數表 TablesBack
咁如果10分代表絕對廉潔,0分代表絕對不廉潔,5分代表一半半,你會比幾多分香港社會? (半年結)
If you were to use 0-10 to evaluate whether Hong Kong is a corruption-free society, with 10 indicating absolutely corruption-free, 0 indicating absolutely corruptive, 5 indicating half-half, how would you rate Hong Kong? (half-yearly average)
調查日期 Date of survey |
廉潔程度評價 Appraisal of Degree of Corruption-free Practices |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
半年結樣本人數 Total Sample(half year) |
半年結次樣本人數 Sub Sample(half year) |
評分人數 Number of Raters |
認知率 Recognition Rate |
1-6/2019 | 6.43 | 0.10 | 1018 | 594 | 579 | 97.5% |
1-6/2018 | 6.45 | 0.08 | 2052 | 1651 | 1609 | 97.5% |
7-12/2017* | 6.74 | 0.08 | 1030 | 643 | 636 | 99.0% |
1-6/2017 | 6.17 | 0.09 | 1029 | 600 | 586 | 97.7% |
7-12/2016 | 5.95 | 0.09 | 1013 | 648 | 626 | 96.6% |
1-6/2016 | 6.36 | 0.09 | 1026 | 626 | 609 | 97.2% |
7-12/2015 | 6.39 | 0.09 | 1010 | 550 | 532 | 96.6% |
1-6/2015 | 6.48 | 0.07 | 1019 | 641 | 624 | 97.4% |
7-12/2014 | 6.25 | 0.08 | 1017 | 649 | 622 | 95.9% |
1-6/2014 | 6.61 | 0.08 | 1031 | 573 | 558 | 97.4% |
7-12/2013 | 6.37 | 0.08 | 1027 | 611 | 598 | 97.8% |
1-6/2013 | 6.68 | 0.08 | 1023 | 612 | 589 | 96.2% |
7-12/2012 | 6.64 | 0.09 | 1040 | 512 | 503 | 98.1% |
1-6/2012 | 7.37 | 0.07 | 1007 | 582 | 562 | 96.5% |
7-12/2011 | 7.32 | 0.07 | 1005 | 601 | 574 | 95.4% |
1-6/2011 | 7.26 | 0.08 | 1035 | 512 | 491 | 96.0% |
7-12/2010 | 7.21 | 0.07 | 1007 | 544 | 527 | 96.9% |
1-6/2010 | 7.18 | 0.07 | 1060 | 515 | 497 | 96.5% |
7-12/2009 | 6.96 | 0.06 | 1006 | 1006 | 991 | 98.5% |
1-6/2009 | 6.93 | 0.06 | 1011 | 1011 | 980 | 96.9% |
7-12/2008 | 7.20 | 0.06 | 1016 | 1016 | 987 | 97.2% |
1-6/2008 | 7.30 | 0.05 | 1028 | 1028 | 972 | 94.6% |
7-12/2007 | 7.29 | 0.05 | 1010 | 1010 | 978 | 96.9% |
1-6/2007 | 7.25 | 0.05 | 1014 | 1014 | 979 | 96.5% |
7-12/2006 | 6.94 | 0.05 | 1019 | 1019 | 995 | 97.7% |
1-6/2006 | 7.08 | 0.05 | 1017 | 1017 | 991 | 97.4% |
7-12/2005 | 6.95 | 0.06 | 2025 | 2025 | 1936 | 95.6% |
1-6/2005 | 7.11 | 0.06 | 2034 | 2034 | 1936 | 95.2% |
7-12/2004 | 6.92 | 0.06 | 2042 | 2042 | 1944 | 95.2% |
1-6/2004 | 6.85 | 0.06 | 2055 | 2055 | 1969 | 95.8% |
7-12/2003 | 6.79 | 0.06 | 2090 | 2090 | 1940 | 92.8% |
1-6/2003 | 6.88 | 0.06 | 2070 | 2070 | 1899 | 91.7% |
7-12/2002 | 6.86 | 0.05 | 2096 | 2096 | 1853 | 88.4% |
1-6/2002 | 6.73 | 0.06 | 2063 | 2063 | 1851 | 89.7% |
7-12/2001 | 6.71 | 0.06 | 2102 | 2102 | 1920 | 91.3% |
1-6/2001 | 6.65 | 0.06 | 2128 | 2128 | 1958 | 92.0% |
7-12/2000 | 6.48 | 0.06 | 2125 | 2125 | 1910 | 89.9% |
1-6/2000 | 6.76 | 0.07 | 2631 | 2631 | 2474 | 94.0% |
7-12/1999 | 6.66 | 0.08 | 1646 | 1646 | 1571 | 95.4% |
1-6/1999 | 6.84 | 0.07 | 1590 | 1590 | 1529 | 96.2% |
7-12/1998 | 6.78 | 0.07 | 1550 | 1550 | 1475 | 95.2% |
1-6/1998 | 6.59 | 0.07 | 1589 | 1589 | 1460 | 91.9% |
7-12/1997 | #N/A | 0.07 | 1087 | 1087 | 1002 | 92.2% |
1-6/1997 | 7.02 | 0.07 | 548 | 548 | 504 | 92.0% |
* The mobile sample was not included when survey results were released. The figures in the table above have been updated to reflect the results based on the combined landline and mobile sample.