數表 TablesBack

咁如果10分代表絕對高效率，0分代表絕對低效率，5分代表一半半，你會比幾多分香港社會？ (按次計算)
If you were to use 0-10 to evaluate whether Hong Kong is an efficient society, with 10 indicating absolutely efficient, 0 indicating absolutely inefficient, 5 indicating half-half, how would you rate Hong Kong? (per poll)

調查日期 Date of survey	效率程度評價 Appraisal of Degree of Efficiency	標準誤差 Standard Error	樣本人數 Total Sample	次樣本人數 Sub Sample	評分人數 Number of Raters	認知率 Recognition Rate
6-9/5/2019	6.36	0.09	1018	642	615	95.7%
4-9/5/2018	6.66	0.07	1017	1017	997	98.0%
15-18/1/2018	6.72	0.08	1035	640	622	97.2%
10-13/7/2017*	6.81	0.08	1030	594	576	96.9%
6-9/02/2017	6.58	0.08	1029	633	618	97.6%
18-21/7/2016	6.32	0.10	1013	601	574	95.5%
15-18/2/2016	6.54	0.09	1026	597	571	95.7%
20-23/7/2015	6.59	0.09	1010	557	536	96.3%
9-12/2/2015	6.86	0.07	1019	622	609	98.0%
21-24/7/2014	6.82	0.08	1017	604	575	95.2%
7-12/2/2014	6.87	0.08	1031	563	549	97.4%
30/7-1/8/2013	6.80	0.08	1027	575	558	97.1%
4-14/2/2013	6.87	0.08	1023	610	588	96.5%
7-15/8/2012	6.78	0.08	1040	554	540	97.5%
13-16/2/2012	6.78	0.08	1007	613	588	95.9%
15-19/8/2011	6.70	0.08	1005	548	527	96.2%
9-17/2/2011	6.84	0.08	1035	532	522	98.1%
10-13/8/2010	6.95	0.09	1007	521	509	97.8%
4-9/2/2010	6.88	0.08	1060	551	538	97.7%
11-16/8/2009	6.60	0.06	1006	1006	992	98.6%
10-12/2/2009	6.62	0.06	1011	1011	989	97.8%
11-14/8/2008	6.86	0.06	1016	1016	998	98.2%
12-14/2/2008	7.08	0.06	1028	1028	985	95.8%
20-24/8/2007	7.08	0.06	1010	1010	976	96.6%
22-26/2/2007	6.89	0.06	1014	1014	988	97.4%
21-23/8/2006	6.79	0.06	1019	1019	999	98.0%
17-21/2/2006	6.83	0.06	1017	1017	997	98.0%
25-29/10/2005	6.92	0.06	1017	1017	991	97.4%
18-20/7/2005	6.72	0.06	1008	1008	963	95.5%
18-21/4/2005	6.93	0.05	1012	1012	978	96.6%
17-19/1/2005	6.73	0.06	1022	1022	979	95.8%
18-21/10/2004	6.57	0.06	1011	1011	969	95.8%
19-21/7/2004	6.51	0.06	1031	1031	988	95.8%
19-22/4/2004	6.37	0.06	1029	1029	965	93.8%
9-12/1/2004	6.79	0.06	1026	1026	987	96.2%
19-22/10/2003	6.28	0.06	1017	1017	939	92.3%
14-16/7/2003	6.13	0.06	1073	1073	1012	94.3%
16-23/4/2003	5.82	0.06	1021	1021	946	92.7%
20-23/1/2003	6.60	0.06	1049	1049	977	93.1%
13-16/10/2002	6.53	0.06	1028	1028	931	90.6%
2-3/7/2002	6.36	0.06	1068	1068	931	87.2%
2-8/4/2002	6.57	0.06	1017	1017	897	88.2%
2-6/1/2002	6.30	0.06	1046	1046	945	90.3%
5-8/10/2001	6.30	0.06	1051	1051	956	91.0%
3-9/7/2001	6.60	0.06	1051	1051	946	90.0%
18-30/4/2001	6.51	0.05	1082	1082	988	91.3%
17-19/1/2001	6.60	0.05	1046	1046	947	90.5%
3-9/10/2000	6.44	0.06	1067	1067	945	88.6%
6-10/7/2000	6.32	0.06	1058	1058	948	89.6%
5-18/5/2000	6.77	0.05	1060	1060	997	94.1%
1/3/2000	6.95	0.08	517	517	497	96.1%
11-12/1/2000	6.61	0.08	519	519	485	93.4%
4/1/2000	6.68	0.08	535	535	507	94.8%
1-2/11/1999	6.64	0.08	543	543	508	93.6%
10-13/9/1999	6.38	0.07	576	576	545	94.6%
5/7/1999	6.39	0.08	527	527	506	96.0%
4/5/1999	6.61	0.08	536	536	521	97.2%
2/3/1999	6.78	0.08	510	510	503	98.6%
5/1/1999	6.85	0.07	544	544	529	97.2%
4-5/11/1998	7.12	0.07	511	511	490	95.9%
1/9/1998	6.78	0.07	507	507	481	94.9%
7/7/1998	6.87	0.07	532	532	512	96.2%
2/3/1998	7.18	0.06	527	527	498	94.5%
6/1/1998	6.95	0.08	520	520	491	94.4%
4-5/11/1997	7.12	0.07	523	523	478	91.4%
29-30/7/1997	7.55	0.06	564	564	540	95.7%
6/25/1997	7.63	0.07	548	548	517	94.3%

* 該調查結果公佈時尚未包括手機樣本。上表結果已更新為固網樣本及手機樣本的合併統計數字。
* The mobile sample was not included when survey results were released. The figures in the table above have been updated to reflect the results based on the combined landline and mobile sample.