市民對梁振英第二份施政報告之次輪跟進調查 Second Follow-up Survey on the Second Policy Address of Leung Chun-yingBack

28-29/1/2014 (次輪跟進調查)
28-29/1/2014 (Second follow-up Survey)

整體黎講，你對特首梁振英今年既施政報告滿唔滿意呢？^#
How satisfied are you with Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's Policy Address ?^#

調查日期 Date of survey	即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	本題基數 Sub-sample base	非常滿意 Very satisfied	幾滿意 Quite satisfied	一半半 Half-half	幾唔滿意 Not quite satisfied	非常不滿 Very dissatisfied	唔知/難講 DK/HS	平均量值 Mean value	基數 Base	樣本平均標準誤差 Standard Error of Mean	淨值 Net Value
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	516	3.3%	23.2%	26.8%	23.7%	13.4%	9.6%	2.8	466	0.1	-10.6%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	518	3.0%	20.2%	27.9%	23.1%	18.2%	7.5%	2.6	479	0.1	-18.1%
15/1/2014	即時調查 Instant survey	611*	6.6%	29.6%	29.9%	20.0%	11.1%	2.9%	3.0	593	0.1	5.2%
22-24/1/2013	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	506	2.4%	19.4%	28.9%	24.0%	20.7%	4.7%	2.6	482	0.1	-23.0%
17-18/1/2013	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	530	4.4%	22.4%	25.7%	26.1%	13.3%	8.1%	2.8	487	0.1	-12.5%
16/1/2013	即時調查 Instant survey	759*	7.2%	28.6%	34.5%	15.9%	8.5%	5.5%	3.1	717	0.1	11.4%

* 撇除未聞施政報告數字 Excluding those who had not heard of the Policy Address
** 平均量值是把所有答案按照正面程度，以1分最低5分最高量化成為1、2、3、4、5分，再求取樣本平均數值。
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.

組合數據 Collapsed data

調查日期 Date of survey	即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	本題基數 Sub-sample base	滿意 Satisfied	一半半 Half-half	不滿 Dissatisfied	唔知/難講 DK/HS	淨值 Net Value
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	516	26.5%	26.8%	37.1%	9.6%	-10.6%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	518	23.2%	27.9%	41.4%	7.5%	-18.1%
15/1/2014	即時調查 Instant survey	611*	36.2%	29.9%	31.0%	2.9%	5.2%
22-24/1/2013	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	506	21.8%	28.9%	44.7%	4.7%	-23.0%
17-18/1/2013	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	530	26.9%	25.7%	39.3%	8.1%	-12.5%
16/1/2013	即時調查 Instant survey	759*	35.7%	34.5%	24.3%	5.5%	11.4%

* 撇除未聞施政報告數字 Excluding those who had not heard of the Policy Address

再撇除沒有意見者 Those without opinion further excluded

調查日期 Date of survey	即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	基數 Base	滿意 Satisfied	一半半 Half-half	不滿 Dissatisfied	淨值 Net Value
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	466	29.3%	29.6%	41.1%	-11.8%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	479	25.1%	30.1%	44.7%	-19.6%
15/1/2014	即時調查 Instant survey	593*	37.2%	30.8%	31.9%	5.3%
22-24/1/2013	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	482	22.8%	30.3%	46.9%	-24.1%
17-18/1/2013	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	487	29.2%	27.9%	42.8%	-13.6%
16/1/2013	即時調查 Instant survey	717*	37.8%	36.5%	25.7%	12.1%

* 撇除未聞施政報告數字 Excluding those who had not heard of the Policy Address

宜家想請你對特首梁振英今年既施政報告既滿意程度進行評分,0分代表非常不滿，100分代表非常滿意，50分代表一半半，你會俾幾多分今年既施政報告呢？ ^#
Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your degree of satisfaction of the policy address delivered by Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying today, with 0 indicating very dissatisfied, 100 indicating very satisfied and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate his latest Policy Address?^#

調查日期 Date of survey	即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	評分 Ratings	標準誤差 Standard Error	樣本人數 Total Sample	評分人數 Number of Raters	認知率 Recognition Rate
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	48.1	1.0	516	484	93.7%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	48.1	1.0	519	485	93.5%
15/1/2014	即時調查 Instant survey	54.1	1.0	1017	602	59.2%
22-24/1/2013	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	43.8	1.0	506	489	96.7%
17-18/1/2013	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	48.2	1.0	530	500	94.4%
16/1/2013	即時調查 Instant survey	56.4	0.8	759	722	95.1%

* 撇除未聞施政報告數字 Excluding those who had not heard of the Policy Address

整體黎講你對梁振英既施政方針滿唔滿意？^#
On the whole, how satisfied are you with Leung Chun-ying's policy direction?^#

調查日期 Date of survey	即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	本題基數 Sub-sample base	非常滿意 Very satisfied	幾滿意 Quite satisfied	一半半 Half-half	幾唔滿意 Not quite satisfied	非常不滿 Very dissatisfied	唔知/難講 DK/HS	平均量值 Mean value	基數 Base	樣本平均標準誤差 Standard Error of Mean	淨值 Net Value
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	516	3.6%	28.0%	23.3%	26.2%	13.1%	5.8%	2.8	486	0.1	-7.6%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	519	3.6%	25.6%	23.4%	22.4%	19.3%	5.8%	2.7	489	0.1	-12.4%
22-24/1/2013	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	505	3.0%	26.1%	28.1%	24.5%	15.0%	3.4%	2.8	488	0.1	-10.3%
17-18/1/2013	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	529	4.9%	29.9%	25.6%	21.1%	11.3%	7.2%	3.0	491	0.1	2.4%

** 平均量值是把所有答案按照正面程度，以1分最低5分最高量化成為1、2、3、4、5分，再求取樣本平均數值。
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.

組合數據 Collapsed data

調查日期 Date of survey	即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	本題基數 Sub-sample base	滿意 Satisfied	一半半 Half-half	不滿 Dissatisfied	唔知/難講 DK/HS	淨值 Net Value
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	516	31.6%	23.3%	39.3%	5.8%	-7.6%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	519	29.2%	23.4%	41.6%	5.8%	-12.4%
22-24/1/2013	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	505	29.1%	28.1%	39.4%	3.4%	-10.3%
17-18/1/2013	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	529	34.8%	25.6%	32.4%	7.2%	2.4%

今年施政報告既主題係「XXXX」，你認為呢個主題是否切合社會需要？
The theme of this year's Policy Address is 「XXXX」. Do you think this theme concurs with the current needs of the society?

調查日期 Date of survey	即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	本題基數 Sub-sample base	是 Yes	一半半 Half-half	否 No	唔知/難講 DK/HS	淨值 Net Value
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	516	57.9%	12.5%	21.6%	8.1%	36.3%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	519	55.6%	17.3%	22.2%	4.9%	33.5%
22-24/1/2013	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	505	47.7%	14.5%	32.2%	5.6%	15.5%
17-18/1/2013	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	526	53.2%	11.6%	26.8%	8.4%	26.4%

2014年施政報告既主題係「讓有需要的得到支援讓年青的各展所長讓香港得以發揮」 The theme of 2014 Policy Address is “Support the Needy Let Youth Flourish Unleash Hong Kong’s Potential”
2013年施政報告既主題係「穩中求變務實為民」 The theme of 2013 Policy Address is 「Seek Change Maintain Stability Serve the People with Pragmatism」

梁振英提出設立「低收入在職家庭津貼」，以補貼無領取綜援既貧窮在職家庭，基本津貼由300至1,000元，而供養子女人士可獲發額外津貼，預計每年開支約為30億元；你贊成定反對呢個做法？
CY Leung proposed to introduce a Low-income Working Family Allowance, to assist non-CSSA working families living below the poverty line. The basic allowance is from $300 to $1,000, and those taking care of children are entitled to an additional allowance. Do you support or oppose this proposal?

調查日期 Date of survey	首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	本題基數 Sub-sample base	贊成 Support	一半半 Half-half	反對 Oppose	唔知/難講 DK/HS	淨值 Net Value
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	516	61.3%	10.5%	25.6%	2.6%	35.8%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	519	62.2%	8.4%	24.8%	4.5%	37.3%

梁振英提出未來十年供應47萬個單位既建屋目標，當中公營房屋佔六成，你贊成定反對呢個做法？
CY Leung proposed that the new housing target is to provide a total of 470,000 units in the coming ten years, with public housing accounting for 60%. Do you support or oppose this proposal?

調查日期 Date of survey	首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	本題基數 Sub-sample base	贊成 Support	一半半 Half-half	反對 Oppose	唔知/難講 DK/HS	淨值 Net Value
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	514	81.1%	4.4%	10.4%	4.1%	70.7%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	517	75.6%	7.6%	13.4%	3.4%	62.2%

梁振英提出發展大嶼山東部及鄰近地區，包括研究填海及建造人工島，以打造「東大嶼都會」作為新既核心商業區；你贊成定反對呢個做法？
CY Leung proposed to develop the eastern of Lantau Island and neighbouring areas, including studies on reclamation and artificial islands, with a view to developing an East Lantau Metropolis as a new core business district. Do you support or oppose this proposal?

調查日期 Date of survey	首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	本題基數 Sub-sample base	贊成 Support	一半半 Half-half	反對 Oppose	唔知/難講 DK/HS	淨值 Net Value
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	515	52.1%	7.2%	31.4%	9.3%	20.7%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	516	48.4%	6.7%	35.5%	9.4%	12.9%

有意見認為今年施政報告忽視中產，你贊成定反對呢個講法？
There are concerns that the middle class is ignored in the policy address. Do you support or oppose this view?

調查日期 Date of survey	首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey	本題基數 Sub-sample base	贊成 Support	一半半 Half-half	反對 Oppose	唔知/難講 DK/HS	淨值 Net Value
28-29/1/2014	次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey	516	67.8%	8.3%	16.9%	7.1%	51.0%
16-17/1/2014	首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey	518	70.2%	5.6%	15.3%	9.0%	55.0%

# 2014年起，民研計劃把以往按照年齡及性別分佈進行的簡單加權方法，改良成為按照年齡、性別及教育程度（最高就讀程度）分佈的「反覆多重加權」方法調整數據 From 2014, POP enhanced the previous simple weighting method based on age and gender distribution to “rim weighting” based on age, gender and education (highest level attended) distribution