DatatablesBack

In general, are you satisfied with the Budget announced by the Financial Secretary?


  Date of survey Sub-sample base Very satisfied Quite satisfied Half-half Not quite satisfied Very dissatisfied Don't know/ hard to say Total Mean value** Base Standard Error of Mean

Survey Series on John Tsang's Budgets

1/2/2012 826* 4.3% 33.8% 33.2% 17.6% 8.3% 2.7% 100.0% 3.1 804 0.1
23/2/2011 911* 3.2% 24.1% 34.5% 22.8% 12.5% 2.9% 100.0% 2.8 884 0.1
24/2/2010 724* 6.1% 40.4% 35.5% 10.3% 4.2% 3.6% 100.0% 3.4 698 0.1
25/2/2009 669* 3.4% 26.8% 42.8% 15.5% 6.6% 4.9% 100.0% 3.1 636 0.1
27/2/2008 811* 15.0% 53.5% 20.7% 4.5% 1.0% 5.4% 100.0% 3.8 768 0.1

Survey Series on Henry Tang's Budgets

28/2/2007 673* 9.4% 53.0% 24.6% 7.4% 2.0% 3.6% 100.0% 3.6 649 0.1
22/2/2006 577* 5.6% 44.6% 26.3% 14.3% 4.5% 4.6% 100.0% 3.3 550 0.1
16/3/2005 544* 5.2% 42.3% 29.0% 9.4% 1.9% 12.3% 100.0% 3.4 478 0.1
10/3/2004 395* 2.1% 35.0% 33.2% 10.4% 1.3% 18.0% 100.0% 3.3 324 0.1

Survey Series on Antony Leung's Budgets

5/3/2003 495* 1.4% 18.5% 23.2% 35.1% 14.5% 7.3% 100.0% 2.5 459 0.1
6/3/2002 539* 3.4% 43.8% 22.9% 13.8% 3.6% 12.6% 100.0% 3.3 472 0.1

Survey Series on Donald Tsang's Budgets

7-8/3/2001 263* 3.4% 53.6% 24.7% 11.9% 1.0% 5.5% 100.0% 3.5 248 0.1
8/3/2000 643* 7.9% 62.4% 11.8% 3.4% 0.6% 13.8% 100.0% 3.9 553 0.1
3/3/1999 598* 2.0% 43.8% 27.1% 8.5% 1.5% 17.1% 100.0% 3.4 496 0.1
18/2/1998 638* 4.2% 50.5% 19.5% 6.9% 0.5% 18.3% 100.0% 3.6 520 0.1
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.

Collapsed data

  Date of survey Sub-sample base Satisfied Half-half Dissatisfied Don't know/ hard to say Total

Survey Series on John Tsang's Budgets

1/2/2012 826* 38.2% 33.2% 26.0% 2.7% 100.0%
23/2/2011 911* 27.3% 34.5% 35.3% 2.9% 100.0%
24/2/2010 724* 46.5% 35.5% 14.4% 3.6% 100.0%
25/2/2009 669* 30.2% 42.8% 22.2% 4.9% 100.0%
27/2/2008 811* 68.4% 20.7% 5.5% 5.4% 100.0%

Survey Series on Henry Tang's Budgets

28/2/2007 673* 62.4% 24.6% 9.4% 3.6% 100.0%
22/2/2006 577* 50.2% 26.3% 18.9% 4.6% 100.0%
16/3/2005 544* 47.5% 29.0% 11.3% 12.3% 100.0%
10/3/2004 395* 37.1% 33.2% 11.7% 18.0% 100.0%

Survey Series on Antony Leung's Budgets

5/3/2003 495* 19.9% 23.2% 49.6% 7.3% 100.0%
6/3/2002 539* 47.2% 22.9% 17.4% 12.6% 100.0%

Survey Series on Donald Tsang's Budgets

7-8/3/2001 263* 57.0% 24.7% 12.8% 5.5% 100.0%
8/3/2000 643* 70.3% 11.8% 4.0% 13.8% 100.0%
3/3/1999 598* 45.8% 27.1% 10.0% 17.1% 100.0%
18/2/1998 638* 54.7% 19.5% 7.4% 18.3% 100.0%
* Excluding those who had not heard of the Budget / were not clear about the Budget content

Please rate your level of satisfaction with the Budget delivered by John Tsang today, with 0 indicating absolutely dissatisfied, 100 indicating absolutely satisfied and 50 indicating half-half. How will you rate this year's Budget?


  Date of survey Number of Raters Support Rating Standard Error

Survey Series on John Tsang's Budgets

1/2/2012 817* 57.0 0.7
23/2/2011 891* 51.5 0.7
24/2/2010 704* 60.8 0.7
25/2/2009 637* 54.8 0.7
27/2/2008 785* 70.6 0.6
* Excluding those who had not heard of the Budget / were not clear about the Budget content

Please rate your support of the Financial Secretary John Tsang using a 0-100 scale with 0 indicating absolutely not supportive, 100 indicating absolute supportive and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate John Tsang?


  Date of survey Number of Raters Support Rating Standard Error

Survey Series on John Tsang's Budgets

1/2/2012 1000 54.1 0.6
23/2/2011 1011 52.4 0.7
24/2/2010 670 61.3 0.7
29/1-2/2/2010 968 58.3 0.6
25/2/2009 564 54.9 0.8
2-4/2/2009 968 56.7 0.6
27/2/2008 491 67.9 0.7
1-5/2/2008 811 56.0 0.6
More Statistics >>

If you had the right to vote on the reappointment or dismissal of John Tsang as the Financial Secretary tomorrow, how would you vote?


  Date of survey Sub-sample base Reappointment Dismissal Abstention Total

Survey Series on John Tsang's Budgets

1/2/2012 1015 28.9% 25.7% 45.4% 100.0%
23/2/2011 1031 35.9% 22.5% 41.6% 100.0%
24/2/2010 576 53.3% 7.7% 39.0% 100.0%
29/1-2/2/2010 1003 57.0% 11.1% 31.8% 100.0%
25/2/2009 590 42.5% 14.8% 42.7% 100.0%
2-4/2/2009 1010 47.3% 15.3% 37.3% 100.0%
27/2/2008 526 57.7% 3.8% 38.5% 100.0%
1-5/2/2008 1029 35.4% 11.5% 53.1% 100.0%
More Statistics >>