25 | 0.06 | 2025 | 2025 | 1960 | 96.8% |
1-6/2005 | 6.40 | 0.07 | 2034 | 2034 | 1974 | 97.1% |
7-12/2004 | 6.11 | 0.07 | 2042 | 2042 | 1985 | 97.2% |
1-6/2004 | 6.20 | 0.07 | 2055 | 2055 | 1964 | 95.6% |
7-12/2003 | 6.26 | 0.06 | 2090 | 2090 | 1983 | 94.9% |
1-6/2003 | 6.29 | 0.06 | 2070 | 2070 | 1924 | 92.9% |
7-12/2002 | 6.42 | 0.06 | 2096 | 2096 | 1880 | 89.7% |
1-6/2002 | 6.37 | 0.06 | 2063 | 2063 | 1868 | 90.5% |
7-12/2001 | 6.00 | 0.06 | 2102 | 2102 | 1944 | 92.5% |
1-6/2001 | 6.08 | 0.06 | 2128 | 2128 | 2003 | 94.1% |
7-12/2000 | 5.89 | 0.06 | 2125 | 2125 | 1916 | 90.2% |
1-6/2000 | 6.13 | 0.08 | 2631 | 2631 | 2504 | 95.2% |
7-12/1999 | 6.07 | 0.09 | 1646 | 1646 | 1576 | 95.7% |
1-6/1999 | 6.35 | 0.08 | 1590 | 1590 | 1528 | 96.1% |
7-12/1998 | 6.19 | 0.08 | 1550 | 1550 | 1472 | 95.0% |
1-6/1998 | 6.19 | 0.08 | 1047 | 1047 | 999 | 95.4% |
7-12/1997 | 6.04 | 0.08 | 1087 | 1087 | 1031 | 94.8% |
* The mobile sample was not included when survey results were released. The figures in the table above have been updated to reflect the results based on the combined landline and mobile sample.