Frequency Tables返回

[Q1] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of each institution of higher education funded through UGC after taking into consideration its local and international reputation, facilities and campus environment, qualification of its teaching staff, academic research performance, conduct and quality of students as well as its learning atmosphere, diversification and level of recognition of its courses, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the following institutions?
  
 Average 
 Standard error 
 No of raters 
 Recognition 
 HKU 
 7.93 
 0.04 
 1,141 
 94.3% 
 CUHK 
 7.25 
 0.05 
 1,136 
 93.9% 
 HKUST 
 7.16 
 0.05 
 1,089 
 90.0% 
 PolyU 
 6.79 
 0.04 
 1,122 
 92.7% 
 HKBU 
 6.28 
 0.04 
 1,079 
 89.2% 
 CityU 
 6.09 
 0.04 
 1,046 
 86.4% 
 HKIEd 
 5.60 
 0.05 
 981 
 81.2% 
 LU 
 5.57 
 0.05 
 1,025 
 84.9% 

[Q2] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of Vice-Chancellor / President of each institution while taking his local and international reputation, approachability to the public, leadership, vision, social credibility and public relations into consideration, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the following Vice-Chancellors / Presidents?
    Average   Standard error   No of raters   Recognition 
 HKUST - Prof Paul C.W. CHU 
 7.51 
 0.05 
 886 
 73.2% 
 HKU - Prof Lap-chee TSUI 
 7.46 
 0.05 
 867 
 71.6% 
 PolyU - Prof Chung-kwong POON 
 6.83 
 0.05 
 770 
 63.7% 
 CUHK – Prof Lawrence J. LAU 
 6.82 
 0.06 
 781 
 64.5% 
 LU - Prof Edward K.Y. CHEN 
 6.69 
 0.05 
 841 
 69.5% 
 HKBU - Prof Ching-fai NG 
 6.54 
 0.05 
 732 
 60.5% 
 CityU - Prof Richard Y.K. HO 
 6.13 
 0.07 
 526 
 43.5% 
 HKIEd - Prof Paul MORRIS 
 5.69 
 0.07 
 809 
 66.9% 

[Q3] What do you think are the qualities which most Hong Kong university students lack of? (Did not read out the answers, multiple responses allowed)?
    Frequency   % of total responses
(Base = 1,938 responses from 1,206 respondents) 
 % of valid respondents
(Base = 1,206) 
 % of total sample
(Base = 1,210) 
 Conduct, honesty   209   10.8%   17.4%   17.3% 
 Work attitude (e.g. serious, enthusiastic, diligent, responsible, motivated)   201   10.4%   16.7%   16.6% 
 Proficiency in Chinese, English and Putonghua   171   8.8%   14.2%   14.1% 
 Social / interpersonal skills   156   8.0%   12.9%   12.9% 
 Global prospect / foresight   146   7.5%   12.1%   12.0% 
 Critical thinking and problem-solving ability   142   7.3%   11.8%   11.8% 
 Academic and professional knowledge   123*   6.4%   10.2%   10.2% 
 Commitment to society   123*   6.4%   10.2%   10.2% 
 Social / work experience   98   5.1%   8.1%   8.1% 
 Self-confidence   71   3.6%   5.9%   5.8% 
 Communication skills   52   2.7%   4.3%   4.3% 
 Creativity   33   1.7%   2.7%   2.7% 
 Emotion stability   20   1.0%   1.7%   1.7% 
 Financial management   14   0.7%   1.2%   1.2% 
 Job opportunity   13   0.7%   1.1%   1.1% 
 Utilitarian   8   0.4%   0.6%   0.6% 
 Civil awareness   1   0.0%   0.1%   0.1% 
 Nothing   47   2.4%   3.9%   3.9% 
 Others   64   3.3%   5.3%   5.3% 
 Don't know / hard to say   245   12.7%   20.3%   20.3% 
 Total   1,938   100.0%       
 Base   1,206          
 Missing case(s)   4          
* Remark: Expressed in two-decimal places, those who answered "Academic and professional knowledge" should be 123.47, while those who answered "Commitment to society" should be 123.39.

[Q4] Under your job specifications, are you involved, in any way, in the recruitment process of new staff, including teachers?
    Frequency   Percentage 
 Yes   200   16.5% 
 No   1,010   83.5% 
 Total   1,210   100.0% 
 Base   1,210    
 Missing case(s)   0    

[Q5] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] If you looked for a new employee, which institution's graduates would you prefer most? (Did not read out the answers, single response only)?
    Frequency   % of potential employers
(Base = 200) 
 % of total sample
(Base = 1,210) 
 HKU    56   28.0%   4.6% 
 CUHK   30   14.8%   2.4% 
 PolyU    18   8.9%   1.5% 
 HKUST   17   8.7%   1.4% 
 HKBU   6   2.8%   0.5% 
 CityU    5   2.4%   0.4% 
 LU   1*   0.6%   0.1% 
 HKIEd   1*   0.4%   0.1% 
 Other overseas universities   7   3.7%   0.6% 
 Others (please specify)   5   2.7%   0.4% 
 No preference   35   17.4%   2.9% 
 Don't know / hard to say   16   8.1%   1.3% 
 Won't employ graduates   3   1.6%   0.3% 
 Total   200   100.0%    
 Base   200       
 Missing case(s)   0       
* Remark: Expressed in two-decimal places, those who answered "Lingnan University (LU)" should be 1.23, while those who answered "the Hong Kong Institute of Education (HKIEd)" should be 0.81.

[Q6] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff and have preference over a specific institution's graduates] Why would you prefer the graduates of the chosen institution? (Did not read out the answers, multiple responses allowed)?
    Frequency   % of total responses
(Base = 209 responses from 140 respondents) 
 % of valid respondents
(Base = 140) 
 % of total sample
(Base = 1,210) 
 Good performance of previous graduates   50   24.1%   35.8%   4.2% 
 Good knowledge in job-related areas   32   15.1%   22.4%   2.6% 
 Reputation   29   13.7%   20.3%   2.4% 
 Good work attitude   19   9.0%   13.4%   1.6% 
 Diligent, motivated   14   6.9%   10.3%   1.2% 
 Good social relationship   13   6.0%   8.9%   1.0% 
 Good language ability   11   5.4%   8.1%   0.9% 
 Alumni   10   4.8%   7.2%   0.8% 
 Salary matched with abilities   2   0.8%   1.2%   0.1% 
 Good connection with outside (e.g., a university's extensive connection with enterprises, companies, or industrial firms; large number of graduates)   1*   0.5%   0.8%   0.1% 
 Good leadership   1*   0.4%   0.6%   0.1% 
 Others (please specify)   24   11.6%   17.3%   2.0% 
 No specific reasons   2   1.0%   1.5%   0.2% 
 Don't know / hard to say   1   0.5%   0.8%   0.1% 
 Total   209   100.0%       
 Valid base   140          
 Missing case(s)   6          
* Remark: Expressed in two-decimal places, those who answered "Good connection with outside" should be 1.15, while those who answered "Good leadership" should be 0.83.