數表 TablesBack
如果你要用0-10分評價香港是否一個公平既社會,10分代表絕對公平,0分代表絕對唔公平,5分代表一半半,你會比幾多分香港社會? (半年結)
If you were to use 0-10 to evaluate whether Hong Kong is a fair society, with 10 indicating absolutely fair, 0 indicating absolutely unfair, 5 indicating half-half, how would you rate Hong Kong? (half-yearly average)
調查日期 Date of survey |
公平程度評價 Appraisal of Degree of Fairness |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
半年結樣本人數 Total Sample(half year) |
半年結次樣本人數 Sub Sample(half year) |
評分人數 Number of Raters |
認知率 Recognition Rate |
1-6/2019 | 5.47 | 0.09 | 1018 | 589 | 580 | 98.4% |
1-6/2018 | 5.62 | 0.08 | 2052 | 1604 | 1583 | 98.7% |
7-12/2017* | 5.96 | 0.09 | 1030 | 579 | 570 | 98.4% |
1-6/2017 | 5.66 | 0.09 | 1029 | 629 | 619 | 98.4% |
7-12/2016 | 5.58 | 0.09 | 1013 | 577 | 571 | 99.0% |
1-6/2016 | 5.53 | 0.10 | 1026 | 608 | 591 | 97.2% |
7-12/2015 | 5.45 | 0.08 | 1010 | 596 | 585 | 98.0% |
1-6/2015 | 5.67 | 0.09 | 1019 | 598 | 590 | 98.7% |
7-12/2014 | 5.71 | 0.08 | 1017 | 666 | 654 | 98.1% |
1-6/2014 | 5.72 | 0.09 | 1031 | 569 | 562 | 98.8% |
7-12/2013 | 5.76 | 0.08 | 1027 | 612 | 607 | 99.2% |
1-6/2013 | 5.58 | 0.08 | 1023 | 637 | 623 | 97.8% |
7-12/2012 | 5.95 | 0.09 | 1040 | 566 | 556 | 98.2% |
1-6/2012 | 5.58 | 0.08 | 1007 | 624 | 609 | 97.6% |
7-12/2011 | 5.91 | 0.08 | 1005 | 586 | 572 | 97.6% |
1-6/2011 | 5.60 | 0.09 | 1035 | 552 | 545 | 98.8% |
7-12/2010 | 5.62 | 0.09 | 1007 | 511 | 504 | 98.6% |
1-6/2010 | 5.60 | 0.09 | 1060 | 634 | 618 | 97.5% |
7-12/2009 | 5.64 | 0.06 | 1006 | 1006 | 999 | 99.3% |
1-6/2009 | 5.65 | 0.06 | 1011 | 1011 | 1003 | 99.3% |
7-12/2008 | 5.76 | 0.07 | 1016 | 1016 | 1006 | 99.0% |
1-6/2008 | 5.71 | 0.06 | 1028 | 1028 | 995 | 96.8% |
7-12/2007 | 6.01 | 0.06 | 1010 | 1010 | 999 | 98.9% |
1-6/2007 | 5.95 | 0.06 | 1014 | 1014 | 1003 | 98.9% |
7-12/2006 | 5.93 | 0.06 | 1019 | 1019 | 1009 | 99.0% |
1-6/2006 | 6.09 | 0.06 | 1017 | 1017 | 1004 | 98.8% |
7-12/2005 | 6.02 | 0.06 | 2025 | 2025 | 1962 | 96.9% |
1-6/2005 | 5.91 | 0.07 | 2034 | 2034 | 1982 | 97.4% |
7-12/2004 | 5.80 | 0.06 | 2042 | 2042 | 1987 | 97.3% |
1-6/2004 | 5.65 | 0.06 | 2055 | 2055 | 1999 | 97.3% |
7-12/2003 | 5.75 | 0.06 | 2090 | 2090 | 2026 | 96.9% |
1-6/2003 | 5.89 | 0.06 | 2070 | 2070 | 1978 | 95.6% |
7-12/2002 | 6.07 | 0.06 | 2096 | 2096 | 1961 | 93.6% |
1-6/2002 | 5.94 | 0.06 | 2063 | 2063 | 1943 | 94.2% |
7-12/2001 | 5.75 | 0.06 | 2102 | 2102 | 1979 | 94.1% |
1-6/2001 | 5.74 | 0.06 | 2128 | 2128 | 2039 | 95.8% |
7-12/2000 | 5.67 | 0.06 | 2125 | 2125 | 1963 | 92.4% |
1-6/2000 | 5.73 | 0.08 | 2631 | 2631 | 2543 | 96.7% |
7-12/1999 | 5.66 | 0.08 | 1646 | 1646 | 1596 | 97.0% |
1-6/1999 | 5.94 | 0.08 | 1590 | 1590 | 1547 | 97.3% |
7-12/1998 | 6.19 | 0.07 | 1550 | 1550 | 1500 | 96.8% |
1-6/1998 | 6.06 | 0.07 | 1047 | 1047 | 1010 | 96.5% |
7-12/1997 | 6.08 | 0.07 | 1087 | 1087 | 1019 | 93.7% |
1-6/1997 | 6.42 | 0.08 | 548 | 548 | 519 | 94.7% |
* The mobile sample was not included when survey results were released. The figures in the table above have been updated to reflect the results based on the combined landline and mobile sample.