Frequency TablesBack
[1] In his recent Policy Address, CE Tung Chee-hwa said he had decided to establish a task force headed by the Chief Secretary Donald Tsang Yam-kuen to examine constitutional review. Do you think this decision has answered people's demand?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Yes | 319 | 31.9 |
Half-half | 201 | 20.1 |
No | 276 | 27.6 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 205 | 20.5 |
Total | 1,001 | 100.0 |
Missing | 7 |
[2] As for constitutional review, do you support or oppose the SAR government's consulting relevant authorities of the Central Beijing Government about the understanding of the relevant provisions of the Basic Law before a public consultation in Hong Kong?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Supportive | 361 | 36.1 |
Half and half/ Doesn't matter | 123 | 12.3 |
Opposed | 391 | 39.1 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 125 | 12.5 |
Total | 1,000 | 100.0 |
Missing | 8 |
[3] Some people have suggested setting up a restrictive nomination committee to screen out candidates not acceptable to the Central Government, and then conduct a general election of the Chief Executive in 2007. Do you support or oppose with this suggestion?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Supportive | 396 | 39.7 |
Half and half/ Doesn't matter | 72 | 7.2 |
Opposed | 413 | 41.4 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 116 | 11.6 |
Total | 997 | 100.0 |
Missing | 11 |
[4] Assuming that you would vote in the Legislative Council election in September, how important would a party's stand on Article 45, about universal suffrage of CE election, affect your decision?
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very important | 171 | ) | 17.1 | ) |
Quite important | 280 | ) 451 | 28.1 | ) 45.2 |
Half and half | 179 | 18.0 | ||
Quite unimportant | 173 | ) | 17.4 | ) |
Very unimportant/ not important at all | 59 | ) 232 | 5.9 | ) 23.3 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 134 | 13.5 | ||
Total | 996 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 12 |
[5] What do you see as the most important function of political parties in Hong Kong in general?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Reflecting public opinion | 333 | 33.5 |
Serving for the community | 119 | 12.0 |
Monitoring the government | 87 | 8.8 |
Striving for democracy | 57 | 5.8 |
Assisting the government | 31 | 3.1 |
Representing the voices of different social classes | 29 | 2.9 |
Formulating/ amending policies | 15 | 1.5 |
Others | 22 | 2.2 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 284 | 28.6 |
None | 15 | 1.5 |
Total | 993 | 100.0 |
Missing | 15 |
[6] Do you think political parties should play a bigger or lesser role in the governance of Hong Kong?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Bigger role | 535 | 53.5 |
Remain the same as it is | 186 | 18.6 |
Lesser role | 130 | 13.0 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 149 | 14.9 |
Total | 1,000 | 100.0 |
Missing | 8 |
[7] Do you think party politics are more beneficial or harmful to the democratic development in Hong Kong?
Frequency | Percentage | |
More beneficial | 494 | 49.2 |
Half and half | 267 | 26.6 |
More harmful | 117 | 11.7 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 126 | 12.5 |
Total | 1,004 | 100.0 |
Missing | 4 |
[8] [Only for those who believe more beneficial] Why?
Frequency | Percentage of respondents (Base: 489) | Percentage of overall sample(Base: 1,008) | |
More capable of reflecting public opinion | 294 | 60.2 | 29.2 |
Motivating for better policies | 48 | 9.8 | 4.8 |
More bargaining power | 21 | 4.3 | 2.1 |
Easier to obtain concern/ attention | 14 | 2.9 | 1.4 |
Monitoring the government | 8 | 1.7 | 0.8 |
Others | 28 | 5.6 | 2.7 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 75 | 15.4 | 7.5 |
Total | 489 | 100.0 | |
Missing | 5 |
[9] [Only for those who believe more harmful] Why?
Frequency | Percentage of respondents (Base: 111) | Percentage of overall sample(Base: 1,008) | |
Social stratification created | 39 | 35.3 | 3.9 |
China-HK relationship undermined | 10 | 9.0 | 1.0 |
Interests of the minorities ignored | 9 | 8.2 | 0.9 |
Lowered efficiency in government administration | 4 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
Others | 28 | 25.1 | 2.8 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 20 | 18.3 | 2.0 |
Total | 111 | 100.0 | |
Missing | 6 |
[10] Do you think that your interest has been represented by some political parties in Hong Kong?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Yes | 286 | 28.4 |
No | 589 | 58.6 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 131 | 13.0 |
Total | 1,005 | 100.0 |
Missing | 3 |
[11] Which party do you think is doing a better job in coping with political problems facing Hong Kong?
Frequency | Percentage | |
DP:Democratic Party | 241 | 24.3 |
LP:Liberal Party | 93 | 9.4 |
DAB:Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong | 41 | 4.1 |
Frontier:Frontier | 16 | 1.6 |
ADPL:HK Association for Democracy & People's Livelihood | 11 | 1.1 |
HKCTU:Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions | 6 | 0.6 |
FTU:Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions | 2 | 0.2 |
HKASPDMC:HK Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movement in China | 1 | 0.1 |
HKPA:Hong Kong Progressive Alliance | 1 | 0.1 |
NWS:The Neighbourhood and Workers Service | 1 | 0.1 |
Others | 1 | 0.1 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 274 | 27.7 |
None | 304 | 30.7 |
Total | 992 | 100.0 |
Missing | 16 |
[12] Then, which party do you think is doing a better job in coping with economic problems facing Hong Kong?
Frequency | Percentage | |
LP:Liberal Party | 173 | 17.4 |
DP:Democratic Party | 89 | 8.9 |
DAB:Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong | 34 | 3.4 |
HKCTU:Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions | 8 | 0.8 |
Frontier:Frontier | 5 | 0.5 |
ADPL:HK Association for Democracy & People's Livelihood | 4 | 0.4 |
FTU:Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions | 2 | 0.2 |
NWS:The Neighbourhood and Workers Service | 1 | 0.1 |
Others | 1 | 0.1 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 348 | 34.9 |
None | 333 | 33.4 |
Total | 998 | 100.0 |
Missing | 10 |
[13] Then, which party do you think is doing a better job in coping with livelihood problems facing Hong Kong?
Frequency | Percentage | |
DP:Democratic Party | 205 | 20.6 |
DAB:Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong | 116 | 11.7 |
ADPL:HK Association for Democracy & People's Livelihood | 36 | 3.7 |
LP:Liberal Party | 35 | 3.5 |
HKCTU:Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions | 20 | 2.0 |
Frontier:Frontier | 12 | 1.3 |
FTU:Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions | 10 | 1.0 |
NWS:The Neighbourhood and Workers Service | 7 | 0.7 |
HKPA:Hong Kong Progressive Alliance | 2 | 0.2 |
Others | 2 | 0.2 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 301 | 30.3 |
None | 248 | 25.0 |
Total | 995 | 100.0 |
Missing | 13 |
[14] What do you think is the ideal number of political parties in Hong Kong?
Frequency | Percentage | |
0 | 13 | 2.8 |
1-5 | 344 | 71.4 |
6-10 | 79 | 16.4 |
11-15 | 41 | 8.5 |
16-20 | 3 | 0.7 |
30 | 1 | 0.2 |
Number of respondents giving numbers | 482 | 100.0 |
The more, the better | 79 | |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 425 | |
Total | 986 | |
Mean | 4.9 | |
Standard error of mean | 0.17 | |
Missing | 23 |
[15] What do you think is the main problem facing political parties in Hong Kong?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Public recognition | 144 | 14.5 |
Stance of the Central Beijing Government | 130 | 13.1 |
Restricted by systems (e.g.: the political system, the voting system) | 117 | 11.8 |
Limited resources | 101 | 10.2 |
Lacking talented people (e.g.: leadership, experience, etc.) | 69 | 6.9 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 434 | 43.6 |
Total | 995 | 100.0 |
Missing | 13 |
[16] Have you ever joined any political party?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Yes | 10 | 1.0 |
No | 987 | 98.1 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 10 | 1.0 |
Total | 1,006 | 100.0 |
Missing | 2 |
[17] [Only for those who have not joined] why not?
Frequency | Percentage of respondents (Base: 981) | Percentage of overall sample(Base: 1,008) | |
No special reasons/ Never thought of it before | 370 | 37.7 | 36.7 |
Too busy | 168 | 17.1 | 16.7 |
No suitable parties | 138 | 14.0 | 13.7 |
Not qualified / Not capable enough | 91 | 9.2 | 9.0 |
No interest | 68 | 7.0 | 6.8 |
Not aware of the channels | 16 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
No need | 15 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Negative labeling effect | 5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Opposed by others | 2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Others | 53 | 5.4 | 5.2 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 56 | 5.7 | 5.5 |
Total | 981 | 100.0 | |
Missing | 6 |
[18] Which of the following political groups do you support most?
Frequency | Percentage | |
DP led by Young Sum | 228 | 23.2 |
HKCTU led by Lau Chin shek and Lee Cheuk yan | 113 | 11.5 |
FTU led by Chan Yuen han | 103 | 10.5 |
LP led by James Tien | 74 | 7.5 |
DAB led by Ma Lik | 55 | 5.6 |
Frontier led by Emily Lau | 50 | 5.1 |
ADPL led by Frederick Fung | 47 | 4.8 |
NWS led by Leung Yiu chung | 43 | 4.4 |
AFA led by Leung Kwok hung | 4 | 0.4 |
HKPA led by Ambrose Lau | 3 | 0.3 |
Others | 1 | 0.1 |
None | 154 | 15.7 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 107 | 10.9 |
Total | 983 | 100.0 |
Missing | 25 |
[19] What do you think is the most important task for political groups to handle in the coming year?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Proposing measures for revitalizing the economy/ livelihood issues | 420 | 43.2 |
Paying concern over the underprivileged | 19 | 2.0 |
Other economic/ livelihood issues | 71 | 7.3 |
Striving for democracy | 66 | 6.7 |
Striving for general elections of CE and Legco | 54 | 5.5 |
Improving the relationship with the Central Beijing Government | 12 | 1.3 |
Other political issues | 69 | 7.1 |
Conducting policy studies | 21 | 2.2 |
Preparing for elections | 10 | 1.0 |
Community work | 9 | 0.9 |
Recruiting new members/ Party development | 6 | 0.6 |
Other issues on party developments | 5 | 0.5 |
Others | 25 | 2.5 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 186 | 19.1 |
Total | 974 | 100.0 |
Missing | 34 |
[20] Now, I'd like to ask you some questions about Frontier. When it comes up the name of "Frontier", what adjectives immediately cross your mind?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Positive adjectives | 158 | 16.1 |
Negative adjectives | 222 | 22.5 |
Neutral adjectives | 71 | 7.2 |
Ambiguous adjectives | 63 | 6.4 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 471 | 47.8 |
Total | 985 | 100.0 |
Missing | 23 |
[21] Are you satisfied with the work performance of "Frontier"?
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very satisfied | 17 | ) | 1.7 | ) |
Quite satisfied | 190 | ) 207 | 19.2 | ) 20.9 |
Half and half | 268 | 27.1 | ||
Quite dissatisfied | 127 | ) | 12.8 | ) |
Very dissatisfied | 62 | ) 189 | 6.3 | ) 19.1 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 324 | 32.8 | ||
Total | 988 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 20 |
[22] Which class do you think "Frontier" represents?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Upper class | 22 | 2.2 |
Upper middle class | 46 | 4.6 |
Middle class | 171 | 17.2 |
Lower middle class | 188 | 19.0 |
Grassroots | 205 | 20.6 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 362 | 36.5 |
Total | 992 | 100.0 |
Missing | 16 |
[23] Now, I'd like to ask you some questions about DAB. Did you vote for DAB's candidates in last year's District Councils Elections?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Yes | 114 | 11.5 |
No:voted, but cast vote on other parties or abstained | 326 | 32.8 |
No:voted, but unaware of his/ her background | 23 | 2.3 |
No:did not vote at all | 507 | 51.2 |
Forgotten | 22 | 2.2 |
Total | 992 | 100.0 |
Missing | 16 |
[24] [Only for those who voted for DAB's candidates] Why did you support DAB's candidates?
Frequency | Percentage of respondents (Base: 114) | Percentage of overall sample(Base: 1,008) | |
Good performance in community work | 35 | 30.6 | 3.4 |
Good performance of the candidate | 21 | 18.6 | 2.1 |
Supportive of DAB's position | 18 | 15.5 | 1.7 |
Party's rational and pragmatic style of work | 13 | 11.0 | 1.2 |
Disliked other contestants | 10 | 8.5 | 1.0 |
Others | 7 | 6.5 | 0.7 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 11 | 9.3 | 1.0 |
Total | 114 | 100.0 | 11.3 |
Missing | 0 |
[25] [Only for those who abstained or voted for other parties] why didn't you vote for DAB's candidates?
Frequency | Percentage of respondents (Base: 318) | Percentage of overall sample(Base: 1,008) | |
Poor image and style of work | 103 | 32.3 | 10.2 |
Too pro government | 65 | 20.3 | 6.4 |
Poor performance | 32 | 10.1 | 3.2 |
Article 23 of the Basic Law | 16 | 5.1 | 1.6 |
More supportive of other parties | 12 | 3.8 | 1.2 |
No DAB candidates | 12 | 3.7 | 1.2 |
Not agree with DAB's political stances | 10 | 3.0 | 0.9 |
Others | 35 | 11.1 | 3.5 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 34 | 10.6 | 3.3 |
Total | 318 | 100.0 | |
Missing | 8 |
[26] (For all respondents) How can DAB win your support?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Change its "Pro government" image | 128 | 12.9 |
Won't support DAB under all circumstances | 118 | 12.0 |
Be outspoken and strive for interests of HK people | 118 | 11.9 |
Listen to public opinion | 112 | 11.3 |
Firm positions and no U turns | 86 | 8.7 |
Suggest concrete solutions to solve the difficulties facing HK | 24 | 2.5 |
Will support DAB under all circumstances | 18 | 1.9 |
Others | 78 | 7.9 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 305 | 30.9 |
Total | 988 | 100.0 |
Missing | 20 |
[27] What is the main problem of DAB in your opinion?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Positioning | 243 | 24.4 |
Image | 209 | 21.1 |
Quality of policies | 67 | 6.8 |
Quality of leaders | 51 | 5.2 |
Others | 49 | 4.9 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 373 | 37.6 |
Total | 993 | 100.0 |
Missing | 15 |
[28] What do you think should be the relationship between DAB and the Government?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Judge things in its own right | 181 | 18.2 |
Keep a distance from the government | 161 | 16.2 |
Give more support to the administration of the government | 102 | 10.3 |
Strengthen its role of monitoring the government | 42 | 4.2 |
Strengthen its influence on government in Executive Council | 32 | 3.2 |
More communication | 27 | 2.7 |
Maintain a neutral stance | 27 | 2.7 |
Maintain harmonic relationship with the government | 16 | 1.6 |
More cooperation | 4 | 0.4 |
Others | 92 | 9.3 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 310 | 31.2 |
Total | 994 | 100.0 |
Missing | 14 |
[29] Now, I'd like to ask you some questions about DP. Are you satisfied with the performance of DP?
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very satisfied | 32 | ) | 3.2 | ) |
Quite satisfied | 271 | ) 303 | 27.1 | ) 30.3 |
Half and half | 319 | 32.0 | ||
Quite dissatisfied | 173 | ) | 17.3 | ) |
Very dissatisfied | 75 | ) 248 | 7.5 | ) 24.8 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 129 | 12.9 | ||
Total | 999 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 9 |
[30] What do you think the DP should focus on?
Frequency | Percentage | |
Servicing the community | 345 | 34.9 |
Improving the relationship with the SAR Government | 115 | 11.7 |
Advocating democracy | 101 | 10.2 |
Improving relationship with Central Beijing government | 29 | 3.0 |
Conducting policy studies | 26 | 2.7 |
Being more pragmatic | 25 | 2.5 |
Other issues on party developments | 15 | 1.5 |
Listening to public opinion | 5 | 0.5 |
Others | 102 | 10.3 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 224 | 22.7 |
Total | 988 | 100.0 |
Missing | 10 |
[31] Are you satisfied with the political stand of DP?
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very satisfied | 45 | ) | 4.5 | ) |
Quite satisfied | 308 | ) 353 | 31.0 | ) 35.5 |
Half and half | 302 | 30.3 | ||
Quite dissatisfied | 127 | ) | 12.8 | ) |
Very dissatisfied | 70 | ) 197 | 7.0 | ) 19.8 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 143 | 14.4 | ||
Total | 995 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 13 |
[32] Are you satisfied with the economic policies of DP?
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very satisfied | 13 | ) | 1.3 | ) |
Quite satisfied | 135 | ) 148 | 13.6 | ) 14.9 |
Half and half | 267 | 26.9 | ||
Quite dissatisfied | 153 | ) | 15.4 | ) |
Very dissatisfied | 69 | ) 222 | 6.9 | ) 22.3 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 356 | 35.9 | ||
Total | 993 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 15 |
[33] Are you satisfied with DPs policies on livelihood problems such as education, welfare and medical services? (Interviewers to probe degree)?
Frequency | Percentage | |||
Very satisfied | 27 | ) | 2.7 | ) |
Quite satisfied | 283 | ) 310 | 28.5 | ) 31.2 |
Half and half | 274 | 27.6 | ||
Quite dissatisfied | 127 | ) | 12.8 | ) |
Very dissatisfied | 46 | ) 173 | 4.6 | ) 17.4 |
Don't know/ Hard to say | 237 | 23.9 | ||
Total | 993 | 100.0 | ||
Missing | 15 |