Research Design返回


The target population of this survey was Cantonese-speaking population of Hong Kong of age 18 or above. To minimize sampling bias, the following sampling technique was adopted:

 

Telephone numbers will be randomly generated using known prefixes assigned to telecommunication services providers under the Numbering Plan provided by the Office of the Communications Authority (OFCA). Invalid numbers will then be eliminated according to computer and manual dialing records to produce the final sample.

 

When telephone contact was successfully established with a target household, one person of age 18 or above was selected. If more than one qualified subject had been available, selection was made using the “next birthday rule” which selected the person who had his/her birthday next from all those present. Please refer to Appendix 1 for the demographic profile of the respondents.

 

Telephone interviews were carried out between 8 and 15 May 2017. Data were collected by interviewers using a Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI) system under close supervision.

 

As shown from the detailed breakdown of the contact information, among the 24,973 telephone numbers sampled for the survey, 3,174 were confirmed ineligible, among them 338 were fax or data lines, 2,450 were invalid telephone numbers, 45 were call-forwarding numbers, while another 311 were non-residential numbers. Besides, 14 of them were invalidated due to special technological circumstances, while 16 cases were voided because no eligible respondents were available at the numbers provided.

 

Meanwhile, a total of 10,811 telephone numbers were invalidated since the research team could not confirm their eligibility. Among them 661 were busy lines, 8,540 were no-answer calls, 797 cases were diverted to answering devices while 53 were blocked. In addition, 346 cases were treated as ineligible because of language problems, 409 interviews were terminated before the screening question, while 5 cases were voided for other problems.

 

Of the remaining 10,988 eligible cases, 9,728 failed to complete the interview. Among them 2 rejected the interview immediately after their eligibility was confirmed, 9,652 were unfinished cases with appointment dates beyond the end of fieldwork period. Besides, 74 cases were incomplete due to unexpected termination of interviews, and the remaining 1,260 were successful cases (Table 1).

 


Table 1    Breakdown of contact information of the survey

 

 

Frequency

Percentage

 

 

Telephone numbers’ ineligibility confirmed

 

3,174

 

12.7

Fax/data line

338

 

1.4

 

Invalid number

2,450

 

9.8

 

Call-forwarding/mobile/pager number

45

 

0.2

 

Non-residential number

311

 

1.2

 

Special technological circumstances

14

 

0.1

 

No eligible respondents

16

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Telephone numbers’ or respondents’ eligibility not confirmed

 

10,811

 

43.3

Line busy

661

 

2.6

 

No answer

8,540

 

34.2

 

Answering device

797

 

3.2

 

Call-blocking

53

 

0.2

 

Language problem

346

 

1.4

 

Interview terminated before the screening question

409

 

1.6

 

Others

5

 

<0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Telephone numbers’ eligibility confirmed, but failed to complete the interview

 

9,728

 

39.0

Household-level refusal

2

 

<0.1

 

Known respondent refusal

0

 

0.0

 

Appointment date beyond the end of the fieldwork period

9,652

 

38.6

 

Partial interview

74

 

0.3

 

Miscellaneous

0

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Successful cases

 

1,260

 

5.0

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

24,973

 

100.0


To sum up, a total of 1,260 Hong Kong residents of age 18 or above were successfully interviewed in this survey. The overall response rate was 72.2% as shown in the following calculation. The standard error due to sampling was no more than 1.4 percentage points.


Table 2    Calculation of overall response rate

 

Overall response rate
= [Successful cases / (Successful cases + Refusal cases + Incomplete cases)] 100%
= [1,260 / (1,260 + 2 + 409 + 74)] 100%
= 72.2%



The data collected have been adjusted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2016 year-end and the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution collected in the 2011 Census. All analyses in this report are based on the weighted data.

 

Statistical tests of “difference-of-proportions” and “difference-of-means” have been employed whenever applicable, in order to check for significant changes. Figures marked with single asterisk (*) denoted statistical significance at p=0.05 level whereas those with double asterisks (**) indicated that the variation has been tested to be statistically significant at p=0.01 level.

 

The researcher is aware that the POP Team is part of The University of Hong Kong, which is one of the institutions rated by the respondents. As a precaution to eliminate any possible bias due to desirability effect, all respondents were explicitly told at the beginning of the interview that the POP Team was an independent research team, and the respondents should simply report honestly what they felt.