<<Voices from the Hall – Should Citizens Support LegCo Passing the Political Reform Proposal?>> public survey Back

| Background | Research team members | Contact information | Frequency tables | Demographics |


Background

The research instrument used in this study was designed entirely by the POP Team after consulting the Radio Television Hong Kong, all fieldwork operations, data collection and analysis were carried out independently by POP, in other words, POP has full independence in the survey design and operation and would take full responsibility for all the findings reported herewith.

 

Survey questions Q1 Taking the overall society into consideration, do you think Hong Kong citizens should support passing the political reform proposal by LegCo?
Q2 In your personal opinion, to what extent do you support or oppose passing the political reform proposal by LegCo?



Research team members

Research Directors:
Robert Ting-yiu Chung,
Karie Ka-lai Pang

Research Manager:
Frank Wai-kin Lee

Data Analysts:
Edward Chit-fai Tai, Alex Ka-wai Huang,
Alan Chi-phone Yum



Contact information

Date

:

8-9/6/2015

Survey method

:

Telephone survey conducted by real telephone interviewers

Target

:

Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong citizens aged 18 or above

Sampling method

:

Telephone numbers are randomly generated using known prefixes assigned to telecommunication services providers under the Numbering Plan provided by the Office of the Communications Authority (OFCA). Invalid numbers are then eliminated according to computer and manual dialing records to produce the final sample. If more than one eligible subject had been available, the one who had his/her birthday next was selected.

Sample size

:

1,004 successful cases

Overall response rate

:

65.5%

Sampling error

:

Standard error less than 2%, that is, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3.0% at 95% confidence level

 

* In order to increase the representation of the results, the survey figures have been rim-weighted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2014 year-end and the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution collected in the 2011 Census. Figures in the report are prevailed according to the “weighted” sample.


Q1 Taking the overall society into consideration, do you think Hong Kong citizens should support passing the political reform proposal by LegCo? (Interviewer probe intensity)

 

Frequency

Percentage
(Base=1,006)

Very much support

} Support

308

} 505

30.7%

} 50.3%

Quite support

197

19.6%

Half-Half

100

10.0%

Quite oppose

} Oppose

130

} 330

12.9%

} 32.9%

Very much oppose

200

20.0%

Don’t know/hard to say

69

6.8%

Total

1,004

100.0%


Q2 In your personal opinion, to what extent do you support or oppose passing the political reform proposal by LegCo? (Interviewer probe intensity)

 

Frequency

Percentage
(Base=1,006)

Very much support

} Support

292

} 488

29.0%

} 48.6%

Quite support

196

19.5%

Half-Half

87

8.7%

Quite oppose

} Oppose

148

} 390

14.7%

} 38.9%

Very much oppose

242

24.1%

Don’t know/hard to say

39

3.9%

Total

1,004

100.0%


Sex

 

Frequency

Percentage
(Base=1,004)

Male

454

45.3%

Female

550

54.7%

Total

1,004

100.0%


Age

 

Frequency

Percentage
(Base=997)

18 - 39

361

36.2%

40 - 59

386

38.8%

60 or above

250

25.0%

Total

997

100.0%

Missing

7

 


Education attainment

 

Frequency

Percentage
(Base=998)

Primary or below

138

13.9%

Secondary school

493

49.4%

Tertiary or above

367

36.7%

Total

998

100.0%

Missing

6

 


Occupation

 

Frequency

Percentage
(Base=989)

Professionals and semi-professionals

224

24.7%

Clerk and service workers

200

20.2%

Production workers

88

8.9%

Students

75

7.6%

Housewives

142

14.4%

Others

240

24.2%

Total

989

100.0%

Missing

15

 


Social strata

 

Frequency

Percentage
(Base=994)

Self-claim “upper class”

248

25.0%

Self-claim “middle class”

315

31.7%

Self-claim “lower class”

407

40.9%

Total

994

100.0%

Missing

10

 

Don’t know/hard to say

24

 



| Background | Research team members | Contact information | Frequency tables | Demographics |