<<Voices from the Hall – Deliberative Forum on 2017 CE Election Method>> public surveyBack

| Background | Research team members | Contact information | Collection of Findings |

Background

The research instrument used in this study was designed entirely by the POP Team after consulting the Radio Television Hong Kong. All fieldwork operations, data collection and analysis were carried out independently by POP. In other words, POP has full independence in the survey design and operation and would take full responsibility for all the findings reported herewith.

 

Survey questions:

Q1. In defining the meaning of “universal suffrage”, how important do you think the definition should follow the United Nations guidelines on universal suffrage?
Q2. In defining the meaning of “universal suffrage”, how important do you think the definition should follow the Central government’s definition on universal suffrage?
Q3. According to the Basic Law, the Chief Executive shall be selected by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures. Do you think the nomination procedure conforms with the requirement of “broadly representative” if it follows the same nomination model as last term?



Research team members

Research Directors:
Robert Ting-yiu Chung
Karie Ka-lai Pang

Research Executive:
Frank Wai-kin Lee

Data Analysts:
Edward Chit-fai Tai,
Kelvin Chung-ho Yu


Contact information

Date

:

29/4-2/5/2013

Survey method

:

Telephone survey conducted by real telephone interviewers

Target

:

Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong citizens aged 18 or above

Sampling method

:

Telephone numbers were first drawn randomly from the residential telephone directories as "seed numbers", from which another set of numbers was generated by computer, in order to capture the unlisted. If more than one eligible subject had been available, the one who had his/her birthday next was selected.

Sample size

:

1,001 successful cases

Overall response rate

:

65.6%

Sampling error

:

Standard error less than 2%, that is, sampling error of percentages not more than +/-3.0% at 95% confidence level

Collection of Findings

Collection of Findings (Chinese pdf available only)


| Background | Research team members | Contact information | Collection of Findings |