The target population of this survey was Cantonese-speaking population of Hong Kong of age 18 or above. To minimize sampling bias, the following sampling technique was adopted:

Telephone numbers will be randomly generated using known prefixes assigned to telecommunication services providers under the Numbering Plan provided by the Office of the Communications Authority (OFCA). Invalid numbers will then be eliminated according to computer and manual dialing records to produce the final sample.

When telephone contact was successfully established with a target household, one person of age 18 or above was selected. If more than one qualified subject had been available, selection was made using the “next birthday rule” which selected the person who had his/her birthday next from all those present. Please refer to Appendix 1 for the demographic profile of the respondents.

Telephone interviews were carried out between 12 and 27 May 2016. Data were collected by interviewers using a Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI) system under close supervision.

As shown from the detailed breakdown of the contact information, among the 31,475 telephone numbers sampled for the survey, 6,448 were confirmed ineligible, among them 886 were fax or data lines, 4,722 were invalid telephone numbers, 186 were call-forwarding numbers, while another 582 were non-residential numbers. Besides, 55 of them were invalidated due to special technological circumstances, while 17 cases were voided because no eligible respondents were available at the numbers provided.

Meanwhile, a total of 16,155 telephone numbers were invalidated since the research team could not confirm their eligibility. Among them 1,527 were busy lines, 11,632 were no-answer calls, 2,068 cases were diverted to answering devices while 40 were blocked. In addition, 363 cases were treated as ineligible because of language problems, 516 interviews were terminated before the screening question, while 9 cases were voided for other problems.

Of the remaining 8,872 eligible cases, 7,650 failed to complete the interview. Among them 15 rejected the interview immediately after their eligibility was confirmed, 7,561 were unfinished cases with appointment dates beyond the end of fieldwork period. Besides, 70 cases were incomplete due to unexpected termination of interviews, 4 were classified as miscellaneous due to other non-contact problems, and the remaining 1,222 were successful cases (Table 1).

To sum up, a total of 1,222 Hong Kong residents of age 18 or above were successfully interviewed in this survey. The overall response rate was 67.0% as shown in the following calculation. The standard error due to sampling was no more than 1.4 percentage points.

The data collected have been adjusted according to provisional figures obtained from the Census and Statistics Department regarding the gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population in 2015 year-end and the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution collected in the 2011 Census. All analyses in this report are based on the weighted data.

Statistical tests of “difference-of-proportions” and “difference-of-means” have been employed whenever applicable, in order to check for significant changes. Figures marked with single asterisk (*) denoted statistical significance at p=0.05 level whereas those with double asterisks (**) indicated that the variation has been tested to be statistically significant at p=0.01 level.

The researcher is aware that the POP Team is part of The University of Hong Kong, which is one of the institutions rated by the respondents. As a precaution to eliminate any possible bias due to desirability effect, all respondents were explicitly told at the beginning of the interview that the POP Team was an independent research team, and the respondents should simply report honestly what they felt.