返回
1.而家想請你用0-100分評價你對經濟發展及勞工局局長葉澍堃既支持程度，0分代表絕對唔支持，100分代表絕對支持，50分代表一半半，你會俾幾多分經濟發展及勞工局局長葉澍堃呢？ (按月計算)
2.假設明天你有權投票決定續任或者罷免葉澍堃作為經濟發展及勞工局局長，你會投續任、罷免、定棄權票？ (按月計算)
3.你認為葉澍堃做經濟發展及勞工局局長既工作做得好唔好? (按月計算)
1.Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your extent of support to the Secretary for Economic Development and Labour Stephen Ip Shu-kwan, with 0 indicating absolutely not supportive, 100 indicating absolutely supportive and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate the Secretary for Economic Development and Labour Stephen Ip Shu-kwan? (monthly average)
2.If you had the right to vote on the reappointment or dismissal of Stephen Ip Shu-kwan as the Secretary for Economic Development and Labour tomorrow, how would you vote? (monthly average)
3.Do you think Stephen Ip Shu-kwan is doing a good or bad job as the Secretary for Economic Development and Labour? (monthly average)
| 調查月份 Month of Survey |
0至100支持度評分 0-100 support rating |
假想投票續任率 Hypothetical vote share on reappointment |
工作表現認許率 Job performance approval rate |
| 6/2007 | - | 56.5% | - |
| 05/2007 | 60.9 | - | - |
| 04/2007 | - | 56.1% | - |
| 03/2007 | 59.6 | - | - |
| 02/2007 | - | 58.9% | - |
| 01/2007 | 59.2 | - | - |
| 12/2006 | - | 57.4% | - |
| 11/2006 | 58.5 | - | - |
| 10/2006 | - | 46.6% | - |
| 09/2006 | 57.3 | - | - |
| 08/2006 | - | 50.8% | - |
| 07/2006 | 59.6 | - | - |
| 06/2006 | - | 52.8% | - |
| 05/2006 | 58.4 | - | - |
| 04/2006 | - | 52.5% | - |
| 03/2006 | 61.2 | - | - |
| 02/2006 | - | 57.5% | - |
| 01/2006 | 58.8 | - | - |
| 12/2005 | 58.9 | 53.3% | - |
| 11/2005 | 59.2 | - | - |
| 10/2005 | 60.6 | 58.5% | - |
| 09/2005 | 58.4 | - | - |
| 08/2005 | 59.3 | 55.6% | - |
| 07/2005 | 59.8 | - | - |
| 06/2005 | 60.5 | 58.6% | - |
| 05/2005 | 57.2 | - | - |
| 04/2005 | 59.5 | 55.5% | - |
| 03/2005 | 53.9 | - | - |
| 02/2005 | 57.1 | 55.2% | 39.1% |
| 01/2005 | 55.8 | - | - |
| 12/2004 | 56.2 | 53.0% | - |
| 11/2004 | 56.0 | - | - |
| 10/2004 | 56.5 | 58.2% | - |
| 09/2004 | 56.2 | - | - |
| 08/2004 | 57.7 | 56.6% | 38.4% |
| 07/2004 | 55.3 | - | - |
| 06/2004 | 54.4 | 53.4% | - |
| 05/2004 | 54.1 | - | - |
| 04/2004 | 55.9 | 55.8% | - |
| 03/2004 | 54.8 | - | - |
| 02/2004 | 56.4 | 52.1% | 33.1% |
| 01/2004 | 55.4 | - | - |
| 12/2003 | 55.0 | 55.4% | - |
| 11/2003 | 55.9 | - | - |
| 10/2003 | 55.2 | - | - |
| 09/2003 | 55.0 | 55.8% | - |
| 08/2003 | 54.5 | - | 28.7% |
| 07/2003 | 48.2 | - | - |
| 06/2003 | 55.5 | 45.9% | 28.4% |
| 05/2003 | 55.2 | - | - |
| 04/2003 | 54.8 | - | 26.4% |
| 03/2003 | 54.1 | 46.8% | - |
| 02/2003 | 54.2 | - | 22.7% |
| 01/2003 | 54.6 | - | - |
| 12/2002 | 55.2 | 42.5% | 25.1% |
| 11/2002 | 54.6 | - | - |
| 10/2002 | 54.6 | - | 19.4% |
| 09/2002 | 55.3 | 38.3% | - |
| 08/2002 | 55.5 | - | 21.3% |
| 07/2002 | 57.0 | - | - |
