Frequency TablesBack
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Yes | 319 | 31.9 |
| Half-half | 201 | 20.1 |
| No | 276 | 27.6 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 205 | 20.5 |
| Total | 1,001 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 7 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Supportive | 361 | 36.1 |
| Half and half/ Doesn't matter | 123 | 12.3 |
| Opposed | 391 | 39.1 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 125 | 12.5 |
| Total | 1,000 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 8 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Supportive | 396 | 39.7 |
| Half and half/ Doesn't matter | 72 | 7.2 |
| Opposed | 413 | 41.4 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 116 | 11.6 |
| Total | 997 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 11 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |||
| Very important | 171 | ) | 17.1 | ) |
| Quite important | 280 | ) 451 | 28.1 | ) 45.2 |
| Half and half | 179 | 18.0 | ||
| Quite unimportant | 173 | ) | 17.4 | ) |
| Very unimportant/ not important at all | 59 | ) 232 | 5.9 | ) 23.3 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 134 | 13.5 | ||
| Total | 996 | 100.0 | ||
| Missing | 12 | |||
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Reflecting public opinion | 333 | 33.5 |
| Serving for the community | 119 | 12.0 |
| Monitoring the government | 87 | 8.8 |
| Striving for democracy | 57 | 5.8 |
| Assisting the government | 31 | 3.1 |
| Representing the voices of different social classes | 29 | 2.9 |
| Formulating/ amending policies | 15 | 1.5 |
| Others | 22 | 2.2 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 284 | 28.6 |
| None | 15 | 1.5 |
| Total | 993 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 15 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Bigger role | 535 | 53.5 |
| Remain the same as it is | 186 | 18.6 |
| Lesser role | 130 | 13.0 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 149 | 14.9 |
| Total | 1,000 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 8 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| More beneficial | 494 | 49.2 |
| Half and half | 267 | 26.6 |
| More harmful | 117 | 11.7 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 126 | 12.5 |
| Total | 1,004 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 4 |
| Frequency | Percentage of respondents (Base: 489) | Percentage of overall sample(Base: 1,008) | |
| More capable of reflecting public opinion | 294 | 60.2 | 29.2 |
| Motivating for better policies | 48 | 9.8 | 4.8 |
| More bargaining power | 21 | 4.3 | 2.1 |
| Easier to obtain concern/ attention | 14 | 2.9 | 1.4 |
| Monitoring the government | 8 | 1.7 | 0.8 |
| Others | 28 | 5.6 | 2.7 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 75 | 15.4 | 7.5 |
| Total | 489 | 100.0 | |
| Missing | 5 |
| Frequency | Percentage of respondents (Base: 111) | Percentage of overall sample(Base: 1,008) | |
| Social stratification created | 39 | 35.3 | 3.9 |
| China-HK relationship undermined | 10 | 9.0 | 1.0 |
| Interests of the minorities ignored | 9 | 8.2 | 0.9 |
| Lowered efficiency in government administration | 4 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
| Others | 28 | 25.1 | 2.8 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 20 | 18.3 | 2.0 |
| Total | 111 | 100.0 | |
| Missing | 6 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Yes | 286 | 28.4 |
| No | 589 | 58.6 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 131 | 13.0 |
| Total | 1,005 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 3 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| DP:Democratic Party | 241 | 24.3 |
| LP:Liberal Party | 93 | 9.4 |
| DAB:Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong | 41 | 4.1 |
| Frontier:Frontier | 16 | 1.6 |
| ADPL:HK Association for Democracy & People's Livelihood | 11 | 1.1 |
| HKCTU:Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions | 6 | 0.6 |
| FTU:Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions | 2 | 0.2 |
| HKASPDMC:HK Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movement in China | 1 | 0.1 |
| HKPA:Hong Kong Progressive Alliance | 1 | 0.1 |
| NWS:The Neighbourhood and Workers Service | 1 | 0.1 |
| Others | 1 | 0.1 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 274 | 27.7 |
| None | 304 | 30.7 |
| Total | 992 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 16 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| LP:Liberal Party | 173 | 17.4 |
| DP:Democratic Party | 89 | 8.9 |
| DAB:Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong | 34 | 3.4 |
| HKCTU:Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions | 8 | 0.8 |
| Frontier:Frontier | 5 | 0.5 |
| ADPL:HK Association for Democracy & People's Livelihood | 4 | 0.4 |
| FTU:Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions | 2 | 0.2 |
| NWS:The Neighbourhood and Workers Service | 1 | 0.1 |
| Others | 1 | 0.1 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 348 | 34.9 |
| None | 333 | 33.4 |
| Total | 998 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 10 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| DP:Democratic Party | 205 | 20.6 |
| DAB:Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong | 116 | 11.7 |
| ADPL:HK Association for Democracy & People's Livelihood | 36 | 3.7 |
| LP:Liberal Party | 35 | 3.5 |
| HKCTU:Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions | 20 | 2.0 |
| Frontier:Frontier | 12 | 1.3 |
| FTU:Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions | 10 | 1.0 |
| NWS:The Neighbourhood and Workers Service | 7 | 0.7 |
| HKPA:Hong Kong Progressive Alliance | 2 | 0.2 |
| Others | 2 | 0.2 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 301 | 30.3 |
| None | 248 | 25.0 |
| Total | 995 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 13 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| 0 | 13 | 2.8 |
| 1-5 | 344 | 71.4 |
| 6-10 | 79 | 16.4 |
| 11-15 | 41 | 8.5 |
| 16-20 | 3 | 0.7 |
| 30 | 1 | 0.2 |
| Number of respondents giving numbers | 482 | 100.0 |
| The more, the better | 79 | |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 425 | |
| Total | 986 | |
| Mean | 4.9 | |
| Standard error of mean | 0.17 | |
| Missing | 23 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Public recognition | 144 | 14.5 |
| Stance of the Central Beijing Government | 130 | 13.1 |
| Restricted by systems (e.g.: the political system, the voting system) | 117 | 11.8 |
| Limited resources | 101 | 10.2 |
| Lacking talented people (e.g.: leadership, experience, etc.) | 69 | 6.9 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 434 | 43.6 |
| Total | 995 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 13 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Yes | 10 | 1.0 |
| No | 987 | 98.1 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 10 | 1.0 |
| Total | 1,006 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 2 |
| Frequency | Percentage of respondents (Base: 981) | Percentage of overall sample(Base: 1,008) | |
| No special reasons/ Never thought of it before | 370 | 37.7 | 36.7 |
| Too busy | 168 | 17.1 | 16.7 |
| No suitable parties | 138 | 14.0 | 13.7 |
| Not qualified / Not capable enough | 91 | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| No interest | 68 | 7.0 | 6.8 |
| Not aware of the channels | 16 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| No need | 15 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Negative labeling effect | 5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Opposed by others | 2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Others | 53 | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 56 | 5.7 | 5.5 |
| Total | 981 | 100.0 | |
| Missing | 6 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| DP led by Young Sum | 228 | 23.2 |
| HKCTU led by Lau Chin shek and Lee Cheuk yan | 113 | 11.5 |
| FTU led by Chan Yuen han | 103 | 10.5 |
| LP led by James Tien | 74 | 7.5 |
| DAB led by Ma Lik | 55 | 5.6 |
| Frontier led by Emily Lau | 50 | 5.1 |
| ADPL led by Frederick Fung | 47 | 4.8 |
| NWS led by Leung Yiu chung | 43 | 4.4 |
| AFA led by Leung Kwok hung | 4 | 0.4 |
| HKPA led by Ambrose Lau | 3 | 0.3 |
| Others | 1 | 0.1 |
| None | 154 | 15.7 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 107 | 10.9 |
| Total | 983 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 25 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Proposing measures for revitalizing the economy/ livelihood issues | 420 | 43.2 |
| Paying concern over the underprivileged | 19 | 2.0 |
| Other economic/ livelihood issues | 71 | 7.3 |
| Striving for democracy | 66 | 6.7 |
| Striving for general elections of CE and Legco | 54 | 5.5 |
| Improving the relationship with the Central Beijing Government | 12 | 1.3 |
| Other political issues | 69 | 7.1 |
| Conducting policy studies | 21 | 2.2 |
| Preparing for elections | 10 | 1.0 |
| Community work | 9 | 0.9 |
| Recruiting new members/ Party development | 6 | 0.6 |
| Other issues on party developments | 5 | 0.5 |
| Others | 25 | 2.5 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 186 | 19.1 |
| Total | 974 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 34 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Positive adjectives | 158 | 16.1 |
| Negative adjectives | 222 | 22.5 |
| Neutral adjectives | 71 | 7.2 |
| Ambiguous adjectives | 63 | 6.4 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 471 | 47.8 |
| Total | 985 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 23 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |||
| Very satisfied | 17 | ) | 1.7 | ) |
| Quite satisfied | 190 | ) 207 | 19.2 | ) 20.9 |
| Half and half | 268 | 27.1 | ||
| Quite dissatisfied | 127 | ) | 12.8 | ) |
| Very dissatisfied | 62 | ) 189 | 6.3 | ) 19.1 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 324 | 32.8 | ||
| Total | 988 | 100.0 | ||
| Missing | 20 | |||
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Upper class | 22 | 2.2 |
| Upper middle class | 46 | 4.6 |
| Middle class | 171 | 17.2 |
| Lower middle class | 188 | 19.0 |
| Grassroots | 205 | 20.6 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 362 | 36.5 |
| Total | 992 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 16 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Yes | 114 | 11.5 |
| No:voted, but cast vote on other parties or abstained | 326 | 32.8 |
| No:voted, but unaware of his/ her background | 23 | 2.3 |
| No:did not vote at all | 507 | 51.2 |
| Forgotten | 22 | 2.2 |
| Total | 992 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 16 |
| Frequency | Percentage of respondents (Base: 114) | Percentage of overall sample(Base: 1,008) | |
| Good performance in community work | 35 | 30.6 | 3.4 |
| Good performance of the candidate | 21 | 18.6 | 2.1 |
| Supportive of DAB's position | 18 | 15.5 | 1.7 |
| Party's rational and pragmatic style of work | 13 | 11.0 | 1.2 |
| Disliked other contestants | 10 | 8.5 | 1.0 |
| Others | 7 | 6.5 | 0.7 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 11 | 9.3 | 1.0 |
| Total | 114 | 100.0 | 11.3 |
| Missing | 0 |
| Frequency | Percentage of respondents (Base: 318) | Percentage of overall sample(Base: 1,008) | |
| Poor image and style of work | 103 | 32.3 | 10.2 |
| Too pro government | 65 | 20.3 | 6.4 |
| Poor performance | 32 | 10.1 | 3.2 |
| Article 23 of the Basic Law | 16 | 5.1 | 1.6 |
| More supportive of other parties | 12 | 3.8 | 1.2 |
| No DAB candidates | 12 | 3.7 | 1.2 |
| Not agree with DAB's political stances | 10 | 3.0 | 0.9 |
| Others | 35 | 11.1 | 3.5 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 34 | 10.6 | 3.3 |
| Total | 318 | 100.0 | |
| Missing | 8 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Change its "Pro government" image | 128 | 12.9 |
| Won't support DAB under all circumstances | 118 | 12.0 |
| Be outspoken and strive for interests of HK people | 118 | 11.9 |
| Listen to public opinion | 112 | 11.3 |
| Firm positions and no U turns | 86 | 8.7 |
| Suggest concrete solutions to solve the difficulties facing HK | 24 | 2.5 |
| Will support DAB under all circumstances | 18 | 1.9 |
| Others | 78 | 7.9 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 305 | 30.9 |
| Total | 988 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 20 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Positioning | 243 | 24.4 |
| Image | 209 | 21.1 |
| Quality of policies | 67 | 6.8 |
| Quality of leaders | 51 | 5.2 |
| Others | 49 | 4.9 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 373 | 37.6 |
| Total | 993 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 15 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Judge things in its own right | 181 | 18.2 |
| Keep a distance from the government | 161 | 16.2 |
| Give more support to the administration of the government | 102 | 10.3 |
| Strengthen its role of monitoring the government | 42 | 4.2 |
| Strengthen its influence on government in Executive Council | 32 | 3.2 |
| More communication | 27 | 2.7 |
| Maintain a neutral stance | 27 | 2.7 |
| Maintain harmonic relationship with the government | 16 | 1.6 |
| More cooperation | 4 | 0.4 |
| Others | 92 | 9.3 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 310 | 31.2 |
| Total | 994 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 14 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |||
| Very satisfied | 32 | ) | 3.2 | ) |
| Quite satisfied | 271 | ) 303 | 27.1 | ) 30.3 |
| Half and half | 319 | 32.0 | ||
| Quite dissatisfied | 173 | ) | 17.3 | ) |
| Very dissatisfied | 75 | ) 248 | 7.5 | ) 24.8 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 129 | 12.9 | ||
| Total | 999 | 100.0 | ||
| Missing | 9 | |||
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Servicing the community | 345 | 34.9 |
| Improving the relationship with the SAR Government | 115 | 11.7 |
| Advocating democracy | 101 | 10.2 |
| Improving relationship with Central Beijing government | 29 | 3.0 |
| Conducting policy studies | 26 | 2.7 |
| Being more pragmatic | 25 | 2.5 |
| Other issues on party developments | 15 | 1.5 |
| Listening to public opinion | 5 | 0.5 |
| Others | 102 | 10.3 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 224 | 22.7 |
| Total | 988 | 100.0 |
| Missing | 10 |
| Frequency | Percentage | |||
| Very satisfied | 45 | ) | 4.5 | ) |
| Quite satisfied | 308 | ) 353 | 31.0 | ) 35.5 |
| Half and half | 302 | 30.3 | ||
| Quite dissatisfied | 127 | ) | 12.8 | ) |
| Very dissatisfied | 70 | ) 197 | 7.0 | ) 19.8 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 143 | 14.4 | ||
| Total | 995 | 100.0 | ||
| Missing | 13 | |||
| Frequency | Percentage | |||
| Very satisfied | 13 | ) | 1.3 | ) |
| Quite satisfied | 135 | ) 148 | 13.6 | ) 14.9 |
| Half and half | 267 | 26.9 | ||
| Quite dissatisfied | 153 | ) | 15.4 | ) |
| Very dissatisfied | 69 | ) 222 | 6.9 | ) 22.3 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 356 | 35.9 | ||
| Total | 993 | 100.0 | ||
| Missing | 15 | |||
| Frequency | Percentage | |||
| Very satisfied | 27 | ) | 2.7 | ) |
| Quite satisfied | 283 | ) 310 | 28.5 | ) 31.2 |
| Half and half | 274 | 27.6 | ||
| Quite dissatisfied | 127 | ) | 12.8 | ) |
| Very dissatisfied | 46 | ) 173 | 4.6 | ) 17.4 |
| Don't know/ Hard to say | 237 | 23.9 | ||
| Total | 993 | 100.0 | ||
| Missing | 15 | |||







