Frequency TablesBack
Frequency | Percentage | |
Support | 140 | 14.2 |
Half-half/ Doesn't matter | 55 | 5.6 |
Oppose | 646 | 65.5 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 145 | 14.7 |
Total | 986 | 100.0 |
Missing | 23 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Yes | 190 | 19.1 |
Half-half | 54 | 5.4 |
No | 587 | 59.2 |
Don't know / Hard to say | 162 | 16.3 |
Total | 992 | 100.0 |
Missing | 17 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Agree very much | 176 | ) | 17.5 | ) |
Agree somewhat | 269 | ) 444 | 26.8 | ) 44.4 |
Half-half | 42 | 4.2 | ||
Disagree somewhat | 216 | ) | 21.6 | ) |
Disagree very much | 198 | ) 414 | 19.8 | ) 41.3 |
Don't know / Hard to say | 101 | 10.1 | ||
Total | 1,002 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 7 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Agree very much | 197 | ) | 19.6 | ) |
Agree somewhat | 419 | ) 616 | 41.7 | ) 61.3 |
Half-half | 73 | 7.3 | ||
Disagree somewhat | 162 | ) | 16.2 | ) |
Disagree very much | 84 | ) 247 | 8.4 | ) 24.6 |
Don't know / Hard to say | 69 | 6.9 | ||
Total | 1,005 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 4 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Agree very much | 285 | ) | 28.3 | ) |
Agree somewhat | 271 | ) 556 | 27.0 | ) 55.3 |
Half-half | 33 | 3.3 | ||
Disagree somewhat | 198 | ) | 19.7 | ) |
Disagree very much | 158 | ) 357 | 15.7 | ) 35.5 |
Don't know / Hard to say | 60 | 5.9 | ||
Total | 1,005 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 4 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Agree very much | 166 | ) | 16.6 | ) |
Agree somewhat | 412 | ) 578 | 41.3 | ) 57.9 |
Half-half | 62 | 6.2 | ||
Disagree somewhat | 180 | ) | 18.0 | ) |
Disagree very much | 106 | ) 286 | 10.6 | ) 28.6 |
Don't know / Hard to say | 73 | 7.3 | ||
Total | 999 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 10 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Agree very much | 195 | ) | 19.6 | ) |
Agree somewhat | 355 | ) 551 | 35.6 | ) 55.3 |
Half-half | 31 | 3.1 | ||
Disagree somewhat | 172 | ) | 17.2 | ) |
Disagree very much | 105 | ) 277 | 10.6 | ) 27.8 |
Don't know / Hard to say | 138 | 13.8 | ||
Total | 996 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 13 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Agree very much | 190 | ) | 18.9 | ) |
Agree somewhat | 445 | ) 634 | 44.3 | ) 63.2 |
Half-half | 54 | 5.4 | ||
Disagree somewhat | 158 | ) | 15.8 | ) |
Disagree very much | 59 | ) 218 | 5.9 | ) 21.7 |
Don't know / Hard to say | 97 | 9.7 | ||
Total | 1,003 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 6 |
1st survey | 2nd survey | |||
Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |
More beneficial | 494 | 49.2 | 605 | 60.3** |
Half and half | 267 | 26.6 | 119 | 11.9** |
More harmful | 117 | 11.7 | 190 | 18.9** |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 126 | 12.5 | 90 | 8.9** |
Total | 1,004 | 100.0 | 1,004 | 100.0 |
Missing | 4 | 5 |
1st survey | 2nd survey | |||
Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |
Bigger role | 535 | 53.5 | 483 | 48.3* |
Remain the same as it is | 186 | 18.6 | 81 | 8.1** |
Lesser role | 130 | 13.0 | 285 | 28.4** |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 149 | 14.9 | 153 | 15.2 |
Total | 1,000 | 100.0 | 1,001 | 100.0 |
Missing | 8 | 8 |
1st survey | 2nd survey | |||
Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |
Yes | 286 | 28.4 | 345 | 34.3** |
No | 589 | 58.6 | 567 | 56.5 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 131 | 13.0 | 92 | 9.2** |
Total | 1,005 | 100.0 | 1,004 | 100.0 |
Missing | 3 | 5 |
1st survey | 2nd survey | |||
Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |
DP led by Young Sum | 228 | 23.2 | 230 | 23.4 |
LP led by James Tien | 74 | 7.5 | 130 | 13.2** |
FTU led by Chan Yuen-han | 103 | 10.5 | 109 | 11.1 |
HKCTU led by Lau Chin-shek and Lee Cheuk-yan | 113 | 11.5 | 105 | 10.7 |
Frontier led by Emily Lau | 50 | 5.1 | 59 | 6.0 |
DAB led by Ma Lik | 55 | 5.6 | 58 | 5.9 |
NWS led by Leung Yiu-chung | 43 | 4.4 | 34 | 3.4 |
ADPL led by Frederick Fung | 47 | 4.8 | 26 | 2.6** |
AFA led by Leung Kwok-hung | 4 | 0.4 | 7 | 0.7 |
HKPA led by Ambrose Lau | 3 | 0.3 | 7 | 0.7 |
Others | 1 | 0.1 | 6 | 0.6 |
None | 154 | 15.7 | 96 | 9.8** |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 107 | 10.9 | 115 | 11.7 |
Total | 983 | 100.0 | 982 | 100.0 |
Missing | 25 | 27 |
1st survey | 2nd survey | |||
Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |
Striving for democracy | 66 | 6.7 | 83 | 8.4 |
Striving for general elections of CE and Legco | 54 | 5.5 | 40 | 4.1 |
Improving the relationship with the Central Beijing Government | 12 | 1.3 | 23 | 2.3 |
Other political issues | 69 | 7.1 | 69 | 7.0 |
Proposing measures for revitalizing the economy/ improving unemployment | 420 | 43.2 | 282 | 28.7** |
Paying concern over the underprivileged | 19 | 2.0 | 15 | 1.5 |
Other economic/ livelihood issues | 71 | 7.3 | 85 | 8.6 |
Community work | 9 | 0.9 | 9 | 0.9 |
Conducting policy studies | 21 | 2.2 | 9 | 0.9* |
Preparing for elections | 10 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.6 |
Other issues on party developments | 5 | 0.5 | 13 | 1.3 |
Collecting and reflecting public opinion | - - | - - | 45 | 4.6 |
More communication with the government | - - | - - | 11 | 1.1 |
Not organizing demonstration | - - | - - | 5 | 0.5 |
Others | 25 | 2.5 | 71 | 7.2** |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 186 | 19.1 | 218 | 22.2 |
Total | 974 | 100.0 | 983 | 100.0 |
Missing | 34 | 26 |
1st survey | 2nd survey | |||
Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |
Positive adjectives | 158 | 16.1 | 158 | 16.2 |
Negative adjectives | 222 | 22.5 | 307 | 31.5** |
Neutral adjectives | 71 | 7.2 | 59 | 6.1 |
Ambiguous adjectives | 63 | 6.4 | 17 | 1.7** |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 471 | 47.8 | 389 | 39.9** |
Person names | - - | - - | 44 | 4.5 |
Total | 985 | 100.0 | 975 | 100.0 |
Missing | 23 | 34 |
1st survey | 2nd survey | |||||||
Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |||||
Very satisfied | 17 | ) | 1.7 | ) | 35 | ) | 3.5* | ) |
Quite satisfied | 190 | ) 207 | 19.2 | ) 20.9 | 213 | ) 248 | 21.6 | ) 25.1* |
Half and half | 268 | 27.1 | 212 | 21.5** | ||||
Quite dissatisfied | 127 | ) | 12.8 | ) | 140 | ) | 14.2 | ) |
Very dissatisfied | 62 | ) 189 | 6.3 | ) 19.1 | 143 | ) 283 | 14.5** | ) 28.7** |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 324 | 32.8 | 244 | 24.7** | ||||
Total | 988 | 100.0 | 986 | 100.0 | ||||
Missing | 20 | 23 |
1st survey | 2nd survey | |||
Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |
Upper class | 22 | 2.2 | 22 | 2.2 |
Upper middle class | 46 | 4.6 | 35 | 3.6 |
Middle class | 171 | 17.2 | 153 | 15.6 |
Lower middle class | 188 | 19.0 | 214 | 21.9 |
Grassroots | 205 | 20.6 | 198 | 20.2 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 362 | 36.5 | 356 | 36.4 |
Total | 992 | 100.0 | 977 | 100.0 |
Missing | 16 | 32 |
1st survey | 2nd survey | |||||||
Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |||||
Very satisfied | 32 | ) | 3.2 | ) | 70 | ) | 6.9** | ) |
Quite satisfied | 271 | ) 303 | 27.1 | ) 30.3 | 278 | ) 348 | 27.7 | ) 34.6* |
Half and half | 319 | 32.0 | 248 | 24.7** | ||||
Quite dissatisfied | 173 | ) | 17.3 | ) | 170 | ) | 16.9 | ) |
Very dissatisfied | 75 | ) 248 | 7.5 | ) 24.8 | 158 | ) 328 | 15.7** | ) 32.6** |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 129 | 12.9 | 81 | 8.1** | ||||
Total | 999 | 100.0 | 1,005 | 100.0 | ||||
Missing | 9 | 4 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Upper class | 21 | 2.1 |
Upper middle class | 67 | 6.8 |
Middle class | 206 | 20.8 |
Lower middle class | 220 | 22.2 |
Grassroots | 195 | 19.7 |
None of the above | 88 | 8.9 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 193 | 19.5 |
Total | 990 | 100.0 |
Missing | 19 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very much represents | 54 | ) | 5.4 | ) |
Somewhat represents | 203 | ) 257 | 20.3 | ) 25.7 |
Half-half | 153 | 15.2 | ||
Not much | 294 | ) | 29.3 | ) |
Not at all | 205 | ) 498 | 20.4 | ) 49.7 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 95 | 9.4 | ||
Total | 1,003 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 6 |
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Yes, very much | 25 | ) | 2.5 | ) |
Yes, to a certain extent | 137 | ) 162 | 13.6 | ) 16.2 |
Half-half | 254 | 25.3 | ||
No, to a small extent only | 241 | ) | 24.0 | ) |
Not at all | 208 | ) 448 | 20.7 | ) 44.8 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 138 | 13.7 | ||
Total | 1,002 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 7 |
1st survey | 2nd survey | |||||||
Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |||||
Very satisfied | 45 | ) | 4.5 | ) | 83 | ) | 8.2** | ) |
Quite satisfied | 308 | ) 353 | 31.0 | ) 35.5 | 277 | ) 359 | 27.5 | ) 35.8 |
Half and half | 302 | 30.3 | 247 | 24.6** | ||||
Quite dissatisfied | 127 | ) | 12.8 | ) | 135 | ) | 13.4 | ) |
Very dissatisfied | 70 | ) 197 | 7.0 | ) 19.8 | 173 | ) 308 | 17.2** | ) 30.6** |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 143 | 14.4 | 90 | 9.0** | ||||
Total | 995 | 100.0 | 1,005 | 100.0 | ||||
Missing | 13 | 4 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Promoting economic development | 129 | 13.3 |
Reflecting public opinion | 60 | 6.2 |
Maintaining the interests of businessmen | 42 | 4.4 |
Maintaining the interests of the middle class | 40 | 4.1 |
Balancing voices from different sectors in society | 32 | 3.3 |
Easing conflicts between China and HK | 25 | 2.5 |
Advocating democratic development | 19 | 2.0 |
Motivating government administration | 9 | 0.9 |
Supporting the government | 8 | 0.9 |
Others | 82 | 8.5 |
None | 19 | 2.0 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 503 | 52.0 |
Total | 967 | 100.0 |
Missing | 42 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
No solid ground of support | 151 | 15.6 |
Unable to represent the grassroots | 98 | 10.1 |
Swinging stands | 37 | 3.8 |
Opposition from the Beijing government | 34 | 3.5 |
Inadequate community work | 20 | 2.1 |
No talents for direct elections | 18 | 1.9 |
Unclear political stands | 18 | 1.8 |
The limitations of the existing voting system | 18 | 1.8 |
Blurred party image | 14 | 1.5 |
Too strong "pro-government" image | 9 | 1.0 |
Others | 65 | 6.7 |
No difficulties | 17 | 1.7 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 473 | 48.6 |
Total | 973 | 100.0 |
Missing | 36 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Positive adjectives | 375 | 38.6 |
Negative adjectives | 189 | 19.5 |
Neutral adjectives | 176 | 18.2 |
Ambiguous adjectives | 46 | 4.8 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 184 | 18.9 |
Total | 971 | 100.0 |
Missing | 38 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Positive adjectives | 407 | 41.7 |
Negative adjectives | 128 | 13.1 |
Neutral adjectives | 192 | 19.7 |
Ambiguous adjectives | 31 | 3.2 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 217 | 22.3 |
Total | 975 | 100.0 |
Missing | 34 |
Frequency | Percentage | |
Promoting economic development | 175 | 18.0 |
Serving the community | 132 | 13.5 |
Advocating democracy | 54 | 5.5 |
More communication with HK people | 46 | 4.7 |
Fighting for the interests of common HK people | 38 | 3.9 |
Policy research | 34 | 3.5 |
Party development (eg: trainings, recruitment of members, etc.) | 26 | 2.7 |
Clarifying its political stand/platform | 25 | 2.6 |
Strengthening its relationship with the HKSARG | 10 | 1.0 |
Strengthening its relationship with the Chinese Central government | 6 | 0.6 |
Others | 90 | 9.2 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 337 | 34.6 |
Total | 974 | 100.0 |
Missing | 35 |