Frequency Tables返回


[Q1] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of each institution of higher education after taking into consideration its local and international reputation, facilities and campus environment, qualification of its teaching staff, academic research performance, conduct and quality of students as well as its learning atmosphere, diversification and level of recognition of its courses, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the following institutions?

 

Average

Standard error

No of raters

Recognition

HKU 

8.03

0.04

1,134

94.3%

CUHK 

7.72

0.04

1,128

93.7%

HKUST 

7.54

0.04

1,079

89.7%

PolyU

6.98

0.04

1,106

91.9%

HKBU 

6.35

0.04

1,068

88.8%

CityU

6.22

0.04

1,043

86.7%

HKIEd

5.75

0.05

970

80.7%

LU

5.58

0.05

1,002

83.3%

HKSYU

5.50

0.05

968

80.5%

OUHK

5.34

0.05

961

79.9%


[Q2] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of Vice-Chancellor / President of each institution while taking his local and international reputation, approachability to the public, leadership, vision, social credibility and public relations into consideration, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half.  How would you rate the following Vice-Chancellors / Presidents?

 

Average

Standard error

No of raters

Recognition

CUHK – Joseph S.Y. SUNG

7.65

0.04

1,015

84.4%

HKU – Lap-chee TSUI

7.17

0.05

1,005

83.6%

HKUST – Tony F. CHAN

6.96

0.06

622

51.7%

HKSYU – Chi-yung CHUNG

6.64

0.07

604

50.2%

PolyU – Timothy W. TONG

6.46

0.06

575

47.8%

HKIEd – Anthony B.L. CHEUNG

6.32

0.06

776

64.5%

HKBU – Albert CHAN

6.19

0.07

615

51.1%

CityU – Way KUO

6.12

0.07

536

44.6%

LU – Yuk-shee CHAN

6.04

0.07

516

42.9%

OUHK – John C.Y. LEONG

5.97

0.07

496

41.2%


[Q3] What do you think are the qualities which most Hong Kong university students lack of? (multiple responses allowed)

 

Freq.

% of total responses
(Base = 2,040)

% of total sample
(Base = 1,203)

Work attitude (e.g. serious, enthusiastic, diligent, responsible, motivated)

216

10.6%

18.0%

Social/interpersonal skills

159

7.8%

13.3%

Conduct, honesty

122

6.0%

10.2%

Critical thinking and problem-solving ability

114

5.6%

9.5%

Global prospect / foresight

106

5.2%

8.8%

Commitment to society

95

4.6%

7.9%

Independence

93

4.6%

7.8%

Communication skills

88

4.3%

7.3%

Social/work experience

81

4.0%

6.8%

Proficiency in Chinese, English and Putonghua

80

3.9%

6.7%

 

 

 

 

Academic and professional knowledge

60

2.9%

5.0%

Self-confidence

58

2.8%

4.8%

Creativity

49

2.4%

4.1%

Emotion stability

47

2.3%

3.9%

Civil awareness

38

1.9%

3.2%

Self-expectations / dreams

36

1.7%

3.0%

Alertness to risk / handling adverse conditions

33

1.6%

2.8%

 

 

 

 

Discipline, patience

25

1.2%

2.1%

All-roundness

24

1.2%

2.0%

Learning attitude

21

1.0%

1.7%

Self-motivation, aggressiveness

18

0.9%

1.5%

Utilitarian / materialistic

17

0.8%

1.4%

Financial management

16

0.8%

1.3%

Egocentricity / selfishness

15

0.7%

1.3%

Patriotism

15

0.7%

1.2%

Social awareness

14

0.7%

1.2%

Resources / opportunity

11

0.6%

1.0%

Maturity / stability

11

0.5%

0.9%

Political awareness / participation

10

0.5%

0.8%

Leadership skills

8

0.4%

0.7%

Humble / sympathy

8

0.4%

0.7%

Job opportunity

8

0.4%

0.7%

Politeness

5

0.3%

0.4%

 

 

 

 

Nothing

51

2.5%

4.3%

Others

43

2.1%

3.6%

Don’t know/ hard to say

244

11.9%

20.3%

 

 

 

 

Total

2,040

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Base

1,199

 

 

Missing case(s)

4

 

 


[Q4] Under your job specifications, are you involved, in any way, in the recruitment process of new staff, including teachers?

 

Frequency

Percentage

Yes

240

20.0%

No

962

80.0%

 

 

 

Total

1,203

100.0%

 

 

 

Base

1,203

 

Missing case(s)

0

 


[Q5] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] If you looked for a new employee, which institution’s graduates would you prefer most? (single response only)

 

Frequency

% of potential employers
(Base = 240)

% of total sample
(Base = 1,203)

HKU 

46

19.2%

3.8%

 

 

 

 

CUHK 

42

17.4%

3.5%

PolyU

32

13.2%

2.6%

HKUST 

27

11.4%

2.3%

HKIEd

4

1.5%

0.3%

CityU

3

1.4%

0.3%

HKSYU

3

1.2%

0.2%

HKBU 

1

0.6%

0.1%

LU

1

0.5%

0.1%

 

 

 

 

Other overseas universities

5

2.0%

0.4%

 

 

 

 

No preference

55

22.7%

4.5%

Don’t know / hard to say

17

6.9%

1.4%

Won’t employ graduates

5

2.0%

0.4%

 

 

 

 

Total

240

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Valid base

240

 

 

Missing case(s)

0

 

 


[Q6] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff and have preference over a specific institution’s graduates] Why would you prefer the graduates of the chosen institution? (multiple responses allowed)

 

Frequency

% of total responses (Base = 241 responses from 164 respondents)

% of valid respondents (Base = 164)

% of total sample
(Base = 1,203)

 

 

 

 

 

Good performance of previous graduates

65

26.8%

39.5%

5.4%

 

 

 

 

 

Good knowledge in job-related areas

38

15.8%

23.3%

3.2%

Reputation

28

11.7%

17.2%

2.3%

Good work attitude

24

10.2%

15.0%

2.0%

Diligent, motivated

16

6.8%

10.0%

1.4%

Alumni

13

5.3%

7.8%

1.1%

Good language ability

11

4.7%

6.9%

0.9%

 

 

 

 

 

Good academic ability

8

3.5%

5.1%

0.7%

Good moral character

8

3.5%

5.1%

0.7%

Good social relationship

7

3.1%

4.6%

0.6%

Good connection with outside (e.g., a university’s extensive connection with enterprises, companies, or industrial firms; large number of graduates)

3

1.3%

2.0%

0.3%

Good leadership

3

1.2%

1.7%

0.2%

Salary matched with abilities

1

0.3%

0.5%

0.1%

 

 

 

 

 

Others

9

3.6%

5.2%

0.7%

Don’t know / hard to say

5

2.3%

3.4%

0.5%

 

 

 

 

 

Total

241

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valid base

164

 

 

 

Missing case(s)

1