港人眼中的大專院校排名調查2003 - 調查問卷Opinion Survey on the Public Ranking of Universities in Hong Kong 2003 - QuestionnaireBack
| Section I Self Introduction |
| Good evening, I am an interviewer from the Public Opinion Programme of The University of Hong Kong. We would like to ask for your opinion regarding the local universities in Hong Kong. It would take you a couple of minutes and the information you provide will be kept strictly confidential. Should you have any doubts about the authenticity of this survey, you may contact our supervisor at the hotline 2857 8335, or call 2859 2988 in office hours. |
| ‥ District of residence |
| ‥ Household size |
| Section II Selection of Respondent |
| Are you aged 18 or above? If there is more than one available, may I speak to the one who will have his/her birthday next? (If the one who answers the phone is not 18 or above, then interviewer asks, "Is there any member of your family who is 18 or above?" If none, terminate the interview) |
| Yes |
| No (terminate) |
| Section III General Questions |
| Interviewer: We are an independent research team. You should simply report honestly what you feel regardless of the fact that we belong to The University of Hong Kong, otherwise, the information will be of no reference value. |
| [Q1] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of each university in Hong Kong while taking its local and international reputation, facilities and campus environment, qualification of its teaching staff, academic research performance, overall performance, conduct and quality of students as well as its learning atmosphere, diversification and level of recognition of the courses into consideration, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate (eight universities in rotation)? [97 = Don't know the university; 98 = Don't know / hard to say; 99 = Refused to answer] |
| [Q2] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the level of transparency of each university while taking its performance in consulting its students and teaching staff, releasing information to the mass media as well as explaining to the public and collecting public opinions when carrying out new policies and reforms into consideration, with 0 representing absolutely non-transparent, 10 representing absolutely transparent and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the level of transparency of (eight universities in rotation)? [97 = Don't know the university; 98 = Don't know / hard to say; 99 = Refused to answer] |
| [Q3] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the contribution made by the teaching staff of each university to society while taking their academic research performance, efforts in promoting university image and upgrading its international ranking, participation in social charities as well as their response and commitment to the needs of society into consideration, with 0 representing minimal contribution, 10 representing maximal contribution and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the contribution made by the teaching staff of (eight universities in rotation)? [97 = Don't know the university; 98 = Don't know / hard to say; 99 = Refused to answer] |
| [Q4] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of Vice-Chancellor/President of each university while taking his/her local and international reputation, approachability to the public, leadership, vision, social credibility and public relations into consideration, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the Vice-Chancellors/Presidents of (eight universities in rotation)? [96 = Don't know the Vice-Chancellor/President; 97 = Don't know the university; 98 = Don't know / hard to say; 99 = Refused to answer] |
| The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Prof Ambrose Y.C. KING |
| The City University of Hong Kong (CityU) - Prof H.K. CHANG |
| The Hong Kong Baptist University (HKBU) - Prof Ching-fai NG |
| The Hong Kong Institute of Education (HKIEd) - Prof Paul MORRIS |
| The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) - Prof Paul C.W. CHU |
| The Lingnan University (Lingnan) - Prof Edward K.Y. CHEN |
| The Polytechnic University of Hong Kong (PolyU) - Prof Chung-kwong POON |
| The University of Hong Kong (HKU) - Prof Lap-chee TSUI |
| [Q5] What do you think are the qualities which most Hong Kong university graduates lack of? (Do not read out the answers, multiple responses allowed) |
| Conduct, honesty |
| Proficiency in Chinese, English and Putonghua |
| Critical thinking and problem-solving ability |
| Work attitude (e.g. serious, enthusiastic, diligent, responsible, motivated) |
| Social skills / interpersonal skills |
| Work experience |
| Emotion stability |
| Communication skills |
| Academic and professional knowledge |
| Computer proficiency |
| Self-confidence |
| Commitment to society |
| Global prospect / foresight |
| Creativity |
| Others (please specify) |
| Don't know/ hard to say |
| Refused to answer |
| [Q6] Apart from the existing subvented tertiary institutions, do you consider the local demand for other private tertiary institutions (such as Hong Kong Shue Yan College or Chui Hai College), or external programmes offered by overseas universities to be high, half-half or low? |
| High |
| Half-half |
| Low |
| Don't know / hard to say |
| Refused to answer |
| [Q7] Under your job specifications, are you involved, in any way, in the recruitment process of new staff? |
| Yes |
| No (Skip to Section IV) |
| Refused to answer (Skip to Section IV) |
| [Q8] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] Then, have you ever recruited university graduates via the career centre or counseling centre? |
| Yes |
| No |
| Refused to answer |
| [Q9] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] If you looked for a new employee, which university's graduates would you prefer most? (Do not read out the answers, single response only) |
| The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
| The City University of Hong Kong |
| The Hong Kong Baptist University |
| The Hong Kong Institute of Education |
| The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology |
| The Lingnan University |
| The Polytechnic University of Hong Kong |
| The University of Hong Kong |
| Other overseas universities |
| Others (please specify) |
| Don't know / hard to say (skip to Section IV) |
| No preference (skip to Section IV) |
| Refused to answer (skip to Section IV) |
| [Q10] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] Why would you prefer the graduates of the chosen university? (Do not read out the answers, multiple responses allowed) |
| Good performance of previous graduates |
| Good social relationship |
| Good work attitude |
| Good leadership |
| Diligent, motivated |
| Good language ability |
| Good knowledge in job-related areas |
| Good connection with outside (e.g., a university's extensive connection with enterprises, companies, or industrial firms; large number of graduates) |
| Salary matches ability |
| Alumni |
| Reputation |
| Others (please specify) |
| Don't know / hard to say |
| Refused to answer |
| [Q11] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] If you looked for a new employee, which would you prefer, Hong Kong graduates or Mainland graduates? |
| Hong Kong graduates |
| Mainland graduates (Skip to Q13) |
| Don't know / hard to say (Skip to Section IV) |
| No preference (Skip to Section IV) |
| Refused to answer (Skip to Section IV) |
| [Q12] [Only for those who chose "Hong Kong graduates" in Q11] Why? (Do not read out the answers, multiple responses allowed) |
| Preference for "HongKonger" |
| Better work attitude |
| More diligent and motivated |
| Better leadership |
| More able to bear a global prospect |
| More familiar with the Hong Kong situation |
| Higher English proficiency |
| Better job-related knowledge |
| Others (please specify) |
| Don't know / hard to say |
| Refused to answer |
| [Q13] [Only for those who chose "Mainland graduates" in Q11] Why? (Do not read out the answers, multiple responses allowed) |
| Lower salary |
| Deserves giving a chance to |
| Better performance than Hong Kong graduates |
| Better work attitude |
| More diligent and motivated |
| Better language ability and higher Putonghua proficiency |
| More familiar with the Mainland situation |
| Better job-related knowledge |
| Others (please specify) |
| Don't know / hard to say |
| Refused to answer |
| Section IV Personal Particulars |
| Interviewer: I'd like to know some of your personal particulars in order to facilitate our analysis. |
| [D1] Gender |
| Male |
| Female |
| [D2] Age (exact number) |
| 【99 = Refused to answer】 |
| [D3] Education Attainment |
| Primary or below |
| Secondary |
| Matriculated |
| Tertiary, non-degree course |
| Tertiary, degree course |
| Postgraduate or above |
| Refused to answer |
| [D4] The type of ownership of your house is: |
| Self-purchased, or |
| Rent? |
| Refused to answer |
| [D5] House type |
| Public housing estate |
| Housing Authority subsidized sale flats |
| Housing Society subsidized sale flats |
| Private housing |
| Village: villas / bungalows / modern village houses |
| Village: simple stone structures / traditional village houses |
| Staff quarters |
| Others |
| Refused to answer |
| [D6] Occupation |
| Managers and administrators |
| Professionals |
| Associate professionals |
| Clerks |
| Service workers and shop sales workers |
| Skilled agricultural and fishery workers |
| Craft and related workers |
| Plant and machine operators and assemblers |
| Non-skilled workers |
| Students |
| Housewives |
| Unclassified |
| Others (unemployed, retired, etc.) |
| Refused to answer |
| [D7] [Only for those who are professionals or associate professionals] Are you working in the academy? |
| Yes-Teaching staff of primary school (including teachers and principal) |
| Yes-Teaching staff of secondary school (including teachers and principal) |
| Yes-Teaching staff of university |
| Others |
| No |
| Refused to answer |
| 第一部份 自我介紹 |
| 喂！你好，我地係香港大學民意研究計劃打電話黎既，想訪問你對一ｄ大專院校既意見，我地只會阻你幾分鐘時間，而你提供既資料係會絕對保密既。如果你對今次既訪問有任何疑問，你可以打去熱線電話2857 8335同我地既督導員姚小姐聯絡，或者係辦公時間打去熱線電話2859 2988查詢今次訪問既真確性同埋核對我既身份。 |
| ‥ 居住地區 |
| ‥ 住戶人數 |
| 第二部份 選出被訪者 |
| 請問你夠唔夠 18 歲。因為我地要隨機抽樣，所以請你叫即將生日果位黎聽電話。（如果接聽電話者不足18歲，則請問你家中有冇18歲或以上既人呢？若戶中冇成年人，訪問告終；多謝合作，收線。） |
| 有 |
| 冇 (訪問告終) |
| 第三部份 問卷部份 |
| 我地係一個立場絕對中立既研究小組，你回答問題時唔好因為我地屬於香港大學而影響你原本既意見，請你務須如實作答，否則就冇參考價值。 |
| [Q1] 請你用0-10分形容你對香港每間大專院校的整體評價，0分代表極差，10分代表極佳，5分代表一半半。請你綜合有關學校既本地與國際聲譽及名氣、設備及校園環境、教職員資歷、學術研究表現、學生成績及品行質素、學習氣氛與課程多元化及認可度等，然後作出評分。請問你會俾（八間大專院校輪流轉換次序）幾多分呢？ |
| 〔97 = 不認識該院校；98 = 唔知道/難講；99 = 拒答〕 |
| [Q2] 請你用0-10分評價各院校既透明度，0分代表透明度極低，10分代表透明度極高，5分代表一半半。請你綜合有關學校係推行新政策及新改革時，向學生及教職員徵詢意見、向傳媒發放消息同埋向公眾解釋及收集意見時既表現，然後作出評分。請問你會俾（八間大專院校輪流轉換次序）對外既透明度幾多分呢？ |
| 〔97 = 不認識該院校；98 = 唔知道/難講；99 = 拒答〕 |
| [Q3] 請你用0-10分評價各院校教職員對社會既貢獻，0分代表貢獻極少，10分代表貢獻極多，5分代表一半半。請你綜合有關學校教職員既學術研究表現、推廣大學形象及提升國際等級、參與社會公益事務及對社會需求作出回應及承擔等，然後作出評分。請問你會俾（八間大專院校輪流轉換次序）既教職員對社會既貢獻幾多分呢？ |
| 〔97 = 不認識該院校；98 = 唔知道/難講；99 = 拒答〕 |
| [Q4] 請你用0-10分評價各院校校長既整體表現，0分代表極差，10分代表極佳，5分代表一半半。請你綜合有關校長既本地及國際知名度、親民度、領導能力、洞察力、社會公信力及對外公共關係等，然後作出評分。請問你會俾（八間大專院校校長輪流轉換次序）幾多分呢？ |
| 〔96 = 不認識該校長；97 = 不認識該院校；98 = 唔知道/難講；99 = 拒答〕 |
| 中文大學 金耀基教授 |
| 城市大學 張信剛教授 |
| 科技大學 朱經武教授 |
| 香港大學 徐立之教授 |
| 浸會大學 吳清輝教授 |
| 教育學院 莫禮時教授 |
| 理工大學 潘宗光教授 |
| 嶺南大學 陳坤耀教授 |
| [Q5] 你認為宜家香港既大學畢業生最欠缺d乜野？(不讀答案，可選多項) |
| 品德、誠實 |
| 中、英文及普通話能力 |
| 思考及解決問題能力 |
| 工作態度（例如：認真、熱誠、勤奮、有責任感、上進） |
| 待人接物態度 |
| 工作經驗 |
| 情緒控制 |
| 溝通技巧 |
| 學術能力、專業知識 |
| 電腦應用能力 |
| 自信 |
| 對社會的承擔 |
| 國際視野 / 遠見 |
| 創意 |
| 其他 (請註明) |
| 唔知道/難講 |
| 拒答 |
| [Q6] 你認為除左政府資助既大專院校之外，香港學生對其他私立專上院校（例如「香港樹仁學院」及「珠海書院」），又或者係一d外國大學係本地開辦既課程需求大唔大？ |
| 大 |
| 一半半 |
| 唔大 |
| 唔知道/難講 |
| 拒答 |
| [Q7] 請問係你既工作範圍內，你有冇權聘請或者參與聘請僱員呢？ |
| 有 |
| 冇 (跳至第四部份) |
| 拒答 (跳至第四部份) |
| [Q8] [只問有權聘請或者參與聘請僱員之被訪者] 咁你有冇透過大學既就業中心或者輔導中心聘請大學畢業生呢？ |
| 有 |
| 冇 |
| 拒答 |
| [Q9] [只問有權聘請或者參與聘請僱員之被訪者] 如果要你選擇，你會比較喜歡邊間大學既畢業生呢？(不讀答案，只選一項) |
| 中文大學 |
| 城市大學 |
| 科技大學 |
| 香港大學 |
| 浸會大學 |
| 教育學院 |
| 理工大學 |
| 嶺南大學 |
| 其他海外大學 |
| 其他 (請註明) |
| 唔知道/難講 (跳至Q11) |
| 冇所謂 (跳至Q11) |
| 拒答 (跳至Q11) |
| [Q10] [只問有權聘請或者參與聘請僱員之被訪者] 點解你比較喜歡呢間大學既畢業生呢？(不讀答案，可選多項) |
| 以往該院校的畢業生表現良好 |
| 人際關係良好 |
| 工作態度認真 |
| 有領導才能 |
| 勤奮、上進 |
| 語文能力佳 |
| 具有與工作相關的知識 |
| 對外聯繫廣 (例如: 大學與企業、公司或廠商連繫多、畢業生多) |
| 薪酬與能力相稱 |
| 舊生/校友 |
| 有名氣 |
| 其他(請註明) |
| 唔知道/難講 |
| 拒答 |
| [Q11] [只問有權聘請或者參與聘請僱員之被訪者] 如果要你選擇，你會比較喜歡香港定係內地既大學畢業生呢？ |
| 香港 |
| 內地 (跳至Q13) |
| 唔知道/難講 (跳至第四部份) |
| 冇所謂 (跳至第四部份) |
| 拒答 (跳至第四部份) |
| [Q12] [只問於Q11選擇 "香港" 之被訪者] 點解呢？(不讀答案，可選多項) |
| 自己人 |
| 工作態度較認真 |
| 較勤奮、上進 |
| 較有領導才能 |
| 較具國際視野 |
| 較熟悉香港情況 |
| 英語能力較佳 |
| 較具有與工作相關的知識 |
| 其他(請註明) |
| 唔知道/難講 |
| 拒答 |
| [Q13] [只問於Q11選擇 "內地" 之被訪者] 點解呢？(不讀答案，可選多項) |
| 薪酬較低 |
| 值得給予機會 |
| 表現較香港畢業生好 |
| 工作態度較認真 |
| 較勤奮、上進 |
| 語文、普通話能力較佳 |
| 較熟悉內地情況 |
| 較具有與工作相關的知識 |
| 其他(請註明) |
| 唔知道/難講 |
| 拒答 |
| 第四部份 個人資料 |
| 我想問你些少個人資料，方便分析。 |
| [D1] 性別 |
| 男 |
| 女 |
| [D2] 年齡（準確數字） |
| 【99 = 唔肯講 】 |
| [D3] 教育程度 |
| 小學或以下 |
| 中學 |
| 預科 |
| 專上非學位 |
| 專上學位 |
| 研究院或以上 |
| 拒答 |
| [D4] 請問你住緊既單位係： |
| 自置，定係 |
| 租住既呢？ |
| 拒答 |
| [D5] 咁係咩類型既房屋呢？ |
| 公營租住房屋 |
| 房屋委員會補助出售單位 |
| 房屋協會補助出售單位 |
| 私人住宅單位 |
| 村屋：別墅／平房／新型村屋 |
| 村屋：簡單磚石蓋搭建築物／傳統村屋 |
| 員工宿舍 |
| 其他 |
| 拒答 |
| [D6] 職業 |
| 經理及行政人員 |
| 專業人員 |
| 輔助專業人員 |
| 文員 |
| 服務工作及商店銷售人員 |
| 漁農業熟練工人 |
| 手工藝及有關人員 |
| 機台及機器操作員及裝配員 |
| 非技術工人 |
| 學生 |
| 家庭主婦 |
| 不能辨別 |
| 其他（包括失業、已退休、及其他非在職者） |
| 拒答 |
| [D7] [只問職業為專業人員及輔助專業人員者] 請問你係唔係教育界人士？ |
| 係－小學教職員（包括老師及校長） |
| 係－中學教職員（包括老師及校長） |
| 係－大專院校教職員 |
| 其他 |
| 唔係 |
| 拒答 |
