市民對林鄭月娥第二份施政報告之首輪跟進調查 Follow-up Survey on the Second Policy Address of Carrie LamBack
11-12/10/2018 (首輪跟進調查)
11-12/10/2018 (First follow-up Survey)
整體黎講，你對特首林鄭月娥今年既施政報告滿唔滿意呢？
How satisfied are you with Chief Executive Carrie Lam's Policy Address ?
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
非常滿意 Very satisfied |
幾滿意 Quite satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
幾唔滿意 Not quite satisfied |
非常不滿 Very dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
平均量值** Mean value** |
基數 Base |
樣本平均標準誤差 Standard Error of Mean |
淨值 Net Value |
| 11-12/10/2018 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 503 | 7.1% | 24.9% | 21.9% | 13.3% | 19.7% | 13.2% | 2.8 | 437 | 0.1 | -1.0% |
| 10/10/2018 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 534 | 9.6% | 23.7% | 24.4% | 13.7% | 20.4% | 8.2% | 2.9 | 484 | 0.1 | -0.8% |
| 6-7/11/2017 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 501 | 6.4% | 33.1% | 20.4% | 20.6% | 11.6% | 7.8% | 3.0 | 462 | 0.1 | 7.2% |
| 12-13/10/2017 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 508 | 9.4% | 33.1% | 21.9% | 19.1% | 5.3% | 11.2% | 3.3 | 451 | 0.1 | 18.1% |
| 11/10/2017 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 524 | 10.2% | 37.3% | 27.6% | 11.1% | 2.7% | 11.0% | 3.5 | 466 | 0.1 | 33.7% |
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.
組合數據 Collapsed data
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
滿意 Satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
不滿 Dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
| 11-12/10/2018 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 503 | 32.0% | 21.9% | 33.0% | 13.2% | -1.0% |
| 10/10/2018 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 534 | 33.3% | 24.4% | 34.1% | 8.2% | -0.8% |
| 6-7/11/2017 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 501 | 39.5% | 20.4% | 32.3% | 7.8% | 7.2% |
| 12-13/10/2017 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 508 | 42.5% | 21.9% | 24.4% | 11.2% | 18.1% |
| 11/10/2017 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 524 | 47.5% | 27.6% | 13.9% | 11.0% | 33.7% |
再撇除沒有意見者 Those without opinion further excluded
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
基數 Base |
滿意 Satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
不滿 Dissatisfied |
淨值 Net Value |
| 11-12/10/2018 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 503 | 36.8% | 25.2% | 38.0% | -1.2% |
| 10/10/2018 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 534 | 36.2% | 26.6% | 37.1% | -0.9% |
| 6-7/11/2017 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 501 | 42.8% | 22.2% | 35.0% | 7.8% |
| 12-13/10/2017 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 508 | 47.9% | 24.7% | 27.4% | 20.5% |
| 11/10/2017 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 524 | 53.4% | 31.0% | 15.6% | 37.8% |
宜家想請你對特首林鄭月娥今年既施政報告既滿意程度進行評分,0分代表非常不滿，100分代表非常滿意，50分代表一半半，你會俾幾多分今年既施政報告呢？
Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your degree of satisfaction of the policy address delivered by Chief Executive Carrie Lam today, with 0 indicating very dissatisfied, 100 indicating very satisfied and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate her latest Policy Address?
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
評分 Ratings |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
樣本人數 Total Sample |
評分人數 Number of Raters |
認知率 Recognition Rate |
| 11-12/10/2018 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 50.5 | 1.2 | 503 | 464 | 92.2% |
| 10/10/2018 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 48.5 | 1.2 | 534 | 497 | 93.1% |
| 6-7/11/2017 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 54.2 | 1.0 | 501 | 477 | 95.2% |
| 12-13/10/2017 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 60.6 | 1.0 | 508 | 464 | 91.3% |
| 11/10/2017 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 62.4 | 0.9 | 526 | 485 | 92.3% |
整體黎講你對林鄭月娥既施政方針滿唔滿意？
On the whole, how satisfied are you with Carrie Lam's policy direction?
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
非常滿意 Very satisfied |
幾滿意 Quite satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
幾唔滿意 Not quite satisfied |
非常不滿 Very dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
平均量值** Mean value** |
基數 Base |
樣本平均標準誤差 Standard Error of Mean |
淨值 Net Value |
| 11-12/10/2018 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 503 | 9.2% | 32.9% | 17.8% | 15.8% | 19.0% | 5.3% | 3.0 | 476 | 0.1 | 7.2% |
| 6-7/11/2017 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 501 | 8.5% | 33.0% | 23.1% | 18.6% | 11.0% | 5.8% | 3.1 | 472 | 0.1 | 11.8% |
| 12-13/10/2017 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 508 | 9.8% | 40.1% | 19.6% | 17.4% | 4.5% | 8.5% | 3.4 | 465 | 0.1 | 28.0% |
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.
組合數據 Collapsed data
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
滿意 Satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
不滿 Dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
| 11-12/10/2018 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 503 | 42.0% | 17.8% | 34.8% | 5.3% | 7.2% |
| 6-7/11/2017 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 501 | 41.4% | 23.1% | 29.6% | 5.8% | 11.8% |
| 12-13/10/2017 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 508 | 50.0% | 19.6% | 21.9% | 8.5% | 28.0% |
# 2014年起，民研計劃把以往按照年齡及性別分佈進行的簡單加權方法，改良成為按照年齡、性別及教育程度（最高就讀程度）分佈的「反覆多重加權」方法調整數據 From 2014, POP enhanced the previous simple weighting method based on age and gender distribution to “rim weighting” based on age, gender and education (highest level attended) distribution
