行政會議成員評分總表Summary Table of Ratings of Members of Executive CouncilBack
調查日期 Date of Survey : << 2-4/7/03, 1-5/8/03, 1-2/10/03, 2-4/1/04, 1-3/4/04, 2-5/7/04, ..., , 3-6/10/05 >> |
評分變化 : 行政會議議員
Difference on Ratings : Members of Executive Council
|
« 調查日期 Date of Survey : 1-2/10/03 | 調查日期 Date of Survey : 2-4/1/04 » | |
||||
姓名 Name |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度變化 Difference in support rating |
行政會議非官方議員周梁淑怡 Non-Official Member of Executive Council Selina Chow Liang Shuk-yee | 55.8 | 0.6 | 87.1% | 56.5 | 0.6 | 89.2% | +0.7 |
行政會議非官方議員鄭耀棠 Non-Official Member of Executive Council Cheng Yiu-tong | 44.7 | 0.7 | 70.0% | 44.5 | 0.8 | 70.5% | -0.2 |
行政會議非官方議員梁振英 Non-Official Member of Executive Council Leung Chun-ying | 44.5 | 0.8 | 74.8% | 43.4 | 0.8 | 75.3% | -1.1 |
行政會議非官方議員曾鈺成 Non-Official Member of Executive Council Jasper Tsang Yok-sing | 42.6 | 0.7 | 85.7% | 42.2 | 0.8 | 86.2% | -0.4 |
評分變化 : 行政會議列席成員
Difference on Ratings : Sit-in Members of Executive Council
|
« 調查日期 Date of Survey : 1-2/10/03 | 調查日期 Date of Survey : 2-4/1/04 » | |
||||
姓名 Name |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度變化 Difference in support rating |
行政長官辦公室主任林煥光 Director of Chief Executive's Office Lam Woon-kwong | 51.6 | 0.7 | 72.1% | 51.3 | 0.6 | 70.2% | -0.3 |
中央政策組首席顧問劉兆佳 Head of Central Policy Unit Lau Siu-kai | 48.5 | 0.7 | 73.0% | 48.7 | 0.7 | 71.1% | +0.2 |
評分變化:認知率未及五成者
Difference on Ratings: Those with recognition rates under 50%
|
« 調查日期 Date of Survey : 1-2/10/03 | 調查日期 Date of Survey : 2-4/1/04 » | |
||||
姓名 Name |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度變化 Difference in support rating |
行政會議非官方議員廖長城 Non-Official Member of Executive Council Liao Cheung-sing | * | * | * 34.3% | * | * | * 37.6% | * |
* 認知率不足五成者評分不能作準
Ratings with less than 50% recognition rates are not taken as representative