返回
1.而家想請你用0-100分評價你對教育統籌局局長李國章既支持程度，0分代表絕對唔支持，100分代表絕對支持，50分代表一半半，你會俾幾多分教育統籌局局長李國章呢？ (按月計算)
2.假設明天你有權投票決定續任或者罷免李國章作為教育統籌局局長，你會投續任、罷免、定棄權票？ (按月計算)
3.你認為李國章做教育統籌局局長既工作做得好唔好? (按月計算)
1.Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your extent of support to the Secretary for Education and Manpower Arthur Li Kwok-cheung, with 0 indicating absolutely not supportive, 100 indicating absolutely supportive and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate the Secretary for Education and Manpower Arthur Li Kwok-cheung? (monthly average)
2.If you had the right to vote on the reappointment or dismissal of Arthur Li Kwok-cheung as the Secretary for Education and Manpower tomorrow, how would you vote? (monthly average)
3.Do you think Arthur Li Kwok-cheung is doing a good or bad job as the Secretary for Education and Manpower? (monthly average)
| 調查月份 Month of Survey |
0至100支持度評分 0-100 support rating |
假想投票續任率 Hypothetical vote share on reappointment |
工作表現認許率 Job performance approval rate |
| 6/2007 | - | 21.5% | - |
| 5/2007 | 46.0 | - | - |
| 4/2007 | 47.5 | 28.0% | - |
| 3/2007 | 48.4 | - | - |
| 2/2007 | - | 34.4% | - |
| 1/2007 | 50.8 | 36.2% | - |
| 12/2006 | - | 34.3% | - |
| 11/2006 | 52.8 | - | - |
| 10/2006 | 51.8 | 36.5% | - |
| 9/2006 | 50.7 | - | - |
| 8/2006 | - | 35.7% | - |
| 7/2006 | 51.2 | 35.5% | - |
| 6/2006 | - | 33.8% | - |
| 5/2006 | 51.2 | - | - |
| 4/2006 | 52.8 | 35.9% | - |
| 3/2006 | 52.1 | - | - |
| 2/2006 | - | 30.0% | - |
| 1/2006 | 53.6 | 31.4% | - |
| 12/2005 | 53.6 | 41.1% | - |
| 11/2005 | 54.1 | - | - |
| 10/2005 | 54.2 | 42.2% | - |
| 9/2005 | 52.0 | - | - |
| 8/2005 | 52.9 | 39.2% | - |
| 7/2005 | 53.8 | - | - |
| 6/2005 | 53.7 | 45.4% | - |
| 5/2005 | 53.2 | - | - |
| 4/2005 | 54.7 | 44.2% | - |
| 3/2005 | 50.4 | - | - |
| 2/2005 | 53.2 | 46.0% | 32.3% |
| 1/2005 | 52.3 | - | - |
| 12/2004 | 53.0 | 44.6% | - |
| 11/2004 | 53.5 | - | - |
| 10/2004 | 52.0 | 42.8% | - |
| 9/2004 | 48.8 | - | - |
| 8/2004 | 49.5 | 35.6% | 24.7% |
| 7/2004 | 46.9 | - | - |
| 6/2004 | 48.1 | 36.4% | - |
| 5/2004 | 48.7 | - | - |
| 4/2004 | 48.2 | 34.7% | - |
| 3/2004 | 50.9 | - | - |
| 2/2004 | 51.3 | 35.4% | 24.4% |
| 1/2004 | 49.6 | - | - |
| 12/2003 | 49.2 | 37.4% | - |
| 11/2003 | 52.5 | - | - |
| 10/2003 | 52.1 | - | - |
| 9/2003 | 52.9 | 45.0% | - |
| 8/2003 | 53.8 | - | 26.0% |
| 7/2003 | 49.7 | - | - |
| 6/2003 | 56.3 | 51.9% | 35.4% |
| 5/2003 | 55.0 | - | - |
| 4/2003 | 53.2 | - | 26.1% |
| 3/2003 | 52.4 | 40.0% | - |
| 2/2003 | 51.9 | - | 19.1% |
| 1/2003 | 51.8 | - | - |
| 12/2002 | 53.6 | 35.7% | 21.2% |
| 11/2002 | 51.9 | - | - |
| 10/2002 | 55.8 | - | 21.7% |
| 9/2002 | 56.5 | 38.3% | - |
| 8/2002 | 56.0 | - | 21.1% |
| 7/2002 | 58.2 | - | - |
